Collected Replies
Of Aniceto do Rosario & His Cause
©Lúcio Mascarenhas.
Copyright Terms & Conditions | Home | Michaelinum.
Dear Paulo,
Thank you for your letter. I understand your viewpoint — which is held by many others, but I must disagree with it. Again, I do not appreciate the patronising statement, "I sympathise with your theories but you really ought to organise your thoughts a little bit better."
I am not discussing "theories" but evidentiary facts, as in a judicial forum. Again, it is you whose thinking needs re-organisation, not me!
Nevertheless, given that the theses I postulate may not be able to be understood properly by the simple-minded, I take take this opportunity to "organise my thoughts a little bit better."
It is my understanding that Dr. Mario Soares is of Goan parentage, although it may be that he is a "mestico".
Again, it is my understanding that he was a card-carrying member of the Portuguese Communist Party, but that he chucked it up opportunistically in order to take office under the "Carnation Revolution" dispensation, prefering to go as a "Socialist".
Dr. Mario Soares also perpetrated the fraud of the 1974 "treaty" signed by the Revolutionary regime — which, because it was not either a legal government, nor reperesentative of the Goans, never had any legal authority — and the Indian Union, wherein, without the consent or consultations with the citizens of the
Estado da India Portuguesa, and without their approval, it was "recognised" as having become part of the Indian Union with retrospective effect from the dates of their respective occupations — 1954 & 1961. For all his faults, I comparatively prefer Dr. Salazar — as a principled man, and as one whose moral values puts him far above such contemptible and despicable traitors and misanthropes as Dr. Soares and the Portuguese "revolutionists" (sic!) of 1974.
Of these, it is claimed that they are "Democratists" and the like; yet they had no moral compunction ceding Goa, without even a pretence of consulting its citizens, to India, as if Goa (and the Goan people) were their private properties or chattels. In the light of this incontrovertible fact, despite all the hatred thrown Dr. Salazar's way, and all the badwording that is directed against him, and despite all the brainless adulation that is given to Spinola, Dr. Soares, and their fellow-traitors, the self-styled "Carnation Revolutionaries", it remains evident that Salazar was morally a giant compared to such vermin as Spinola and Soares! There is nothing that you can or will say that will change the truth of this incontrovertible fact!
The 1974 "Treaty" is a fraud against not only Goa, but also against Portugal and even against all mankind. Indeed, because it justifies and legitimises criminality and crimes against humanity—the Invasion and Occupation of Goa / Portuguese India—it is, in itself, a crime against humanity. As a criminal act, it compares to the Molotov-Ribbentrop Treaty between the Nazis and the Communists to jointly perpetrate Genocide against Poland and the Poles.
There is only a nominal difference between Socialist and Communist — more of degree than of kind.
But if we are being technical, why should we describe Dr. Salazar as "Fascist"?
Was he a card-carrying member of the Italian Fascist Party or of any of its affiliated or connected bodies? There was, as I understand it, a Portuguese Phalangist Party, Phalangism being similar to Fascism, but Dr. Salazar, to the best of my knowledge, was not a member. Correct me if I am wrong.
From my viewpoint, the only real fault of Italian Fascism is that it choose to ally with Hitler, rather than stay neutral, like Franco, or ally with the Allies.
The word "fascist" with all its connotations of vileness is purely the lying propaganda of the Communists, who seek to confuse Fascism with Hitlerism. But the two are not the same. Hitlerism is truly vile; Fascism is merely stupid. Stupid as it is, it is far less vile than the White Anglo-Saxon Protestant's White Racism, built upon the Racism of John Calvin, or than Communism and Socialism. Communism, in the Ukraine alone, murdered more than 10 million, and that before Hitler rose to power in Germany.
My understanding is that Dr. Salazar was an Authoritarian, that he had, for a time, leanings towards Hitler, that he fostered and cultivated a Personality Cult, which hijacked and reduced the Christian Counter-Revolution to the Cult of Salazar; that he was dictatorial; that he made himself indispensable to his dispensation, so that it could but collapse when he collapsed. All this is true, and is a great denunciation of him, without either exaggerating or mis-representing him as what he is not: a "fascist".
