Why did the flight attendants ignore all this? There is no indication from the government that these men took over all four planes while the planes were still on the ground. Even if they had, the pilots would not have taken off if there were hijackers on board. They would have waited to hear the demands, and the demand to "take off now" would have been refused by at least one flight crew -- and I believe all four.
Clearly the story that has been givin to us in horribly incomplete and rather fanciful. It's just plain ridiculous. But you bought it, John Q. Public. It's time to realize your mistake.
I propose that there were no hijackers. The US government gassed the cabin and flew the planes into the WTCs and the Pentagon. They then fabricated cell phone calls and devised an incomplete method of how these 'terrorists' boarded and hijacked these planes. Then, they told us that the 'terrorists' were all Arabic men who were originally trained by the CIA. Suspiciously, all these men were from the Middle East, the very place that the US was planning to attack BEFORE these 'terrorists' hijacked these planes. All of a sudden, after the story was fed to us, it was "Praise Bush!", "Lets kick some terrorist ass and blow up Afghanistan!" "that will solve everything!" "Go America!". Well, you were wrong. Sure, we destroyed Afghanistan. But not because of these 'terrorists'. Osama Bin Laden is as free as a bird. They were planning this all along! Now we are under rule of the oppressive Partiot Act. Hundreds of Americans, including vocal critics of the administration, have been placed on a list of individuals to be stopped, interrogated and searched when they go to the airport, with no way to appeal their status. If you are suspected of terrorist links, law enforcement can access all your records, conduct wire taps and electronic surveillance, search and seize private property and make secret arrests: all without a warrant. Immigrants coming to the US can be contained indefinetly, without access to a lawyer. And for what? We have gone to war with Iraq as part of our 'War on Terror'. 'War on Terror' is just a fancy way of saying New World Order! Can't you see that? The US is an empire. (see NWO.). The war on Iraq is over. We won. But what, exactly, have we won? There is an increased threat of 'terrorism'. Arabs hate us even more. We didn't kill Saddam (or Osama, for that matter). We killed thusands of innocent Iraqis in the collateral damage. Small children are left in the streets, screaming because their arms have been blown off by our bombs, left to die. And we are celebrating? We spent hundreds of billions of dollars on this war. We spend 3 billion dollars on 2 ballistic missiles. Yet we celebrate when we spend 2 billion on education and another 2 billion to fight AIDS in Africa (something we started, by the way.). Basiclly, a couple missiles are worth more to our government than the entire nations education. Now, Saddam has fallen. Do you feel any safer? They said that Saddam would set oil wells on fire. Wrong. They said that the republic guard would cause problems for us. Wrong. They said that Saddam would use chemical or bioloical weapons. Wrong. They said that Iraq would launch scuds into Israel. Wrong. They said that Saddam had weapons of mass destruction (This was the reason that we attcked Iraq in the first place. Right? Or maybe it was because Saddam was a dictator and we want Iraq to be a perfect democracy like us. Who knows?). Well, once again they were wrong. Its definetly ok for us to have weapons of mass destruction though. I sort of went on a rant there, but my point is that our government lied to us. Plain and simple, there were no terrorists. The government killed its own people.
portions taken from articles written by Gary North, John Kaminski and 2012.au.com
