|
Biblical
references can be viewed by pausing on the "false links" and
waiting for a
pop-up window. Reset window by moving away and back as needed. NOTE: Multiple verse links are still "honest" links as well. You can click on them to be taken to the verses written out. THE NEW COVENANT
The last of the four
great determinative covenants into which God entered with
Israel is the new covenant. I. THE IMPORTANCE OF THE NEW COVENANT The new covenant guarantees
Israel a converted heart as the foundation of all her
blessings. According to the Old Testament principle that
such a conversion can not be effected permanently without
the shedding of blood, this covenant necessitates a sacrifice,
acceptable to God, as the foundation on which it is instituted.
Inasmuch as the offering up of the Son of God is the center
of the age-long plan of redemption, and since this covenant
entails that offering, great importance is to be attached to
it. The whole covenant takes on importance, in addition, for amillennialism
attempts to show that the church is fulfilling Israel's covenants
because the church today is redeemed by blood. If the church fulfills
this covenant, she may also fulfill the other covenants made with
Israel and there is no need for an earthly millennium. Because of these
considerations the covenant must be examined.
II. THE PROVISIONS OF THE NEW COVENANT The new covenant promised to Israel was stated in Jeremiah 31:31-34, where we read: Behold, the days come, saith the Lord, that I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel, and with the house of Judah: Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day that I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt; which my covenant they brake, although I was an husband unto them, saith the Lord: But this shall be the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel; after those days, saith the Lord, I will put my law in their inward parts, and write it in their hearts; and will be their God, and they shall be my people. And they shall teach no more every man his neighbour, and every man his brother, saying, Know the Lord: for they shall all know me, from the least of them unto the greatest of them, saith the Lord: for I will forgive their iniquity, and I will remember their sin no more.Ryrie well summarizes the provisions of this covenant when he says: The following provisions for Israel, the people of the new covenant, to be fulfilled in the millennium, the period of the new covenant, are found in the Old Testament.Confirmation of this covenant is given in the statement in Isaiah 61:8-9, where it is called everlasting, and again in Ezekiel 37:21-28. There the following points are to be observed: (1) Israel to be regathered: (2) Israel to be one nation, ruled by one king; (3) Israel no longer to be idolatrous, to be cleansed, forgiven; (4) Israel to dwell "forever" in the land after regathering; (5) the covenant of peace with them to be everlasting; (6) God's tabernacle to be with them, i.e., He will be present with them in a visible way; (7) Israel to be known among Gentiles as a nation blessed of God. All of these promises are implicit in the basic passage of Jeremiah, but they confirm, enrich, and enlarge the covenant.2This covenant, then, has to do with the regeneration, forgiveness, and justification of Israel, the outpouring of the Holy Spirit with His subsequent ministries, Israel's regathering and restoration to the place of blessing, all founded on the blood of Jesus Christ. III. THE CHARACTER OF THE NEW COVENANT Once again the principle is observed that, like all Israel's covenants, this covenant is a literal and unconditional covenant. (1) It is called eternal
in Isaiah
24:5;
61:8; Jeremiah
31:36,
40;
32:40;
50:5. (2) This covenant is a gracious covenant that
depends entirely upon the "I will" of God for its fulfillment, Jeremiah
31:33. It does not depend upon man. (3) This covenant amplifies
the third great area of the original Abrahamic covenant, the area
of "blessing." Inasmuch as this is only an amplification of
the original Abrahamic covenant, which has been shown to be unconditional
and literal, this covenant must be also. (4) This covenant is
largely occupied with the question of salvation from sin and the
impartation of a new heart. Salvation is solely the work of God.
Thus the covenant that guarantees salvation to the nation Israel
must be apart from all human agency and therefore unconditional.
