Reclaim The (Holker) Street
December E-Dition
First (and hopefully 
not last) edition.
Bad Medicine?
December 1st
Should he stay or should he go?   Of course we don't want him to go, but the question 
on the fans' lips is should he play?   Who?   The Doc himself of course.   In recent weeks 
  the Doc has been warming the bench, and many of the fans were asking why he wasn't in
the starting eleven.   Well, there aren't many more exciting sights in the unibond than watching the Doc skin a couple of clueless defenders and put in an inch perfect cross for Pevs to nod home, but does excitement equate into points.
 We thought we'd leave aside the opinions and look at the bald facts and let you the E-reader decide for yourself ( hopefully
  by the next E-dition that might read "yourselves").   Take a look at the table below - current as at the end of November  -
  and see what you think.
   
P
 
W
 
D
 
L
 
F
A
Pts
Pts/game
With Doc Starting
11
 
7
 
0
 
4
 
22
 
16
 
21
 
1.91
Overall
20
 
11
 
1
 
8
 
42
 
31
 
34
 
1.70
Without Doc starting
9
 
4
 
1
 
4
 
22
 
15
 
13
 
1.44

Of course in true journalistic traditions we have chosen to use the statistics that suit us the best, and we have not taken into account the quality of the opposition, the fact that the Doc only missed four minutes of the Orient game and the fact that Simon Bishop returning to the club has led to our first run of two clean sheets on the bounce.   However, our prescription would be to get the Doc starting and change the formation to suit him if needs be.
December 2nd
 
 

  Droylsden at home 2-0

We reckon that you need to average out at a win every home game and a draw away to win the championship.   Barrow are currently six points off the pace.   No points lost or gained today, then.  But what was lost today was over two and a half thousand fans from the Orient game.  Despite our best efforts at undercover journalism we can't figure it out.   Nor can we figure out why most of those that were left moaned so much during the first half.There was so much moaning going on that the Reclaim the Holker Street team gave up the comfort of the Popular Side tostand on the Holker Street terracing and froze our collective b*££*ck$ off rather than listen to the unwarranted negative comments that were being put forward by various Billy Bull$hi_$ and Whinging Willies.   It started to rain and we gave an extra pound to the Raise The Roof fund that day.
December 3rd

Barrow launch their latest reduced admission scheme -
"Kids for a Squid"

December 4th

Southport in for Bulli

We at Reclaim the Holker Street learn that those lovable chaps from Scouseport have designs on Bulli.   Now, we at The Street don't like to indulge ourselves in the antics of the gutterpress and lower ourselves to labelling all Merseysiders as shell-suit, wearing scallies so we went along to see for ourselves and we took in the recent Scouseport v Doncaster game.   It was a close game, but Scouseport just stole it at the end when their left winger robbed the Doncaster full back and then nicked it back for their striker to push it goalwards.   The ball caught up in the mud and half-inched its way across the goal line.  In fairness, we reckon Scouseport just about deserved it.   Their defence was excellent and their centre half had the Doncaster
centre forward in his pocket all evening, together with his wallet and sekonda watch. At one stage Doncaster did think they had scored but their winger was forced down a blind alley by the Scouseport fullback who then produced a bag full of white powder, and that was about as close as Doncaster came to scoring on the night.   Scouseporthad used all of their subs when another midfielder went down injured and they wereforced to bring on their trainer who had been so effective against Barrow in theTrophy last season.   Their talented midfield dynamo A. R. Tful-Dodger was sent off ten minutes from time and took an early trip to the dressing rooms.   He was last seenselling second hand tracksuits at a car boot sale.Apparently some Southport fans have a thing against Doncaster because they might have voted against Scouseport's re-election to the league in the seventies.   Whilst we don't want to rake up the vote that got Barrow expelled from the Conference last year we say YAH-BOO, tough titties.
December 5th
Workington at home - postponed
Who cares?   Probably the most pointless cup competition since that thing in Brazil that Man United entered last year.   Everyone loves an underdog and in a cup competition that takes in two divisions between which there isn't that much difference in standard, then there are no underdogs, so what's the point?   The one game where the programme will probably keep you going right through half-time as it goes through the rules in great detail. (I nearly said explained then by mistake)   Barrow have won all of their games so far, but even if they finish top of their group, they might not make it through to the next round, so what's the point?   The essence of a cup competition is the possibility of playing against teams a higher/lower level, falling victim to a team three divisions below you or pulling off a great giant killing, this cup offers the opportunity of neither, so what's the point?   The reason that the Conference fought so hard to get their clubs into the LDV vans competition was so that they could measure themselves against league opposition.   Is is too much to ask that the Conference opens their back door as wide as they have kicked open the front door.   Would it hurt their "professional" reputation so much to let a couple of clubs from the feeder leagues into their precious McMillan and wife Trophy. (probably - Ed)   This competition isn't well supported so the unibond league have switched later rounds to a Saturday.   This seems to mean that as the season progresses potential crowd pulling  six-pointer league games will be postponed in favour of a  game that no-one (not even the most dedicated the  players) has any real interest, so wha....... (ENOUGH!!! - Ed).   Yellow cards and redd  cards count in this competition so as  well as losing outon revenue clubs are faced  with the prospect of losing players for vital  league games.   It's football Jim, but not as we  know it. 

December 6th
 
 

Watch out Pevs


Ronaldo, the world's most expensive footballer, again played while injured last night.   The Brazilian national side drew 2-2 in a special centenary match against Barcelona, with ronaldo looking exhausted.   Across the sports world more and more fans claim corporations have taken over football, and increasingly the lives of the players involved. The leaked contract of Nike's reputed £200 million sponsorship deal states that Nike can dictate when, where and against which sides the world's most famous football  club will play five times every year until 2006.   The contract states that the team must field the full strength national side.   The small print makes clear that Ronaldo's presence, regardless of form, is a necessity.
The game between Brazil and Nike-sponsored Barcelona, the biggest club in the  world, was Nike's finest corporate showpiece.   The centre of the show was, despite being plagued by injury, Ronaldo, whose personal sponsorship is £10 million a year. 
As Jose Texeira, Ronaldo's childhood friend from their slum in Rio De Janiero,  commented, "Ronaldo has no say, no idea what he's doing.   He is controlled by the businesses". Two years ago Nike was again at the centre of allegations for using its financial clout to influence games.   In the World Cup Final in France, Ronaldo again played whilst clearly unfit to do so.   Conflicting stories of what happened and persistent rumours suggest Nike ordered the World Cup favourites to play Ronaldo for their own commercial advantage.   A Nike spokesperson replied at the time, "Nike wants to emphasise that the reports of such involvement is absolutely false".
In 1997 a new deal between Ronaldo and his last club barcelona broke down, allegedly over the way Nike and the club would split the £30 million needed to keep him there.   Ronaldo was then linked to other clubs.   eventually, again in mysterious circumstances, ronaldo signed for the £125 million Nike-sponsored club Inter Milan.   It seems that Ronaldo, in Nike's eyes, is far from being a human being, but merely another source of profit, like a factory.
Of course, nobody should blame Ronaldo for any of this.   As his Brazilian team-mate and friend Roberto Carlos says, "Football is a route out of poverty.   Brazil is a land of social tension, and football takes our minds off it."   he adds "in fact, if we didn't have football we'd have a revolution in Brazil".
Taken from Evading Standards June 1999
December 7th

  Marine stewards move in to have a friendly word.

Back To Home Page

Next Issue

Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1