Commander Bender March 2004 Newcastle Police Crn Church Street Newcastle NSW

Dear Commander Bender

RE :Copy of letter to JIT

Further to my correspondence to you of last February, please find enclosed a copy of correspondence to JIT.

Yours truly,

Pierre Royan

CC. Commissioner Moroney Minister John Watkins

Anne Morrison March 2004 JIT Docs Cardiff Road Cardiff NSW 2304

Dear Ann Morrison,

Re: Child sex abuse

I would refer to our conversation of last year in which you implied that my allegations of abuse were untrue because my son's mother had taken my son to see a number of professionals.

Please note that every allegation in my section 66 Notice of Abuse (copy of parts 10+11 attached) is true.

As they are true, abuse must be occurring.

In respect to those "professionals" who I know that my son has seen, please note the following: -

1.) Docs. Every officer of Docs that I spoke to who was involved in dealing with my allegations belongs to a special (corrupt) club called "I never said that". That is to say, every one of those officers has denied their words to me.

In addition, the subpoenaed files of Docs that I was able to see contained ludicrous inaccuracies, misinterpretations and examples of incompetence. And that is just the information I was allowed to see. I am aware that much was withheld, including the mother's counter allegations.

2.) Private psychiatrist of the mother's choice

This incapable professional did not want to even hear what I had to say despite the fact that she was supposedly treating my son. When I finally persuaded her to talk to me, what she said turned out to be very different to what turned up in her records (when they were subpoenaed to the Court).

Why did she feel the need to lie and/ or alter her records?

3.) Wallsend Child Unit psychologist

What this so called professional had to say to me on the phone was very different to what was in her records when they were subpoenaed to the Family Court.

Why did she also feel the need to lie and/or subsequently alter her records?

4.) A School Counsellor (at my request)

This individual admitted to me that she had no experience of dealing with sexually abused children. She also openly admitted to me that she thought I was making up my allegations of abuse in order to gain custody of my son.

I have to point out that I made my very detailed allegations when my son was already ten years of age and an articulate child. If he did not behave and express himself in the ways I claimed then I would not only alienate him from me but would make him terrified of me.

To suggest that I might think the Family Court would grant me custody of my son purely on my word and allow me to drag him back to England, kicking and screaming that he never said or did those things, is absurd.

5.) Dr.Brent Waters

The above psychiatrist was imposed on me by the Family Court in respect to my request for a Family Court investigation into my allegations of abuse.

The Court ignored my request for a chance to investigate his suitability. Such a denial by the Court being contrary to the rules (at that time but now changed), which said I should have a say in who was appointed.

Dr.Waters produced a report that covered up my abuse allegations by deliberate lies. He frequently put the opposite to the truth.

He failed to ask me one single question about the matters in my section 66 Notice.

Subsequently I found out that Dr.Waters has appeared in one of your most prestigious newspapers as having a long history of covering up abuse.

That article appeared in The Australian on June 3rd 2000.

Unfortunately I was not aware of that article at the time. If I had known of the article I would not have withdrawn from Family Court proceedings that I regarded as totally corrupt.

My word and that of The Australian are not the only evidence against Dr.Waters being corrupt.

I have discovered other cases involving abuse in which he has been accused of being corrupt.

This includes one case where he flew all the way to Perth (a radio transcript pertaining to the same incident is available) to act as a private consultant in Family Court proceedings where the father was accused of sex abuse by the mother and her eldest daughter in Family Court proceedings.

Dr.Waters recommended to the Family Court that the Father should get custody of the two youngest daughters (but not the eldest). The Court agreed. In the process of agreeing, the Court overruled its own appointed investigator who made the more professional judgement that he could not determine whether the sex abuse allegations were true or not.

Few people who meet me face to face believe that I am so evil as to make up my allegations.

Therefore, if my detailed allegations are untrue I must be insane.

That is why Dr.Waters was imposed on me in respect to my request for a Family Court investigation.

The Court knew he could be relied upon to label me mad.

He has a long history of calling those who claim child sex abuse is occurring as being mad.

Indeed, in a speech he made in 1997(www.aic.govau/conferences/paedophilia) he openly declared his bias against the existence of abuse and that he always looked for the alternatives of "delusion" "obsession" and "schizophrenia".

No surprise therefore that he resorted to lying and using all three terms in order to label me "delusional" "obsessed" and possibly "schizophrenic".

Are you sure my son is not being abused?

Yours sincerely,

Pierre Royan

Enc. Copy of Section 66 Notice of Abuse (parts 10 +11) Copy of Newspaper article on Dr.Brent Waters June 2000 Copy of statement of bestiality

CC. Commander Bender, Newcastle Police Commissioner Moroney, NSW Police John Watkins, Minister for Police