Shogi Vs Chess
After reading my argument a friend of mine emailed me this response, defending Chess. This friend knows more about Chess and Chess theory than I do.
Nice try but no cigar, there are 3 major components to a game of chess.
1. The Opening
2. Midgame
3. Endgame
Each component requires various skill sets to compete well, your
argument re. less pieces on the board therefore less complicated is
incorrect, the less pieces in play the MORE complex the game MUST BE!
As there are less pieces it is more difficult to hide your intentions
from your opponent, which brings into the fore increased levels of
subterfuge and considerably more indirect methods of attack,
the strategies are very difficult to achieve well.
While I was playing competitively I observed that the most successful
players were those who were particularly strong at their openings
and/or their endgames, if their midgames were weak and they had a strong
finish they could carry this weakness and still be very strong players
overall. There is a derivation of chess called 'Transfer' which keeps all
pieces in play (much the same as shogi), this game consists of an
'Opening' and then a perpetual state of 'Midgame' never reaching an
'Endgame', midgames require less skill as with more pieces available there
are many more options available to the player, most times they don't need
to create oportunities as they will avail themselves.
CHESS!!!!!