Subject: FILE: Committee of 300 - Part 4
Date: Sun, 15 Nov 1992 19:47:45 GMT


--- Committee of 300 - Part 4 ---------------------------------------------


   In this public attitude of the American people, the wildest
dreams of Willis Harmon and his teams of scientists became a
reality.  The  Tavistock  Institute was elated at its success in
destroying the self respect and self esteem of this once great
nation. We are told that we won the Gulf War. What is not yet
perceived by the vast majority of Americans is that, in winning
the war, it cost the self respect and honor of our nation. That lies
rotting in the desert sands of Kuwait and Iraq, alongside the
corpses of the Iraqi soldiers we butchered in the agreed retreat
from Kuwait and Basra--we could not keep our word that we
would abide by the Geneva Conventions and not attack them.
"What do you want," our controllers asked us, "victory or self
respect? You can't have both."
   One hundred years ago, this could not have happened, but
now it has happened and excites no comment. We have suc-
cumbed to the long range penetration warfare waged against
this nation by Tavistock. Like the German nation, defeated by
the Prudential Bombing Survey, enough of us have succumbed
to make this nation the kind that totalitarian regimes of the past
would have only envisaged in their dreams. "Here," they would
say, "is a nation, one of the largest in the world, that doesn't
want the truth. All of our propaganda agencies can be dispensed
with. We don't have to struggle to keep the truth from this
nation, they have willingly rejected it of their own volition. This
nation is a pushover."
   Our once proud Republic of the United States of America

                              75

became no more than a series of criminal front organizations,
which history shows is always the start of totalitarianism. This
is the stage of permanent alteration we are at in America as 1991
drew to a close. We live in a throw-away society, programmed
not to last. We do not even flinch at the 4 million homeless nor
the 30 million jobless, nor the 15 million babies murdered thus
far. They are "throw-aways" of the Age of Aquarius, a conspiracy
so damnable that, when first confronted with it, the majority
will disavow its existence, rationalizing these events as "times
have changed."
   This is how the Tavistock Institute and Willis Harmon pro-
grammed us to react. Dismantling of our ideals goes on without
protest. The spiritual and intellectual drive of our people has
been destroyed! On May 27th, 1991, President Bush made a very
profound statement, the thrust of which appears to have been
totally misused by most political commentators:

   "The moral dimension of American policy requires us to
    chart a moral course through a world of lesser evils. That
   is the real world, not black and white. Very few moral
    absolutes."

   What else could we expect from a President who is most
probably the most evil man ever to occupy the White House?
    Consider this in the light of his order to the military to bury
alive  12,000  Iraqi  soldiers.  Consider this in the light of his
ongoing  war of genocide against the Iraqi people. President
Bush was delighted to characterize President Saddam Hussein
as the "Hitler of our times." He never bothered to offer a single
scrap of proof. It was not needed. Because President Bush made
the statement, we accepted it without question. Consider this in
the bright light of truth, that he did all of these things in the
name of the American people while secretly taking his orders
from the Committee of 300.
   But, more than anything else, consider this: President Bush

                              76

and his controllers feel so secure that they no longer deem it
necessary to hide their evil control of the American people, or to
lie about it. This is self-evident in the statement that he, as our
leader, will make all manner of compromises with truth, hon-
esty and decency if his controllers (and ours) deem it necessary.
On May 27th, 1991, the President of the United States abandoned
each  and  every  principle  embodied  in  our  Constitution  and
boldly proclaimed that he was no longer bound by it. This is a
great  victory  for  the  Tavistock  Institute  and  the  Prudential
Bombing Survey, whose target changed from German worker
housing in 1945 to the soul of the American people in a war that
began in 1946 and runs through to 1992.
   Increased pressure on this nation for change was applied by
Stanford Research Institute in the early 1960's. SRl's offensive
gathered power and momentum. Switch on your television set
and you will see Stanford's victory in front of your very eyes:
talk shows featuring heavy sexual details, special video channels
where perversion, rock and roll and drugs reign supreme. Where
once John Wayne ruled, we now have a made-over apology for a
man (or is he?) called Michael Jackson, a parody of a human
being who is held up as a hero, as he gyrates, shuffles, mumbles
and screams his way across television screens in millions of
American homes.
  A woman who has been through a series of marriages gets
national coverage.  One filthy, half-washed drug-ridden deca-
lent rock band after another has hours of air time devoted to its
inane sounds and mad gyrations, clothes fashions and language
aberrations.  Soap operas showing as near as "dammit" is to
wearing pornographic scenes  draw no comment. Whereas in
early  1960 this would never have been tolerated, today it is
accepted as  normal. We have been subjected and we have
succumbed to  what Tavistock Institute calls  "future  shocks"
whose future is NOW and we are so numbed by one cultural
shock after another that to protest seems like a futile gesture
and, therefore, logically we think, it does no good to protest.

