Douglas Reed
Douglas Reed (1895-1976) was a noble man. He believed in good and evil and was in many ways a unique man. Not bound by ideologies, but by faith in mankind.
Douglas was a man with a Irish background who grew up in a upper middle-class English family. He fought in the first world war and was later to become a critic to the things he admired in his youth.
Almost by accident he became a news writer for Times. He loved books and was a quick learner. When it was time for WW2 he was sent as a news correspondent to Germany and saw the rise of Hitler.
He also saw the "Evil Empire" of Stalin.
His journey led him from the powerful Jewish quarters of Soviet to Hitler-Germany. He became unpopular in both camps.
As a "true Christian" Douglas liked the Christian bible (New Testament), but disliked the Levite Torah (and the Old Testament). He did his best to inform the world what the next move of the "hidden hand" was. He foresaw many of the events during WW2 and was not surprised when Nazism made a pact with Communism over Poland. (If only he knew that Hitler put a Jew - Hans Frank - in charge of Poland...)
Reed quit his job at Times when still in Germany and wrote many books from 1934 to 1956. Without his knowledge, put down in his book, mankind would be really lost.
He believed in a "conspiracy" against Christianity and against every righteous man on this planet. He believed that the two world wars would never have happened if it was not for an external force profiting from it. Concrete evidence was also put down in his books and before his death he finished his "grand finale", "The Controversy of Zion", published after his death, in 1978.
Reed was a very wise man. A prophet in our time.
Quick Guide of the Views of Mr. Reed
(My own opinion, from material in his books,
and collected from my memory)1. Hitler?
Reed thought that Hitler was really an agent, maybe educated in Russia, who was recruited during Eisner's Bolshevik revolution in Bavaria.
Reed also quotes a Rabbi calling Hitler "Jewish Messiah".
Source: Mr. Strasser (Hitler's rival) and Hungarian source2. Hitler's role in WW2?
Destruction.
Source: Mr. Rauschning (unreliable?)3. The burning of the Reichstag?
The Nazis did it.
Source: first book of Reed, made the Nazis dislike him4. Wars?
Necessary for spread of Communism and revolutionary activities.5. The Holocaust and persecution of Jews?
The Jews were more mildly treated than they stated abroad. Reed proved with statistics that it is far from certain that 6 million Jews were gassed.6. The Old Testament?
The hostile writings of Levite priests are contrasted with the words of Jesus in the New Testament.7. Origin of Jews?
Obscure Canaanite origin and influx of Khazars.8. Ten lost tribes?
Nothing gets lost. Genocide is a myth. The tribes survived in people across the world.9. Zionism and Communism?
Sprang from Russia. Twin powers that wants to change the world.
"The new crime of 'genocide' (destroying nations) [invented by a Jew] was charged against his [Hitler's] henchmen at the great [Jewish orchestrated Nuremberg -; see Goldmann et al] trial in the Forties [after WW2], and was chiefly argued on behalf of the Jews, but I think the nation[s] he [Hitler] aimed to destroy [and/or unify?] was the German [the 'Aryan'?]. . . .
This key to the riddle . . . was discovered . . . first . . . [by] Hermann Rauschning . . . who sought to enlighten [or misinform?] mankind in two books"
(D. Reed, From Smoke to Smother, ch. 4)"Many times in the past ten years I have been tempted to wish to be a German. I have been sickened more and more by the contrast between the revolting and criminal social conditions in England, which in such places as Shoreditch would disgrace the negro republic of Liberia, and the well-kept, well-ordered and well-found condition of Germany. After all, I have often thought, the Germans at least care for their own people, they give them health and food and houses and sun and light and air, they do not permit these monstrous mass crimes against the community, perpetrated in the interest of the slum landlord. They have a sense of belonging-together, they do not fill the pages of their illustrated papers with pictures of a few grotesquely uniformed popinjays and bejewelled dowagers going from ball to banquet while the people rot and starve. If Hitler had not done this, I think my respect for that side of Germany would have hardened into an immutable conviction, for it is at least arguable that what Germans have done to Germans is their own affair and may be justified if Germany is in the end better for it. But after the invasion of Bohemia and Moravia on March 15th, 1939, which confirmed all my fears, I would sooner be an Indian untouchable, a South African poor white, or an American negro, than a German."
(D. Reed, From Smoke to Smother)"I see very little difference between the Jewish and the Hitlerist method, in this matter of free speech and free discussion. The Jews are for free attacks on Germany, nothing else."
(D. Reed, in the postscript from a later edition of Disgrace Abounding)"... in some of the Scandinavian countries, where Insanity Fair had great success and where publishers were clamouring for the next book - until they saw the Jewish chapters. They [unfortunately a Jewish book publishing company(!), which Reed seems not to have been aware of - and they nevertheless translated Insanity] asked to be allowed to publish the book without them [slight changes in the translation of Insanity Fair were actually done without Reed's knowledge]. I refused. The same thing happened in France . . .
So only in England . . . may a non-Jew openly discuss the for and against of the Jewish question. The importance of this, for you, is that you should realize that what is presented to you as ‘American approval’ or ‘American disapproval’ of this or that action of British policy is not American but Jewish opinion, and that this puts quite another face on the matter."
(D. Reed, in the postscript from a later edition of Disgrace Abounding; in many cases only Reed's first book was translated - into several languages)"Possibly all these things are less important than they seem. Mr. [H. G.] Wells says that if the world were the size of a ping-pong ball the sun would be a globe nine feet thick nearly a quarter of a mile away, and the moon a small pea, two and a half feet from the world, and all around there would be practically nothing at all, and I am not prepared to challenge him. In that vast emptiness beyond human understanding we are all the most infinitesimal maggots scratching at the rind of an insignificant cheese, and Lord Maggot, and Old School Tie Maggot, and King Maggot, and Führer Maggot and Duce Maggot and Henry Ford Maggot and Oil Trust Maggot are all rather ridiculous with their self-important clamour about this piece of the cheese being better than any other part of the cheese and Black Maggots being better than Red Maggots, and the League of Maggots being nothing but the instrument of the Jew Maggots. For my part, I am for the cheese, the whole cheese and nothing but the cheese."
(D. Reed, from later edition of Insanity Fair)
More information on Douglas Reed by Mark Weber, IHR
Some of his books will be put online here.
His books:
The Burning of the Reichstag (1934)
Insanity Fair (Jonathan Cape, 1938)
Disgrace Abounding (Jonathan Cape, 1939)
Nemesis? The Story of Otto Strasser (Jonathan Cape, 1940; 350 pp.; photoillustrated)
A Prophet at Home (Jonathan Cape, 1941)
All Our Tomorrows (Jonathan Cape, 1942)
Lest We Regret (Jonathan Cape, 1943)
From Smoke to Smother {1938-1948}: A Sequel to Insanity Fair (Jonathan Cape, 1948)
Somewhere South of Suez (Jonathan Cape, 1949)
Far and Wide (Jonathan Cape, 1951; 400 pp.)
Prisoner of Ottawa (biography on Otto Strasser; 1965)
The Battle for Rhodesia (HAUM, 1966)
The Siege of Southern Africa (Macmillan, 1974)
The Grand Design of the 20th Century (Dolphin Press, 1977; 45 pp.) p.ages)