IV. THE FULFILLMENT OF THE NEW COVENANT Amillenarians use the New Testament references to the new covenant to prove that the church is fulfilling the Old Testament promises to Israel. Thus there would be no need for a future earthly millennium inasmuch as the church is the kingdom. Allis is representative when he discusses Hebrews 8:8-12; and says: The passage speaks of the new covenant. It declares that this new covenant has been already introduced and that by virtue of the fact that it is called "new" it has made the one which it is replacing "old," and that the old is about to vanish away. It would be hard to find a clearer reference to the gospel age in the Old Testament than in these verses in Jeremiah. . . .3In reply to such allegations, it is necessary to observe certain essential facts about the new covenant. A. The nation with whom the covenant is made. It should be clear from a survey of the passages already cited that this covenant was made with Israel, the physical seed of Abraham according to the flesh, and with them alone. This is made clear for three reasons: First, it is seen by the fact of the words of establishment of the covenant . . . Jeremiah 31:31. . . . Other passages which support this fact are: Isaiah 59:20-21; 61:8-9; Jeremiah 32:37-40; 50:4-5; Ezekiel 16:60-63; 34:25-26; 37:21-28. Secondly, that the Old Testament teaches that the new covenant is for Israel is also seen by the fact of its very name. . . contrasted with the Mosaic covenant . . . the new covenant is made with the same people as the Mosaic . . . the Scripture clearly teaches that the Mosaic covenant of the law was made with the nation Israel only. Romans 2:14 . . . Romans 6:14 and Galatians 3:24-25 . . . 2 Corinthians 3:7-11 . . . Leviticus 26:46 . . . Deuteronomy 4:8.There can be no question as to whom pertains the law. It is for Israel alone, and since this old covenant was made with Israel, the new covenant is made with the same people, no other group or nation being in view. Thirdly, that the Old Testament teaches that the new covenant is for Israel is also seen by the fact that in its establishment the perpetuity of the nation Israel and her restoration to the land is vitally linked with it (Jer. 31:35-40). . . . Thus we conclude that
for these three incontrovertible reasons, the very words
of the text, the name itself, and the linking with the perpetuity
of the nation, the new covenant according to the teaching of
the Old Testament is for the people of Israel.4 B. The time of the fulfillment of the New Covenant. It has been agreed that the time of the new covenant was future. It was always viewed as future when reference is made to it in the Old Testament prophecies. Hosea (2:18-20), Isaiah (55:3), Ezekiel (16:60, 62; 20:37; 34:25-26) all spoke of it as future. It must be viewed as yet future, for this covenant can not be realized by Israel until God has effected her salvation and restoration to the land. Ryrie says:
This covenant must follow the return of Christ at the second advent. The blessings anticipated in the covenant will not be realized until Israel's salvation, and this salvation follows the return of the Deliverer.
The covenant referred to here must of necessity be the new covenant, for that is the only covenant expressly dealing with the removal of sins. And it is said to be actual after the coming of the Deliverer. This covenant will be
realized in the millennial age. Passages such as Jeremiah
31:34; Ezekiel
34:25; and Isaiah
11:6-9, which give descriptions of the blessings to be experienced
in the time of the fulfillment of the new covenant, show that the new
covenant will be realized by Israel in the millennial age.6 The conclusion, therefore,
would be that this covenant, which was future in the
time of the prophets, and was future in the New Testament,
can only be realized following the second advent of Christ in
the millennial age. C. The relation of
the church to the new covenant. There are five clear references to the
new covenant in the New Testament: Luke
22:20; 1 Corinthians
11:25; 2 Corinthians
3:6; Hebrews
8:8;
9:15. In addition to these there are six other references to it:
Matthew
26:28; Mark
14:24; Romans
11:27; Hebrews
8:10-13, and
12:24. The question arises as to the relationship of the believers
of this present age to the new covenant of Jeremiah 31:31-34. This question
is important, for, as has been seen previously, the contention of the
amillennialist is that the church is now fulfilling these Old Testament
prophecies and therefore there need be no earthly millennium.
