My Conservative Commentary for the Month
| These are my humorous, satirical, obnoxous and even serious thoughts for the month. In the spirit of Bill O'Reilly of Fox News: This is a "no spin" zone. |
| December 2008: |
Predictions for coming years: Hope will quickly fade to despair. The government can never spur economic growth by simply spending money. It is far more likely that government action actually will hurt and destroy economic growth and individual wealth. The financial crises we find our selves in directly traced back to socialistic policies enacted by Clinton and his liberal engineers. These policies sounded great but when mixed with super low interest rates created an artificial demand for housing which in turn created a housing price spike. The policy I am referring to is the easing of credit standards used by banks for loan application. These ratings were lowered in order to be �fair� to people who couldn�t afford the loans in the first place. During the late 1990�s banks were being intimidated and threatened with law suits by ACORN and liberal lawyers (including the Change man himself). The banks responded to these accusations and basically said we are private financial institutions and need to be accountable to our investors. They suggested that if Freddie and Fannie would buy these mortgage entities from them and package them as investment vehicles, then they would be glad to implement the loans to people who could not afford them. So ACORN went to Clinton and had these lower standards pushed through stating that they were �fair� and more compassionate to lower income individuals who wanted to own a home. This scheme will work as long as housing prices go up. Under the low interest rates during the past six years record numbers of people applied for credit and bought a home. This created a strong demand for housing and caused housing prices to skyrocket. Many saw opportunity to make money by flipping houses. Greed and irrational behavior mounted. President Bush tried on numerous occasions to have congress implement regulations on Freddie and Fannie during this run up, but were blocked by democrats. Barney Franks is on the record as saying there is not a problem here. He accused the administration of being mean and unfair to the working class and poor. When housing prices began to fall, the entire pyramid collapsed. Institutions that bought these packaged mortgage investments were unable to calculate the true value of the investments they owned. These packaged entities could not be sold due to the unknown valuations involved and large financial institutions collapsed. This collapse will take years to work through the entire economy. The government should never have interfered with the banking industry and eased credit policies that had worked for decades. The most important aspect to remember is that this entire debacle was implemented to make things fair. BHO states he wants to redistribute the income. In code words that means he wants to make things fairer to people that didn�t earn it. You don�t need to be a rocket scientist to realize where this will eventually end up. Unemployment will continue to go up. It will eventually be over ten percent. Eventually, due to the democratic stimulus packages (unlimited welfare payments) inflation will pickup up drastically during the next few years. The stagflation and misery index of the 1970s will return. A true stimulus package would simply lower corporate and individual tax rates and let the private sector start investing on creating jobs. But democrats don�t believe in limited government and any opportunity to grow the government and control of the economy will not be passed up. Add on top of this a passive foreign policy that elevates the UN and rising international tensions due to worldwide financial distress and you have an absolute disaster waiting to occur. Expect massive food shortages and numerous outbreaks of wars. We haven�t even touched on the aftermath of another terrorist attack. Our response to that will probably be completely embarrassing as it was when Clinton did nothing after the 1993 WTC bombing. It will be a long four years. Wish yourself luck � Your gonna need it. Who will be the true conservative that will fix the mess created by this COMMUNIsTY organizer in 2012. We can only hope that another great conservative leader will emerge to clean up the coming BHO disaster. Just as President Reagan cleaned up the mess of the Carter years, this new leader will have to do the same. The hunger for a true conservative explains why Governor Pallin is received so well by many. She touts the proven Reaganesque conservative policies that have worked every time they have been enacted (limited government, limited taxes, limited spending, energy independence and a strong foreign policy that puts America first). Once those things in place the free market will take off as it always has. |
||||||||||||||||||||
| April 2006: |
SECURE THE BORDER FIRST... PERIOD. ILLEGAL immigrants decided to join in a communist march celebrating May Day yesterday. They were marching for illegal immigrant rights. The only problem is they are not citizens. If you are not a citizen then you have no rights under the constitution. You have NO rights!!!!! Legally, you should be declined access to our schools. Legally, you should be declined access any healthcare. Legally, you should not be employed to work. You should be thanking us for letting you stay. Any company not open yesterday will never see my business again. I will no longer be going to any Mexican restaurants. I will not be taking any more trips to Mexico. I urge all Americans to boycott anything related to Mexico. Lets see who has more economic clout. And by the way... SPEAK ENGLISH! |
||||||||||||||||||||
| June 2005: |
The expected complete and utter meltdown of the Democratic party is in full swing and I thought I would give them due credit. They are finding it more and more difficult to hide who they really are as they show their hate for capitalism, America, religion, and moral character. So without any more delays I give you the DEMOCRATS. DEan�s Mean ObstruCtionist Revisionist anti-American Taxing Socialists or DEvious Mean ObstruCtionist Radical anti-American Treasonous Socialists Take your pick. It really doesn't matter anymore. If you fall for the lies these people have to come up with every day to justify their radical actions then please do us a favor and move to Europe with all the other radical pacifist socialists. And speaking of radical. Europe is toying with creating a Union of bureacracy that is completely removed from accountability to the people. It resembles an Empire dictating rather than any sort of democracy. Has anyone seen Senator Palpatine in Europe? Take a look America. Its what the liberals want to enact on you. |
||||||||||||||||||||
| May 2005: | Harry Reid is an embrassment to any clear sighted thinking individual. He is the perfect example of a walking contradiction. Harry has always had the advantage of not getting too much attention in Washington because he came from a, historically, less populated state (NV) and was previously not in a power position within the Demogogue party. Now that he has become the leader of his party in the senate he can no longer hide behind the curtain of his contradictions. Last week he referred to President Bush as a "loser" at a high school rally while the president was out of the country. Immediately after the rally (indoctrination attempt of young people) he called the white house to apologize for his gaffe. A day later he stated that he really did not think there was anything wrong with what he originally said. He has made the same kind of ridiculous contradictory statements about judicial nominees, social security reform, tax cuts, tort reform and many other issues. When you add all of his shady family kick backs to the picture you get one shady walking contradiction. As a Nevada resident, I demand that he step down because he is surely not enacting or supporting what he ran on just seven months ago. If he were truly for the little guy, as he stated in his 2004 commercials, then he can not be against SS reform where even the lowest wage earners will have the opportunity to invest in the financial markets. Is Harry Reid investing his money in the financial market? Why doesn't any pathetic liberal reporter ask him that question? Maybe you liberal simpletons should simply ask some of his family members who have raked in thousands and thousands of dollars off of "kick back" deals. Hmmm? | ||||||||||||||||||||
| January 2005: |
Liberation, Democracy, Freedom, Humanitarianism and most importantly Security are all good reasons for a legal war against dictators and sponsors of world terrorism. By spreading freedom and democracy you end the tyranny of dictatorship, the seeds of poverty and the tyranny which in turn create the terrorists of tomorrow. The current administration's policies are truly visionary. Afghanistan is going through an amazing transformation which should be a precursor for what will happen in Iraq. These policies are far more productive than a piece of paper agreement or a few words in a speech. Libs are just too filled with hatred to acknowledge the successes taking place because their vision of the world is self defeating negativism. Liberalism is dying. College Kids are marching to the right. There are now more conservative groups than Liberal groups on college campuses. Have you been to an affirmative action bake sale lately? Depending on heritage you are charged different prices for the same item. The hypocracy of the economics mocks affirmative action as nothing more than racism. These sort of bake sales are catching on like wild fire. Students for Academic Freedom (130+Chapters and growing) |
||||||||||||||||||||
| December 2004: |
Looks like my political predictions from January were not very far off. I said Bush would win re-election by carrying 40 states. He carried only 32, but was competitive in another 5. I nailed the GOP pickups in the senate with a prediction of 6 seats (GOP picked up 4 seats). I was a bit over confident with the house predictions but the campaign reform bill pretty much kept the incumbants unchallenged (GOP picked up 4 seats). Now that John Kerry has been written off as a cliffnote of history, the third quarter economic numbers have been revised upward, the stock market has surged nearly 10% since the election, and the news media has dropped all of the doom and gloom stories about the sky falling. I Can't wait for SS reform. In the current system, you own nothing. You are guaranteed nothing but a taxed allowance. When privatization takes place you will have a life long generated wealth accrued into an account in your name to invest as you please and you will own it. No lock box will be necessary as the government will not be able to touch it. Even if you die the government can not prevent you from leaving it to your kids. The dems will be against it BECAUSE, this tool would empower people not to depend on the government and would enable the generation of wealth. The dems will oppose this because if you are better equipped to take care of yourself then your need for Washington (libs) will be decreased and the liberal wing of government will become even more obsolete and irrelevant. In other words they would be writing their own pink slip. Which is why you should not believe a thing they will say during the debate on revamping SS. The dems do not have your best interest in mind which is contrary to what they should be doing representing their constituents. Instead they are concerned about the long term damage that would be done to their liberal ideological goals. Givem hell W. REVAMP SS NOW! Chile did privatization of retirement 20 years ago. Its working. Article describing Chilean retirement reform success |
||||||||||||||||||||
| October 2004: |
Headline:Media and Kerry get an F!