                              77
                  
   In 1986 the Committee of 300 ordered the pressure turned
up. The U.S. was not going down fast enough. The United States
began the process of "recognizing" the butchers of Cambodia,
the criminal Pol Pot regime, self confessors to the murder of 2
million Cambodian citizens. In 1991, the wheel turned the full
circle. The United States went to war against a friendly nation
that had been programmed to trust the Washington traitors. We
accused President Hussein of the small nation of Iraq of all
manner of evil, NONE OF WHICH WAS EVEN REMOTELY
TRUE. We killed and maimed its children, we left them to
starve and to die of all manner of diseases.
   In  the  same  breath  we  sent  the  Bush  emissaries  of the
Committee of 300 to Cambodia to RECOGNIZE THE EVIL
MASS MURDERERS OF 2 MILLION CAMBODIANS, who
were  sacrificed by the Committee of 300's  depopulation of
cities experiment, which the big cities of the United States will
experience in the not too distant future. Now, President Bush
and his Committee of 300-ridden administration say, in effect,
"Look people, what do you want from me? I told you that I will
compromise where I see fit, even when that means sleeping with
the Pol Pot murderers. SO WHAT--KISS MY HIPS."
   The level of pressure for change will reach its peak in 1993
and we shall witness scenes such as we would never have
thought possible. Punch drunk America will react, but ever so
slightly. Not even the latest threat to our freedom, the personal
computer card disturbs us. Willis Harman's "CHANGING IM-
AGES OF MAN" would have been too technical for most so the
service  of Marilyn Ferguson was  obtained to make  it more
easily understood. "THE AGE OF AQUARIUS" heralded nude
stage shows and a song which made the top of the charts:  "The
Dawning of the Age of the Aquarius" swept the globe.
   The personal computer card which, when fully distributed,
will deprive us of our familiar environment and, as we shall see,
environment means a lot more than the usually accepted mean-
ing of the word. The United States has gone through a period of

                              78

intense trauma such as has never been visited on any other
nation in the history of the world, and the worst is yet to come.
   Everything is  going according to what Tavistock ordered
and what the social scientists at Stanford mapped out. Times do
not change; they are made to change. All changes are preplanned
and come as the result of careful action. We have been changed
gradually at first, but now the pace of change is picking up. The
United States is being transformed from One Nation Under God
to a polyglot of nations under several gods. The U.S. is  no
longer One nation under God. The framers of the Constitution
have lost the battle.
   Our forebears spoke a common language and believed in a
common religion Christianity, and held common ideals. There
were no aliens in our midst; that came later in a deliberately
planned attempt to break up the United States into a series of
fragmented nationalities, cultures and beliefs. If you doubt this,
go down to the East Side of New York, or the West Side of Los
Angeles  on  any  given  Saturday and look around you.  The
United States has become several nations struggling to coexist
under a common system of government. When the floodgates of
immigration were opened wide by Franklin D. Roosevelt, a
cousin of the head of the Committee of 300, the cultural shock
caused great confusion and dislocation and made "One Nation"
an unworkable concept. The Club of Rome and NATO have
exacerbated the situation. "Love thy neighbor" is an ideal that
will not work unless your neighbor "is as yourself."
   To the framers of our Constitution, the truths they laid out
For future generations were "self evident"--to themselves  Be-
ing unsure that future generations would also find the truths to
which they bound this nation self evident, THEY SET ABOUT
SPELLlNG THEM OUT. IT SEEMS THAT THEY WERE
AFRAID OF A TIME THAT MIGHT COME WHEN THE
TRUTHS THEY ESPOUSED WOULD NO LONGER BE
SELF-EVIDENT. The Tavistock Institute for Human Relations
has made sure that what the framers feared might come to pass

