Jega's Sob Story

©Prakash John Mascarenhas, Bombay. 21^st October 2003. This page is copyright! See also The Situation in Kerala
Message # on MalaysianIndianClub
From: "Jega"
Date: Thu Oct 16, 2003 8:07 pm
Subject: A classic example

Ahh.....another classic example on how people segragate themselves further according to their religious beliefs. Why cant we be tolerant, learn, understand & live to coexist as a community instead ? Hope everyone have got something to learn from this.

Jega
Original Message
From: "P.J.M." <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, 17 October, 2003 1:23 AM
Subject: Re.: Solitary Plagiarist?

>To the MIC list,
>
>Friends, please find my reply to your member, "Solitary Hunter", and his provocative and insulting remarks against the Goan Liberation Movement, here at http://www.geocities.com/prakashjm45/direstraights.html
>
>In addition, you will also find this page pertinent: http://www.geocities.com/prakashjm45/eipviable.html
>
>I came into this list merely to verify what I was told that "Solitary Hunter" had written. In coming in, I have noted the motto of this organisation, at its' homepage, and I know that to subscribe to it, or to be seen to subscribe to it by remaining a member, is to be seen to repudiate Jesus Christ and his Gospel. Therefore, since I no longer need to remain, and since Christianity forbids me to remain, I take your leave.
>
>Yours sincerely,
>
>Prakash
Friends,

This is the third page in the controversy commenced by "Solitary Hunter" when he began to patronizingly deprecate the Goan Liberation Movement without any provocation whatsoever, on the Malaysian Indian Club (MIC) list, plagiarising, in the process, a position paper by the TGF - Dr. Jose Colaco, the Goan Masochist-Quisling.

The previous pages were Solitary Plagiarist? and Dire Straights (together with Is Goa Viable As An Independent State?).

I had hoped that I would not need to take up this matter again. However, the MIC Moderator, Jegathesang, has "graciously" weighted in with a bit of malicious misrepresentation and patronisation of his own, and I require to set him straight.

At the outset, I would like to once again reiterate certain background facts.

Jega is accusing me of not integrating into the community. I ask: What community is he talking about?

Worldwide, in the languages which use the word "Community" in various forms derived from the Latin, such as, for example, the English word "Community" and the Portuguese word "Communidade", the word means the total inhabitants of a particular geographical area. Thus, a village, a city neighbourhood, even towns and cities, all these are called Communities.

India would qualify to be called a Community. However, in India, a different meaning is usually given to the word Community. That word has now been made the equivalent of a caste-fellowship, a sect.

Thus, Indians talk of the Hindu Community, the Muslim Community, the Brahmin Commmunity, the Kayastha, Bania, Marwari, etc. communities. Further to this usage, the word communal also has a different meaning in India.

It is in this sense that Jega uses the word "Community".

Obviously, the Indians in Malaysia, no matter how long they have lived there, do not believe that they are part of the Malaysian community, but that they are Malaysian Indians, part of the Malaysian Indian community...

However, as for myself, as I have already pointed out: I am not an Indian; I am not even a Malaysian Indian.

Therefore, the question of me integrating or not integrating with the Indian "community" worldwide, or with the Malaysian Indian "community" in South East Asia, cannot and does not arise. So much should be, ought to be, common sense. And yet, Jegathesang wishes to pretend that I have "sinned" against this principle of integration!

Of course, it is very much evident that Indianism and commonsense are mutually exclusive. Mind you, I do not say, "Indians and commonsense"; I say, "Indianism and commonsense."

This extraordinary pretension by Jegathesang and all Indianists is even more extraordinary given the acute racism of the Indians, not only in India, but even in the diaspora, so much so that they are incapable of integrating with and intermarrying with natives and locals, so as to produce an integral, integrated society.

Nowhere is this more evident than in Malaysia, which is sharply polarized between the Malay natives and the Chinese and Indian colonists who were imported by England.