[
It is amply clear to any honest mind that a man who certifies Salazar as "fascist" is actually certifying himself to be either a Communist/Socialist hypocrite or an idiot. You may take your pick!]
As for Portuguese "re-unification", it is not more fantastic or difficult than procuring Goan independence; so what should be the ideological and moral basis of prefering "Goan Secessionism" over "Portuguese loyalism"? [See my article
"The Doctrines of Nationalism, Anti-Colonialism and Irredentism"]
From my viewpoint, I believe that Goa had entered voluntarily, in 1510 itself, a non-formal "Free Association" with Iberian Portugal, and since it did not have any urgent cause for seceding, I therefore reject any "Goan Secessionism" from Portugal as immoral.
[An urgent cause for secession would be when a people, regardless of whether they are ethnically distinct from the rulers, are so persecuted for no fault of their own, that their very existence as a people is threatened, and so that the only means of securing their existence is by seceding and constituting themselves a distinct, independent state. This was true of the Germans of Schwyz who rebelled against the Habsburgs to form Switzerland; the same is true of the Tamils of Ceylon, and of the East Bengalis from the Official policy of Bengali Genocide and from the raping hordes of "West Pakistan", etc. This is not true of the Calvinist Dutch, but, again, it is true of the Belgians seceding from the Calvinist Dutch...]
But if the
Estado da India Portuguesa was merely a "colony" and not an integral part of Portugal, and if "Goan secessionism" is moral, then Aniceto do Rosario was not either Portuguese nor a hero; he was merely a fool who choose patently the wrong side of history — if "anti-Colonialism" is true, then it is actually a "bad" cause!
In that case, it makes sense to rename the place in Lisboã bearing his name, after some such as Francisco Mascarenhas, Lamberto Mascarenhas, Prof. Lucio Rodriques and his wife Laura, who patently choose the "right" side...
Why did a young man of 37, with a wife and children to care for, choose what is "evidently folly", to throw away his life for a "lost" cause, even when his opponents choose to give him a chance to defect to the "right" cause?
Aniceto do Rosario did not choose to lay down his life in what was evidently a futile attempt at resistance, in order to defend some "notion" of a Goan right to independence, but for Portugal, as a Portuguese under the flag of Portugal, as a Portuguese from Damao, from Dadra, from the
Estado da India Portuguesa — as Portuguese as any Portuguese from Lisboã or the Algarve. If we agree totally with him, he is our hero; if we reject that concept, then he was only a fool!
Today, Aniceto's widow is fighting for his share of his father's property in Damao. If he had not thrown away his life, he would have been able to protect his wife and his children's right.
If the cause of "Goan secessionism" is right, all I can say is: What a fool! What a waste! This is a man worthy of our pity—and contempt, not of our emulation!
To sum up: If we accept the values for which Spinola and Dr. Soares and the "Carnation Revolutionaries" stood for, then Aniceto do Rosario was wrong, is wrong, and it is urgent and necessary to eliminate his name and any possibility of his
cultus as a patriot. On the contrary, if Aniceto do Rosario was truly a Portuguese patriot, one whom not only Goans and Damaoense can honor and emulate, but also the Iberian Portuguese, then the values of Spinola, Soares and the "Carnation Revolution" are dead wrong, and must be rejected and reversed.
If a Spinolist pretends to a cultus of Aniceto do Rosario as a hero, then he certifies himself a hypocrite! There can be no arguments on this incontrovertible fact!
Yours sincerely,
Lúcio
--- In
[email protected], "Paulo CColaco Dias" wrote:
I sympathise with your theories but you really ought to organise your thoughts a little bit better.
What do you mean Goan Communist traitor? Mario Soares is not a Goan nor he was ever communist. He is a socialist which is not a communist. There is a difference.
Why would they have renamed the road Aniceto do Rosario? As I understand, Aniceto do Rosario was a Portuguese hero under orders of Salazar, not necessarily a fascist like Salazar. I do not think they would have renamed the road.
Finally, you have to understand there is no coming back. Goa is never going to be Portuguese again. However, there is a case for the independence of Goa, which can be taken further as long as you get enough people to fight for it.
