The Darkest Day:
Thoughts on the Attacks that have Redefined Our World
It has been two weeks to the day of that fateful morning when two
jetliners flew into the foot of Manhattan and transformed the World Trade
Center into the mouth of Hell.
Finishing an issue for publication, I like the rest of my countrymen
watched in dumbfounded horror as the catastrophe unfolded. It seemed
surreal - like a combination of the Book of Revelations and a bad Bruce
Willis movie, only the horror was much more precise and imminent - a
strategic attack targeted directly at the soul.
Since that fateful morning of September 11th, the defensive numbness has
given way to a need among all of us to comprehend the magnitude of this
attack. Frankly, it will take months and perhaps years to fully assess the
impact and meaning.
This calamity goes way beyond physical and human damage suffered by our
nation because it is international in scope; indeed, it is civilizational.
Since the end of the Cold War the human race has become, with increasing
rapidity, a single organism. Many of the barriers to the free and rapid
movement of goods & commodities has been lowered, and the nations of the
world have increasingly relied upon an invisible 'trust' that people will
behave in their rational self-interest.
Now that terrorists have violated that trust, the looming questions remain
about what we (and I mean this in the sense of viewing our planet as one
single organism) intend to do about it.
Whether policies or an implacable history has delivered this day (and both
have arguably contributed) as a nation we must gather our hurting
countrymen, wrap our arms around them and address the well being of our
future.
In the two weeks since the WTC attack, I have received hundreds of e-mails
from voices that are not being heard on CNN or any of the other mainstream
news outlets.
Apart from being hurt, many of these voices are 'angry', reflecting
sentiments ranging from the desire for more bloodshed through retribution
against Afghanistan and Iraq, to assertions that it is G.W. Bush's
unilateralist policies, his backing out of the Kyoto Peace Conference and
the Durban Conference while funneling millions of dollars into Israel that
has brought this tragedy to our doorstep.
In reading through these many letters and e-mails I have come to the
conclusion that what is needed on both sides of the political spectrum is a
sense of restraint.
Accusing President Bush of deliberately causing the terrorism through his
policies, for example, will neither help our nation nor further the goals
of freedom. Instead, it will only hurt those in pain and alienate those
that otherwise might concur.
But this also does not undercut our need for understanding the roots of
this tragedy and the need for open debate about formulating a reaction.
Indeed, it is at the precise moments in a democracy when threats seem their
greatest that the freedom of open discourse is most needed.
At this crucial time in our history it is also paramount for Americans to
revisit and reflect upon their own role on the global stage.
That the perpetrators of these attacks must be brought to justice is
undeniable - the trick, of course, is how to accomplish this goal without
subverting our own liberties and freedoms.
The day following the attacks, I was driving back from Standish listening
to Rush Limbaugh on the radio. He was saying how in the weeks ahead, we
will be hearing many leaders talking about how America needs to "pull back
on our domestic freedoms and civil liberties", going on to state how "this
would be the worst thing we could do because it would signify that the
actions of the terrorists had succeeded." This is the first time I have
ever heard Rush say anything that I could remotely agree with, and I
thought to myself how amazing it is that acts of aggression can indeed
create 'strange bedfellows'.
It also must be said that President Bush deserves credit for demonstrating
the 'restraint' that he has thus far. Rather than wage a quick and
ill-planned counter-attack, he has been working to forge international
alliances, build consensus, speaking against ill-founded attacks on Islamic
Americans, and in general instructing the American people that terrorist
enemies are fundamentally different from any other adversary we have faced.
The terrorists of September 11th are global outlaws. Their status and
numbers are such that the task of dealing with them should be viewed as a
police matter of the most urgent kind. The essential job is to find out who
and where they are.
We also need to reflect upon the dysfunctional foreign policy that helped
bring Osama Bin Laden to power.
For example, while Bin Laden inherited about $300 million from his tycoon
Saudi father, a builder & developer, he was also trained by the American
CIA to help push the Soviet Union out of Afghanistan. This was recently
documented in an excellent BBC broadcast.
Additionally, back in May of this year, the U.S. Government gave the
Taliban in Afghanistan $48 million dollars of our tax money because they
promised to "ban all illegal drugs" in their country. This was reported
and documented in The New York Times.
On September 11th the line between the permissible shifted.
Americans are a trusting and good-natured people seemingly immune from many
of the ravages of this world. Yet we also must realize that one billion
people on this planet have no clean drinking water. Two billion have no
electricity. Three billion have never made a phone call from their home. We
have the money and resources to alter all of this; and now, more than ever,
we have a moral imperative to recognize that all events are linked, part of
that 'inescapable web of mutuality' that Martin Luther King referred to.
These are facts that are not being discussed on CNN that as an informed
democracy, we need to both comprehend and address.