Clinton awards Halliburton no-bid contract in Yugoslavia � good� Bush awards Halliburton no-bid contract in Iraq � bad� Clinton spends 77 billion on a war in Serbia � good� Bush spends 87 billion in Iraq � bad� Clinton imposes regime change in Serbia � good� Bush imposes regime changed in Iraq � bad� Clinton bombs Christian Serbs on behalf of Muslim Albanian terrorists � good� Bush liberates 25 million from a genocidal dictator � bad� Clinton bombs Chinese embassy � good� Bush bombs terrorist camps � bad� Clinton commits felonies while in office � good� Bush lands on an aircraft carrier in a flight suit � bad.. No mass graves found in Serbia � good� No WMDs found in Iraq � bad� Stock market crashes in 2000 under Clinton � good� Economy on upswing under Bush � bad.. Clinton refuses to take custody of Bin Laden � good� World Trade Center fall under Bush � bad� Clinton says Saddam has nukes � good�. Bush says Saddam has nukes � bad� Clinton calls for regime change Iraq � good� Bush imposes regime change in Iraq � bad� Terrorists training in Afghanistan under Clinton � good� Bush destroys training cams in Afghanistan � bad� Milosevic not yet convicted � good� Saddam turned over for trial � bad� Looks like CBS is not the only mass media that is not slanted on the left bank of mainstream America. Every year an independent tax watch dog group analyzes the average tax burden on Americans, and then calculates the �Tax Freedom Day� This is the day after which the money your earn goes to you and not the government. This year, tax freedom day was April 11th. That the earliest it has been since 1991. It�s latest day ever was May 2nd, which occurred in 2000. Notice anything special about those dates. Recently John Kerry gave a speech in which he claimed Americans are actually paying more taxes under president Bush, despite the tax cuts. He gave no explanation and provided no data for this claim. Another interesting fact: Both president Bush and John Kerry are wealthy men. Bush owns only one home, his ranch in Texas. Kerry owns four mansions, all worth several million dollars. (His ski resort in Idaho is an old barn brought over from Europe in pieces. Not your average A-frame). President Bush paid 250,000 in taxes this year. Kerry paid $90,000. Does that sound right? The man who wants to raise your taxes obviously has figured out a way to avoid paying his own. Pass it on� |
||||||||||||||||||||
| September 2004: | Kerry's implosion has started. Its all down hill from here Lurch. | ||||||||||||||||||||
| July 2004: |
This documentary would be based on facts not drug induced hallucinations
COMING to a theatre near you soon: CELCIUS � My LIfE�.. ACT I Scene 1 Bubba getting flute tuned in oval office while on phone. Scene 2 2 US embassies blow up. Al Queda linked Scene 3 Back to scene 1. Scene 4 USS Cole Blows up. Al Queda linked. Scene 5 Back to scene 1 Scene 6 WTC Blows up in 1993. Al Queda and Iraq linked (that is in the court records) Scene 7 Back to scene 1 Scene 8 Saudi Arabia housing complex blows up (US citizens murdered). Al �Queda linked. Scene 9 Back to scene 1 Scene 10 Waco TX US citizens attacked. Scene 11 Back to scene 1 Scene 12 Mogadisue (Black Hawk Down). Al Queda linked. Scene 13 Back to scene 1 Scene 14 Bubba Quote:�I did not have sex with that woman� Scene 15 Impeachment proceedings begin Scene 16 US missiles hit Aspirin factory and bombs begin to fall in Yugoslavia. Numerous civilian casualties. Scene 17 Bubba quote:�Depends what U mean by the word is� Scene 18 Bubba quote from book:�I did it because I could� (contradicts sworn testimony) Scene 19 Bubba quote from 1992:�We will have the most ethical administration in history� Narrative: This president refused to do anything to protect the citizens of this nation but was happy to start a war the minute his presidency was on the line. Treasonous. Scene 20 Bubba playing the Saxophone. FOLLOW UP ACTS in no particular order�. Travelgate, Troopergate, FBI files, Haircutgate, Chinagate, Jennifer Flowers and the rest of the Herim, Elion Gonzales debacle, WTC coverup, Buddagate, Lincoln bedroom bribe scheme, Bribary scheme regarding Indonesian clean coal monopoly and UTAH land grab, Selling nuclear secrets to China and North Korea, Rose Law firm, Vince Foster, Hillary Health care fiasco (and Kerry wants to do this again), �Woa Maybe I Raised your taxes too much�, Ron Brown, Impeachment, Biggest tax increase in history (and Senior Citizens hit hard), Clinton recession, John Livingston fiasco, Most Executive orders made than any other president in HISTORY (dictator?), Pardongate, Trash the white house (the people�s house?), steal the computer keyboard keys (pathetically childish) THIS COULD BECOME A 10 part MINISERIES.... Mikey, we can start production tomorrow. ??? Oh. you mean u have an agenda and are partisan. Why didnt you tell us that before hand? Oh. You did not want anyone to know. Liberals lie. They have to. Because if you knew what they really wanted to do, you would never vote for them. |
||||||||||||||||||||
| June 2004: |
I have just about had it with the left's (politicians and national media of which 97% is registered demogogues) attack on the War on Terrorism in Iraq. The media has staked their reputation (woops) that there are no WMDS originating from Iraq in an attempt to shape the Bush administration's policy as failure. Their entire reporting agenda is shaped within the prism of the 2004 elections and implementing a liberal into the white house. There is just one small problem for the elitist leftists. WMDs have been found. The really big Question is when is this fact going to be forced upon the mass media's radar screen and who is going to do it. It will be fun watching Lurch's campaign implode this summer! Below are some links supporting these statements: Article 1 , Article 2 , Article 3 Article 4 , Article 5 , Article 6 , Article 7 , Article 8 , Article 9 , Article 10 , Article 11 Now connect the dots: Sanctions Article 1 , Sanctions Article 2 , Sanctions Article 3 , Sanctions Article 4 , Sanctions Article 5 (no surprises here) The left has tried to attack the president on Education (failed), economy (failed), a jobless recovery (big time flip flop failed), outsourcing (flip flop off the radar screen failed), 9/11 commission intelligence (failed big time Mrs. Gorelick style), and WMDs in Iraq (literally will blow up in their faces). Now who are the real incompotent components in this equation? Have a great time in Taxachusetts at you nominating (flip flop) convention. |
||||||||||||||||||||
| May 2004: | Headline:Kerry sides with terrorists! Kerry has called for the resignation of Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld because a bunch of independent vigilatee servicemen hurt the feelings of a bunch of despots. The detainees in question are known to be the worst group of prisoners and were involved in activities such as gang raping Jessical Lynch murdering innocent Iraqees, attacking our troops and killing American contractors. I belive that if the humiliating actions depicted results in the collection of intelligence that leads to a single American soldier's life being saved, that the action are fully justified. Putting this in the perspective of war and comparing them to the atrocities that Kerry admitted being part of in Vietnam prove that they are merely humiliating but not torturous. The demogogues are in an uproar demanding resignations and apologies over these same pictures. Unfortunately, there was NO uproar, NO moral clarity nor demand for an apology from these same anti American liberals when the following was pictures were shown (or not shown by the biased mass media though we know they exist): pictures of planes flying into buildings, pictures of individuals crushed by buildings, pictures of individuals hitting the pavement on 9/11 (we were told this was too heart wrenching to show on TV), pictures of dead American bodies hanging from bridges in Iraq (shown for just one day), pictures of the murdering of kidnapped Americans and journalists (will not show entire tape-why), pictures of what happened to the crew of the USS Stark, pictures of what happened to the diplomats in African embassies after terrorists blew them up. One other noticable difference is the fact that the despot detainee who have had their feelings hurt are still alive while all the other individuals described above are not. But yet, Kerry still sides with the despots. This statement is dated May 12th, 2004 as Kerry might change his position on this issue as he does on all issues. So why are the demogogues not demanding apologies from these evil people? Unfortunately, the real question is why are they constantly asking the current administration for apologies and acknowledgment of mistakes. And the answer to that is that the demogogues have taken the side of the terrorists and have politicized the war on terror. Consider this: If UBL is caught or there is successful turnover in Iraq or Iraq's WMDs are found in Syria it will be bad news for Demogogues. Put another way: Good news for America is bad news for Demogogues. Now who will you vote for in November? | ||||||||||||||||||||
