TO: EVOC 501 Course Instructor
FROM: David Wiget
DATE: October 6, 2004
RE: EVOC 501, EA1 Self Evaluation of WR1

 

EA1 SELF EVALUATION OF WR1
 

Scholar's Name: David Wiget

Clearly hand print or write comments in all three of the following sections:

PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE - Briefly describe what someone should reasonably be able to do as a result of reading the WR1 report (consider the purpose of the report). Do NOT use words like "Know", "Understand", "Learn" or "Appreciate".

Any of the other STAR teachers throughout California should be able to identify resources that would be appropriate to use for facilitating the STAR program.


POSITIVE REINFORCEMENT - Using words like "Good", "Very Good" and/or "Excellent", briefly describe two things relating to how well the WR1 report was written, that you feel are worthy of praise.

David – Exceptional correlation: your selection of resources are precise and helpful for the population specified. It is clear and easy to follow with up to date resources regarding current issues involving substance abuse.


CONSTRUCTIVE CRITICISM - Considering things like content, format, literary style, etc., make one specific suggestion that clearly describes how something about the WR1 report could be improved.

David – I suggest that you not limit your resources strictly to substance abuse. You may want to expand your resource list to other related issues.


Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1