Best regards
Paulo Colaco Dias
[Message # 282 GoanCenter]
From: "Paulo Colaco Dias"
Date: Sun Jul 18, 2004 4:37 pm
Subject: RE: More on Aniceto do Rosario
Lucio,
- Mario Soares is not of Goan parentage. There were some Goans spreading that rumour sometime in the past. It came up again recently on Goanet. But it is false. He does not have any Goan blood.
- It is true that he was for a short period a member of the Communist Youth (Juventude comunista). But that was too long ago, much before the carnation revolution. You cannot call him a communist. That is not fair. Even I sympathised with the juventude comunista when I was about 13 years old. I was never a member but enjoyed their excellent sporting and cultural activities in Portugal. They had very interesting competitions to keep the youth busy and distracted from the usual problems of drugs, etc. You have to give them the credit for that. They still do it.
- I agree the revolution government had not been democratically elected by the Portuguese people and therefore, the handover to India is illegitimate. However, there is no going back. The sooner you realise this, the better. If you want, you can concentrate on the independence of Goa and I am sure it is possible to work for that but the Portuguese are not interested in having Estado da India Portuguesa back. That is for sure. There is no going back. So do not waste your time on that.
There is indeed a big difference between socialism and communism. I am not going to explain that to you. You will need to do your homework better. But if you think there is hardly any difference, you will probably think the UK is a communist country. Let me tell you that several countries in Europe have currently a socialist government, including the UK.
- Salazar's regime is known in Portugal as "O regime fascista portugues". Don't you know that? You are probably right. The communists call him a fascist more than anyone else. But he was indeed a fascist. You do not need to be Italian to be a fascist. Ask any Portuguese and you will get the answer. He was indeed a fascist and that is how he is recognised in Portugal. A fascist dictator.
- Estado da India Portuguesa was indeed an integral part of Portugal, but only after 1952. Before that it was a colony. Let�s not fool ourselves on that. Portugal made it an integral part of Portugal in 1952 in response to the UN resolutions for the right of self-determination of the still existing colonies of the world. It was a smart move from Portugal, but not everyone recognised the renaming.
- Aniceto do Rosario is a hero because he was defending his Patria. Like him, there are several more heroes who died in defence of Portugal The "Mosteiro da Batalha" in Batalha, Portugal, contains biographies of several of these heroes who died in defence of Estado da India Portuguesa.
Best regards
Paulo Colaco Dias
Dear Paulo
You wrote:
"You cannot call Mario Soares a communist. That is not fair. There is indeed a big difference between socialism and communism. I am not going to explain that to you. You will need to do your homework better. But if you think there is hardly any difference, you will probably think the UK is a communist country. Salazar's regime is known in Portugal as "O regime fascista portugues". Don't you know that? You are probably right. The communists call him a fascist more than anyone else. But he was indeed a fascist. You do not need to be Italian to be a fascist. Ask any Portuguese and you will get the answer. He was indeed a fascist and that is how he is recognised in Portugal. A fascist dictator."
"There is indeed a big difference between socialism and communism" Indeed, but insignificant compared to the difference between Fascism and Salazarism.
Why is it "unfair" to call a Communist a communist? Or for that matter, why is it "unfair" to call a Socialist a Communist? Communism and Socialism are but factions of the same ideology, just as Shi'itism and Sunni-ism are but factions of Islam. And just as, despite their somewhat mutual animosities, both Shi'ites and Sunnis are truly and really Muslim and therefore equal threats to the Christian, in like manner, a Socialist and a Communist are both Communist and equal threats to the Christian.
Why is it "unfair" to call a Socialist who had been admittedly a Communist, and whose migration to Socialism was merely tactical and not ideological, a Communist, while it is "fair" for you to call Salazar a Fascist? This is hypocrisy, pure and unadulterated!
If Salazar and Franco were "Fascists", then Moreno Gracias of Ecuador, or Pope Pius IX, Pope St. Pius X, etc., were also "Fascists", weren't they? And what of Christ? Was he not "Fascist" also?
It is the summit of idiocy to call a man who was not a Fascist a Fascist, even as one loudly protests that a Socialist is not a Communist!
Again, "one does not need to be an Italian in order to be a fascist", one needs to be a Fascist in order to be a Fascist. This any dolt can tell!
More than bothering about me overcoming my imaginary shortcomings, it would do you tremendous benefit to detoxify yourself of the Communist biases and lies that you had imbibed as a youth and which you still evidently hold on to!