| April 2004: | Headline:Why gas prices have spiked! The liberal domestic agenda of demogogues is very straight forward. They pay off consituents to vote for them and use your tax dollars to do it. There is no intent by the demogogues to solve any of the under lying social ills that create the needy people because that would eliminate the unknowing accomplice and the control they have on the needy people and groups. Public school indoctrination, business regulations, the EPA, diversity, acceptance, political correct behavior and social security checks are some of the tools used to control individuals by the demogogues. Any proposal to give individual any choice such as school vouchers or private investment options in social security are staunchly opposed. The common thread of most liberal initiatives is they use your tax dollars to buy control over your lives. Howard Dean said yesterday that rugged individualism is a way of the past and that we are in this all together. That means he is against individual choice and for socialistic, bureacratic programs and the high taxes that go along with them. Pure liberalism. The foreign policy of liberals is very similar to their domestic agenda. Buy entities in order to control them. In other words, they pay off every despot, dictator, mullah in order to gain access and control (please behave yourself and we will give you ?). Clinton gave North Korea two nuclear reactors to behave. Clinton met with Arafat numerous times and the palestinians sort of behaved. As soon as president Bush was in office all of these despots realized, as they have in the past when conservatives take office, that the gravy train was over. They began to act up and have temper tantrums (North Korea). The policy of paying off dictators and appeasing tyranny were over. The liberal agenda of supporting dictators that terrorize their own citizens are the seeds that create hatred for America and terrorists. Contrast that with the liberation of Iraq and what will probably become a prosperous free market economy based on democratic ideals. The OPEC (Iran, Saudi Arabia, Egypt) dictators and socialists of the world are very concerned about democracy in the middle east. When their citizens see how successful democracy is, their dictatorships will be threatened. The lies about America that are portrayed in their controlled media will be refuted. That is why OPEC and many socialist leaders do not want Iraq and president Bush to succeed. That is why they are attempting to affect the election in November with higher prices by cutting production and raising the price of oil. They are planning to cut production in April again. The president's policies are a direct threat to all dictators whose gravy train was stopped when the liberals left office in 2000 and then escalated when post 9/11 policies were implemented. Now we can deduce who the leaders are that John Kerry states "are none of our business". OPEC (Saudi Arabia, Iran), dictators (Castro, North Korea) and Socialists (Germany, France). And we also know that Germany and France were owed billions of dollars by Iraq and wanted to exercise receiving that money form Saddam. That is why they were against the war. The president has put forth a policy that places national security above all other issues including pandering to nations that take bribes from dictators that murder their own citizens. And "Implosion Kerry" wont name these people. Wonder why! We also know why demogogues will not allow us to drill for oil reserves in Alaska. It has nothing to do with the environment and everything to do with becoming more independent and losing options to buy access to middle east dictators. The demogogues use the environmental issues for cover. Money makes the world go round and it goes for both parties. BUT WHEN POLICY IN WHICH DICTATORS AND DESPOTS ARE APPEASED, BOUGHT OR DO THE BUYING IS PUT ABOVE NATIONAL SECURITY IT BECOMES TREASONOUS. I agree with our president that you are either with us or against us and OPEC is stating their response. They are obviously against us and it is time to open the reserves and start drilling in Alaska! | ||||||||||||||||||||
| March 2004: | Headline:Monster Mayham Movie Crashes Ted Kennedy (Senator from Taxachussets) will portray the mad doctor in an upcoming movie release this summer. The story will follow the mad (drunk) doctor's campaign to create a living breathing monster (frankenliberal). John Kerry (the other liberal Senator from Taxachussets) will play frankenliberal. Attempts to get Algore involved in this saga were unsuccesful, however Howard Deaniac will have a cameo as the wolfman. This movie looks to be in need of a retrocative abortion. Kerry can't remember if he voted for or against making this movie but insists that it is really none of anyone's business anyway. | ||||||||||||||||||||
| March 2004: | Headline:A resounding SEE I TOLD YOU SO As mentioned in January 2003 (see below), Sean Penn will be rewarded for his Anti American tantrum. Penn was given actor of the year honors for his portrayal of an ignoramus who treks to a despot dictator's homeland, lies to reporters and trashes the United States of America who in the end liberates the beseiged poverty stricken nation. His publicity stunt payed off, but it had nothing to do with the acting in whatever movie he was nominated for and everything to do with his ignoramus PR tantrum in Iraq. CommieWood's true "Anti American" colors are exemplified as this ignoramus wins the worthless prize. I predicted he would be rewarded by these bastards over a year ago. McCarthy was right, there are anti-American radicals in Commiewood and their true colors are very apparent with this award. Next year these same people will have to come up with an excuse to bypass what will be the biggest box office draw of 2004, "The Passion of the Christ". They will probably state that because it is a sub-titled film in non english that it is not eligible for most awards. There is no way that CommieWood would ever allow a religious movie or a devout Christian producer (Mel Gibson) to receive any praise or recognition. You watch them squirm their way out of nominating this film. If The Passion is nominated due to public outcry, you will see some well known actors boycotting the awards for some illogical made up reason. These people are so predictabe just as the demogogues are. | ||||||||||||||||||||
| March 2004: | Headline:Heinz to Market new brand of WAFFLEs Heinz a leading food marketer that is owned by the wife of leading demogogue nominee John "Lurch" Kerry has announced a new product for release this summer. A spokesman for Heinz (which has over two third of its operations overseas [which creates a serious conflict of interest for this candidate who wishes to make foreign outsourcing an issue in the upcoming election] confirms that Lurch loves "waffling" all the issues and would be a great marketing sponsor for their new Lurch Waffles. Other issues in which Lurch has waffled his way through include: The death penalty (for and against depending on when and where you ask him), gay marriages (for and against depending on where and when you ask him), detaining suspected terrorists (for and against depending on where and when you ask him), Invading Iraq (for and against depending on where and when you ask him), financially supporting the military (says he is for but his voting record says otherwise), financially supporting Intelligence (says he is for it but his voting record says otherwise and he once stated that he wishes it was dismantled), taxes (depending on what he defines as rich today $40,000, 50,000), Healthcare for everyone (Who is going to pay for it today and what is today's definition of rich? 25,000), Drilling for oil (for and against depending on where and when you ask him) Making military records presidential campain issues (he is for it today but was against it when Clinton was reported as protesting in communist countries). Lurch waffles will come in assorted flavors and assorted prices (both depending on how we feel that day) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| February 2004: |
Reasons Why John Kerry is not electable:
* The Clintons and their grip on the DNC will not allow Kerry to win the election because it would prevent the co-presidents from running in 2008. * Kerry's record is abysmal. He says he is for a strong defense but his record says otherwise. He voted against the following successful military programs that we are utilizing today to win the war against terrorism: B1 bomber, B2 bomber, F-15, F-16, Trident submarine, cruise missile, Aegis cruiser, A1 Abrams tank, Bradley fighting vehicle, Star Wars initiative, Minuteman missile initiative. He voted for substantial cuts in military and CIA funding during the Clinton debacle years. His record proves that he is a standard flaming liberal and that his public statements are only to cloak his true policies and voting record. You can not trust what a liberal says, you simply have to look at what they have done. And Kerry's record speaks volumes. * Kerry is quoted as saying in a Hartford newpaper twenty years ago that the CIA should be dismantled and that any military action taken by US forces should be approved by the United Nations. Having Kerry as president would create a danger greater than the worst terrorists. * Kerry's vietnam era campaign is an insult to the veteran's of that war. His public statements and partnership with radical leftist protest organizations delayed the release of many POW from Hanoi. Vietnam Veterans Against John Kerry. * Kerry says he is for the little people. This coming from the richest senator in the country. A news story in Boston reports that Kerry had a fire hydrant removed from in front of his house because he wanted to park his SUV there. Don't we all wish we could be so humble. * Kerry has made absolutely no policy statements in his campaign except that he hates the current president and wants to remove him. I apologize. I forgot that he has stated that he wants to remove the Bush tax cut from rich people (he did not explain what he defines rich as) so that Dems can expand social programs and bribe some more uneducated lazy voters. * Kerry criticises the effort in Iraq even though he voted for it. Hypocritical? Not according to Kerry. He had access to the same intelligence as the president in making his decision. He is on record listing numerous reasons excluding WMDs for the removal of Saddam. Yet he now criticises the president for not finding the WMDs that we know existed. If anyone thought this out logically, the only question that anyone should be asking is "Where are the WMDs that we know existed before the war? This fact is truly a very serious threat to national security. * Kerry complains about the economic state of the union and the willing accomplaces in the press attempt to support this view, but as the citizens of this country start doing their tax returns this month a resounding majority will await a hearty return of the money they are owed and earned through their own efforts. Kerry has and will celebrate any bad economic news, yet he says he represents the best interests of the American people. I have bad news for Mr. Kerry. People will be spending their tax returns (Its their money and they earned it) and at sometime in July when the economic reports are released we will see another major uptick in the employment numbers, stock market and job creation. Good news for America is bad news for Demogogues. |
