The silence of the Sudbury Police about my complaint is not surprising in light of the fact that the same position was taken by VPD, RCMP etc., about when I am the victim, a position very distinct from when I am the alleged offender. Police was quick to show up at Holland Dr., and even at Portsmouth.
The false incimination of the racial minorities and refusal to protect them from being lynched is the ultimate form of the State condoned racism and happens around the world on a daily basis. Canada is no exception and there is no need for surprise or alarm. Refusal to concede that fact on part of most is also cleraly understandable.
As previously mentioned, there is an intense reluctance on my part to use emails for philosophical debates on ethics of policiticians, police, judges and even your sisters. I would be offering an extremely limited comment. Your time is precious too and MUST not be wasted on issues that are not worthy of debate at this time. Please see my trip to Ontario of two month duration within which the desired result MUST be obtained, and I would like you to STAY FOCUSSED. We will have (hopefully!) several decades ahead of us to argue, debate and ponder upon the issues that you seem wishing to discuss while I am here.
Ms. MacNeil, the special assistant to MPP of Sudbury, Mr. Rick Bartolucci has given me a printout of here mssage stating the following:
The intent of shis office is to facilitate resolutions through provincial Ministries by providing appropriate information. If you decide to apply for Ontario Works, I wouild be happy to walk you through and help with the process. Which woul dhel ypu obtain the proper documents that would help you obtain your health card.
As far as OPGt is concerned, I wil ahve to inquire with the inegrity commission to find out what my role could be. Because many of your issues may be of a legal nature. That is why because, normally we cannto get involvedin legal matters.
In ordder for me to become involved with the OPGT who can address your legal matters, I must call the integrity commission. Please allow me time to get answers for you.
Forced Health Card:
If a minor needed surgery and the parents would not consent and it is evident in the eyes of the laws that surgery or another intervention must be carried out against the wishes of the guardian, who have been found by the COURT not to be acting in the best interests of the minor or the mentally ill, the court can permit the doctors to go ahead or condone the fact if the in fact did when sufficient precautions like the affidavits or documentation or consent by 2 medical experts is taken. This is done becuase the State has a right and a duty to keep you alive.
The proposal "If the authorities feel that you need an OHIP card" is fundamentally absurd because there is no alternative if the State has to uphold its obligations. Whether I am unable, unwilling or incapable of signing for anything of or providing consent for this or that, is immaterial when the issue at hand is the obligation of the State to address the needs of a subject of the Crown or Ward of the Crown.
It must be clearly understood by you that I AM REFUSING to sign anything that a legal guardian MUST sign. For the past 9 years they have made your and my life miserable by pushing on you and me the obligations that rightfully belong to the PGT.
It is also incorrect that I am not allowed to sign. In fact, I am encouraged to sign and do my own banking, enter into my own lease and other contracts, sign consent for my own treatment etc., so that my life can be further screwed as well stress caused to you. That is going to end now. This is about time this nonsense ends, and your help in speaking to the MPP office, Ms. Kurke (legal clinic) and the SPS (Cst. Hotson) would likely do that, otherwise private information would be swron agains the police officer by me.
I am not trying to make trouble for OPGT and others. If they issue me the OHIP card anyways (regardless!) thenmy resistance would take the form of not cooperating with the health care providers and not ingesting the medications (unless court ordered) until each one of my conditions is fulfilled. And I hope you would not take a chance of being disobeyed by requesting me to cooperate. I will cooperate only after ALL my conditions have been met.
You are making an error of faulty Charter interpretation by assuming that to provide me medical care I must be in possesion of an OHIP card. At the risk of being ficisious I can tell you that you are getting the care without having one. The point is that the State can not benefit from its own misconduct or make self-serving and self-protective rules. There are no such cards in India, everyone gets to be seen, no matter what. If they are going to continue to argue that I am preventing them from providing with my Charter rights, then that is the famous Myles Clay-Kimberly Azyan argument. Anyone who is interfering with the execution of the functions of the State is in fact obstructing justice and can be penalized accordingly. In the case the person himself is waiving his Charter rights, then he can really not allege its violation at the same time. I am demanding the medical care - a basic Charter and human right. How the orchestrate that is up to them. The State must not make rules that it knows that the member of the public like an unborn or a toddler can not comply with and use that to deprive the person of the Charter rights. The Charter is not a joke. Please understand that. How well Canada protects the Charter rights of its public determines whether investors would open bussiness in this country and that affects the value of the dollar and the entire economy of the nation. By their recklessness Canadian governments continue to lower the standards of living of the Canadians and some sense must be talked into their heads.
Who would take the tort to trial ? I am confident that I will get a standing in prosecuting the charter tort against MOH, for refusal to provide medical care which includes the proper safe placement etc.
The knowledge of MOH of my mental infirmness since May 1997, and the alleged fitness to stand trial in May 98 does not permit the MOH to change their mind. Here again, as usual you are seemingly being the advocate of the MOH and doing the job of Maria Scarfo, but I am prepared to give you the benefit of doubt and assume that you are being simply curious, and that you are asking what if the fitness to stand trial determined in May 98 would constitute a defence. Maria Scarfo to defend the MOH would need to establish that the fitness to stand trial use the same test as for consent to treatment and ability to prosecute civil matters on one's own. We can even argue taht teh May 98 fitness was fradulently found by fudging the documentation. The responses that I allegedly gave to the psychiatrists could very easily be "doctored". How will Dr. Mantle prove (with corroboration as required by s. 15 of the Evidence Act) that the responses were in fact mine. There is no videotape. You have been advised that there is a distinction in the test for fitness to stand trial and the capacity assessment. Even an otherwise sane person can be found incapable for pragmatic reasons and I can cite you the case of a diabetic, schizophrenic, MS patient in wheelchare where PGT BC was appointed committee for her 1.5 million esate that she got after MVA in order to protect the estate from being dissipated or scammed by others.