It is my understanding that Goa became a part of Portugal as a result of the accretion of the affectations of the Goan people to Portugal, after Portugal liberated and evangelised them, thus entering into a
de facto relation of "free association" with Portugal. Goans owed — and freely tendered their loyalty, with the exception of a small minority — not to Goa, but to Portugal, the concept of which included Goa. It was on the basis of this understanding that both Iberian Portuguese and Goans acted, especially when Goans were appointed to high, sensitive and strategic positions, and when Goans acted, as individuals, in Africa and in other theaters, to advance the interests of Portugal, not of Goa.
Further, as a result of the "Reforms" of the Marquis of Pombal, Goa, in my understanding was enfranchised and made a formal and integral part of the Portuguese State, so that it no longer could be termed even a dependency.
This relation continued, in my understanding, until the advent of Dr. Salazar. Salazar was an admirer of Hitler and became infected with his racist ideas, ideas of White Supremacy and he re-organised Portugal accordingly, so that Goa came to be denoted (for the first time in its relationship with Iberian Portugal, I believe) as a "Colony." Salazar boasted of his Portuguese Colonial Empire.
It is also true that Goan legal representatives in the Parliament at Lisboa, such as Froilano de Melo, strenuously protested this degradation in status. Eventually, as a result of these protests, Salazar restored Goa to its former status.
It is claimed by people of mischievous bent, that the restoration of Goa, from the status of a "colony" to that of an integral and responsible part of Portugal, was "an innovation" and the result of the actions of the Indian Union and of the United Nations. Those are nothing but contemptible slanders, and I intend to pay no attention to them.
I am unaware that the legitimacy of the internal constitution of a state depends on "outside recognition". I do not accept any such pretension; I specifically reject it. The only people competent to pronounce on the subject of the internal organisation of the Portuguese State are the people of Integral Portugal and, in so far as it affects them, the people of Goa, and no other.
I cannot see why it is "unfair" to call an adherent of Socialism, which is semi-Communism, as a Communist, even when one can freely assert that one who was by no means a Fascist, is indeed a Fascist. This is ridiculous; this is also simultaneously nonsensical. Dr. Salazar was as much a Fascist as he was a Mormon!
If you object to describing Soares as a Communist, you must also refrain from the slander that Salazar was a Fascist! You cannot both have your cake and eat it too!
Indeed, one does NOT need to be an Italian to be a Fascist — nor did I allege that. I reiterate that to be a Fascist in fact, one needs to be a Fascist in fact. Merely because one's enemies slander one as a Fascist does not make one a Fascist.
Those who slander Dr. Salazar do not evidence against Salazar, but evidence only their own malice and vileness. For all my difficulties with Dr. Salazar — and I am not one of his admirers — I can harbour nothing but contempt and loathing for those who were responsible for the "Carnation Revolution", including General Spinola — the whole bunch of leperous hypocrites who are loud in badmouthing Dr. Salazar, but who did far more evil to Portugal (and Goa) than Dr. Salazar ever did! As you read my letter further, you will understand why I loath and abhor these with so much vehemence.
Since Goa became an integral part of Portugal, much as Lisboa and the tracts progressively further south, coming to the Algarve, and the Açores and Madeira, etc., Goans are, merely by being Goans, as Portuguese as any other Portuguese. I differentiate between the Portuguese of Iberia and the Portuguese of Goa.
As such, I do not "seek" that the Iberian Portuguese "take the
Estado da India Portuguesa back". From my viewpoint, by the "Carnation Revolution", Iberian Portugal seceded from "Multi-Continental Portugal" (to use a phrase that General Spinola himself used) and constituted itself a separate state. I seek the restoration of "Multi-Continental Portugal" which is my country — not the mythic Iberian Portugal.
I give the Communists credit for nothing except for being what they are: vile, evil, Godless, God-haters, the cultees of Cain, whose spoor is up against all mankind. I believe that one needs a pretty long spoon to sup with the devil, and I sedulously avoid such vermin.