||||||||||||||||||||
| January 2004: | Predictions for 2004: * Howard Dean will have a messy public outburst. (confirmed) * Clinton and Dean will have a messy confrontation at their convention. * Republicans pick up 19 seats in House and 6 seats in Senate. * President Bush carries 40 states and is re elected. * Social Security private investments accounts are formally proposed. * SETI identifies a questionable signal. * Dow will go up 15%. * Technology stocks will soar 20%. * Nano stocks will go throught the roof (and if you do not know what they are yet, by the end of the year you will). * Pixar has hit movie of the year again. | ||||||||||||||||||||
| December 2003: | Are these Democratic presidential hopefuls for real. They do not have any issues other than their anger and hatred for America. Let the facts speak for themselves. Demogogues continue to criticize the Bush tax cuts, but vindication for the current administration is underway as the economy continues to rebound as predicted. Now we can understand why the demogogues in congress were against the tax cut proposals. A robust economy would not assist them at election time. Or put another way, Good news for America is bad news for Demogogues. Demogogues continue to criticize the war on terror. The Taliban have been removed from Afghanastan, Iraq has been liberated, Saddam has been captured, over 40 of the top 55 (deck of cards) most wanted Saddam loyalists have been captured and yet the Demogogues still whine of failure. What will they say after Osama is caught. Or should I comment what will they say when the news of his capture is released to the general public. Again, it seems that good news for America is bad news for the Demogogues. If Bubba Clinton accomplished one feat in the interest of patriotic Americans it is the fact that he alone destroyed the Democratic party. (socialistically speaking of course). Since Clinton's reign in 1992 through the present (2003), where he still pulls the strings through the DNC chairman McCallugh, the demogogues have lost the presidency, House or Representatives, Senate (twice), a majority of state governors (including California and New York), numerous state governing bodies and the list goes on. The only place that the liberal agenda is still having serious impact on America is through the liberal appointed judges of the judicial branch. And we all know that the demogogues are attempting to hold up any conservative judges from being appointed by the president because that might weaken their position on the bench as well. The democratic party will crash and burn in 2004! "Mission Accomplished" It could be a very Happy New Year! | ||||||||||||||||||||
| October 2003: | HEADLINES that were squashed by the liberal press (October 8th) - Hasta la Vista Grey, You have been Terminated... and You won't be back! - "Grey Out" - Out of a job - Liberal Press's "Too close to call race" another fabrication - California leftist elitists money machine threatened by the Terminator - LA Times follows CNN into ratings obscurity - LA Times loses thousands of subscriptions for tampering with election - LA Times buries Grey's verbal and physical assault on office staff - Republican candidates take over 60% of the vote in a Democratic state - Demogogues have nothing to offer again... except taxes, misery, another crises and more law suits. - Demogogues put on defense for 2004 on the left coast - Recall effort in NV against tax extortionist Guinn energized - Guinn and tax hike will be recalled - petitions signing gaining momentum - Jobs, Businesses and growth threatened by Guinn's tax hike - Dah! | ||||||||||||||||||||
| September 2003: | The liberal press shows it's true colors as Arnold is poised to take the governorship of Kalifornea. For years, Arnold S. has been reported with a positive image from the liberal media for his sponsorhip of children programs and his action packed entertainment. Now that he is running for the governorship there appears to be a problem. The real problem is that his name has an R in front of it (Republican that is). All of a sudden Arnold was and is a groping facist from 20+ years ago. If only the media was so concerned about the previous occupant of the white house's actions during his tenure as governor and president. Oh, I forgot but that was his personal life. I guess selling nuclear secrets to China, selling a nuclear reactor to N.Korea, not getting Osama when he was offered and raising our taxes must have all happened on his personal time as well. We all know he got so much groping time in the oval office ;). | ||||||||||||||||||||
| June 2003: | QUESTION: How do you "give" a tax refund to a person who does not pay any income taxes? ANSWER: Pretend you are compassionate. Say that you care. Say that it is a tax refund to poor people when in reality it is nothing more than slick marketing of socialism, wealth distribution, buying a vote with someone else's money scheme or welfare (take your pick). In other words, liberal B.S. QUESTION: Why aren't the liberals concerned about the cost of this version of the "tax cut"? ANSWER: Because it really is not a tax cut. You can't cut a number that is already less than zero. QUESTION: What has the stock market done since president Bush signed the real tax cut bill? ANSWER: Surged nearly 10% in less than 2 weeks. And the liberals lined up against this bill...? Liberalism needs misery and fear to be prevalent in order for it to florish and be evenly distributed for the purpose of control by the leftist elitists. Liberals are always attempting to scare people into voting for them or their cause. Every subject (Social Security losses, deficits, children, defense, peace, the economy, the stock market, the environment) is always attached with unwarranted fear and panic by liberals. For example "Your grandparents will not get their SS check. (Lie-they will), The war in Iraq will be come a quagmire. (Wrong) Tax cuts will cause the deficit to go up. (Lie-Tax cuts generate revenues by creating growth in the economy) , The worst economy in fifty years (Big lie), Its for the children and their education (Lie-Its for the bureaucrats and the elitists), The enviroment will die, the oceans will rise, the trees will die, the ozone will zone out (Big Big Lie). Unfortunately, many fall for liberalism's "feel good" front cover where class warfare, utopian pipedreams and paper peace agreements with evil organizations are promoted. If the privitization of Social Security were in place then even the poor people could be taking part in this market rally. But of course that would mean that liberal elitists would lose "control" of the the purse strings in Washington and poor people might become a little more financially autonomous. In other words, they might become conservative Republicans who want to keep more of what they earned instead of having to fork it over to deadbeats. And that is it in a nutshell! | ||||||||||||||||||||
| May 2003: | The War with Iraq is over and all of the predictions of DOOM and GLOOM from the Demogogues has been proven to be nothing more than BS. There was not a long war of attrition, No truck load of American soldiers in body bags, No blood and rage in the Moslem streets, No mass civilian casualties, No international crises from lack of consensus at the UN. Instead we find a country thanking us for liberation from a dictator and ruthless murderer, A definitive success for president Bush's foreign policy, A defining victory for our armed servicemen, The elimination of a terrorist state that sponsored the murder of innocent civilians of numerous countries, and a soon to be blossoming democratic Islmaic country in the midst of countries with dictators. Why aren't the liberals held accountable for all of the inaccurate statements? How can these bunch of uninformed politicians (liars) be trusted if they regurgitate such falsehoods? Would you trust a liberal (liar) with a dollar of your own money? The reported cost (though it really is not a cost to anyone because it is not Washington's money in the first place-It's yours and they did nothing to earn the right to spend your money) of the Bush tax break has been reported to be $330 Billion dollars. The liberal media is attempting to suggest that President Bush backed down to the Senate figure. The liberal media reporting is misleading because the president was able to get most of the proposals he requested including extensive rate cuts on corporate dividends. The bill's figure was lowered simply by shortening the life of the tax break. In two or three years when these tax breaks begin to expire inaction by congress will default in a tax hike. Do