|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Etymology Tells the Story
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Zeus, aka "Zeus
Pateras," who we now automatically believe to be a myth and not a historical
figure, takes his name from the Indian version, "Dyaus Pitar."
Dyaus Pitar in turn is related to the Egyptian "Ptah," and from
both Pitar and Ptah comes the word "pater," or "father."
"Zeus" equals "Dyaus," which became "Deos,"
"Deus" and "Dios" - "God." "Zeus Pateras,"
like Dyaus Pitar, means, "God the Father," a very ancient concept
that in no way originated with "Jesus" and Christianity. There
is no question of Zeus being a historical character. Dyaus Pitar becomes
"Jupiter" in Roman mythology, and likewise is not representative
of an actual, historical character. In Egyptian mythology, Ptah, the Father,
is the unseen god-force, and the sun was viewed as Ptah's visible proxy
who brings everlasting life to the earth; hence, the "son of God"
is really the "sun of God." Indeed, according to Hotema, the very
name "Christ" comes from the Hindi word "Kris" (as in
Krishna), which is a name for the sun. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Furthermore, since
Horus was called "Iusa/Iao/Iesu" the "KRST," and Krishna/Christna
was called "Jezeus," centuries before any Jewish character similarly
named, it would be safe to assume that Jesus Christ is just a repeat of
Horus and Krishna, among the rest. According to Rev. Taylor, the title "Christ"
in its Hebraic form meaning "Anointed" ("Masiah") was
held by all kings of Israel, as well as being "so commonly assumed
by all sorts of impostors, conjurers, and pretenders to supernatural communications,
that the very claim to it is in the gospel itself considered as an indication
of imposture . . ." Hotema states that the name "Jesus Christ"
was not formally adopted in its present form until after the first Council
of Nicea, i.e., in 325 C.E. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In actuality, even
the place names and the appellations of many other characters in the New
Testament can be revealed to be Hebraicized renderings of the Egyptian texts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As an example, in
the fable of "Lazarus," the mummy raised from the dead by Jesus,
the Christian copyists did not change his name much, "El-Azar-us"
being the Egyptian mummy raised from the dead by Horus possibly 1,000 years
or more before the Jewish version. This story is allegory for the sun reviving
its old, dying self, or father, as in "El-Osiris." It is not a
true story. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Horus's principal
enemy - originally Horus's other face or "dark" aspect - was "Set"
or "Sata," whence comes "Satan." Horus struggles with
Set in the exact manner that Jesus battles with Satan, with 40 days in the
wilderness, among other similarities. This is because this myth represents
the triumph of light over dark, or the sun's return to relieve the terror
of the night. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"Jerusalem"
simply means "City of Peace," and the actual city in Israel was
named after the holy city of peace in the Egyptian sacred texts that already
existed at the time the city was founded. Likewise, "Bethany,"
site of the famous multiplying of the loaves, means "House of God,"
and is allegory for the "multiplication of the many out of the One."
Any town of that designation was named for the allegorical place in the
texts that existed before the town's foundation. The Egyptian predecessor
and counterpart is "Bethanu." |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|