Today, in the UK, the Blairite "Socialists" or "New Labour" Party is not the true Socialist or Labour Party of old, but a "Neo-Liberalist" party, like the Chinese Communist Party. It would be more appropriate to describe these as being "Thatcherites" or "Reaganites" by ideological creed, and nominally Leftists by historical accident. Ken Livingstone, the Mayor of Metropolitan London (not the Mayor of the City of London) is the actual representative of the old, "orthodox" Socialism in England.
"Orthodox" Socialism differs from Communism only in degree and not in kind, as I had first stated. Socialism is "Communism Lite"; Communism is a more rabid strain of Socialism. Both are "Statist", "Dirigist", secularist, anti-Christian. Both are opposed to social and individual freedom, and raise the "Socialist State" to idolatry. Capitalism, for all its faults, is closer to the natural state of man than Socialism or Communism.
Let me explain what I mean by the incongruity of the post-Spinola dispensation not erasing the memorial to Aniceto do Rosario.
It may, at first sight, seem not pertinent, but there is a World-wide Jewish Conspiracy targeted against all non-Jews, but even more specifically against Christians and Catholics. The aim of this Conspiracy is to bring about a situation wherein the Messiah according to their specifications, will come; since they reject the claims of Christ Jesus to be the Messiah. This Conspiracy aims to upset all systems of social order in order to establish a pro-Jewish worldwide system — what Christianity sees as the Reign of the Antichrist.
The premier tool of this conspiracy is that of "Solve et Coagula" — dissolve non-Jewish systems and states, and reassemble the parts in a pro-Jewish system.
The Freemasons are "Noahides", a sect invented and cultivated by the Jews as their stooges in their conspiracy. The Freemasons and the Jews have spearheaded "Liberalism" or "Free Thought", also called "Anti-Clericalism".
It seems that the Jews and their agents contrived the English Schism as much as the Protestant "Reformation"; what is certain is that ever since, the English act as the prime agents of the Jews in their worldwide Jewish Conspiracy.
It would seem that the Enemies of God are disunited among themselves, split into two opposite blocks, left and right, locked in perpetual confrontation with each other. This is but a trick. The servants of darkness are actually united and complement each other. This is a strategy designed to suck in the unwary Christian into becoming engrossed and taking sides, and into abandoning the War for Christ for either of the two play-acting warring factions of Satan.
Acting in Complement, the two parties of Satan set-up the United Nations in order to progress towards the Jewish Messiah to come, and for his reign.
The Jews contrived the French Revolution through the Freemasons, who openly own up to having brought it about; the Jews also brought about the Russian Revolution, one consequence of which was the Genocide of more than 10 million Ukrainians, most of them Catholics, at the hands of the Bolsheviks under Lenin and Stalin.
Despite having brought about the dissolution of the Catholic Spanish and Portuguese Super-States during the Napoleonic Era, and despite having foisted anti-Catholics such as the traitors, apostates and anti-Catholics, Peter "Emperor of Brazil" and his equally vile daughter, Mary, these agents of the Jews and Freemasons still saw in the remnant Portugal and Spain a threat and an obstacle towards achieving their ends.
Therefore the United Nations, under the joint impetus of the Leftists-Communists, and the Rightists of the USA, UK, etc., decreed that certain territories (principally of the Portuguese and Spanish states) were "non-self-governing territories" and
must be given independence.
Today, having achieved the dissolution of these states, the Freemasons now are working overtime at the "Coagula" part of it: Unifying the disparate peoples, nations and states of Europe into one God-less, anti-Christian Super-State.
Portugal�s
Difficulties did not commence with Dr. Salazar, but with the joint-conspiracy of the Communists, the "Liberals"-Freemasons and the United Nations. "Multi-Continental" Portugal came into being long before Salazarism came to be; Vasco da Gama, Afonso de Albuquerque and others did not represent Salazar to Goa, but Portugal. The Goans of 1510 did not covenant with Salazar but with Portugal.
The Spinolista Revolution was not so much against Salazar, as it was against Portugal, or more precisely, against the ideals of a "Multi-Continental Portugal" that Salazar
inherited and defended and which were targeted — hypocritically — by the Communists, Liberal-Freemasons and the United Nations.
As part of the anti-Christian conspiracy of these forces, which, despite their seeming disunity, are actually united in their united service to their Master, Satan, the United Nations, without consultations with the affected peoples, and without any moral basis, and unilaterally, notified certain parts of Multi-Continental Portugal as being "Colonies" and "Non-Self-Governing Territories" which had the right to self-determination.