you honestly think law makers will allow a tax hike of this magnitude to occur. Most, if not, all Republican will vote to extend these tax cuts. It is also very important to realize that Democrats have 4 more seats than Republicans to defend in the 2004 Senate elections. The Democrats also have more seats to defend that have been categorized as "up for grabs" by pollsters. In reality president Bush was able to lead (as great presidents do) and get most of the proposals he requested with the knowledge that extension of those tax cuts is fairly secure. When these tax cuts are extended to 10 years, the actual amount of the tax cuts is over $700 billion, which of course is extremely close to the amount he requested in the first place! The media, yet again, tells only half of the story and yet again the president has proven himself a crafty politician. Not bad for a guy who, according to the media, couldn't speak English without defacing it with his own Bush ism's. So now, I will patiently be wait'n (Bushism) for my cash rebite (Bushism) check and for my FICA witholdings to be lowered. Thanks you, yet again, president Bush for rescuing the overtaxed families of the United States of American. It is far more important what you DO as apposed to what you say or what you say you will do. As my 2 1/2 year old daughter (who knows that George Bush is the president when asked) would probably say... "The proof is in the puddin". And so that brings me back the the liberal loosers again: Can you really believe any of the outrageous statements being made recently by the Demogogues related to these tax cuts? The real headline should be: Tax Cuts help stimulate economic and stock marken boom by mid 2004... defeat for Demogogues expected to follow... . Now some more thoughts: The top 50% of wage earners pay over 96.6% of all income taxes. If you implement a tax cut who do you think will receive most of the tax cuts? Again the media only tell half the story. Democrats can't win in 2004 unless the economy tanks. That is why they were really really upset and against this pro growth tax cut. Liberal job creation plan: Extend unemployment benefits... make you become dependent on the government for your livelihood so that they can bribe you to vote for them. I never met a poor businessman who offered anyone a job. It's not Washington's money in the first place. Tax cuts stimulate the economy and create jobs. Reagan and the JFK (Slick Willy's protoge) said it and were proven correct after their tax cut proposals were implemented into law. The proof really is in the puddin. | ||||||||||||||||||||
| March 2003: | The French and the UN have proven their irrelevance. The armed forces were created to break things and kill people. It does not sound very "nice, but it is a reality of our dangerous world. Accept it and support it. Your life may depend on it one day. | ||||||||||||||||||||
| February 2003: | Finally Dascle's budget fiasco from last year has personally affected me. He purposely defaulted on his responsability to fund the governemnt for 2003 by holding up the spending bills that should have been passed prior to October of last year and now his "caring" liberal agenda has affected my family personally. This is now a personal issue between the leftists and my family. This anti-family, anti-American, pro-tax, pro-socialist, power hungry SOB has affected this family because he wanted to weaken the economy and promote his agenda. I thought these people were about caring, compassion and working families. What a lie and delusion that reality is. The left has no moral base and thus their entire agenda is lies and distortions. Tom, come out from behind your Washington desk and stop hiding behind your monotone microphone. I need just five minutes with you. I call you out you! | ||||||||||||||||||||
| February 2003: |
Some feedback on the State of the Union:
-How many times did the President mention God in his speech?
-A permanent tax cut (President Bush's plan) vs. a one time rebate for all workers (Democratic plan). I'll take the permanent plan since politicians (especially liberals) seem to forget that it is not their money that they are discussing. It is ours (the tax payers) and income taxes are nothing more that legal extortion.
-Did you catch the polite slam of France and Germany. "The course of this nation does not depend on the decisions of others."
-Did you notice that the Axis of Evil nations (Iran, Iraq and N.Korea) were all singled out and mentioned again by name as they were in last years SotU speech.
-Did you notice that there were 2 separate speeches in last nights SotU. (Iraq vs. everything else) -Did you notice the slam of the Clinton administration "This administration has a responsability to confront these evils and not pass it on to our children, another administration or other world bodies". Also how many times have we heard the president state the phrase "moral clarity"? Why do you think that simple statement has been reiterated under so many different situations? more to come.... |
||||||||||||||||||||
| January 2003: | As the war with Iraq inches closer to a reality and the confrontation with the other Axis of Evil members (Iran & North Korea) begins to escalate, we are being treated to an examplary display of stupidity from a RDDBs (Red Diaper Doper Baby) in action. Sean Penn is in a self induced hallucinogenic state as he reports from Baghdad on the plight of the Iraq people. This moron has stated that he wanted to go to Baghdad in order to get a better understanding of the situation. Can you imagine this sort of stupidity in World War II regarding the opressed people of Europe and Asia. Can you imagine any moron heading over to nazi Germany in order to get a better understanding of what Hitler's issues were. President Bush has stated that the people of Iraq are victums of a regime that has waged violance against Kuwait, Iran, Israel, the United States, its own minority citizens and any citizen that resists internal policy. This regime has prioritized building weapons of mass destruction over feeding its people. This regime has a consistent pattern of links to terrorism. There is not much that Penn could possibly accomplish other than attempting to confront the war momentum in the Unites States and gain some PR points with the ultra leftists who run Commiewood. This moron actor has made his living playing criminals and portraying violant characters is now telling America that it needs to attempt to understand the agenda of Saddam's dictatorship. What drugs is this comedian on. You can bet that Penn will be rewared for this leftist trip with some big roles in 2003. I for one will be avoiding anything with his name attached to it. I really can't take seriously someone who can't figure out that he is being used as a pawn in a game where the stakes could be thousands of lives. I hope he misses his flight out. Better yet, I hope he is still there trying to understand everything as the fireworks begin. Yet another Hollywood idiot in action. | ||||||||||||||||||||
| December 2002: | It is official. The Demogogues have begun their post-election melt down. "Puff Daddy" Daschle blamed the election results on Rush Limbaugh and other conservative talk show hosts. He then accuses them of inciting threats against himself and his family. When pressed for confirmation of these threats, Daschle backed down and later did a 180 degree change of course. That is what the demogogues have been reduced to. A second rate group of whiners and inciters. They constantly categorize individuals into groups and instigate conflict between them. The rich vs. the poor. The have's vs. the have nots. The perverts vs. the family. The degenerates vs. working America. The blacks vs. the whites. The trial lawyers vs. corporate america. Security vs. Union Membership. The democrats no longer offer any solutions and are preparing to move even further into obscurity with their march to the far left. I look forward to watching Miss Pelosi show her true extreme leftist colors next year! | ||||||||||||||||||||
| November 2002: |
Headlines for November 6th (day after 2002 elections) that you should see: -You can fool some of the people some of the time, but you can't fool all of the people all of the time - GOP wins big. -Jumpin Jim Jeffords losses chairmanship of senate committee and makes himself and the state he represents irrelevant. -Demogogues lose big even after changing rules and candidates. -America chooses character. -Perverts to start building closets to go back into. -Carville gives up, shuts up and throws waste basket onto his own head live on CNN! (did anyone else see him do this)? -Mondull reminds America what liberalism did to country during Carter years! -Obstructionists Dascle and Gephardt lose their pants. -Coming Soon: Permanent tax cuts, Capital Gains tax cuts, Homeland Security, More Conservative Judges, Privatization of SS, reasonable Medicare reform, improvements for "working America", Victories on Terrorism. -Clinton really has done a lot for America: He successfully wrecked Democratic party. -Clinton's legacy continues. "Well, I think we meant to lose." -Al Gore's 2000 election get out the vote whine flies like a fart in the wind. -Jennings, Brokaw and Rather get migranes during election results. -Hardboil's Chris Mathews jaw hits floor 'live' on MSNBC during early election results. -DNC leaders target Jeb, miss and shoot their own feet. |
||||||||||||||||||||
| October 2002: |
If your current team member is injured, just send in a substitute. Even if it breaks the rules. I suggest boxing, racing, tennis and any individual olympic events adopt similar lefist exceptions. The New Jersey senate race debacle is allowing us to view the true face of demogogues (democrats).
