Eryn Brown

©Lucio Mascarenhas, Bombay. 19th February 2004.

To "Mangalore-Joakim"

Sir,

This article posted by you is insulting, slanderous, and full of calumnies and misrepresentations against us Catholics. It is obvious that this article has been written with mischievous intent, in order to further and to participate in the lies, misrepresentation and maliciously false propaganda against us Catholics, and in favour of the apostate, Protstitute Church of the antipope "John-Paul II". This is despicable. This is contemptible.

But, since you have posted this article, I will specifically ask you to prove these statements:
  1. "But the breakaway faction rejects the vatican."
  2. "Since then, many traditionalists have not recognized the pope as their leader."
  3. "They are, after all, folks who have taken the radical step of breaking away from Rome."
It is more than amply evident that Eryn Brown is not objective, that she is in full sympathy with the Prostitute Anti-Church, the apostate sect founded by Angelo Roncalli ("John XXIII-II") through his "Aggiornomento" and Robbers' Council of "Vatican II". And by posting her lies, without any qualifications, you make yourself party to them.

Eryn Brown's hypocrisy is demonstrated by her rejection of certain truth; yet consistently calling Wojtyla "Holy Father" [even as she claims to not be a 'Catholic'] even as she seeks to portray us Catholics as renegades and mavericks. Her "Objectivity" is only pretended and not real.

But Eryn Brown lets out the truth about herself early in her article, when she says: It's hard to be an absolutist in the modern world-our society simply isn't set up for it. Boundless, diverse and brimming with energy, it's better at fostering a culture where anything goes than one obsessed with strict definitions of right and wrong. It's better at building a spiritual world where people customize their beliefs rather than demanding they adhere to rigid dogma. There is no black and white anymore. Most of us prefer our world in muddier-but-subtler, ever-evolving shades of gray. This is the Ideology — and Manifesto — of Hypocrisy and of Spiritual Whoring and Fornication. It is the Foundation Belief of the heresy of "Liberalism", of Libertinism, and the beginning of Homosexuality, Free Sex, Materialism, "Free Thought", Anti-Clericalism, Abortionism or Feminism, (which are one and the same things), Eclecticism, Ecumenism, Secularism, Socialism, Capitalism, etc. More than anything else, it is the Foundation of the West, of "Westernism", a "Civilisation" built upon the Rejection and for the Destruction and Supplanting of Christendom...

This is the very opposite of the ideology that St. Francis Xavier came to Goa and the East to bring to our ancestors. But this "new" ideology is also the very ideology that Remo Fernandes, who advocates and teaches Goans to join Hindus in their satanic rites, the Homosexual Wendell Rodrigues, the Secularist and Quislingist Floriano Lobo, the Collaborationist Dr. Jose Colaco and other "Psuedo-Catholics" espouse.

It is this, "new", ideology that has destroyed, and is destroying us Goans, that alienated the affections of Goans from our Patria, Portugal, and re-oriented them to a brainless Indophilia, an Indianism that raveningly militates against our identity as Goans and Portuguese — destroying us Goans as a Community.

It is this new, false ideology that makes us ashamed of and to badword and denigrate the Holy Inquisition and the history of the Church, that also makes us to compromise and to yield in front of — and fatally, suicidically — to accomodate the Hindus, who do not let up in their misanthropy or in their hatred of Christ and his Gospel.

It is this "new" ideology that is busy Westernising us, inculcating in us a mindless, militant Anglophones and Indolatrists — worshippers of India — thereby causing us either to take Hindu names, like "Prakash" (no thanks to my Indolatrist Mamti) or names from Mills-and-Boons or outrightly Portestant, WASP (White, Anglo-Saxon Protestant) names, such as "Wendell", "Clifford", "Calvin", etc., even as we are taught to be mindlessly and unthinkingly ashamed of our sensible and historical, Goan and Portuguese names...

Christ, as God, had given us the Ten Commandments, through Moses, and which includes the first: "I am the Lord your God. You shall know no other God besides me." No scope for the Prostitute's "customization" there, for "muddier-but-subtler, ever evolving shades of grey".