                              79

has indeed come to pass. That time has arrived with Bush and
his "no absolutes" and his New World Order under the Committee
of 300.
   This is part of the concept of social changes forced upon
Americans which Harmon and the Club of Rome said would
make for severe trauma and a great building up of pressure. The
social  upheavals  that  have  taken  place  since  the  advent of
Tavistock, the Club of Rome and NATO will continue in the U.S.
for as long as the limit of absorption is ignored. Nations are made
up of individuals and, like individuals, there is a limit to their
ability to absorb changes, no matter how robust they may be.
   This psychological truth was well proven by the Strategic
Bombing Survey which called for saturation bombing of Ger-
man worker housing. As mentioned earlier, the project was the
work of the Prudential Insurance Company and no one doubts
today that Germany suffered its defeat because of this operation.
Many of the scientists who worked on that project are working
on saturation bombing of America, or else they have passed on,
leaving  their  skilled techniques  in the hands  of others  who
followed behind them.
   The legacy they left behind them can be found in the fact
that we have not so much lost our way as a nation, but that we
have  been  steered in  a direction opposite  to  that  which  the
framers of the Declaration guided us for over 200 years. We
have, in short, lost contact with our historical genes, our faith,
which inspired countless  generations of Americans  to move
forward as a nation, benefiting from the patrimony left to us by
the framers of the Declaration of Independence and the United
States Constitution. That we are lost is clear to all who seek the
truth, as unpleasant as it may be.
   With President Bush and his "no absolute morals" guiding
us, we blunder ahead as lost nations and individuals tend to do.
We are collaborating with the Committee of 300 for our own
downfall and our own enslavement. Some sense it--and feel a
strong sense of unease. The various conspiracy theories they are

                              80

familiar with do not seem to cover it all. This is because they
know nothing of the Conspirators'Hierarchy, The Committee
of 300.
   These souls who feel a deep sense of unease and that some-
thing is radically wrong, yet cannot put their collective fingers
on the problem, walk in darkness. They look to a future they see
slipping away from them. The American dream has become a
mirage. They place their faith in religion but take no steps to
help that faith along by ACTION. Americans will never experi-
ence a retracing of steps  such as the Europeans experienced
when at the height of the Dark Ages. By determined ACTlON,
they awoke in themselves a spirit of renewal which resulted in
the glorious Renaissance.
   The enemy that has directed them to this point decided to
make a strong move against the United States in 1980, so that
Renaissance of America would be impossible. Who is the enemy?
The enemy is no faceless "they." The enemy is clearly identifi-
able as the Committee of 300, the Club of Rome, NATO and all
of its affiliated organizations, the think tanks and research in-
stitutions  controlled by  Tavistock.  There  is  no  need  to  use
"they" or "the enemy" except as shorthand. WE KNOW WHO
"THEY," THE ENEMY, IS. The Committee of 300 with its
Eastern Liberal Establishment "aristocracy," its banks, insurance
companies,  giant corporations,  foundations,  communications
networks, presided over by a HIERARCHY OF CONSPIRA-
TORS--THIS IS THE ENEMY.
   This is the power that brought to life the reign of terror in
Russia, the Bolshevik Revolution, World Wars I and II, Korea,
Vietnam, the fall of Rhodesia, South Africa, Nicaragua, and the
Philippines.  This  is  the  secret  upper-level  government  that
brought into existence the controlled disintegration of the U.S.
economy and deindustrialized what was once the greatest indus-
rial power, for good, that the world had ever known.
   America today can be compared with a soldier who falls
asleep in the thick of battle. We Americans have fallen asleep,

                              81

given way to apathy caused by being confronted with a mult-
plicity of choices which has confused us. These are the changes
that alter our environment, break down our resistance to change
so that we become dazed, apathetic and eventually fall asleep in
the thick of battle.
    There is a technical term for this condition. It is called "long
range penetration strain." The  art of subjecting  a very  large
group of people to continued long range penetration strain was
developed by scientists working out of the Tavistock Institute of
Human Relations and their U. S. subsidiaries, Stanford Research
and Rand Corporation, and at least another 150 research institu-
tions here in the U.S.
   Dr. Kurt Lewin, the scientist who developed this fiendish
warfare, has caused the average American patriot to fret over
various conspiracy theories, leaving him or her with a feeling of
uncertainty and insecurity, isolated and perhaps even afraid, as
he searches, but fails to understand the decay and rot caused by
"THE CHANGING IMAGES OF MANKIND," unable to
identify  or combat the  social,  moral,  economic  and political
changes he deems undesirable and does not want, yet which
increase in intensity on every hand.
   Dr. Lewin's name will not be found in any of our establish-
ment history books which, in any event, are a record of events
mostly from the side of the ruling class or the victors of wars.
Therefore, it is with pride that I introduce his name to you. As
mentioned before, Dr. Lewin organized the Harvard Psycho-
logical Clinic and the Institute for Social Research under the
auspices of the Tavistock Institute.  The names do not give much
indication of the purpose of the two organizations.
   This reminds me of the infamous bill to reform coinage and
mint laws passed in 1827. The title of the bill was harmless
enough or sounded harmless, which was the intention of its
backers. Through this Act, Senator John Sherman betrayed the
nation into the hands of the international bankers.  Sherman
allegedly sponsored the bill "without reading it." As we know,