But rather than indulge you with my own opinions, I would like to share
with you a diverse range of sentiments, facts, and formulations that,
hopefully, will deliver a sense of sanity, compassion, and morality to an
action that on a bright sunny Tuesday, possessed none.
We Must Transcend This
Tragedy Together
The letters below were received at Review Magazine after
the events of September 11th, 2001
Dear Editor,
One of the most important things I've learned in this life is that
we create our own monsters. As we feed our fears, their power grows and we
are left feeling more helpless than ever. This is the illusion. It is
imperative that we turn our backs on this monster because by doing
everything in our power to create good and love in our lives, we remove its
power.
I fail to see the justification for more innocent bloodshed. This is
exactly what the Beast wants - he wants us to destroy ourselves, and that
is exactly what we are about to let our American leaders do unless we speak
up.
I recall several avatars that made a profound impact on the lives of
humanity for thousands of years. Jesus, Buddha, Ghandi, and others believed
in peace, not retaliation. Fear is the ultimate destroyer and all violence
is based upon fear.
I also recall the story of the walls of Jericho and how thousands marching
in unison with unified shouts and trumpets crumbled the walls. No weapons,
cannons, bombs, just vibration. Vibration is the core of creation, our
bodies, and everything around us.
We have alternatives and can choose our own destiny. In the face of this
tragedy, I have seen an overflow of support from people all over the world.
Keep praying and if you dare speak out, please do. Start planning for a
better tomorrow, for the world as it exists right now is about to come
crumbling down upon us. It's time to shatter the illusion and take away the
power of the beast. This is just my opinion. Bless you and may we transcend
together.
Pamela West
Perspective and Background
Editor's Note: This letter was written by an Afghani-American with an
inside view of Afghanistan. It offers an interesting perspective.
Greetings,
I speak as an Afghani-American who hates the Taliban and Osama Bin Laden.
There is not doubt in my mind that these people were responsible for the
atrocity in New York. I agree that something must be done about these
monsters.
But the Taliban and Bin Laden are not Afghanistan. They're not even the
government of Afghanistan. The Taliban are a cult of ignorant psychotics
who took over Afghanistan in 1997. Bin Laden is a political criminal with a
plan. When you think Taliban, think Nazis. When you think Bin Laden, think
Hitler. And when you think "the people of Afghanistan" think "the Jews in
the concentration camps." It's not only that the Afghan people had nothing
to do with this atrocity, they were the first victims of the perpetrators.
They were the first victims of the perpetrators and would exalt it someone
would come in there, take out the Taliban, and clear the rats nest of
international thugs holed up in their country.
Some say why don't the Afghans rise up and overthrow the Taliban? The
answer is they're starved, exhausted, hurt, suffering. A few years ago, the
United Nations estimated there are 500,000 disabled orphans in Afghanistan
- a country with no economy, no food.. There are millions of widows, and the
Taliban has been burying those widows alive in mass graves.
We come now to the question of bombing Afghanistan back to the Stone Age.
Trouble is, that's been done. The Soviets took care of it already. Make the
Afghans suffer? They're already suffering. Level their houses? Done.
Destroy their infrastructure? Too late. Someone already did all that.
New bombs would only be making common cause with the Taliban by raping once
again the people they've been raping all this time.
We are flirting with a world war between Islam and the West. And guess
what: that's Bin Laden's program. That's exactly what he wants. That's why
he did this. Read his speeches and statements. It's all right there. He
really believes Islam would beat the west.
If the west wrecks a holocaust in these lands, that's a billion people with
nothing left to lose, which is even better from Bin Laden's point of view.
Tamin Ansary
The Breakdown of Intelligence
Editor's Note: Did the United States have any advance knowledge that the
attacks on Sept. 11th would occur? This report by Arianna Huffington
raises serious questions.
The phrase 'massive failure of intelligence' has become a numbing
cliché. But what no one is talking about is another, equally serious
intelligence failure - the failure of the media to properly estimate the
intelligence of the American people by catering to the lowest common
denominator in pursuit of ratings and money.
Only seven months ago a congressionally mandated federal commission
released a prophetic report predicting this kind of terrorist assault on
U.S. soil, concluding that the question was not if a terrorist attack on
America could happen but when.
The U.S. Commission on National Security, headed by former Senators Gary
Hart and Warren Rudman, found that "despite the end of the Cold War threat,
America faces distinctly new dangers, particularly to the homeland" and
identified "homeland security as a primary national security mission."
A key conclusion of the commission was the need to replace the hodgepodge
of agencies that currently deal with terrorist threats and attacks -
including the CIA, the Justice Department, the Defense Department, FEMA,
U.S Customs and the Coast Guard - by the National Homeland Security Agency.
Like the rest of the report, this simple and sensible suggestion was
ignored.
Despite its far-reaching implications regarding the security and future of
our nation, very few people read it. Indeed, very few reporters read it.