1. There are three premillennial
views as to the relation of the church to the new covenant made with Israel.
a. The first view is that of Darby. He presented the view that there was one and only one new covenant in Scripture, made with the houses of Israel and Judah and to be realized at a future time, to which the church bears no relationship whatsoever. He writes: This covenant of the letter is made with Israel, not with us; but we get the benefit of it. . . . Israel not accepting the blessing, God brought out the church, and the Mediator of the covenant went on high. We are associated with the Mediator. It will be made good to Israel by-and-by.7 And again:
Further:
And finally:
It would thus seem to
be Darby's view that, in all its New Testament references, the new covenant
is to be equated with the covenant of Jeremiah 31. In
the New Testament it has no reference whatever to the church
in this age, although the blessing of that covenant comes
to others beside Israel now, since the blood was "shed for many."
It will, however, be fulfilled literally in the millennium.
There are certain propositions
in the view presented by Darby with which there is full
agreement. (1) The new covenant of Jeremiah 31 necessitated
the work of a Mediator and the death of Christ is that which
makes a new covenant possible. (2) The new covenant
was originally made with the houses of Israel and Judah and
will be fulfilled in them literally in the millennium. The covenant
can only be fulfilled literally by those with whom it was made
and, since the church is not Israel, the church can not fulfill
that covenant. (3) All the blessings which come to the church today
are based upon the blood of Christ, which was necessarily shed
to make possible the new covenant.
b. The second view is that of Scofield. This view, more generally held than Darby's view, says: "The New Covenant . . . secures the perpetuity, future conversion, and blessing of Israel . . ."11 and it ". . . secures the eternal blessedness . . . of all who believe."12 Thus, according to this view, there is one new covenant with a two-fold application; one to Israel in the future and one to the church now. Lincoln says:
Grant says:
This view places the
church under the new covenant, and views the relationship
as a partial fulfillment of the covenant. There can be agreement
with Scofield that the blood of Christ is the basis for
the new covenant with Israel and any covenant relation which
the church may sustain to Christ, for it was not necessary for
Christ to die once for Israel and then again for the church.
The church, however, can not be placed under Israel's covenant.
Scofield agrees with Darby fully that the covenant was primarily
for Israel and will be fulfilled by them. Any application of it
to the church, as the Scofield position holds, does not nullify the
primary application to Israel. c. The third
view is the two-covenant view.15 This view holds that there are
two new covenants presented in the New Testament; the first with
Israel in reaffirmation of the covenant promised in Jeremiah 31
and the second made with the church in this age. This view, essentially,
would divide the references to the new covenant in the New Testament
into two groups. The references in the gospels and in Hebrews
8:6;
9:15;
10:29; and
13:20 would refer to the new covenant with the church, Hebrews
8:7-13 and
10:16 would refer to the new covenant with Israel, and Hebrews
12:24 would refer, perhaps, to both, emphasizing the fact
of the mediation accomplished and the covenant program established
without designating the recipients. This view would accept the Darbyist
concept that Israel's new covenant is to be fulfilled by Israel
alone. In addition it would see the church as brought into relation
to God by a new covenant that was established with them.
It is not in the scope
of this treatment to attempt to settle the difference
of opinion among premillennialists on this question of the
relation of the church to the new covenant. It is sufficient here
to establish but one point. Regardless of the relationship
of the church to the new covenant as explained in these three views,
there is one general point of agreement: the new covenant of Jeremiah
31:31-34 must and can be fulfilled only by the nation Israel and not
by the church. Since this was a literal covenant made with the physical
seed of Abraham, any relationship of the church to the blood required
by that covenant can not change the essential promises of God in the covenant
itself. Apart from any relationship of the church to this blood, the
covenant stands as yet unfulfilled and awaits a future literal fulfillment.