This fiasco proves that demogogues have no morals, no sense of shame, no respect for the law and are only interested in one thing POWER AND CONTROL over you. It also proves that main stream media are willing accomplaces in their biased presentation of existing election laws that would have to be broken in order for this sham to occur. And speaking of no shame: How about those demogogue traitors over in Baghdad. Pathetic. I would like to assist them by suggesting some election jingles: "Democrats for Saddam", "Liberals for Liars", "Democrats caring for Terrorists too". Conservatives should make these national issues and point out which party breaks electorate laws. Which party twists the laws that they themselves assisted in writing. Which party attempted to hijack a state supreme court in an attempt to steal a national election by changing the rules after the game. Which party sends its members to a terrorist state at a time of crises in order to politicize a serious threat to national security. To win at all costs no matter what. That is what demogogues stand for today. They can not run on issues because they have none. Let them run on their actions and make them a national issue. Let them stand behind what they themselves have said and done. It's the party of no morals with of course yours truly (Buba) still pulling the strings from his home office in Harlem. This individual starts a war against Milosovich to cover his personal "ISes" (clintonism). He waged this personal war without the approval of congress, without the approval of the UN and without any threat to the United States. Where were the peace demonstrations. Where were the peace nuts then. The radical followers of demogogues prove that they have no relevance to the debate, due to their hypocrosy. As president Bush has stated, it is time for the UN to face this challenge or reserve a place in history as irrelevant. I would personally like to add Demogogues to the irrelevant category because I can guarantee that they can not and will not rise to the challenge of doing what is best for the United States and its citizens. I was just wondering which demogogues are getting policial contributions from Baghdad in the same spirt that Clinton received contributions from China for the sale of missile technology. |
||||||||||||||||||||
| September 2002: |
First and update regarding July 2002: It is now confirmed that the Clinton administration fudged the Commerce Departments economic reports during 1999-2000 by as much as 20% as confirmed by an investigative report on Newsmax.com. Yet again, Clinton was on the cutting edge of corruption and deception. The coming war with Iraq, and it definitely is coming, should be regarded as the main event in response to the sneak attack on America on 9/11. The military planners have had nearly ten months to plan and develop new weaponry for this show. Rumors of a non-nuclear Electo Magnetic Pulse weapon that would "short out" every electronic device (including cars) have been surfacing around washington. This provokes interesting scenarios for a very quick start and end to any conflict. I referred to our response earlier as a show because what will happen to Iraq will be regarded as an "example" to the world of what happens when a peaceful nation is provoked to vent its fury. The ammunitions have been replenished, the new state of the art bases have been built in Quatar, the roads have been widened in Jordan and the curtain is ready to be raised. I envision on the night of 9/11/2002, as America comes home from work and the events of the last year are pondered, the curtain on Desert Wrath will be unleashed. That would be a striking statement in itself. To the pathetic pacifists I point to history. In the 1930's Hitler came to power in Germany and Europe looked to him to bring stability back to Germany. When it was rumored that he was building an air force and mechanized divisions in underground factories (which was illegal according to the Treaty of Versaile ending World War I) the pacifists said "We shouldn't do anything because we have no proof". After Hitler was able to build his strong military he stopped hiding it from the world and the pacifists said "Oh no. Germany is too strong to enforce the treaty on now. Let's give them back some land to avoid going to war." And so Hitler marched into Austria and Czeckoslovakia. World War II, in Europe, could have been avoided if any country had the courage to enforce the original treaty. How many people's lives would have been spared under this scenario. I realize that the events stated here are simplified but the theme is quite similar to today's situation. When you hear the liberal pacifists state that we have no proof that Saddam is developing or has weapons of mass destruction - realize that when he finally unveils them, it will be too late to prevent a lot of deaths. Someone has to lead and and looking at Europe's dismal track record, I wouldn't expect them to step up to the role. As for the OPEC nations, of course they are against our response. If a pro-western government is created in Iraq, then their oil would no longer be subject to constraints of the UN embargo. Considering that Iraq has the second largest reserves in the middle east, this would create more competition for the other OPEC nations. This would, undoubtedly, cause either a drop in oil prices or a cut in production by the cartel. It is always about money and don't let anyone tell you otherwise. I can think of nothing more that would stimulate the world economy than $10 barrels of oil. That might explain why the Demogogues have been so quiet lately. They would not want to be on the wrong side of a large issue, such as this, so close to election time. Quite interesting. |
||||||||||||||||||||
| July 2002: |
The following facts set the stage for yet another CLINTON scandal to be unearthed.
