Hindu Tolerance
©Prakash John Mascarenhas, Bombay. 24th October 2003.
This page is copyright!
The Indian Pagans are fond of saying that "all" men "love" their "gods". Francois Gautier, the French apostate to Indian paganism, repeats the same Hindu claim, of being "loved and adored by all" for his demon, Rama of Ayodhya.
Likewise, the "Sai Baba" cults too gratuitously - and for Christians, insultingly, affirms, "Sab ka Malik ek!" "All the gods are one!" - thus lumping Yahweh and Christ Jesus with their demons!
Is it really "all"? Who constitutes this "all"?
Etymologically, "all" would mean either all the populace of India, or even, in an absolute sense, all mankind.
As a matter of fact, all mankind certainly does not own up to any of the Hindu demons. But it is also true that even in India, not all own up to these demons.
The Christians and the Muslims and most of the Buddhists don't. And many others too. That makes a substantial portion of India which makes the claim of "all" a lie.
But let me press further. The Hindus are very loud in protesting that the Christians or the Muslims have imposed upon them or impose upon them, their religions as against Hinduism. Aside from Islam, which will be spoken for by its adherents themselves, I know that it is a fact that, minor exceptions apart, there has been no systematic effort at any time to impose Christianity on anyone who did not wish to be Christian. This is hotly disputed, I grant, but those who dispute it either put forward untrue propaganda against Christianity or are duped by such propaganda.
But on the contrary, it is very evident that forced participation of non-adherents in paganism and its rituals is an integral and substantial part of both Hinduism and for any other form of paganism worldwide.
This has been demonstrated beyond doubt for the now defunct paganisms of the Greeks, Romans, Celts, Teutons, etc.
In India, we see that the same holds true. Not only do the pagans claim gratuitously that "all" accept their monstrous and obscene paganism as being valid and true, they insist on stuffing it down one and all.
This takes the form of the grotesque and obscene pictures and idols of their demons gratuitously put up everywhere - even in the official buildings of the putatively secular state - in police stations, post offices, government offices, railway stations, etc., etc.
This takes the form of rituals and "worship sessions" arrogantly imposed upon and insolently and ostentatiously performed in government facilities, as above.
This takes the form of rituals and "worship sessions" opening the morning broadcasts of the state controlled television and radio stations.
And much much more.
So much so, that pagans students, hostelites, employees demand the "right" to do the same even on premises and in the properties of non-pagan owners - and riot if forbidden! Even in churches and church-run properties!
The pagan thump their chests and screech: "Gai Hamara Mata Hai!" - Cow is our mother!
I answer, if the cow is your mother, then it must be that you are not human. Therefore, that you look human is a deception: you are undeniably monsters in human form! Now monsters are not tolerable, and monsters ought to be put to death, lest they injure some human being, for to injure men and do evil is the proper nature of monsters.
Truly I say to you: It is no sin to eat the cow, or to refrain therefrom, but it is a monstrousity to worship the cow! And he who will not eat the flesh of the cow, because he believes that it is divine and therefore not to be eaten, sins grievously, not because it is a virtue to eat kine, but because it is idolatry to worship kine!
The pagan reveres and worships kine, and kisses its arse fondly, for they say, according to their "scriptures" that their demons were saved when they took refuge therein!
Wherefore I say: It is better to eat the cow than to kiss its arse!
The pagan proudly demands that the Christian acknowledge that Rama and Sita are his ancestors and respect, honour and worship them.
We are all aware of India and its history. We are all aware of how Rama murdered the Shudra Tsambuk for taking to asceticism in violation of the Hindu shastras ("Scriptures"), which forbid the Shudras from partaking of (Hindu) religion.
We are also aware - well aware - that the same Shastras forbid Brahmins from marrying Kshatriyas, and Kshatriyas from marrying Brahmins, and so on.
It was for this reason that Krishna, a Kshatriya, choose not to marry Radha and the other cowherdesses, because they were of lower castes than himself, choosing to keep them as his kept-women, his
rakhels - his whores!
Therefore, I ask: How is it that Rama could be the ancestor of all India? Or did he also, like Krishna, mass-fornicate?
Did he also fornicate with all the Brahmin women of his time, so that all Brahmins of today can claim him to be their ancestor?
Friends, I will not have you in deception: My ancestors too were Brahmins. Therefore, I know that Rama could not have been mine ancestor.
Likewise, I reject the claim that the descendants of Tsambuk the Dalit, the Dalits of today, ought to or should honour, respect and worship this malefactor, this evil man, Rama, as their ancestor or as their "god"!
The pagan thump their chests and screech: "Garv se kaho ki ham Hindu hain!" - and assault and terrorise Christians who will not repeat their diabolic cry, "Jai Sri Ram" - Long live the demon Ram!
To all Christians, I say, Cry out rather, "Garv se kaho ki ham Hindu nahin hai!" "Say with pride: I am not a pagan!"
Remember the first commandment, and put your trust in the eternal God of Abraham and not in the threats and blandishments of malefactors, and make no compromises with them!
© Prakash John Mascarenhas
See
What the Bible Says On This Subject...