Daniel Jones, Colinite Schismatic
Transcription of letter received on 27th January 2004. See my reply.
Fr. Daniel E. Jones, T.O.D.M.,
Box 89, Westcliffe, CO 81252.
[email protected]
+J.M.J.
January 14, 2004
Dear Mr. Prakash J. Mascarenhas,
Heidi Hagen in Switzerland sent me your address.
There is a false logic in your reasoning in the following statement:
I reject the idea that God Himself or any of His Saints will, by Private Revelation, institute a new Pope as being against what God Himself revealed, by amending Public Revelation, since, in order to believe the (purported) papal claims, one must necessarily accept what was purported to have been revealed in a putative Private Revelation as being necessary to salvation, thus adding it to Public Revelation.
With such reasoning, you must also reject what Jesus revealed to St. Margaret Mary Alacoque, to Sister Faustina, what Mary revealed at La Salette, Lourdes, Fatima, etc.
St. Paul became an Apostle by Divine intervention, did he not?
I have no time or motivation to argue with you. Just letting you know my limited observation. I have been travelling over 4,000 miles round trip to St. Jovite to see Gregory XVII for over 10 years (at least twice a year). Before jumping to conclusions, if you really are looking for the true Vicar of Christ, go to St. Jovite and see for yourself...
Father Durando of the Consolata Fathers, 17 years a personal confidant of Sr. Lucy of Fatima, found out in 1963 at Lourdes that the 3rd. Secret concerned a Mystical Pope.
A little priest out there,
+Fr. Daniel E. Jones, T.O.D.M.
- Bishop -
Sangre de Cristo Newsnotes