The Securities and Exchange Commission has five Commissioners who are appointed by the President of the United States with the advice and consent of the Senate. Their terms last five years and are staggered so that one Commissioner's term ends on June 5 of each year. To ensure that the Commission remains non-partisan, no more than three Commissioners may belong to the same political party. The President also designates one of the Commissioners as Chairman, the SEC's top executive. The above facts mean that by 1997 all of the SEC commissioners were Clinton appointees. What would happen if somehow the Clinton appointed SEC leaked to corporate accounting groups and enacted policy to support leniant enforcement of regulation regarding corporate accounting practices? Almost an invitation for corporate America to "cook" the books. Initial reaction to such a thought is disbelief. Why would an administration allow corporations to deceive the public? The answer is rather simple. To keep the stock market momentum going into the presidential elections of 2000. You must realize that the Clinton administration had no morals and has a consistent track record of using smoke screens to influence positive public opinion. As long as Americans have good paying jobs and the "appearance" of a bull stock market, presidential incumbents (party's) usually win. It is extremely suspicious that only three of the five positions are currently filled and all were appointed by president Bush. All of the Clinton appointees are no longer on the commission. You must be asking how that is possible if only one is replaced every year. Two of Clinton's appointees died and the others decided to retire early. The corporations can only hide these secrets so long. It is also coincidental that the stock market has not reacted at all to the slow recovery. What do the insiders know? We already know that Clinton played golf numerous times with Enron CEO Lay. Why was a high ranking Enron officer found dead in his car of an apparant suicide? So the next question is what other CEOs/CFOs did Clinton have meetings with? When did they meet, how "cooked" are their books, when will they declare their new earnings statements and when will the investigations begin? Something smells like a rat and it sounds like Willey could be involved again! This sort of corruption explains how Hillary Clinton made thousands of dollars on futures investments during a "bear" market in the early 90's. Clinton appointees:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| June 2002: | As a taxpayer who has a quarter of my income taken by the U.S government, I am demanding accountability for my contributions. A nation is defined by it heritage and ability to protect its citizens and infastructure. Statements describing how the intelligence community can not protect the country from evil terrorist activities are ludicrous and non productive. In contrast, A productive public policy statement would convey the following message to these evil fanatics: If any moslem terrorist attack takes place on American soil and a single American citizen is killed then Mecca, Tehran and Baghdad become sand glazed parking lots (Nuked) . It is time for some accountability. If these organizations are hell-bent on obtaining and using weapons of mass destruction then it is time for the nations that directly and indirectly fund and support these lunatics to know that they will be held accountable. It is time to scare the living death out of their leaders and citizens instead of scaring the American public with inept incompotent warnings. I am convinced that the warnings have been made through dipomatic channels but it is, now, time to begin publicly warning them of their pending fate as well. History has proven that weakness and ineptness only invite more aggressive attacks. Chamberlain attempted to appease Hitler in order to avoid WWII. It did not work. I have had enough warnings from my leaders. It is now time to hear our leaders state what our response will be if another attack occurs so that all parties (including moderate Arab groups-whatever that term really means?) will have an incentive to prevent it at all costs. Their lives and country should depend on it. | ||||||||||||||||||||
| May 2002: | The Politics of Star Wars. This one is really worth looking at. | ||||||||||||||||||||
| April 2002 (b): | I didn't realize that Halle Berry was in the Monsters movie. Was she in a scene with Sulley or Mike Wazowski. Lets face it. No one saw that movie and this just goes to prove how out of touch and irrelevant Hollywood is. | ||||||||||||||||||||
| April 2002 (a): | Why we must build the Missile Defese Shield. In response to some mean spirted, peace loving liberals who think it is too costly. I hear all you whinnnnnnnnning and name calling and love it. You are all in a Chernobyl like melt down and are showing your true 'red' colors! Read on and maybe we can save you from yourself. WHAT THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IS FOR: The only purpose the federal government was created for, in the first place, was to protect the 'united states' from foreign threats. All this leftist social 'feel good' fluff is not necessary for the well being of the nation. The more money that you through into these social programs, the more people are going to sit on their butts, expect more of a handout, whine that they don't get enough to succeed and feel sorry for themselves. People have to be responsible for themselves and stop looking for someone else to foot the bill. All these social programs create is mind numbed robots unable to produce anything including a productive life for themselves. But they sure can name call and complain! China, Iraq and North Korea are pouring big $ into new missile programs. (Did the leftist news media tell you that) China is currently building two air craft carriers . (Did the leftist news media tell you that?) China has moved into Panama to control both ports of the canal. (Did the leftist news media tell you that?) Russia is still developing new torpedo weapon systems that could sink any of our naval ships - including an aircraft carrier. (Did the leftist news media tell you that?) The world is a dangerous place. The development of missile defense system will easily bankrupt these rougue nations as Reagan bankrupted the USSR. That can easily lead to a better world for all citizens. The surging economy of the 90's was the peace dividend that Reagan and Bush and the conservative congress promised. (caused by tax cuts, the end of the cold war, the reform of welfare, balanced budget amendment and sound fiscal policy which (remember H. of R. writes all spending bills) resulted in lower interest rates and a surging economy. Social handouts have been given out for the past 30+ years and solved absolutely nothing. They don�t produce anything. They don�t solve anything. They don�t contribute to the well being of the economy. Millions of our ancestors came to this country with nothing but the clothes on their backs and quickly made a life for themselves and their children. WHEN WILL U PEOPLE START TAKING RESPONSIBILITY FOR YOURSELVES and QUIT BLAMING EVERYONE ELSE FOR YOUR OWN STUPIDITY OR LAZZINESS. In the spirit of 'Puff Daddy' Dascle I ask. "What is the end goal of these social handouts? When will we be able to declare victory against poverty? When will it be enough?" I demand accountability for my taxes dollars. Now that is a really funny thought! Accountability from "Puff Daddy" Dascle. Ha Ha Ha :) WHY WE MUST LEAD: America is the last beacon of hope for the human race. When the Roman Empire fell, Europe fell into the dark ages for eons. Without America, the world would be thrown into utter chaos and probably another world war. Without America, Russia would have invaded Europe. Without America, there would be a religious war erupting in Southern Europe (Kosovo). Without America, Iraq would control 90% of the world's oil. Without America, China would have invaded Taiwan. Without America North Korea would invade South Korea. Without America Europe would be speaking German. So your saying that you would rather live under these regimes? These Dictatorships? That Tyranny? That Oppression? Your nuts!. I'm sick and tired of hearing from you wackos who have been indoctrinated and brain washed into hating this country and it�s patriotic leaders who defend the hard working citizens that make this country so great. Move to the Axis of Evil and see how great it is over there. Please. WE WILL BUILD IT BECAUSE WE CAN BUILD IT AND WE WILL PROTECT OURSELVES. Once they are bankrupt they can not bankroll the terrorists Dah! Where do you think the terrorists get a lot of their money from? If the technology is questionable and it is a waste of our money, why are so many countries like Russia and China objecting to it's development? | ||||||||||||||||||||
| March 2002: | In response to the pacifistic Red Diaper Doper Babies ** (Drug impaired immoral adults who were indoctrinated into Communistic ideology by their ultra liberal radical commie parents and University professors) Bush did not ask for this war. The attack on the United States killed thousands of U.S. citizens. These citizens could easily be anyone of our family members or friends. The president is responding to this sneak attack on our country. For eight years under Clinton we sat back and let the world know that we were not committed to defending ourselves or our commitments (Somalia [meals on wheels - go see Blackhawk Down], U.S.S Cole, African Embassy bombings, Nuclear secrets to China, Criminals visiting our White House). The current administration is putting the world on notice that if you are going to threaten or attack us or our interests, there will be a price to pay. Payback is on its way. For all of you liberal Red Diaper Doper Babies that means that there is a consequence for an entity's policies and that there will be no social, psychological or emotional excuses that will be deemed acceptable for misbehavior (though R.D.D.B. lawyers would beg to disagree). The U.S. is currently the only super power and we must take the lead on this war. If we do not then who else will? If you disagree with the policies of getting tough with these terrorists then maybe you should have been visiting the W.T.C. on September 11th for a real close up and personal experience with terrorism. Case in point: 1980's Momar Khadafi of Libya. Pan Am 747 blown out of sky over Lockerbee Scottland by terrorists traced back to Libya. Reagan orders strike force of U.S. fighters to bomb Khadafi's residence and military installations. Result: Have not heard from Khadafi or Libya for the past 15 years. This is no different than raising children and teaching them that there is a consequence for their actions. Then again, half of the kids in this country do not have parents that grasp that concept and that might explain why so many of you R.D.D.B. can not grasp the magnitude and importance of this administration's policy. Its not dangerous. It's smart. It's bold and it will let the world know that there will be consequences for their action. As President Bush said "You are either with us or you are with the terrorists". There is no double meanings allowed such as was the case with the word "IS" under a previous administration! Let's Roll. GOD BLESS AMERICA! ** R.D.D.B. is a term coined by Michael Savage of the nationally syndicated Savage Nation radio program. | ||||||||||||||||||||