This actually was a naked cultivation of sedition and secessionism, besides constituting an act aiming at the alienation of the affection of peoples from their legitimate government.
The hypocrisy of this is shown by the fact that not all subject peoples were so "benefited", nor did it universally and indiscriminately cover all peoples who were "Non-Self-Governing".
The pertinent UN prescriptions prescribed certain means and criteria for making these "Non-Self-Governing Territories" into "Self-Governing Territories". That included the right of that territory to enter into a relation of "Free Association" with an established state.
Yet it is obvious that Goa was already in exactly such a state, from the commencement of its relationship with Portugal.
As a result of the United Nations� mischief, Portugal was subjected to a War of Attrition, and its people became disaffected. The Conspirators successfully seduced the people of Iberian Portugal, which culminated in Spinola�s Coup.
Spinolism, therefore, did not represent, so much as a reaction against Salazarism, but a submission to the objections of the enemies of God and of Portugal against the concept of a Multi-Continental Portugal. It represented the effort of misguided Iberian Portuguese to secede from Multi-Continental Portugal.
As a result, the Portuguese patriots in the Ultramarines were abandoned to the tender mercies of the Communist traitors, agents of the imperialist and misanthropic ambitions of the Soviets, Communist China, etc..
The Iberian Portuguese, for all their excuses, were being merely selfish and thinking only of themselves, thus abandoning all those who stood for the Ideal of Portugal and who even sacrificed their lives for this Ideal — such as Aniceto do Rosario did.
It is vain for those who count themselves with the Treason of Spinola to levy a "claim" upon Aniceto as their "hero". That is adding insult to the injury!
If Spinolism is right then it is an inevitable conclusion that Aniceto was misguided. There is an incongruity between the ideals of Aniceto do Rosario, the ideals for which he even sacrificed his life, and the ideals of the Spinolistas.
This is why I ask: Why was the Lisboã memorial to Aniceto not renamed by the Spinolistas?
From my viewpoint, indeed, the viewpoint of the majority of Goans, Spinola and his conspirators and supporters were nothing less than knaves, traitors and renegades, contemptible — men without faith or honour; blackguards and scapegraces. They may have not been formal Communists, but, by falling in with the Communist Agenda against Portugal, by becoming the representatives, defenders and executors of that Conspiracy, they became factually Communists themselves.
The sins of the Salazaristas, such sins as there actually are sins, cannot justify and whitewash the sins of the Spinolistas.
But even more importantly, we, the Patriots, who are faithful to the Ideals of Aniceto, refuse to either be bogged down in the controversy over Salazarism, or to recognise as legitimate or moral the sedition and secession of the Spinolist regime in Iberian Portugal from Multi-Continental Portugal.
We became Portuguese by natural right from the time of our incorporation into Portugal. Iberian Portugal cannot withdraw from us, or qualify, our right to be Portuguese. We do not need a certificate or passport from Iberian Portugal in order to verify our Portuguese-ness. We aim at nothing less than the total restoration of the (Constitutional, not ideological) Status Quo Ante — the Restoration of the Multi-Continental Portugal as it was.
If Iberian Portugal owns up to Aniceto do Rosario as its hero, and recognises that the Soares-Chavan "treaty" was a fraud, what stops it from formally repudiating it?
We have had enough of deceiving excuses; of a mess of lies, decorated and garnished, it is true, yet nevertheless, nothing but a mess of lies!
Let those who pretend to an affectation for us and our plight show their sincerity by repudiating that one single act that constitutes the knife in our back.
After that we will credit them with some sincerity!
Lúcio
Much has been made of the Abbe Faria and the Pintos, of the Bishops Tome de Crasto and his nephew.
Abbe Faria apparently came from a family of insincere converts, which is proven by his father's reputed behaviour in the Parliament at Lisboa. Faria himself cast in his lot with the anti-Catholic Freemasons of the French Revolution.
Faria instigated the "Conjuracao dos Pintos"; the Pintos were his disciples and infected with the same beliefs as the French apostates. And, if they had succeeded in their endeavour, Goa would have been utterly destroyed.
