Progressive Hebrew Faith
‘Is
all Mankind Really Descended from Noah?’
Today
we will be looking at the legend of Noah and the ark. This is a worthwhile study, as Noah, so the
Hebrew bible says, is the forefather of humanity today. If this were true, then the covenant of Noah
that the Hebrew bible speaks of would apply to all mankind today.
For
those of you who are new to the story of Noah, here is a brief snapshot of the
biblical portrait.
Mankind
had gone astray from the laws that God had committed to them. So bad had they become that God decided to
destroy all flesh via a flood. Only Noah
was found righteous before him. Because
he was found righteous, God instructed Noah to build an ark that would house
himself and his family. When the flood
came, the world was destroyed – all humanity with it – all except for Noah and
his family. All of this can be found in
Genesis chapters 6 to 10. Now, after the
flood, God entered into a covenant with Noah and all his descendants, which
would include humanity today – with, naturally, separate covenants for the
children of Abraham and
Well,
this is an interesting story, but the question remains what of it, if any, is
true.
For
most people in the world, the story of Noah is only a legend. They are, to a degree, familiar with it, but see
it nothing more than a Jewish/Christian fable.
But the world’s opinion is not necessarily the truth, is it.
I
used to believe that the story of Noah was literally true in every aspect, and
that I was in fact descended from this ancient patriarch myself. However, truth is an elusive thing, and just
because I believed at a certain stage in my spiritual development certain
things about the bible, they were not necessarily the truth. I found out things about the bible, certain
problems with it, that made me question biblical faith
seriously. The end result of this type
of thinking was that I ultimately concluded that the Bible was NOT the word of
God as fundamentalists claim, but rather a historical record – a fallible
historical record – of God’s dealing with mankind.
So
I gradually revised my thinking about the Noahide concept.
Now,
what are the facts, if any, about the story of Noah? Do we have any evidence to support the
conclusion that there was a man called Noah, and that a worldwide flood occurred. In fact, we do. Creation science, although fundamentalist in
nature in general, does provide sound evidence that a worldwide flood occurred. Such things as the fossil record, fossils
being found near the top of
The
theory does explain such things as the fossil record, how coal and oil
reservoirs could be formed quickly, and the various geological phenomenon that point to a worldwide flood.
And
the hydroplates theory is in accordance with how the
bible describes ‘the foundations of the deep bursting open’.
Of
course, this is just a brief snapshot into the creation science evidence for a
flood. If you want to know more, try
contacting the ‘answers in genesis’ website, or type in ‘creation science
flood’ into a search engine. You will be
presented with a whole host of evidence which supports the notion that a worldwide
flood did indeed occur.
So
the biblical story of a worldwide flood is accurate. This does lend weight to the biblical claim
that the bible comes from God, but it is only one piece of evidence. It is not the whole story, as we shall see.
Noah himself. Did he exist? We have no historical records, apart from the
bible, that prove that a man called Noah lived and built the ark. There are of course the ancient legends found
in many cultures that speak of a worldwide flood, and even some tales of a man
and his family surviving this flood. The
Babylonian epic is one such piece of evidence.
So
the Noah theory is possible. But the
bottom line is this. The only evidence
we really have is the bible itself. As
many of us know, the bible is not an infallible document, so we cannot have
absolute proof that the Story of Noah is 100% true – or even partially
true. The plain fact comes down to
this. To believe that a man called Noah
exists requires ‘Faith’. We can not
prove he existed with historical records.
We can only reach our conclusions based upon these records. To claim that Noah existed is a fact, as some
creationists do, is unable to be proven absolutely. All they really have is the Bible, and the
manmade tradition that the bible is the infallible word of God. This is not scientific truth. It is theory and faith. That is all that it is.
However,
as a flood did indeed occur, and the bible speaks of this, let us consider the
notion that Noah did exist.
The
noahide concept explains how man survived the flood
and later populated the planet. This is
the chief idea of the Noah story.
Supposedly, Noah built the ark for himself, his family, and all those
animals, thus preserving seed upon the planet.
Are there any problems with this theory?
Yes, there are.
A
chief problem is the idea that all the kinds of animals could have fitted on
the ark. Science has shown that every
kind of species on earth today could not have fitted upon the ark. Doubt of this theory is why so many people do
not believe the Noah story literally.
