>This is a classic !! Actual letter by a pissed off employee at Zantex

>Computers, US...to his boss. His boss resigned very soon afterwards, the
>
>names have been changed.
>
>*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
>
> Mr. Baker,
>
>As an employee of an institution of higher education, I have a few very
>basic expectations. Chief among these is that my direct superiors have
>an
>intellect that ranges above the common ground squirrel. After your
>consistent and annoying harassment of myself and my coworkers during the
>
>commission of our duties, I can only surmise that you are one of the
>few
>true genetic wastes of our time. Asking me, a network administrator, to
>explain every little nuance of everything I do each time you happen to
>stroll into my office is not only a waste of time, but also a waste of
>precious oxygen. I was hired because I know about Unix, and you were
>apparently hired to provide amusement to myself and other employees,who
>watch you vainly attempt to understand the concept of "cut and paste"
>for
>the hundredth time. You will never understand computers. Something as
>incredibly simple as binary still gives you too many options.
>
>You will also never understand why people hate you, but I am going to
>try
>and explain it to you, even though I am sure this will be just as
>effective
>as telling you what an IP is. Your shiny new iMac has more personality
>than
>you ever will. You walk around the building all day, shiftlessly looking
>
>for fault in others. You have a sharp dressed useless look about you
>that
>may have worked for your interview, but now that you actually have
>responsibility, you pawn it off on overworked staff, hoping their talent
>
>will
>cover for your glaring ineptitude. In a world of managerial evolution,
>you
>are the blue-green algae that everyone else eats and laughs at. Managers
>
>like you are a sad proof of the Dilbert principle. Seeing as this
>situation
>is unlikely to change without you getting a full frontal lobotomy
>reversal, I am forced to tender my resignation, however I have a few
>parting thoughts.
>
>1. When someone calls you in reference to employment, it is illegal to
>give
>me a bad recommendation. The most you can say to hurt me is "I prefer
>not
>to comment." I will have friends randomly call you over the next couple
>of
>years to keep you honest, because I know you would be unable to do it on
>
>your own.
>
>2. I have all the passwords to every account on the system, and I know
>every password you have used for the last five years. If you decide to
>get
>cute, I am going to publish your "favorites list", which I
>conveniently saved when you made me "back up" your useless files. I do
>believe that terms like "Lolita" are not usually viewed favorably by the
>
>administration.
>
>3. When you borrowed the digital camera to "take pictures of your
>mothers
>b-day", you neglected to mention that you were going to take pictures of
>
>yourself in the mirror nude. Then you forgot to erase them like the
>techno-moron you really are. Suffice it to say I have never seen such
>odd
>acts with a ketchup bottle, but I assure you that those have been copied
>
>and kept in safe places pending the authoring of a glowing letter of
>recommendation. (Try to use a spell check please, I hate having to
>correct
>your mistakes.)
>
>Thank you for your time, and I expect the letter of recommendation on my
>
>desk by 8:00 am tomorrow. One word of this to anybody, and all of your
>little twisted repugnant obsessions will be open to the public. Never
>f***
>with your systems administrators, because they know what you do with all
>
>your free time.
>
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Darryl Brewer.
>
>