Rights of the mentally ill impecunious on the street: You are vagulely correc that there are lot of people out there who are poor and vulnerable and if they are subjects to torts at the hands of the public servants or medical care providers they tend to not prosecute them because they often can't as there is no legal aid for that purpose. So if your question is to be seen as who is to protect the Charter rights of the impecunious, I think the answer lies in the Okanagan v BC and in Paluska v Cava. So far the courts and justice has been only for the rich and the powerful. Access to the courts has never been nor still is something within the reach of the impecunious. That has to be changed. Just becuase one can not prosecute the violation of his Charter rights does not give the State the right to violate them with impunity. Before Elderige the State was able to do that without any fear. That has not changed much. Outside of BC, the deaf still dont get ASLI for the medical care, let alone ohter situations.
It is not a lawful position for you to take that if you are being discriminated against, it is just a part of life, a bad part, but still a part. That is what a Nazi could be seen telling a Jew. If we are go work for a stable and happy community, we have to seek protection of rights of all. Not only that the white, rich, powerful can have their rights protected and the poor and mentally ill are not worthy of being protected against crimes and other forms of discriminations.
The question whether I should be making my own decisions will be debated shortly
*******************************************************
Ethics Commissioner investigating Grewal tapes
CTV.ca News Staff
June 3, 2005
The controversy in Ottawa over the Gurmant Grewal tapes showed no signs of slowing down, with word the federal ethics commissioner will be investigating what went on.
Bernard Shapiro, the federal Ethics Commissioner, confirmed Friday his office has now launched an investigation.
Shapiro's spokesman Jonathan Choquette told CTV.ca the ethics commissioner would have to drop the case if the RCMP opens a criminal investigation into the matter.
Meanwhile, Shapiro has been asked by an NDP MP to look at the taping by Conservative MP Grewal of his conversation with Prime Minister Paul Martin's chief of staff, Tim Murphy and Health Minister Ujjal Dosanjh.
The recordings purport to show Grewal engaged in negotiations with the Prime Minster's Office about him and his wife, also an MP, leaving the Conservatives, in exchange for possible political favours.
The ethics office would be looking at three issues, Choquette said:
If Grewal sought inducements in exchange for changing his vote on the budget
If Dosanjh and Harper offered inducements
If the surreptitious audio taping by Grewal was an attempt at entrapment
Right now, though, NDP Leader Jack Layton says Martin, Murphy and Dosanjh should all step down until the matter is resolved.
Grewal alleges he and his wife were offered plum posts in exchange for their support in the crucial budget vote. However, Dosanjh and Murphy deny any wrongdoing and say Grewal approached them.
In the House of Commons on Friday, Conservative Deputy Leader, Peter MacKay kept up the heat on the government.
"The Prime Minister's chief of staff and his minister of health are caught red-handed acting as agents, trying to buy Tory votes to save a corrupt government," MacKay said.
"Isn't the real reason the minister of health and the prime minister's chief of staff remain is because they were simply acting on the prime minister's instructions to do whatever was necessary to save his corrupt government?," MacKay went on to ask.
"Why hasn't the let's-make-a-deal prime minister fired his chief of staff for even attempting to manipulate an officer of parliament?"
Still, after days of backing the integrity of the tapes, the Conservatives are recanting, saying only that the original recordings were turned over to the Mounties.
In Calgary, meanwhile, Conservative Leader Stephen Harper defended Grewal, saying his MP is the only person who's told Canadians the truth, so far.
Harper denied there was any doctoring of the tapes. And he says, unless an investigation shows otherwise, Grewal has done nothing wrong and, in fact, deserves praise for coming forward.
However, audio experts say a segment of a taped conversation between Grewal and a Liberal appears to have been altered.
After analyzing a 46-second segment of recordings of Grewal speaking with Dosanjh, audio expert Steven Pausak said Thursday that there appears to be a break in one of the tapes.
"It appears to be altered," Pausak said.
"This brief segment at the beginning shows that it's not continuous, and it should be."
The Conservative Party said late Thursday that small gaps occurred when the master tapes were transferred to CD.
But Pausak said he found an entirely separate abnormality that couldn't be explained by transferring.
Pausak, who once worked for the Ontario government and now testifies in trials, said there is a discontinuity in the audio file.
"I'm talking about alteration. I am trying to avoid the word tampering,'' he said.
"When you are using the word 'tampering', that means intent, right?
Most of the time there is no way to show intent through the examination of the recording. You just see that it's altered.''
Grewal denies tampering with the evidence.
**********************************************************
Carole Ann wrote:
Rynveld, a police watchdog with PCC released his report yesterday, 6000 pages on corruption within VPD, particularly with the chief of police regarding failure to investigate complaints against the VPD.
His recommendation? That the police chief reopen the investigations- big deal
I heard this on the local version of CTV news so don�t know if you would be able to link to it at ctv.ca or not
Carole Ann