Whether in Kenya, Uganda, South Africa, British Guaiana, Dutch Guiana (Suriname), Trinidad & Tobago, other Caribbean countries, South Africa, Malaya, Fiji or in the newer destinations of Indian emigration - England, Scotland, the USA, Canada, etc., the Indians famously and rigidly adhere to a racist, superioritarian attitude, towards whites, creoles, blacks, and every other race of men.

One year back, I was a student in a computer arts course, where I had a colleague from Kenya, a Kenyan of Indian origin. He would tell me of the troubles the Indians face there from the majority blacks. I asked him why the Indians settled there, who claimed to have made that country their own homeland, had not integrated, married into the local population. The boy was horrified by the very idea.

We would argue the point. I insist that immigrants who wish to permanently settle in their host country should integrate.

In Goa, during the Portuguese rule, twice we had to face a piquant situation. The first time was during the world-wide abolition of slavery, when many Africans were released. Goa had been their home for generations and they could not return to Africa, where they were not welcome by the blacks there. And the Goans, because of a carry over of Hindu casteist attitudes would not marry these ex-slaves.

The Catholic Church stepped in with its influence and conducted a public campaign to educate the Goan population and to force an integration. Today, there is no separate, distinct, Afro-Goan population in Goa because they were seamlessly integrated into Goan population.

Some years latter, the same situation arose once again, when cheap Chinese labour who had been imported to build the railways, were required to be absorbed into Goan society. Once again, the Church stepped in and forced Goan society to integrate these immigrants. Today, there is no separate, distinct, Sino-Goan population in Goa because they were seamlesly integrated into Goan population.

Unlike the Goans, the Malaysian Indians contemptuously refuse to integrate into Malaysian society, preferring to remain in a mutually agreed Apartheid system segregating Malays, Chinese and Indians. And despite this, Jega has the insolence to accuse me of refusing to integrate! Is there no end to Indian hypocrisy?
As I have already stated, I had entered the MIC list purely to verify what I had been told, that a person using the pseudonym "Solitary Hunter" had written a particular post there. While joining up, I had read the homepage, which reflects the Hindu, pantheistic viewpoint, that all life forms are divine, partake of the Divine Substance.

The Message on the MIC homepage (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/malaysianindianclub)reads: Dear new member,

We salute all the divine qualities in you... WELCOME! Now it is not acceptable for Christians to subscribe or to appear to subscribe to such false, satanic ideas. Nevertheless, I needed to enter, temporarily, in order to verify an allegation, and when I had verified that, and had answered it, I withdrew.

The MIC Moderator, Jega, misrepresents my resignation letter as being "another classic example on how people segragate themselves further according to their religious beliefs" then goes on to ask, "Why cant we be tolerant, learn, understand & live to coexist as a community instead ?", rounding up with, "Hope everyone have got something to learn from this."

In his Epistle to the Corinthians, the Apostle St. Paul warns us (1 Corinthians, 8) that while meateating in itself is neither evil nor good, yet to be seen or seem to be seen eating meats sacrificed to the idols, to the demons, could cause a soul seeing such an action to be deceived into considering that it is permissible to partake of the worship of these idols and thus to fall to damnation.

This has been one of the guiding principles of Christian behaviour.

Even though I do not subscribe to the satanic falsehood of Hindu Advaitism, by consenting to remain on the MIC list, with its present motto could make me liable of causing scandal and deception unto error to others. It is therefore my obligation to avoid such occassions.

Again, a Christian has no real moral need to be part of a group with such ideals, and it is better for the Christian to refuse to be part of such groups.

It is for these reasons that I departed the MIC list.

I am fully aware that others who call themselves "Christian" are or choose to be members of such groups. I am also fully aware that many who were once Christians are now formal apostates, becoming members of Hare Krishna, ISCON, Rajneesh, Yoga, TM, etc.

I personally know that many "Christians" are astrologers and the like. I have personally seen "Christian" homes with an image of the demon Sai Baba installed, often close to or along with that of Christ Jesus...

Because others choose to be Coprophages and Coprolatrists, does not mean that I too must or should.

I owe loyalty to Yahweh first and above all.

Prakash John Mascarenhas