222Empty words such as "there is still dangerosity," proves nothing. There was no proof to support their claims, otherwise they would be have been delighted to mention it. And there were many alternatives if the psychiatrists were really concerned about my "dangerosity." The simplest and logical alternative was to "direct" me to Hamilton, as they did after six months of torturing me. Lack of "self-criticism" is not a reason for applying cruel and degrading treatment. "Therapeutic disciplinary policies" are not medical and ethical policies. I am sure the judge knows that.