The Compulsion To Tell All
Bloggers are getting in trouble for confessing their sins to the web community
by: Kassell Pierre-Jean
Rachelle
Ann Monica Waterman is a 16-year-old girl who created an online journal, titled
“My Crappy Life: The Inside
Look of an Insane Person.” The blog detailed her life in the small town of
Waterman’s
last entry, dated Nov. 18, 2004, read, “Just to let everyone know, my mother
was murdered. I won’t have computer access until the weekend or so because the
police took my computer.”
The
Alaska State Troopers’ press release dated Nov. 20 said that Waterman,
and alleged accomplices Jason Arrant and Brian Radel, admitted to being involved
in Lauri Waterman’s murder. They are all currently being charged with first
degree murder.
Blogs,
short for Web logs, have become an Internet phenomenon and gained notoriety
since last fall when blogs cast doubt on the authenticity of the Bush National
Guard memos from the CBS Network on Sept. 9. Mainstream society has become more
aware of the blogging trend, and as the trend expands, bloggers are exhibiting a
compulsion to “tell all” about their lives.
Craig
Johnson, associate professor of psychology at
“[The
Internet] enables people to talk about things they wouldn’t normally talk
about,” Johnson said. “Even
though their identity is known to some extent, it’s more protected than
face-to-face interaction.”
Livejournal.com,
a free Weblog site, has a feature that can restrict viewing access to those
designated as “friends” but recommends that the user have an updated Web
browser and Java Script enabled. Most
blogs, however, do not have this feature and are accessible to anyone scouring
the Internet.
“Just
remember there is nothing personal about a blog,” said Jonathan McCarthy,
professor of online journalism at Hofstra. “So if you write it, be prepared to
share it with the world.”
Livejournal hosts an unofficial
Hofstra blog that serves as a community where various bloggers can join and post
their thoughts on Hofstra-related topics. Even the official Hofstra Web site
enlisted student Michelle LaNoce to blog about her summer 2004 experience as she
trekked across Western Europe with her professor and fellow
Waterman
is an extreme case of a “tell all” blogger whose personal details may have
gotten her into trouble, but cases of ordinary citizens suffering consequences
of blog blabbing are constantly popping up.
The
San Francisco Chronicle covered the recent trend of fired bloggers in late
January 2005. Bloggers all over the net—from the anonymous “Papal Bull”
site to freelance writer Curt Hopkins—have kept updates on who gets fired, who
gets suspended and whose juicy, detailed blogs disappear mysteriously.
Mark
Jen is an example of a blogger who may have told too much about his job at
Google.
The
22-year-old
“I
was just too excited,” Jen wrote in his blog. “I thought I was going to
start new initiatives and improve existing ones…I thought I could make
connections to real people in the outside world and get first hand feedback. I
thought Google would love it.”
Then
Jen added, “I thought wrong.”
After a Google ski weekend retreat, which he also blogged about, one of Jen’s managers called him into his office. His manager warned that people knew about his blog and suggested that he take it down. Jen immediately complied and unpublished his posts. Once Jen followed his manager’s orders, he began investigating Google’s blogging policy and went through his signed non-disclosure agreement. Since Google had no blogging policy, Jen determined that he had not violated his non-disclosure agreement, and began blogging again without the job description details.
On
Jan. 28, only 11 days after Jen began his new job, he was fired for “telling
all” about Google.
Jen’s
managers said, in an interview with Gelf magazine, that “his blog had upset
some people” and as a result, he needed to be fired.
Jen
said he did not value blogging more than he valued his job: “I’m not
insubordinate,” he said. “If I was told to shut down this blog, I would
have.”
Joyce
Park, a former Web developer for Friendster, said she was fired for mentioning
her company in two specific posts. Though, in her Aug. 30 entry she noted the
irony: “Friendster, of course, is a company that is all about getting people
to reveal information about themselves,” she said.
Heather
Armstrong of dooce.com has coined the term “dooced” to define the world of
dismissals for blogging. Armstrong—who says she was one of the first bloggers
to be fired—was terminated from a Los Angeles Web design firm for writing
exaggerated, funny stories about people in her office.
Former
Delta Airlines flight attendant Ellen Simonetti was dismissed for posting
“inappropriate” photos of herself in her online diary. Simonetti resized all
the posted photos of herself so her employer could not be identified by the pin
on her uniform. She calls her photos “innocent and playful representations of
a grief-stricken 29-year-old.”
In
her CNET column, Simonetti said, “The reason I started my blog in the first
place was as a form of therapy...It was much easier to write about my feelings
than talk about them.” But after working for Delta
nearly eight years, her therapy got her discharged.
“I
felt my rights were being infringed upon,” Simonetti said, “and I decided to
fight back.”
Simonetti
serves as deputy director for the Committee to Protect Bloggers along with
Director Curt Hopkins in an attempt to raise awareness about bloggers in
trouble—not just fired bloggers, but those who have been jailed, threatened or
persecuted in other countries. She
also runs The Bloggers’ Rights Blog, which keeps track of companies that have
terminated or reprimanded employees for their personal blogs.
Blogging could also affect college students, especially those who live with others in dorms. Former Hofstra student Christine Haskell was called to the Dean’s Office because her roommate filed a complaint about Haskell’s livejournal posts.
“I
went and talked to the assistant dean of students and he agreed that it was
absurd,” Haskell said.
Melissa Connolly, assistant vice president for University Relations, said blogging is a fairly new realm in which Hofstra has not considered taking disciplinary action against students.
“Students
have every right to express their opinions in whichever way they like,”
Connolly said. “We’re a college where we encourage exploring freedom of
speech and freedom of thought. Our faculty encourages that.”
But lack of disciplinary action against students who blog about professors or other students does not exempt them from charges of libel. Bloggers—students or not—can only be prosecuted for libel if a publication falsely damages a person’s reputation and has caused that person irreparable damage or harm. Libel covers both printed and electronic publication.
“The
Guide to Pride, [Hofstra’s student handbook], contains two references to
libel,” Connolly said. “Those would be the statues applicable to blogging,
but in no way different than they are applicable to any other form of public
communication.”
Employee bloggers should certainly check company policies and ensure their online diaries are kept private to avoid unnecessary penalties until a clear legal precedent is set.
“At my next employer,” Simonetti said, “I would make sure to ask about a blogging policy before deciding to keep a blog or not.”