The pyramid effect
This page contains information about the pyramids and their paranormal properties
THE THEORY OF PYRAMID'S FIELD
 

THE THEORY OF PYRAMID'S FIELD

Quantum Physics Background

It may sound rather strange, but having understood the reasons for such a considerable influence of the pyramid on a matter, we should turn to the inspection of the fundamental construction of Nature. A theoretical physicist who works tightly with condensed matter experimentalists understands that all the phenomena observed by his colleagues are caused by the microstructure of specimens studied. In other words, the phenomena should be contained – in more or less explicit form – in structural blocks of specimens. The blocks include atoms/molecules and special kinds of bonds between them.

Just the same takes place in quantum mechanics and generally in quantum physics;  we may say that the phenomena which we study should reflect the properties of structural blocks of real space. A detailed analysis of the fundamentals of quantum physics carried out recently by the author has shown that a vague vacuum of quantum physics and an empty space of general relativity should make way for a single substrate. Indeed, the models of grand unification of all physical interactions based on experimental results allow the calculation of evolutions of three constants (electromagnetic a e-m, weak a w and strong a s as functions of distance r that parts interacting particles. All the constants come together at 10^{-28} cm, Figure 1. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Moreover, high-energy physics proposes an abstract "superparticle" whose different states are quarks, electron, muon, neutrino, and others. Thus taking into account these two facts, one may suggest that just those superparticles form a world substrate, which shares both discrete and continual properties. The substrate may be thought of as the degenerate space net. So, the space net is simulated as a tessellation of balls, or superparticles, or elementary cells, which are the primary blocks of Nature.

A local deformation of the space net, i.e., a stable change of the initial volume of a superparticle in the degenerate space net,  is associated with the creation of a particle in it. Unstable deformations constitute spatial excitations, or quasi-particles, called "inertons." When the particle begins to move it experiences friction-striking superparticles. Owing to the interaction with coming superparticles, the particle emits and then absorbs elementary excitations, i.e. inertons. Once the particle is in motion between fluctuating superparticles, inertons migrate as typical quasi-particles, i.e., they carry bits of space deformation hopping from superparticle to superparticle by relay mechanism.

The particle oscillates along the trajectory, i.e., its velocity v changes periodically from v to zero along the particle's de Broglie wavelength l . With such motion, inertons, which accompany the moving particle, oscillate in the surrounding of the particle. Oscillations of a cloud of inertons are specified by amplitude L = l c/v where c is the velocity of light. Note that the value L indicates the cloud size distribution in the vicinity of the particle.

Thus, inertons surrounding a moving particle make up a substructure of the matter waves, which so far have only been treated in the framework of the wave probabilistic formalism and, therefore, any physical interpretation of the y -function has not been taken into account. Meanwhile experiments conducted by my colleagues and me provided rigorous support for the submicroscopic approach to quantum mechanics.

Summarizing we may infer that just the inerton field, a new physical field, whose carriers – inertons – make a substructure of the matter waves, generates the quantum mechanics formalism in the region from 10^{-28} cm to the atom size. The amplitude of particle's inerton cloud L limits the radius of action of the field of a particle. This also signifies that the same distance restricts the gravitational radius L of a particle since any piece of information about the particle cannot be found beyond the bounds of its inerton cloud. Thus, the dynamic inerton field becomes a real candidate for understanding the gravitation phenomenon and yet the research conducted denies an option of the existence of gravitons of general relativity without any doubt. The inerton field is capable also of accounting for macroscopic phenomena trespassing upon the range traditionally described by general relativity. This means that general relativity loses its monopole rights as the all-embracing theory: the static relativity should be replaced for a dynamic theory based on the inerton field that realizes the direct interaction between massive objects.

2006-06-29 09:00:05 GMT
Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1