Constable Kaluska 3 May 2003 Newcastle Police Station Newcastle NSW

Dear Constable Kaluska,

Re: Horrific child sex abuse

I have been informed that my abuse allegations have been referred to the JIT team of Docs and the Police.

Previously I was advised that the JIT declined to investigate.

However, there is evidence to suggest that DOCS gave them edited versions of my allegations.

Most certainly the reports of DOCS (which I have seen when subpoenaed to the Family Court) contain many inaccuracies and misrepresentations.

As such, I hereby present evidence that my son's mother claim to always have been opposed to my having contact with my son was a bogus shame by someone who has much to hide.

Attached are samples of letters from the mother to me.

These letters make it quite clear that the mother was not originally against me for the reasons she gave to DOCS.

The letters make it quite clear that she wanted to marry me and for me to be part of my son's life.

However, I have been informed both by solicitors that I employed, and by social contacts I have made with people within DOCS, that the officers responsible for investigating my allegations greedily believed the mother's claim as a result of their prejudiced hostility towards me.

The attached letters prove the mother's character as cunningly hypocritical and two faced.

Please note that unlike the "edited" and unsigned typed documents that have been used against me; these letters of the mother are hand written and signed.

I recognise that those who cannot see further than their noses will probably leap to suggest that if the mother was not opposed to me for her stated reasons but wanted me to have contact then how could she been involved in the sexual abuse?

Of course, only the mother can explain her thinking.

I can speculate that her desperately stated wish to marry me was to avoid returning to her abusive family in Australia.

However, my refusal to marry her meant she had nowhere else to go.

Once back with her family she was (according to her mother) depressed and took no initial interest in my newborn son.

An alternative view might be that paedophiles believe that everybody is as corrupt, or corruptible, as themselves.

The situation remains that not only did my son display the most extreme of sexual behaviour but also that he had the audacity to argue with me that child sex was acceptable.

Other children in the family displayed extreme sexual behaviour and the adults around them also expressed and behaved themselves in way that can only mean sex abuse is occurring.

The only way that it can be possible that all the children are not being abused is that the (divided) maternal family united in an attempt to deliberately make me think that abuse was occurring.

I find such a scenario highly unlikely but am prepared to listen to reason.

I did write to many parties (including DOCS) to state that I was ready to accept that my son was not being abused but wanted an explanation for the matters in my Section 66 Notice.

I suggested to DOCS that some of the behaviour from the children that occurred subsequent to my original complaint to them was on instruction from their abusers (especially that of my son's cousins).

However, it was, and remains, my view that any such instructed behaviour was to make me sound wide-eyed and hysterical when I reported that additional behaviour to the authorities.

I do not regard myself as an expert on child abuse. However, because from my first contact with my son I suspected abuse, I was initially wise enough to keep my eyes open and my mouth firmly shut on the increasing evidence.

I thus was able to gain a foothold in my son's and life and thereby learnt how well children will hide their abuse. I am also learnt how superbly two faced and crafty paedophiles are.

My son never once displayed his sexual behaviour in public and even (convincingly) denied directly to me that he had behaved towards me in the ways I have claimed.

It was only when, not only did confirmation of my suspicions of abuse emerge, but its full horrific extent; that I was panicked into reporting the abuse to DOCS. (My son's maternal family had previously made it quite clear that they despised the abilities of DOCS.)

With hindsight it is clear that I should have taken a long-term view on trying to stop the abuse.

However, I wanted the abuse stopped immediately.

Yours sincerely,

Pierre Royan

Attached: Letters from my son's mother to me Statement regarding my allegations of bestiality Section 66 Notice