Haider Ali and Tipu Sultan were eagerly waiting at the borders of Goa in order to destroy Goa; if the Pintos had succeeded in establishing a "Free Goa" under a pro-French, anti-Catholic regime, it would have been made short work of by Tipu Sultan!
I believe that the real reason why the religious orders began to be choosy about taking in Goan novices was not because of White Racism, but because, from experience, they learnt the perfidy and insincerity of many of the upper caste converts!
As it is, these upper caste converts managed to deceive the papacy into issuing an ambiguous decree, which these upper caste converts used in order to enforce a
de facto monopoly on orders in Goa, to the complete exclusion of converts from the lower castes! After this shameless display of perfidy, these malefactors have no right in protesting the increasing hostility of the orders to admitting them!
It is pretended that the "White Portuguese" objected to native bishops, which is why they "misbehaved" with Bishop Tome de Crasto. What is ignored is that Tome was irrascible, arrogant, insolent and impudent; that he represented the recalcitrant upper castes. Bishop Custodio do Pinto, however, was as Goan as Tome de Crasto, but the "White Portuguese" never had any problem in working with him. He was, even for a time, in an interregnum, the administrator of the See of Goa, and consecrated the incoming bishop of Goa! "Nationalists" make a big song and dance of Bishop Tome, but conveniently overlook Bishop Custodio — which is sheer hypocrisy!
According to the
Summer Institute of Linguistics, the following are the Nationalities of Portuguese Timor with some overlaps with Dutch Timor: Adabe; Atoni; Banak; Fataluku; Galoli; Habu; Idate; Kairui-Midiki; Kemak; Lakalei; Makasae; Maku'a; Mambae; Nauete; Tetun; Tukudede; Waima'a — a total of 17!
Let me explain what I mean by the incongruity of the post-Spinola dispensation not erasing the memorial to Aniceto do Rosario.
It may, at first sight, seem not pertinent, but there is a World-wide Jewish Conspiracy targeted against all non-Jews, but even more specifically against Christians and Catholics. The aim of this Conspiracy is to bring about a situation wherein the Messiah according to their specifications, will come; since they reject the claims of Christ Jesus to be the Messiah. This Conspiracy aims to upset all systems of social order in order to establish a pro-Jewish worldwide system — what Christianity sees as the Reign of the Antichrist.
The premier tool of this conspiracy is that of "Solve et Coagula" — dissolve non-Jewish systems and states, and reassemble the parts in a pro-Jewish system.
The Freemasons are "Noahides", a sect invented and cultivated by the Jews as their stooges in their conspiracy. The Freemasons and the Jews have spearheaded "Liberalism" or "Free Thought", also called "Anti-Clericalism".
It seems that the Jews and their agents contrived the English Schism; what is certain is that ever since, the English act as the prime agents of the Jews in their worldwide Jewish Conspiracy.
It would seem that the Enemies of God are disunited among themselves, split into two opposite blocks, left and right, locked in perpetual confrontation with each other. This is but a trick. The servants of darkness are actually united and complement each other. This is a trick designed to suck in the unwary Christian into becoming engrossed and taking sides, and into abandoning the War for Christ for either of the two play-acting warring factions of Satan.
Acting in Complement, the two parties of Satan set-up the United Nations in order to progress towards the Jewish Messiah to come, and for his reign.
The Jews contrived the French Revolution through the Freemasons, who openly own up to having brought it about; the Jews also brought about the Russian Revolution, one consequence of which was the Genocide of more than 10 million Ukrainians, most of them Catholics, at the hands of the Bolsheviks under Lenin and Stalin.
Despite having brought about the dissolution of the Catholic Spanish and Portuguese Super-States during the Napoleonic Era, and despite having foisted anti-Catholics such as Pedro II and Maria II, the anti-Catholics, agents of the Jews and Freemasons, still saw in remnant Portugal and Spain a threat and an obstacle towards achieving their ends.
Therefore the United Nations, under the joint impetus of the Leftists-Communists, and the Rightists of the USA, UK, etc., decreed that certain territories (principally of the Portuguese and Spanish states) were "non-self-governing territories" and
must be given independence.
Today, having achieved the dissolution of these states, the Freemasons now are working overtime at the "Coagula" part of it: Unifying the disparate peoples, nations and states of Europe into one Super-State.
