Iakov Levi
 

 

Hands. From Rodin’s Sublimation of an Instinctual Need to Hitler’s Perversion

 

 July 2, 2006

 

Many noticed Rodin’s tormented way of representing hands in his sculptures. Some commented:

Rodin saw hands as able to express the emotions of the entire body. Our hands are important tools and means of expressions. Hands are points of connection and passing between people.
(Melissa Payne and Christina Sutherland, Sculpture, Hands, and Rodin
Lessonplan for BETA workshop 3/11/99,  in  http://www.umfa.utah.edu/?id=MjE1 )

Rodin was fascinated by the expressive possibilities of hands: hands gesturing in anguish as in The Burghers of Calais, small studies of hands pulsing with life, giant enigmatic hands sufficient unto themselves. The poet Rainer Maria Rilke (1875–1926), who was for a time Rodin's secretary, wrote: "There are among the works of Rodin's hands, single small hands, which without belonging to a body, are alive. Hands that rise, irritated and in wrath; hands whose five bristling fingers seem to bark like the five jaws of a dog of Hell."
    http://www.metmuseum.org/toah/hd/rodn/hod_12.12.18,.17.htm

 

  

Rodin's Hands


Freud has analyzed a short story by Stefan Zweig: “Four – and - Twenty Hours in a Woman’s Life”. Freud writes:

In her forty second year, expecting nothing further of life, she happens, on one of her aimless journeyings, to visit the Rooms at Montecarlo. There, among all the remarkable impressions which the place produces, she is soon fascinated by the site of a pair of hands which seem to betray all the feelings of the unlucky gambler with terrifying sincerity and intensity. These hands belong to a handsome young man – the author, as though unintentionally, makes him of the same age as the narrator’ elder son – who, after losing everything, leaves the rooms in the depth of despair, with the evident intention of ending his hopeless life in the casino gardens […].
Various mischances delay her, so that she misses the train. In her longing for the lost one she returns once more to the Rooms and there, to her  horror, sees once more the hands which had first excited her sympathy: the faithless youth had gone back to his play. […].
The brilliantly told, faultlessly motivated story is of course complete in itself and is certain to make a deep effect upon the reader. But analysis shows us that its intention is based fundamentally upon a wishful fantasy belonging to the period of puberty, which a number of people actually remember consciously. The fantasy embodies a boy’s wish that his mother should herself initiate him into sexual life in order to save him from the dreaded injuries caused by masturbation. (The numerous creative works that deal with the theme of redemption have the same origin.) The “vice” of masturbation is replaced by the addiction to gambling; and the emphasis laid upon the passionate activity of the hands betrays this derivation. Indeed, the passion for play is an equivalent of the old compulsion to masturbate; “playing” is the actual word used in the nursery to describe the activity of the hands upon the genitals. The irresistible nature of the temptation, the solemn resolution, which are nevertheless invariably broken, never to do it again, the stupefying pleasure, and the bad conscience which tells the subject that he is ruining himself (committing suicide) – all these elements remain unaltered in the process of substitution [1]

Rodin’s art therefore represents the sublimation of the instinctual need of masturbation.


  
Iakov Levi at Norton & Simon in Pasadena  and  Mrs Iakov Levi at the Kunst Museum in Basel

 

 

Hitler’s Hands

After puberty, masturbation represents a regression. The libido inhibited from the heterosexual object regresses to the need to masturbate. However, whilst in Rodin’s work the energies activated in the process were sublimated and resulted in masterpieces of art, if the regression is acted out we speak of perversion.