Or, if they did, very few of them reported they had read it. In fact, the
Hart-Rudman report received practically no play either in print or on
television.
At the time the report came out, the media were too busy ferreting out the
latest info on the Gary Conduit scandal. Hindsight is always 20/20. But
we'll forever wonder. Would the World Trade Center still be standing today
if the Hart-Rudman report had been spotlit instead of swept under the rug
of Gary Conduit?
Bomb Them With Information
Dear Editor,
A military response, particularly an attack on Afghanistan, is exactly what
the terrorists want. It will strengthen and swell their small but fanatical
ranks.
Instead, bomb Afghanistan with butter, with rice, bread, clothing and
medicine.
It will cost less than conventional arms, poses no threat of U.S.
casualties and just might get the populace thinking that maybe the Taliban
doesn't have the answers. After three years of drought and with starvation
looming, let's offer the Afghani people the vision of a new future. One
that includes full stomachs.
Bomb them with information. Video players and cassettes of world leader,
particularly Islamic leaders, condemning terrorism. Carpet the country with
magazines and newspapers showing the horror of terrorism committed by their
'guest'. Blitz them with laptop computers and DVD players filled with a
perspective that is denied them by their government. Saturation bombing
with hope will mean that some of it gets through. Send so much that the
Taliban can't collect and hide it all.
The Taliban are telling their people to prepare for Jihad. The word 'Jihad'
does not translate into 'Holy War' but 'struggle for justice.' So let's
give the Afghani people their first good meal in years. Seeing your family
fully fed and the prospect of stability in terms of food and a future is a
powerful deterrent to martyrdom. All we ask in return is that they, as a
people, agree to enter the civilized world. That includes handing over
terrorists in their midst.
In responding to terrorism we need to do something different. Something
unexpected, something that addresses the root of the problem. We need to
take away the well of despair, ignorance and brutality from which the Osama
Bin Laden's of the world water their gardens of terror.
Kent Madlin
Editor's Note: The following are excerpts from noted American intellectual
and essayist Susan Sontag that appeared in the Sept. 24th edition of 'The
New Yorker'.
The self-righteous drivel and outright deceptions being peddled by
public figures and TV commentators is startling, depressing. The voices
licensed to follow this event seem to have joined together in a campaign to
infantilize the public.
Our leaders are bent on convincing us that everything is O.K. America is
not afraid. Our spirit is unbroken, although this was a day that will live
in infamy and America is now at war. But everything is not O.K. And this
was not Pearl Harbor.
A lot of thinking needs to be done, and perhaps is being done in Washington
and elsewhere, about the ineptitude of American intelligence and
counter-intelligence, about options available to American foreign policy,
particularly in the Middle East, and about what constitutes a smart program
of military defense.
But the public is not being asked to bear much of the burden of reality.
The unanimity of the sanctimonious, reality-concealing rhetoric spouted by
American officials and media commentators in recent days seems, well,
unworthy of a mature democracy.
Those in public office have let us know they consider their task to be a
manipulative one: confidence-building and grief management. Politics, the
politics of a democracy - which entails disagreement, which promotes candor
- has been replaced by psychotherapy..
Let's by all means grieve together. But let's not be stupid together. A few
shreds of historical awareness might help us understand what has happened,
and what may continue to happen.
"Our country is strong" we are told again and again. I for one don't find
this entirely consoling. Who doubts that America is strong? But that's not
all America has to be.
Other Voices, Other Thoughts
"The World Trade Center attack was in retaliation for something else, and
that was the retaliation for something else. Are we going to continue this
in perpetuity? We have to say at some point, 'Okay, let's find another way
of doing this."
- Judy Keane, whose husband Richard was killed during the attack.
Dear friends,
It has recently come to our attention that there are many people in
the world who still believe that it's acceptable for them to kill other
people. They are apparently under the illusion that war is still an
acceptable option.
The hijackers wanted a war and now many Americans want one, too. They are
united in wanting the same thing. They think that whoever kills more people
somehow 'wins'.
The billions of people who don't want to have a war apparently don't
matter. No one has asked them. No one has asked the children who are
already traumatized by the crashes and the killing.
Most important, no one has asked whether the planet can actually sustain
another major war - without being completely poisoned by radioactive waste
from nuclear weapons, germs, poison gas and oil fire smoke.
Some people kill for money, some people kill in the name of power. Some
people kill simply because their government "orders" them to. Some kill for
their religion, others for their own or someone else's territory. Everyone
always seems to have a "good reason" to kill in a war, whether that reason
is to "defend freedom", "fight terrorism", "protect our way of life",
defend their religion or whatever.
In fact we are all encouraged to kill in wars. We are told that we must
"punish" the enemy. These days Americans are being told that they must
"make the punishment fit the crime".