2. The question may arise as to why reference is made to Jeremiah 31 in Hebrews 8 if the church is not fulfilling that covenant. In spite of the contention of Allis that Hebrews 8 "declares that this new covenant has been already introduced,"16 no such statement or intimation is made in the passage. On the contrary, the quotation from Jeremiah is used to show that the old covenant itself was recognized as ineffectual and temporary and was ultimately to be superseded by an effectual covenant, so that the Hebrews should not be surprised that a new and better covenant should be preached, nor should they place further trust in that which had been done away. Walvoord says:
Thus, in Hebrews 8 the
promise of Jeremiah is quoted only to prove that the old covenant, that is
the Mosaic, was temporary from its inception, and Israel never could trust
in that which was temporary, but had to look forward
to that which was eternal. Here, as in Hebrews
10:16, the passage from Jeremiah is quoted, not to state
that what is promised there is now operative or effectual, but rather
that the old covenant was temporary and ineffectual and anticipatory
of a new covenant that would be permanent and effectual in its
working. It is a misrepresentation of the thinking of the writer
to the Hebrews to affirm that he teaches that Israel's new covenant
is now operative with the church. 3. In its historical setting, the disciples who heard the Lord refer to the new covenant in the upper room the night before His death would certainly have understood Him to be referring to the new covenant of Jeremiah 31. Several things are to be observed concerning the record of this reference on that occasion. In Matthew 26:28 and Mark 14:24 the statement is recorded: "This is my blood of the new covenant. . ." [italics mine]. In this statement emphasis would be placed upon the soteriological aspects of that covenant. The blood that was being offered was that required by the promised new covenant and was for the purpose of giving remission of sins. In Luke 22:20 and 1 Corinthians 11:25 the statement is recorded: "This is the new covenant in my blood . . ." [italics mine]. This statement would emphasize the eschatological aspects of the new covenant, stating that the new covenant is instituted with His death. This would be according to the principle of Hebrews 9:16-17:
Since the disciples would certainly have understood any reference to the new covenant on that occasion as reference to Israel's anticipated covenant of Jeremiah, it seems that the Lord must have been stating that that very covenant was being instituted with His death, and they were ministers of the blood (the soteriological aspects) of that covenant (2 Cor. 3:6), but these to whom it was primarily and originally made will not receive its fulfillment nor its blessings until it is confirmed and made actual to them at the second advent of Christ, when "all Israel shall be saved . . . for this is my covenant unto them, when I shall take away their sins" (Rom. 11:26-27). There certainly is a difference between the institution of the covenant and the realization of the benefits of it. Christ, by His death, laid the foundation for Israel's covenant, but its benefits will not be received by Israel until the second advent (Rom. 11:26-27). 4. There are several
considerations which support the view that the church
is not now fulfilling Israel's new covenant, (1) The term
Israel is nowhere used in the Scriptures for
any but the physical descendents of Abraham. Since the church
today is composed of both Jews and Gentiles without national
distinctions, it would be impossible for that church to fulfill
these promises made to the nation. (2) Within the new covenant, as
its provisions have previously been outlined, there were promises
of spiritual blessings and promises of earthly blessing. While the
church, like Israel, is promised salvation, the forgiveness of
sin, the ministry of the Holy Spirit, yet the church is never promised
inheritance in a land, material blessings on the earth, and rest from
oppression, which were parts of the promise to Israel. The new covenant
not only promised Israel salvation, but a new life on the millennial
earth as all her covenants are realized. The church certainly is
not fulfilling the material portions of this covenant. (3) Since
the church receives blessings of the Abrahamic covenant (Gal.