                              82

the bill's true purpose was to demonetize silver and give the
thieving bankers unlimited power over the credit of our nation;
powers to which the bankers were clearly not entitled under the
clear and unmistakable terms of the U.S. Constitution.
   Kurt Lewin gave the Tavistock Institute, the Club of Rome
and NATO unlimited power over America, to which no organi-
zation, entity or society is entitled. These institutions have used
the usurped powers to destroy the will of the nation to resist the
plans and intentions of the conspirators to rob us of the fruits of
the American  Revolution  and  steer us  on  a  course  leading
directly to a New Dark Ages under a One World Government.
   Lewin's colleagues in this long range penetration objective
were Richard Crossman, Eric Trist, H. V. Dicks, Willis Harmon,
Charles Anderson, Garner Lindsay, Richard Price and W. R.
Bion. Again, these names never appear in the evening news; in
fact, they only appear in scientific journals--so very few Ameri-
cans are aware of them and not at all aware of what the men
behind the names have done and are doing to the United States.
   President Jefferson once said he pitied those who thought
they knew what was taking place through reading the newspaper.
Disraeli, the British prime minister, said much the same thing.
Indeed, down through the ages, rulers have delighted in running
things from behind the scenes. Man has always felt the need to
dominate and nowhere and at no time is the desire more preva-
lent than in this modern era.
   If it were not so, why all the need for secret societies? If we
are  ruled  by  an  open  system run  by  democratically  elected
officials,  why  the  need for a  secret Masonic order in every
village, town and city across the United States? How is it that
Freemasonry can operate so openly and yet keep its secrets so
well hidden? We can't ask the Nine Unknown Men of the Nine
Sisters Lodge in Paris that question, nor can we ask it of their
nine fellows in the Quatuar Coronati Lodge in London. Yet
these eighteen men form part of an even more secret govern-
ment, the RIIA, and beyond that, the Committee of 3OO.

                              83

   How is it that the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry could brain-
wash John Hinckley to shoot President Reagan? Why do we
have such secret orders as the Knights of St. John of Jerusalem,
the Round Table, the Milner Group and so on down line upon
line of secret societies? They form part of a world-wide chain of
command and control running through the Club of Rome, NATO,
the RIIA and finally right up to the Conspirators' Hierarchy,
The Committee of 300. Men need these secret societies because
their deeds are evil and must be hidden. Evil cannot stand in the
light of truth.
   In this book we shall find an almost complete list of the
conspirators, their institutions, fronts and publications. In 1980
the Aquarian Conspiracy was in full swing and its success can
be  seen in every facet of our private and national  life.  The
overwhelming rise in mindless violence, serial killers, teenage
suicides, the unmistakable signs of lethargy--"long range pen-
etration" is a part of our new environment, as dangerous, if not
more so, than the polluted air that we breathe.
   The coming of the Age of Aquarius caught America totally
unprepared. We as a nation were not prepared for the changes
about to be forced upon us. Who ever had heard of Tavistock,
Kurt Lewin, Willis Harmon and John Rawlings Reese? They
were not even on the American political scene. What we would
have noticed, if we bothered to look at all, was a falling off of
our ability to withstand futuristic shock as we became more
fatigued, distressed and eventually entered a period of psycho-
logical shock followed by widespread apathy as an outward
manifestation of long range penetration warfare.
   The Age of Aquarius was best described by Tavistock Institute
as the vehicle for delivering turbulence: "There are three distinct
phases in the response and reaction to stress displayed by large
social groups. First, there is superficiality; the population under
attack will defend itself with slogans; this does not identify the
source of the crisis and therefore does nothing to address it,
hence the crisis will persist. The second is fragmentation. This