| February 2002: | Secretary of Defense, Donald Rumsfeld's style is such a refreshing change. After eight dreadful years of poll seeking politically correct spin, equivocation, fecklessnes, half-measures and weakness, we now are treated to plain truth with pride and strength. For example, when a reporter asked Rumsfeld to explain "the tactical rationale" for using cluster bombs, the Secretary or Defense responded with "They are being used on front-line al Qaeda and Taliban troops to try to kill them, to be perfectly blunt". Another reporter suggests that the U.S. is being too aggresive by asking "Do you have concerns that they may get so desperate that they may launch some sort of last gasp terrorist attack? Rumsfeld discards the suggestion with, "The idea that you could appease them by stop doing what we're doing... is just utter nonsense ... It's kind of like feeding an alligator, hoping it eats you last". These types of responses make perfect sense to most American citizens, however the liberal press is in palpable shock at such blunt straight forward statements. The "Rummy Show" would win in a ratings war with CNN (Communist News Network) at any time on any day! I'm proud to say that I have not watched CNN in over 3 years! | ||||||||||||||||||||
| January 2002: | What to do with this bozo John Walker Lindh. The libs and the media are already propagandizing him as a victim in need of a trial. If he is to be considered an American citizen then he should be tried for treason and conspiracy to commit murder(since he admits of knowing of plans for mass killings by biological attacks) by the war tribunal. If you consider that Walker lost his citizenship when he joined the Taliban, then he should be tried with the rest of the evil fighters of Afghanastan and meet his fate with them in Afghanastan. Whatever you believe, I will simplify the outcome for you. Just find the nearest tree and get some rope. And, by the way, who were this trator's parents? | ||||||||||||||||||||
| December 2001(b): | Politicians are a lot like diapers. They both need to be changed often because they stink or are simply just full of it! | ||||||||||||||||||||
| December 2001 (a): | During the Iran-Contra hearings, 15 years ago, General Oliver North stated that he had received serious threats to his life and was concerned for the safety and well being of his family. He explained that the person responsible for this threat was one of the most evil people on the face of the planet. He officially recommended that the U.S. government send in special forces and hunt down this mad man. Do you have any idea who the person Oliver North was referring to, in the late 1980's, is? Usama Bin Laden? Not exactly. The terrorist he was referring to is not relevant to my point. What is note worthy is the fact that nearly 15 years later these terrorist thugs are still attempting to disrupt the world using a religion as cover. The time has come to end this cycle known as "terrorism". I am happy to report that we finally have a president that is up to the task of doing just that! God Bless America. | ||||||||||||||||||||
| November 2001: | Can you imagine the absurdity of Al Gore fighting the war against terrorism. Even some of Gore's political advistors have anonymously stated that the country is definitely better off with the present leadership. Thank God we have a "leader" like George "W" Bush. In less than a month he has successfully mobilized the country, military and world for an major offensive against terrorism. Even socialist "peace loving" leaders from France are chiming in REPEATING what "W" stated in his great speech in front of congress. France's socialist prime ministrer stated that "..we are committed to winning the war against terrorists or any country financially or logistically supporting them including harboring them." Bush has successfully conveyed and convinced world leaders that the present undertaking is not a "Clinton era" emotional response but a serious commitment and change in American foreign policy. "W" has emerged a world leader and don't forget that the democrats and especially Hillary have taken notice. Hillary looked like she was in pure agony during "W"s charged speech before congress. She knew she was watching her leftest-socialist agenda and political asperations for 2004 going up in smoke. She should be upset about her political misfortunes, since it was her husband's pathetic policies that weakened our nation to the point where this attack was made possible. Sounds like there will be lamps flying again at the Clinton residence. But... can't they just get along. Only in America where we are blessed with freedom. God Bless America. | ||||||||||||||||||||
| October 2001:(b) | Our nation was sneak attacked in 1941 by forces of the "evil" empire of Japan in an attempt to intimidate us and weaken our will to part take in WWII. They miscalculated. Admiral Yamamoto, who had visited America, realized the risks associated with the strategy coordinated by his superiors. His worst fears were finalized over Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Before September 11th the terrorist organizations of the middle east envisioned their enemy as the government and policies of the United States. Unfortunately for them, now they have made themselves the enemy of the people of the United States. They miscalculated. I do not think they realize exactly what they have started. But, I do know how it will end. And when it does, it will redefine the word retribution. God bless America. | ||||||||||||||||||||
| October 2001:(a) | We can finally identify the defining legacy of the Clinton presidency. Unfortunately for the citizens of this country it is the WTC and pentagon disasters. The consistent cutting of military and intelligence budgets under the Clinton administration considerably weakened our ability to protect ourselves and was an invitation for disaster. The policies enacted, by his administration, on the CIA and FBI focused on "political correctness" and "diversity training" while curtailing information gathering efforts with strict human rights litmus tests on informants. Our armed forces were cut nearly in half under his administration. It is a disgrace that he even showed his face at the sight of the WTC disaster, however, I was glad to hear that he was boooed by much of the crowd. Clinton was right about one thing. "It is the economy, stupid". However, without a coherent foreign policy and the ability to protect and serve your own citizens, the economy and the country goes straight into the crapper. | ||||||||||||||||||||
| September 2001: | When congress ended their session and went on vacation last month, everyone should note that the country kept on working just fine without them. Maybe shuting down the government is not such a bad idea after all. Well, at least shutting down congress would guarantee no new taxes, no new social experiments and no new regulations. | ||||||||||||||||||||
| August 2001 (b): | Have you received your special mail insert from the IRS yet? I can think of 600 really good reasons why I voted for "W" this month? If those reasons are not good enough for you, then send your unwanted reasons on over to me. I can still use some more because the IRS, originally, confiscated a lot more to begin with from me. It's your money and you earned it. Were you aware that 50 years ago income tax was not deducted from your pay. Instead, you had to write a quarterly check to the government much like any other bill you pay. Take a look at a recent copy of your paystub and ask yourself, would you pay that amount to the IRS? If your answer is "no", then you know why they started confiscating it ahead of time from citizen's paychecks! Its your money and you earned it. Demand representation, with compassion for their citizens. Demand further tax cuts! The representatives are suppose to work for you. We are not suppose to work to support them. | ||||||||||||||||||||
| August 2001: (a) | The development of the National Missile Defense system has been openly debated during the past few months with president Bush pressing forward on the issue. Many Democrats have criticized the development of this program as too expensive and possibly not feasible. In 1981 these same fascists cried foul at the Reagan military build-up with the same sort of cynicism. However, less then 10 years later the Soviet Union had fallen, the Berlin wall was taken down, The Warsaw Pact was dissolved, the "Cold War" was over and the U.S. had won without firing a single bullet. The rogue nations of today's world must never be given the impression that America is unwilling to defend itself. That impression will embolden them to challenge or threaten us into a situation where war could end up the only possible response. This type of lax national policy is exactly what prompted Japan to attack Pearl Harbor. God forbid we have to use the missile defense just once, imagine all the children we would "really" save. See what Reagan said on Missile Defense in 1977: Reagan Commentary | ||||||||||||||||||||
| July 2001: | How come every time the media refers to the democratic representative Condit from California they seem to omit his political party's affiliation? If he had been a republican do you really believe that this fact would be omitted? Yet another example of why the media establishments are losing viewers in droves. For example, viewership of the nightly network news (ABC,CBS,NBC,CNN) is down 70% in the last five years. The quality of the news reported on these programs is ridiculous since it does not contain any. It contains biased opinions and half truths in which a political agenda is always promoted. Sounds like Provda to me! (Update:July 17 2001: Dan Rathers, 77 days into the Condit/Levy investigation has NOT mentioned it once on the nightly news - How is that for honest reporting.) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| June 2001: | Dan Rathers of CBS (Communist Biased Systems) recently stated the following while on the O'reilly Factor (Fox News) referring to Bill Clinton: 'I believe an individual can tell lies but still be an honest trust worthy person'. That statement alone explains what he thinks when he looks in the mirror every night! | ||||||||||||||||||||
| May 2001: | Senators state that the country can not afford to return the tax payers money back to them in the form of a tax cut, but then they write a budget that increases spending by 8%+. Did you get an 8% raise in your salary this year? Demand your money back now or else vote them OUT!!!!!!!! | ||||||||||||||||||||
| April 2001: | Every time I hear a politician discuss "the community" I have a difficult time believing that they are not promoting socialism and communism. | ||||||||||||||||||||
| March 2001: | Rumor has it that Clinton is now regretting not pardoning himself on his last day as president. | ||||||||||||||||||||
| February 2001: | G W is not budging from his campaign agenda and beginning to look extremely competent as POTUS, meanwhile, liberals are headed toward hysteria. Beautiful! | ||||||||||||||||||||
| January 2001: | Mandate or not. It is a simple fact that the GOP has control of all three bodies of government that are required to legislate a bill into law! | ||||||||||||||||||||
| December 2000: | Alec Baldin, Your plane is ready and waiting for immediate departure... (Update:Jan 22 2001: Since Alec is still in the country, we can now call him a liar!) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| November 2000: | Today we can simplify political ideology by defining individuals who wish the government would allow them to live the American dream and opportunity to succeed vs. individuals who demand the American dream (taxpayer) give them their opportunity to succeed. |