Paedophilia: Policy and Prevention -

Australian Institute of Criminology

Conference

By Jean Lennane

This conference was held at Sydney University on

14-15 April. It was a serious conference, on an

increasingly hot topic for whistleblowers, so it

seems important to share information from it with

readers of the whistle. The following is

necessarily only a brief outline, but it can give

some idea of who's who in the area, and where

they're coming from.

 

It's not altogether clear how and why people were

invited, but WBA, and people like Franca Arena,

heard about it only on the grapevine. The main

invitees appeared to be government departments,

who could afford the high registration fee ($200 a

day!), but whose record in this area is not

impressive. Victim/survivor lobby and support

groups seem not have been invited, and any

input from victims or their families was

conspicuously absent from the official program -

even from the section on 'Victim Evidence'. This

section was originally going to have only two

 speakers - Brent Waters, a child psychiatrist

whose evidence in court has usually been on

behalf of alleged offenders; and Richard Guilliatt, a

journalist with the Sydney Morning Herald, who

has written a number of articles about false

allegations of sexual abuse, and a book

'debunking' the existence of satanic abuse.

However after protests Dr Anne Cossins, a Senior

Lecturer from the Faculty of Law at UNSW was

added to that section, giving an excellent and

comprehensive paper on memory, and there was

strong and vocal victim representation in the

audience and discussion throughout the

conference.

 

The keynote address was 'Paedophilia: the public

health problem of the decade', by Dr Bill Glaser, a

Melbourne forensic psychiatrist. It  was excellent,

pointing out the magnitude of the problem, its

devastating effects on victims, and the failure of

existing systems, legal and otherwise, to deal with

it, prevent it, or provide effective treatment

 for victims or perpetrators. There was a great deal of

media coverage of what he said, which seemed to

 me to stymie what could otherwise have been the

result of the conference, viz to provide a

supportive introduction  for proposals from Judge

Howie that are to to to the Attorneys-General

These were announced in the Sun-Herald the

 following Sunday, and when viewed in a cynical

light appear in effect to lower the age of consent to

about ten, as long as the perpetrator has an

honest belief that the child is older. {Since

evidence from children under 6 years, for various

 reasons is seldom accepted in court, the practical

result of these recommendations if implemented

 would be to provide legal protection - such as it is

- only between the ages of 6 and 10.)  It would

seem wildly unlikely that any Attorney-General

could think such proposals could be acceptable to

the electorate, but some very influential people are

pushing them very hard.

 

The section on detection and reporting included

Professor Kim Oates (paediatrics, Sydney Uni), Dr

Judy Cashmore (Social Policry Research, UNSW),

Kylie Miller (Strategic Intelligence Unit, NCA), who

gave more information on the extent

 and seriousness of the problem from a victim-empathic

point of view, and Dr Diana Kenny, (A/prof

Psychology, Sydney Uni) whose line I found hard

to follow, but tended to emphasise the unreliability

of people alleging child sexual abuse.

 

The section on investigation, prosecution and

defence included John Heslop, head of the new

Child Protection Enforcement Agency, NSW

Police, who seems to have a realistic view of the

difficulties posed by offenders being 'nice men',

often pillars of their community, and with networks

of protection. Margaret Cunneen, (Crown

Prosecutor, DPP NSW) spoke about practical

problems in prosecution, e.g. the refusal of most

judges to allow offenders with multiple victims to

have a single trial, at which they would almost

certainly be convicted, rather than a separate trial

fro each victim, at each of which they might well be

acquitted, since the jury would be unaware of all

the corroborative evidence.

Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1