Why I believe that my son's sexual abuse involves bestiality

I note that I have been mocked and laughed at by DOCS and others for suggesting bestiality is part of my son's abuse. I subsequently therefore played down such allegations in the hope that if I could only obtain a proper inquiry the full truth would emerge.

I do believe that it is more than likely that my son's abuse does include bestiality for the following reasons: -

1. My son directly told me that he had committed oral sex with his pet dog

2. He did not make such a claim with a cheeky schoolboy grin but while lying in my arms and dozing off to the sleep (and just after I had spent considerable time restraining him from grabbing my groin, rubbing himself up against me, and telling him off for asking to commit oral sex on me).

3. Such an above claim and behaviour by my son is completely out of character for my son who is a quiet, shy, gentle boy.

4. The dog he claimed to have committed such an act upon is sexually out of control despite being well past the puppy stage.

5. The mother when I knew her in London had in her possession pornography involving bestiality.

6. Paedophiles involving children in bestiality is hardly unknown. That my son's mother and her family are paedophiles cannot be in doubt in respect to the matters in my section 66 Notice (copy attached).