Portugal�s
Difficulties did not commence with Dr. Salazar, but with the joint-conspiracy of the Communists, the "Liberals"-Freemasons and the United Nations. "Multi-Continental" Portugal came into being long before Salazarism came to be; Vasco da Gama, Afonso de Albuquerque and others did not represent Salazar to Goa, but Portugal. The Goans of 1510 did not covenant with Salazar but with Portugal.
The Spinolista Revolution was not so much against Salazar, as it was against Portugal, or more precisely, against the ideals of a "Multi-Continental Portugal" that Salazar
inherited and defended and which were targeted — hypocritically — by the Communists, Liberal-Freemasons and the United Nations.
As part of the anti-Christian conspiracy of these forces, which, despite their seeming disunity, are actually united in their united service to their Master, Satan, the United Nations, without consultations with the affected peoples, and without any moral basis, and unilaterally, notified certain parts of Multi-Continental Portugal as being "Colonies" and "Non-Self-Governing Territories" which had the right to self-determination.
This actually was a naked cultivation of sedition and secessionism, besides constituting an act aiming at the alienation of the affection of peoples from their legitimate government.
The hypocrisy of this is shown by the fact that not all subject peoples were so "benefited", nor did it universally and indiscriminately cover all peoples who were "Non-Self-Governing".
The pertinent UN prescriptions prescribed certain means and criteria for making these "Non-Self-Governing Territories" into "Self-Governing Territories". That included the right of that territory to enter into a relation of "Free Association" with an established state.
Yet it is obvious that Goa was already in exactly such a state, from the commencement of its relationship with Portugal.
As a result of the United Nations� mischief, Portugal was subjected to a War of Attrition, and its people became disaffected. The Conspirators successfully seduced the people of Iberian Portugal, which culminated in Spinola�s Coup.
Spinolism, therefore, did not represent, so much as a reaction against Salazarism, but a submission to the objections of the enemies of God and of Portugal against the concept of a Multi-Continental Portugal. It represented the effort of misguided Iberian Portuguese to secede from Multi-Continental Portugal.
As a result, the Portuguese patriots in the Ultramarines were abandoned to the tender mercies of the Communist traitors, agents of the imperialist and misanthropic ambitions of the Soviets, Communist China, etc..
The Iberian Portuguese, for all their excuses, were being merely selfish and thinking only of themselves, thus abandoning all those who stood for the Ideal of Portugal and who even sacrificed their lives for this Ideal — such as Aniceto do Rosario did.
It is vain for those who count themselves with the Treason of Spinola to levy a "claim" upon Aniceto as their "hero". That is adding insult to the injury!
If Spinolism is right then it is an inevitable conclusion that Aniceto was misguided. There is an incongruity between the ideals of Aniceto do Rosario, the ideals for which he even sacrificed his life, and the ideals of the Spinolistas.
This is why I ask: Why was the Lisboa memorial to Aniceto not renamed by the Spinolistas?
From my viewpoint, indeed, the viewpoint of the majority of Goans, Spinola and his conspirators and supporters were nothing less than knaves, traitors and renegades, contemptible — men without faith or honour; blackguards and scapegraces. They may have not been formal Communists, but, by falling in with the Communist Agenda against Portugal, by becoming the representatives, defenders and executors of that Conspiracy, they became factually Communists themselves.
The sins of the Salazaristas, such sins as there actually are sins, cannot justify and whitewash the sins of the Spinolistas.
But even more importantly, we, the Patriots, who are faithful to the Ideals of Aniceto, refuse to either be bogged down in the controversy over Salazarism, or to recognise as legitimate or moral the sedition and secession of the Spinolist regime in Iberian Portugal from Multi-Continental Portugal.
We became Portuguese by natural right from the time of our incorporation into Portugal. Iberian Portugal cannot withdraw from us, or qualify, our right to be Portuguese. We do not need a certificate or passport from Iberian Portugal in order to verify our Portuguese-ness. We aim at nothing less than the total restoration of the (Constitutional, not ideological) Status Quo Ante — the Restoration of the Multi-Continental Portugal as it was.
Lúcio
©Lúcio Mascarenhas.
Orthopapism II/Michaelinum | Index of Articles