3:14;
4:22-31) by faith without being under or fulfilling that covenant,
so the church may receive blessings from the new covenant without
being under or fulfilling that new covenant. (4) The time element
contained within the covenant itself, both in its original statement
and in its restatement in Hebrews, precludes the church from being the
agent in which it is fulfilled. The covenant can not be fulfilled and
realized by Israel until after the period of Israel's tribulation and
her deliverance by the advent of Messiah. While the church has had
periods of persecution and tribulation it never has passed through
the great tribulation of prophecy. Certainly the church is not now in
the millennial age. Romans 11:26-27 clearly indicates that this covenant
can only be realized after the second advent of the Messiah. Since
the tribulation, second advent, and millennial age are yet future, the
fulfillment of this promise must be yet future, and therefore the church
can not now be fulfilling this covenant. V. THE ESCHATOLOGICAL IMPLICATIONS OF THE NEW COVENANT A reference to the provisions
of this covenant, stated earlier, which have never been fulfilled to the
nation Israel, but which must yet be fulfilled, will show how extensive
an eschatological program awaits fulfillment. Israel, according to this covenant,
must be restored to the land of Palestine, which they will possess as their
own. This also entails the preservation of the nation. Israel must experience
a national conversion, be regenerated, receive the forgiveness of sins and
the implantation of a new heart. This takes place following the return of
Messiah to the earth. Israel must experience the outpouring of the Holy
Spirit so that He may produce righteousness in the individual and teach
the individual so that there will be the fulness of knowledge. Israel must
receive material blessings from the hand of the King into whose kingdom
they have come. Palestine must be reclaimed, rebuilt, and made the glorious
center of a new glorious earth in which dwelleth righteousness and peace.
The Messiah who came and shed His blood as the foundation of this covenant
must personally come back to the earth to effect the salvation, restoration,
and blessing of the national Israel. All of these important areas of eschatological
study are made necessary by this covenant. CONCLUSION Four of the five covenants
with the nation Israel have been surveyed to show that
they are unconditional and eternal covenants, made with
a covenant people, and to be fulfilled because of the faithfulness
of the One making the covenants with those to whom they are
given. These covenants not only had a relation to the nation
at the time of their inception and gave a basis on which God dealt
with Israel, but they bind God to a course of action in relation
to future events, which determine the course of Eschatology. When
the covenants are studied analytically we find seven great features which
are determinative: (1) a nation forever, (2) a land forever, (3)
a King forever, (4) a throne forever, (5) a kingdom forever, (6)
a new covenant, and (7) abiding blessings.18
These seven features will be developed later in the course of
these studies.
Footnotes:
1 Charles C. Ryrie, The Basis of the Premillennial Faith, pp. 112-14.BACK 2 John P. Walvoord, ''Millennial Series,'' Bibliotheca Sacra, 110:197, July,1953.BACK 3 Oswald T. Allis, Prophecy and the Church, p. 154.BACK 4 Ryrie, op. cit., pp. 108-10.BACK 7 William Kelly, editor, The Collected Writings of J. N. .Darby, XXVII, 565-66.BACK 8 J. N. Darby, Synopsis of the Books of the Bible, V, 286.BACK 9 Kelly, op. cit., III, 79.BACK 11 C. I. Scofield, editor, The Scofield Reference Bible, p. 1297.BACK 13 C. Fred Lincoln, ''The Covenants," pp. 202-3.BACK 14 F. W. Grant, The Numerical Bible, VII, 48.BACK 15 Lewis Sperry Chafer, Systematic Theology, IV, 325; Walvoord, op. cit., 110: 193-205; Ryrie, op. cit., pp. 105-25.BACK 16 Allis, op. cit., p. 154.BACK 17 Walvoord, op. cit., 110:201.BACK 18 Chafer, op. cit., IV,
315.BACK
Chapter 9: The Course of the Present Age Scriptural References:
*Eze 16:60-62 Nevertheless I will
remember my covenant with thee in the days of thy youth, and I will establish
unto thee an everlasting covenant. Then thou shalt remember thy ways, and
be ashamed, when thou shalt receive thy sisters, thine elder and thy younger:
and I will give them unto thee for daughters, but not by thy covenant. And
I will establish my covenant with thee; and thou shalt know that I am the
LORD: RETURN
Chapter 9: The Course of the Present Age
|