Christ says: I am the Way, the Truth and Life. No scope for the Prostitute's "customization" there, for "muddier-but-subtler, ever evolving shades of grey".

The Bible tells us: "There is no other name under the heaven, given to man, whereby man can be saved, other than that of Christ Jesus." No scope for the Prostitute's "customization" there, for "muddier-but-subtler, ever evolving shades of grey".

Christ is not confused or muddied or muddled. Nothing has changed since then. Christ has not failed. Christianity has not failed. Christ has not been disproven. Christianity has not been disproven.

However, the peoples of the West have, as once did the Jews, become fatigued with God and His high standards, and want to go whoring and fornicating, lusting after "gods" fabricated after their own fallen natures, limited and subject to the same limitations and failings as we are.

It is not extra-ordinary that people — such as the Traditionalists — have refused to join this near-universal festival of self-indulgence and spiritual whoring; it is extra-ordinary that people like Eryn Brown go forth into this spiritual hypocrisy and lusting after fantastic and fabricated superstitions, even as they contemn Christianity.

Pathetic. Really pathetic.

As against the lies put forward by Eryn Brown, we have not rejected the Vatican. We have not broken from Rome. We have not rejected the Pope as our leader. We reject the New Religion. We reject those who have abandoned the Catholic Faith and who hold the Vatican illegally, pretending to continue the Catholic Church, when in fact, they do not.

We reject the false popes, the antipopes, of this schismatic, heretical and apostate sect: Roncalli, Montini, Luciani & Wojtyla.

The distinction is important.

We are not mavericks. We are not innovators. What we have done is to act faithfully in accordance with the Catholic Faith.

Most importantly, our actions is in line with the Church Law as settled by Pope Paul IV in the Bull �Cum ex Apostolatus Officio�: "Let Us add that if at any time whatsoever, a bishop, even acting as an Archbishop or Patriarch or Primate, or a Cardinal, even acting as a Legate, and also a Roman Pontiff prior to his promotion or elevation to the cardinalate or pontificate had deviated from the Catholic faith or fallen into some heresy or schism, or had caused or originated it, his promotion or elevation, even if re�sulting from the unanimous resolution by all the Cardinals, should be null, invalid and with no effects; and in no wise could such an elevation become valid through his acceptance of office and his consecration nor through the attendant possession or quasi-possession of government and administration, nor even through his enthronement or veneration, nor through everybody's obedience given to him, independently of the elapsed time, if under the above hypotheses. Such elevation should not be deemed a legitimate one even in regard to any of its por�tions...and every pronouncement, fact, action and decision and their attending consequences have no power whatever and do not give any validity or right to anybody.

In addition, [By this Our Constitution which is to remain valid in perpetuity, We also enact, determine, decree and define: that if ever at any time it shall appear that any Bishop, even if he be acting as an Archbishop, Patriarch or Primate; or any Cardinal of the aforesaid Roman Church, or, as has already been mentioned, any legate, or even the Roman Pontiff, prior to his promotion or his elevation as Cardinal or Roman Pontiff has deviated from the Catholic Faith or fallen into some heresy:
  1. The promotion or elevation, even if it shall have been uncontested and by the unanimous assent of all the Cardinals, shall be null, void and worthless;
  2. It shall not be possible for it to acquire validity (nor for it to be said that it has thus acquired validity) through the acceptance of the office, of consecration, of subsequent authority, nor through pos�session of administration, nor through the putative enthronement of a Roman Pontiff, or veneration, or obedience accorded to such by all, nor through the lapse of any period of time in the foregoing situation;
  3. It shall not be held as partially legitimate in any way;
  4. To any so promoted to be Bishops, or Archbishops, or Patriarchs, or Primates or elevated as Cardinals, or as Roman Pontiff, no authority shall have been granted, nor shall it be considered to have been granted either in the spiritual or the temporal domain;
  5. Each and all their words, deeds, actions and enactments, howsoever made, and anything whatsoever to which these may give rise, shall be without force and shall grant no stability whatsoever nor any right to anyone;
  6. Those thus promoted or elevated shall be deprived automatically, and without need for any fur�ther declaration, of all dignity, position, honour, title, authority, office and power, without any ex�ception in respect of those to which they may have been promoted or elevated before they deviated from the Faith, became heretics, incurred schism, or provoked or committed any or all of these." (Pope Paul IV, Bull, Cum ex apostolatus officio)
Tod Tamberg, representative of the "archdiocese of Lost Angels" calls us "facile", saying: "There's a question of what's Catholic and what's not. Is the church that you're in in union with the Holy Father in Rome? If it is, it's Catholic. If it isn't, it's not." As a matter of fact, it is Tamberg and his fellow hypocrites of this antichurch who are facile. A man is not "Pope" merely because he pretends to be, nor "Catholic" for merely claiming that name, even while he has rejected its essence in totality. No more than a man who pretends to be the "True Messias" — such as "Dr. Moon" — is really the "true Messias". Tod Tamberg and his sect are merely play-acting as if they are Catholics, even as they have furiously destroyed all vestiges of Catholicism among themselves, and reduced themselves to an extremely Liberal Protestant sect — the Roman Modernist sect.

