The food was good!!! Worth burning the City down for, even-
Just ask the fatass meter maid dude who parked his buggy blocking the fire hydrant to eat there every day...

---

Lam was actually a hard worker, if an incorrigible crook.....

---

Lam and his business partner were really quite enterprising.....

---

But the worms were left off the menu. We've saved you a plate:

The DA's office was told about this card thing in 2004; they said "go to the police"

The police took this report; they said "go to fraud detail" (the cops were actually very considerate of Business Partner, thank them).

Nothing happened. The DA was told in detail of Lam's course of theft and fraud. They didn't get involved until the recent clamor of vox populi in the matter, via abc's KGO channel 7 tv (thanks to Irene Bartholomew for having some backbone to speak out. Good thing Lam doesn't sue her!).

---

Before that, Citigroup tried to do something...

---

Lam had lost his home and daughter to Yen Do Quan (in Daly City, though who herself figures in Alameda County's property records, if the same Yen), while he ran the original Home Menu at 1420 Market St., a possible explanation to the bitter course he would run to save his only asset left, at any cost to anyone. Her name appeared on some of the bills at the new place, too

---

In originals of the lease to 1565 Mission, site of the New Home Menu, Lam's business partner's name appears whited out, overtyped with Yen Duy Duong. There were a few tries at this, found in the restaurant. Here are 2:

and this one, from the copy actually signed. It was likely the last attempt. In all pieces, the whiteout extends for the original name, a centimeter before Yen:

---

The business partner, Lam's former waitress (we'll call her BP) lost $300k (much of it others' money) to keep the place open.

---

BP started to take over the business pursuant to Lam's default of promissory note for the first $120k

---

When she had him arrested for going into the till in her restaurant, 12/16/03, he came back with this a few days after. Note that the "Lam" line isn't his signature at all, though it appears to say "Lam". The "Yen" line has his actual signature on it.

---

And some more of his signature; it's apparently universal, working for anyone's account- move over John Hancock!

---

BP sued Lam for title to the business she loved, in CGC-04-430831

---

he sued BP (and a man helping her, we'll call him T) for defamation when they reported his theft from Agatha Narvaez (now Okuda)- he wanted $300m, in CGC-04-432996 and then as Federal 04-3127 JSW (in this one, he sued the first two, plus BP's lawyer, his own lawyer, BofA, Judge James L. Warren... plus...)
(remember the handwriting on this one for later...)

---

BP had gotten T, some idiot who worked at a club nearby, to help her in 2003 when she said she was alone

---

while BP was and had been living with B, the son of this man:

http://www.nsanc.org/speakers/morris.html , http://www.nsanc.org/profile.php?id=76
http://www.1spirit.com/sirrom/start.html
Who supposedly told BP: "You should get a lawyer". Oh, thanks for the help...
for three years already, in 3 houses of his and a rental, not telling anyone else of it but one or two

---

BP borrowed money from others, including
Olaf Strohmaier, $50k, who later sued her, got nowhere with that, then stole her mail at 1358 26th Ave- you can read about this online in the Examiner- when she just denied the loan (though had admitted to others), while she helped B save for his mortgages.

---

B indicated that he was paying for her legal fees, started to, then dropped out, after paying her half of the retainer for one leaving T helping her with about $7k for her to his own lawyer (T had gotten his lawyer to defend her as well), then her own lawyer v. Lam, Paul Steiner, about $30k (you can see this amount in her bankruptcy filing)- then B bought another house (what do you do with all that money those other guys don't need, anyway?)

---

And speaking of the Luis... Shun Fai Lui, who sued Lam for fraud, and later spoke of it on ch7, said this in court filing somewhere in between- after a year and then judgment of the suit v Lam for fraud, changed the tune to 'partners in a construction business' that 'lost money' (one might guess that if a suit was filed and followed through with, the basis for it might do well to be consistent)... although, on sftc.org, it appears that the Luis' interest has had some trouble more recently, which may indeed be attributable to the Lam drain:

---

Lam's suits were written by a non-lawyer, Frederick Lawrence Kay, against the law, you know (search unauthorized practice of law for yourself). Look him up on party name search at sftc.org and PACER at uscourts. Or visit him in his office at 12th and Howard- Lam would drive by and exchange paperwork and take-out Chinese food cartons:

Kay had helped both of them, in writing

and

file theft charges? Hey, as long as it's someone else getting busted for taking bogus advice, why not?....

and

Uncovering the Law Corporation sitting Jurist Friends network, no doubt

---

Oops! Busted! (He was id'd by a real lawyer as the one appearing as 'Bobby Puk' for Lam)

payment for Lam's suv:

some of Kay's work for himself:

Check the who's who in this one:

and (remember the marked paragraph and underlined words in this one)...

---

Lam's Fed suit has passages lifted straight out of Kay's (remember 'dispite' and 'Lawman'? Good.):


So many Unknown Insurance Carriers, so little time!

---

Lam got stuck a t.r.o. from BP, ok'd by this guy, so he sued him too!(written on the back of a bank receipt, found in the restaurant. Voodoo doll still on the loose):

later, when he got p-o'ed with Lam, he did this one for BP:

Judge Jeffrey S. White sanctioned one defense counsel for his failure to appear due to his firm's new calendar software cockup, and punished the defendants as well by denying judgment for fees, in sublime ignorance of the fact that the suit had been prepared illegally in the first place, by a former law school 'attendee' from Texas with no license to practice, in violation of California Business and Professions Code ss. 6126 and so on, and applicable in Federal venues under the Assimilative Crimes Act...)

---

And how'd he get in here?!

This man would go to the restaurant, impressing BP with his business acumen, giving her an address of... The Opera Plaza Apts.? You can just go look for some guy named Michael there? (That's some of his advice, and 'address', above, written on a guest check from New Home Menu. He said he was part of a real estate investment gig in Harlem, trading millions worth of properties.) Then why was he HERE?

---

BUY A LUNCH, SEND A POOR MAN TO CHINA!
Lam wanted a trip to China in early 2005, and asked BP for money. BP said no. A customer's card was then charged $4,000. The cops were waiting at the airport when Lam returned. Lam was still on the streets after that. He was actually living around E12th St and 11th Ave in Oakland, hanging out at the Viet cafes nearby, where he was seen just a few weeks before they nailed him for the channel 7 thing.

---

BP filed for bankruptcy 10/16/05, lying in her stmt of financial affairs- about half a dozen places- like 'no business', when she even told the cops it was hers, 'no accounts', when she had one at each of two banks for the business, which she herself used (though said later that Lam had used her name), and 'no records', when T and B were both helping her with those records.

---

with the help of G at the PUC who's always helping her (those fast computers at the PUC!), BP cleaned the filing up a little, but apparently said nothing about the loans to Strohmaier though he knew of them. G, T and B knew she was lying (T and B are in with her creditors too, so could see her filings as well), but did anyone say anything to the Feds? (check out misprision of a felony in the USTM at the doj's site).

---

Lam was a crook, yes. He was honest once or twice, which made him difficult to sort out.
Lam cost BP $300k, plus her hope of her own way in life, slaving her butt off from 8AM to midnight to cover Lam's till tapping.
While BP cost one man $20k for this, another one $50k (and probably his home), her sister and brother inlaw thousands, and B, while she claimed $40k to him in debt, bought another $700+k house to share with her.
Lam in the can now, they'll all have to...

ORDER ONLINE!