However, the people of New Zealand would like you to consider this:
If you really want to have a war, are you willing to destroy the entire
planet on your way to victory? Are you aware of the fact that the entire
ecosystem is on the verge of collapse, as suddenly and as totally as the
World Trade Center?
We the people of New Zealand simply can not believe that the American
people are so blinded by hatred and thoughts of revenge that they are
unable to come up with a better idea than having a war.
All wars are now obsolete. But the kind of war the American and the
Afghani and some other governments are apparently working toward now - is
totally insane. This is a war where people are actually talking about
using "tactical" nuclear weapons, germ warfare and poison gas, on innocent
people (they call it "collateral damage") and soldiers alike.
George W. Bush has called the bombing of the WTC the first act of the
"first war of the 21st century". If this war gets out of control, that is,
if it goes nuclear, there would be no more air to breathe, no more food to
eat, no more water to drink. Another major war could push the whole world
over the edge: oil fires ranging out of control; radioactive debris raining
down; germ warfare spreading ebola and other deadly viruses, plague and
anthrax all over the world, killing millions upon millions of people.
The entire world has been hijacked, not just four airplanes. And the people
in charge apparently intend to fly the whole world into a wall and drop us
into the abyss of a thousand years of darkness.
But, you say, we can't give in to terrorism. What then can we do?
ANSWER: Like the four American heroes on the plane who fought the hijackers
and prevented a fourth catastrophe, the ordinary people of the world must
wrest control of the world from those who have hijacked it before it's too
late. How? By realizing that we are all in this together. We are all one
people, Muslims, Christians, Jews, Buddhists, Hindus and all the nations of
the earth. We have only one home, earth.
Nobody is without blame and guilt. The American government does much good
around the world, but it has indeed helped to create the backlash it now
calls terrorism. It has supported an illegal Israeli occupation,
perpetuated an oppressive blockade on Iraq that has killed hundreds of
thousands of people, many of them children, and it has become the biggest
dealer in arms on the planet.
It has even turned its back on the only worldwide agreement to reduce
harmful emissions, and the only worldwide treaty to stop the deployment of
antiballistic missiles and weapons in space.
Americans must look deeply into themselves, and find their essential goodness.
Instead of defending "capitalism" with the threat of violence as it has
done for many generations, it should now begin a turnaround that will
defend the planet, our only home, from meltdown.
America can create a "compassionate capitalism", by actually putting people
and the planet ahead of profit.
The Americans must recognize that for every action there is a reaction and
must therefore understand that a war will create more terrorists, rather
than getting rid of them. America must once again lead the world to
recovery, just as they did after World War 2. It is so simple. Here is how
it goes:
The Americans reach back to their Christian foundations and find
forgiveness in their heart. Then they ask the forgiveness of others against
whom they have transgressed. They must realize that blame can no longer
bring about the desired results. Blame and revenge no longer work (if they
ever did). They just get everyone killed.
Some segments of the Muslim community believe that violence against
innocent American civilians somehow fulfills their religious teachings.
They should review their own teachings. How holy can a war be if it kills
not only women and children but the whole earth itself? They must realize
that their acts of terror only inflame the situation and bring disgust from
much of the world and rejection. Their acts of terror also create more
terror and more violence against their people.
Can we change this? Can we do it? Of course we can. All we have to do is
love our own life. But we must love everyone else's too. All life is one.
From this planet we are born and to this planet we belong.
We are peering into the abyss only because we have allowed ourselves to be
brainwashed into believing that there are causes to kill for or that the
life of someone's child in a far distant land is not as valuable or as
cherished as the life of our own children.
Jesus told us to "love our enemies." He thought that if we did this it
would stop us from killing and would turn this earth into the paradise that
it can become. He was right.
Islam, we are told, means "peace". There are millions of people in peril as
you read this, and you are one of them. No matter how much we may crave
revenge, it's time to realize that revenge simply doesn't work. In fact,
the whole idea of revenge must be flawed if it can lead us into a situation
where we can annihilate millions of people.
After all, we have nothing to lose but our hatred and suffering. The arms
manufacturers may not like it, but the planet will and all the people on
it. It may take more courage than you think you have, more courage even
than going to war. But the alternative is too unspeakable to bear.
New Zealand once told the world that we no longer agree with a policy that
relied on nuclear weapons for our defense. We said then and we say it now
that there is no security in nuclear weapons, only fear. The only real
security we will ever have is the security of the friendship and respect of
others who know that we really care about what happens to us all.
We send this to you with love. May the light shine on you and from you,
The People of New Zealand
(Note: Too many signatures appeared on this correspondence to reprint here.)
The Review encourages you to express your own thoughts, comments, and views
at this critical junction in our history. Please send your letters to:
Review Magazine o 318 S. Hamilton St. o Saginaw, MI 48602 or e-mail them
through our website at www.review-mag.com