However, in a way, Tamberg is right. The Lefebvrists are also themselves a bunch of liars and hypocrites. Nothing demonstrates their hypocrisy more than the fact that they are fully aware that Wojtyla is a shameless and unrepentant heretic, in massive and formal schism and apostasy from Catholicism, despite which they yet pretend that he is innocently and "ignorantly" straying from the faith.

"Fr." Charles Ward, SSPX, says of the antichrist Wojtyla: "We accept that he's the pope. We just think he's weak. That's sad. But it's nothing new." That is typically the position of the SSPX, the main Lefebvrist organisation. And that is pure and unadulterated hypocrisy. Wojtyla was never a legitimate pope, having been a heretic from even before his purported "election", thus falling under the ban of Catholicism, as exemplified by Pope Paul IV's Cum ex Apostolatus Officio.

And it is an incontrovertible fact that unlike either Popes Liberius or Honorius, Wojtyla is neither forced nor compelled to stray, but that he is doing so entirely out of his own free will, not by any misunderstanding, but with full understanding of the comparative ideologies of Catholicism and the Modernist, Evolutionist and God-hating heresy that he espouses, with a vicious hatred of Catholicism and a conscious and implacable purpose to bring millions of souls to damnation.

It is gratuitous and contemptible — and yet another exercise in hypocrisy on the part of the Lefebvrists — to pretend a supercilious superiority to the sedevacantism of Hutton Gibson (whose weird ideas regarding 9/11 and George Bush I too do not approve), when "Fr." Charles Ward says that he (and the Lefebvrist sect) "does not espouse Mr. Gibson's theories, whatever they are, and that if Mel Gibson's father is a sedevacantist, we don't condone it. He would not come to worship here.".

That is a "cute-ism" — given that it is public knowledge that Hutton Gibson and his family withdrew from the same community (Our Lady of the Angels Church, Arcadia) specifically because that community had seceded from Catholicism to the Lefebvrist sect; and that Hutton Gibson has always, incontrovertibly — and famously — been and still is — Sedevacantist. Moreover, this hypocrisy becomes more pointed when we consider the fact that Hutton Gibson has not ever asked the Lefebvrists to "condone" his Sedevacantism — and it is hypocritical of them to even pretend to anything like it.

Lastly, Eryn Brown quotes one traditionalist as saying, "We are not crazy." I say, either the world is, or we are. I am content to be misrepresented as "crazy", rather than accomodate the world — or seek to minimize or obscure the offensiveness of Christ, his claims and his cross. There has been too much of waffling, too much of pussyfooting, too much of crass cowardice, betraying the offensiveness of Christ, and too much of a false sugar-coating of Christ and his Gospel, thereby fabricating a counterfeit Christ, a glorified "Santa Claus". I want none of it.

I am willing to own up to the offense of the Cross, of Christ the Messias, of His Gospel, and to suffer for it. I believe that it is more profitable to be a fool for Christ than a wise man according to the conceit of God-hating fools, and to attain to eternal damnation.

Lucio Mascarenhas, Bombay.
Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1