At difference from Mussolini, who in his speeches usually held his hands on his belt in a macho attitude of defiance, Hitler literally spoke with his hands, through which he “made love” to himself.
Hitler, the vicar of the Brotherhood Horde of the pubescent rebellious crowd
[2] , never made it to the other side of the puberty rite: the identification with the generation of the Fathers and the gratification of sexual licence.
Erikson pointed at the role that Hitler fulfilled as vicar of the group:

On the stage of German history, Hitler sensed to what extent it was safe to let his own personality represent with hysterical abandon what was alive in every German listener and reader. Thus the role he chose reveals as much about his audience as about himself; and precisely that which to the non - German looked queerest and most morbid became the brown Piper's most persuasive tune for German ears [3]
Hence the hysterical tones which sent the crowd in such an ecstasy. He gave expression to the collective frustration of a horde of novices which could not complete their puberty rite and be granted sexual licence. They were mentally self-hindered from the heterosexual level of the libidinal organisation, and therefore retrenched into masturbation. The reason is that the Nazi horde rejected every compromise with the Fathers’ generation. They subverted every Law and Legitimacy, and went out to act an orgy of instinctual satisfaction with no Super Ego presence and inhibition. Hitler masturbated in public and the public identified with him. He gave full expression to the most repressed needs of his followers who saw in him their most truthful representative.



He did't know what to do with his hands. Or did he?



    
      Hitler's hands                        and             Botticelli's Primavera

Hitler unconsciously making the symbol of the vagina.
(The picture captures Hitler's hands as he speaks of the unity of the National Socialist and socialist ideas).

The same vagina's symbol as in Botticelli's Primavera

In Hamlet. The Puberty Rite of a Danish Prince and His Companions I have discussed the feminine aspect of pubertal boys, who have not yet passed succesfully their puberty rite into the "other" side of the identification with the Fathers' generation.



Gerard David: Christus am Creuz, 1515
(Gemalde Galerie - Berlin)

 

Hitler's Speeches.




NOTES

[1] Sigmund Freud, “Dostoevsky and Parricide”, in The  Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Vintage -The Hogart Press, London 1961, vol. XXI, pp.192-3. (The italics are mine)

[2] For Hitler as Imago of the Son, vicar of the Brotherhood of adolescent youths (and not as image of the Father), see Erik H. Erikson, "The Legend of Hitler's Youth", in Childhood and Society, 1950, Penguin Books Australia Ltd, Ringwood, Victoria -Australia and Harmondsworth, Middlesex, England 1965, (Chapter 9). Erikson writes:

Psychologists overdo the father - attributes in Hitler's historical image; Hitler the adolescent who refused to become a father by any connotation, or, for that matter, a Kaiser or a President. He did not repeat Napoleon's error. He was the Fuhrer: a glorified older brother, who took over prerogatives of the father, without over identifying with them: calling his father " old while still a child", he reserved for himself the new position of the one who remains young in possession of supreme power. He was the unbroken adolescent who had chosen a career apart from civilian hapiness, mercantile tranquility, and spiritual peace: a gang leader who kept the boys together by demanding their admiration, by creating terror, and by shrewdly involving them in crimes from which there was no way back. And he was a ruthless exploiter of parental failures (pp.327-8)

[3] Op.cit. p.321.

Erikson emphasizes the character of German society as similar to that of a pubertal gang, of which shares the main psychological traits:

As "Wanderbirds", adolescent boys would indulge in a romantic unity with Nature, shared with many co - rebels and led by special types of youth leaders, professional and confessional adolescents. Another type of adolescent, the "lone genius", would write diaries, poems and treaties; at fifteen he would lament with Don Carlos's most German of all adolescent complaints: "Twenty years old, and as yet nothing done for immortality!" Other adolescents would form small bands of intellectual cynics, of delinquents, of homosexual, and of race -conscious chauvinists, The common feature of all these activities, however was the exclusion of the individual fathers as an influence and the adherence to some mystic -romantic entity: Nature, Fatherland, Art, Existence, etc., which were super - images of a pure mother, one who would not betray the rebellious boy to that ogre, the father. (p.325)



Links:
Who Burns the Books?
Hamlet. The Puberty Rite of a Danish Prince and His Companions
Pinocchio. The Puberty Rite of a Puppet




Back to Home Page



Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1