Inactive Players
- An Editorial

I think it is time I address some things, just so people see my opinions. This will be mostly rambling...

Well how to begin this. The one thing that I get mad about the most is not people confused with challenges, people who say my site kind of stinks, or that my episodes have a lot of mistake, but inactive players in games. It not only shows who is going first but it doesn't make the game interesting at all. It seems you can't have a game where not one person is inactive.

Some sites claim they never had inactive players, like Survivor Webcam but in reality they do. Survivor Webcam 3.0 is a huge example. A pretty good game is ruined because of the lack of commitment of the contestants.

There is only one game where I can see all active players and that is Survivor X. Matt, the host clearly checks all of the applications carefully. He may have some quiet people but he never had anyone who didn't talk at all.

If you apply for a game please be sure to commit to it. It really stinks when the hosts emails everyone frustrated when nobody even attempted to try the reward challenge or the immunity challenge.

The hosts take a long time thinking up the challenges and making the website and when people just sit there they are dead weight.

Another thing that bugs me is the fact that some people give up. When they see they can't win they give up and don't even try anymore. You should always know that you shouldn't give up at all you are still in the game until you get eliminated by the host.

Hosts don't give up during your first season. You are destined to probably have inactive players. You need to stick it out. You should have less and less each season.

Inactive players sucks and people need to stop playing if they can't play.

Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1