References
Black,
R. (1998) ‘Chance, Credence, and the Principal Principle’, The British
Journal for the Philosophy of Science 49, 371-85.
Brown, J. (2004) ‘Why Thought Experiments
Transcend Empiricism’, in C. Hitchcock (ed.) Contemporary Debates in
Philosophy of Science, Oxford: Blackwell, 23-43.
Cantelli, F. P. (1935) ‘Considerations sur la Convergence
dans le Calcul des Probabilites’, Annals de l’Institut Henri Poincare V,
Presses Universitaires de France, 1-50.
Cooke, M. C. (2003)
‘Infinite Sequences: Finitist Consequence’, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 54, 591-9—revised
version here.
Cooke, M. C. (2005) ‘To
Continue with Continuity’, Metaphysica 6,
91-109—abridged version here.
Craig, E. (1990) Knowledge and the
State of Nature, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Eagle, A. (2004) ’Twenty-One
Arguments Against Propensity Analyses of Probability’, Erkenntnis 60,
371-416.
Earman, J. and J. D.
Norton (1993) ‘Forever Is A Day: Supertasks in Pitowsky and Malament-Hogarth
Spacetimes’, Philosophy of Science 60, 22-42.
Earman, J. and J. D.
Norton (1996) ‘Infinite Pains: The Trouble with Supertasks’, in A. Morton and
S. P. Stich (eds.), Benacerraf and his Critics, Oxford:
Blackwell, 231-61.
Fine,
T. (1973) Theories of Probability: An Examination of Foundations, New
York: Academic Press.
Fletcher, P. (2007) ‘Infinity’ in D. Jacquette (ed.)
Philosophy of Logic, Amsterdam: North-Holland, 523-85.
Freiling, C. (1986) ‘Axioms of
Symmetry: Throwing Darts at the Real Number Line’, Journal of Symbolic Logic
51, 190-200.
Gillies, D. (2000) Philosophical
Theories of Probability, London: Routledge.
Hacking,
I. (1965) Logic of Statistical Inference, Cambridge University Press.
Hájek,
A. (1997) ‘“Mises Redux”—Redux: Fifteen Arguments Against Finite Frequentism’, Erkenntnis
45, 209-27.
Hajek, A. (2003) ‘Interpretations
of Probability’, in E. N. Zalta (ed.)
The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Hawking, S. (2001) The
Universe in a Nutshell, London: Bantam Press.
Humphreys, P. (1985) ‘Why
Propensities Cannot Be Probabilities’, The Philosophical Review 94,
557-70.
Humphreys,
P. (2004) ‘Some Considerations on Conditional Chances’, The British Journal
for the Philosophy of Science 55, 667-80.
Kolmogorov,
A. (1956) Foundations of the Theory of Probability (2nd edition),
New York: Chelsea Publishing.
Kyberg,
H. (1974) ‘Propensities and Probabilities’, The British Journal for the
Philosophy of Science 25, 358-75.
Laplace,
P. (1995) A Philosophical Essay on Probabilities, New York: Dover.
Lewis,
D. (1986) ‘A Subjectivist’s Guide to Objective Chance’ with Postscripts, in his
Philosophical Papers, Vol. 2, Oxford University Press, 83-132.
Lewis,
D. (1994) ‘Humean Supervenience Debugged’, Mind 103, 473-90.
McCurdy,
C. (1996) ‘Humphreys’ Paradox and the Interpretation of Inverse Conditional
Propensities’, Synthese 108, 105-25.
Mellor,
D. (1969) ‘Chance’, The Aristotelian Society Supp. Vol. 43,
11-36.
Mellor,
D. (1971) The Matter of Chance, Cambridge University Press.
Perez Laraudogoitia, J. (2004) ‘Supertasks’, in E. N. Zalta (ed.) The Stanford
Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Popper, K. (1983) Realism and the
Aim of Science, London: Routledge.
Rees, M. (2001) Our
Cosmic Habitat, Princeton University Press.
Reichenbach, H. (1971) The Theory of
Probability (2nd edition), University of California Press.
Salmon,
W. (1979) ‘Propensities’ (review of Mellor 1971), Erkenntnis 14,
183-216.
Thau,
M. (1994) ‘Undermining and Admissibility’, Mind 103, 491-503.
Von
Mises, R. (1957) Probability, Statistics and Truth (2nd
edition), London: Allen and Unwin.