More Zhongery
©Prakash J. Mascarenhas. Friday, October 11th, 2002.
Dear Friends
Here is some more stuff on that impious clown Pope Pius XIV... In this page, he styles himself Roberto Borgia. Fat chance. Then again, a Robert Chung is named as the author. Possibly Chung is a variant of Zhong. The other author is identified as a Pema Cho Dorje - a Tibetan name. More evidence that this imp hails from mainland China... I tried Google searches on Pema Cho Dorje, drew a blank. I tried Robert Chung and got a big number, but no way to know which one is the perpetrator. Previously, too, I had tried Robert Zhong and had got the same result as I have got now for Robert Chung.
Where did I get this page? I ran a Google.com search for "Pope Pius XIV" and got some two pages created by them, on the site http://www.geocities.com/holycatholic_2000/holypapa.html. The links did not work. Then fiddling around, I found that the pages were Cached in Google's memory: the page below is recreated from the Cached pages. The pages have, in the meta tags, their authors. (In the browser window, click on View, on Source, or press the Alt & V keys together, then press the c key. It the head of the Notepad page that opens, you will see the meta tags.)
It seems that the man is schizophrenic: He uses a variety of names and versions of events - Robert Zhong, Robert Chung, Robert Borgia, etc. Who is this clown really? And is he 18 years old, as this page tells us, or is he older than "Vatican 2."
Prakash John Mascarenhas
Introduction to His Holiness
Pope Pius XIV
our 268th Pope in Succession
Lay name: Roberto Borgia
Born: February 15th, 1984
Positions held in the Church:
(1)priest in the diocese Walnut
(2) Become Bishop of Walnut for 2 years
(3)Become Cardinal of the Archdiocese of Walnut
(4) Elected Pontiff and established the New Catholic Order.
His Holiness Pope Pius XIV took on the name Pius XIV because of his predecessors Pius XII and Pius XIII. Pope Pius XII was the Pontiff during WWII, who proved to be a saintly man. Pope Pius XIII, is an Avignon pope who currently resides in the United States. (Pope Pius XIII, antipope in Washington State http://www.truecatholic.org) Since it would bring confusion if there were two Pius XIIIs, His Holiness decided to take on the name Pius XIV.
His Holiness was elected to the seat of St. Peter some day in October of 1999. He was not elected by a College of Cardinals, but was put on the seat of St. Peter by the Lord Himself. His Holiness's desire to guide the young Christians of today ultimately led him to ask the Lord for the keys of Heaven.
Our Holy Father, Pope Pius XIV still recognizes the Papacy in Rome. He sees the Holy See in Rome as the Mother Church to the Holy New Catholic Order. Therefore, His Holiness
Pope John Paul II is also the Pontiff of the New Catholic Order. But, unless HH Pope John Paul II intercedes, we are led by His Holiness Pope Pius XIV. The Church utilizes the 1983 Code of Canon Law, all the Church councils (up till Vatican II) but the Church does not recognize or adhere to certain liberal tenets set forth by the Second Vatican Council.
This is the speech our Holy Father gave on his coronation:
"Fellow Brethern, Cardinals, Bishops, priests, faithful... I am very happy today to be elected onto the seat of St. Peter. As Pope, I would like to bring all the young people back into the arms of the Holy Catholic Church, and with the help of the faithful and those who share the apostolic see, I am determined we will succeed..."
We thank the Lord for giving us a Pontiff that will lead the future Catholics into glory and from the temptations of the world. Deo Gratia! Habemus Papam!
Page created by Pema Cho Dorje & Robert Chung (Robert Zhong)
Further Comments
Nuttier Than A Walnut Cake!
I have already written out my objection to the Zhong Claim. I wish to make further points.
The Zhong party claims to have held a Concilium of some kind in Taiwan in which Zhong was elected pope.
I ask: Did the organisers of this assembly seek out and attempt to liase with Christians outside Taiwan? How did some Taiwanese Catholics, if this fable be granted, presume that they, alone, were the last Catholics remaining on the face of the earth, and set out to elect the pope? Or was it that they wanted only a pope for themselves, for Taiwan and/or China?
Would anyone in his senses accept any such similar attempt in any other country? The three elections that I know of, those of Bawden, of Victor von Pentz and of Pulvermacher, were international affairs, organised and involving, or atleast, by desire and effort, open to, citizens of different countries. That is because they understood that the pope is not just the pope for Taiwan or the US or for England or for Germany or for Europe, but for all the world...
Prakash J. Mascarenhas