The standard explanation that I have heard from creation scientists
regarding this is that only the ‘Genus’ of every animal was brought upon the
ark. Genus refers to a grouping of
animals above the ‘species’ level. The
theory is that each of these ‘genuses’ housed the
genetic information for all the various animal species, that subsequently
repopulated the earth unto today. Is this possible.
Technically
it is possible for one type of animal to beget a ‘brother’ of another species,
but this is not a common event. Let us
look at an example. The
dog. If the theory is true that
there was only a pair or seven dogs on the ark (depending on whether they are
clean or unclean animals – I am not sure in regards to a dog as the bible is
silent) then these dogs must have ultimately spawned the entire diversity of
dog species on the planet today. Is this
plausible? Not really. Whilst technically possible to beget a dog of
a different species if that species is in the genes of the parent, the ongoing
procreation of the new species is doubtful.
Such rarities of a different species would likely be swallowed up in
succeeding generations by the main group.
The ‘kind’ of dogs brought upon the ark would likely remain the dogs that
would breed through subsequent generations.
Oddities, such as a different species coming along, would, as we have
said, likely be swallowed up in subsequent generations. Thus we can see that the survival of all the
different species of dogs is highly doubtful.
And
of course the fundamental problem of the ‘Kind’ of dogs being brought upon the
ark containing ‘ALL’ the genetic information of every dog species created by
God remains. As God created different
species of dogs at the beginning, and not genuses,
the dogs brought upon the ark would have had to contain all the genetic
information of every species created by God.
Given the fact that there is such an enormous array of species of dogs
on the planet today, for the dogs on the ark to have contained all the genetic
information of all the species created, there must have been a ‘ENORMOUS’
amount of interbreeding amongst dog species before the flood. This, of course, is highly improbable.
So we
can see that the notion that animals of every kind being brought upon the ark
appears to be an invention of the Hebrew chronicler of the Noah story.
Are
there any other problems associated with the story of Noah and his family alone
surviving the flood.
In fact, there are.
Like
the diversity of dog species, the ethnic diversity of mankind today suggests
strongly that we are not all descended from just one man and his family. For example, take 19th century
So
the idea that only Noah and his family survived the flood is probably not the
truth. Highly
improbable in fact.
Well,
if a flood did indeed occur, and we have such a diverse array of ethnic types
on the planet today, were did they come from. How did they survive the flood?
I
propose the following ‘realistic’ explanation to the story of mankinds diversity on the planet
today.
In
the beginning God did indeed create many types of ethnic peoples on the
planet. Not just one couple, Adam and
Eve, but a whole host of families, ranging in ethnic diversity. Even Genesis
When
the flood came, God indeed may have called a man named Noah and had an ark
built and survived the flood. But he was
not the only one who survived the flood.
The high probability is that when the various peoples of the earth saw
the rains coming and persisting, when it came to the land being drowned in
water, they boarded boats and rafts of various kinds. At this stage in man’s development it is
highly probably that they had indeed invented sea vessels of various kinds. They would have likely had food taken with
them, so that when the flood came to an end, they resettled the earth. And as for the various animals that survived
the flood, these could have been kept alive on the debris that would have
naturally been floating on the surface of the waters.
Thus,
to say that ‘Only Noah’ and his family survived the flood is highly improbable,
as it is
Nearly
certain that many families of peoples survived the flood in some way, and
eventually went on to repopulate the earth after the flood had ended.
Of
course, the biblical creationist will say ‘NO’ to this theory, but his only
evidence is that the bible says only Noah survived the flood and, as many of us
know, the bible is a fallible, manmade document.
When
the evidence suggests that many people survived the worldwide flood we should
listen to that evidence, instead of dogmatically stating the bible is absolute
truth when, of course, the belief in an infallible bible is only a matter of
‘Faith’. It is not proven, scientific
truth.
One
final point, a problem with the Noah only story is that it does not explain how
certain species of animals can be found in one place on the planet alone. For example, you only find Kangaroos in
To summarise what we have learned today, the story of Noah
alone surviving the flood is clearly only a legend – and, most probably, a
false legend at that. The likelihood is
that many peoples and animals survived the flood in various places throughout
the earth. After the
flood the repopulated the earth, leading to our present day scenario.
So,
should we believe the story of Noah? Probably not. It is
likely the invention of a Hebrew chronicler, someone who had received the
tradition of a worldwide flood, and invented the story of Noah and the