                              84

occurs  as the crisis continues and social order breaks down.
Then, there is the third phase where the population group goes
into 'self realization' and turns away from the induced crisis and
there follows a maladaptive response, accompanied with active
synoptic idealism and disassociation."
   Who can deny that with the huge increase in drug usage--
"crack" making thousands of instant new addicts each day--the
shocking rise in the murder of infants each day (aborticide),
which by  now far exceeds casualties  suffered by our armed
forces in both World Wars, Korea and Vietnam, the open accep-
tance of homosexuality and lesbianism whose "rights" are pro-
tected by more and more laws each year, the terrible plague we
call "AIDS" washing over our towns and cities, total failure of
our education system, the stunning increase in the divorce rate, a
murder rate that shocks  the rest of the world into disbelief,
satanic serial killings, the disappearance of thousands of young
children, snatched off our streets by perverts, a virtual tidal wave
of pornography accompanied by "permissiveness" on our tele-
vision screens--who can deny that this nation is in crisis, which
we are not addressing and from which we are turning away.
   Well-meaning people who specialize in these things blame a
lot of the problem on education, or what passes for it in the
United States. Criminals now abound in the age groups 9-15.
Rapists are quite commonly as young as 10. Our social special-
ists, our teacher's unions, our churches say it is all due to a
faulty education system. Witness how test scores keep drop-
ping. The specialists bewail the fact that the United States now
ranks around 39th in the level of education in the world.
  Why do we bemoan what is so obvious? OUR EDUCATlON
SYSTEM WAS PROGRAMMED TO SELF-DESTRUCT.
THAT WAS WHAT DR. ALEXANDER KING WAS SENT
HERE BY NATO TO ARRANGE. THAT IS WHAT JUSTICE
HUGO BLACK WAS ORDERED TO ARRANGE. THE FACT
IS, THE COMMITTEE OF 300, WITH THE APPROVAL OF
OUR GOVERNMENT, DOES NOT WANT OUR YOUTH TO

                              85

BE PROPERLY EDUCATED. The education that Freemason
Justice Hugo Black, Alexander King, Gunnar Myrdal and his
wife  came  to  give  the  children of the United States is that
CRIME PAYS, EXPEDIENCY IS WHAT COUNTS.
   They taught our children that United States law is unequally
applied, and that is perfectly in order. Our children were properly
educated by a decade of corrupt examples; Ronald Reagan and
George Bush were ruled by greed and became totally corrupted
by it. Our education system hasn't failed. Under the guidance of
King, Black and the Myrdals it is actually a great success, but it
all depends from whose point of view we look at it. The Com-
mittee of 300 is DELIGHTED with our education system, and
will not allow one comma of it to be changed.
   According to Stanford and Willis Harmon, the induced trauma
of long range penetration of which our education is a part, has
been going on for 45 years, yet how many are aware of the
insidious pressures being applied to our society and the constant
exposure to brainwashing that goes on every day? The mysterious
gang wars that broke out in New York in the 1950's is an
example of how the conspirators can create and stage-manage
any type of disruptive elements they like. Where those gang
wars came from nobody knew until the 1980's when researchers
uncovered the  hidden controllers who directed the so-called
"social phenomena."
   Gang wars were carefully planned at Stanford, deliberately
designed to shock society and cause ripples of disturbances. By
1958 there were in excess of 200 of these gangs. They were
made popular by a musical and a Hollywood movie, "West Side
Story." After making the news for a decade, suddenly, in 1966,
they disappeared off the streets of New York, Los Angeles
New York, New Jersey, Philadelphia and Chicago.
   Throughout the near decade of gang violence, the public
reacted according to the profiled response Stanford expected;
society as a whole could not comprehend gang warfare and the
public  responded in a maladaptive manner.  Had there been

                              86

those wise enough to recognize in gang wars a Stanford experi-
ment in social engineering and brainwashing, the conspirator's
plot would have been exposed. Either we did not have trained
specialists who could see what was going on--which is highly
unlikely--or else they were threatened and remained silent. The
cooperation with Stanford by the news media brought to light a
"new age" attack on our environment just as predicted by the
social engineers and new-science scientists at Tavistock.
   In 1989 gang warfare, as a social conditioning to change,
was reintroduced to the streets of Los Angeles. Within a few
short months of the first incidents, gangs began to proliferate--
first in the scores, then in the hundreds on the streets of the East
Side of Los Angeles. Crack houses and rampant prostitution
proliferated; drug dealers dominated the streets. Anybody who
got in their way was gunned down. The outcry in the press was
loud and long. Stanford's targeted large population group began
defending itself with slogans. This is what Tavistock called the
first phase, with the targeted group failing to identify the source
of the crisis.
   The second phase of the gang war crisis was "fragmentation."
People not living in the areas frequented by gangs said, "Thank
God they are not in our neighborhood." This ignored the fact
that the crisis continued with or without recognition and that
social  order  in Los  Angeles  had begun to break  down.  As
profiled by Tavistock, those groups not affected by gang war
"broke away to defend themselves" because the source of the
crisis was not identified, the so called "maladaptation" process
the period of disassociation.
   Apart from the proliferation of drug sales, what is the purpose
of gang wars? First, it is to show the targeted group that they are
not safe, i.e., insecurity is generated. Secondly, it is to show that
organized society is helpless in the face of such violence and
thirdly  to bring about a recognition of the fact that our social
order is collapsing. The present wave of gang violence will go
away just as quickly as it started, once the three phases of the

                              87

Stanford program are completed.
   An outstanding example of social conditioning to  accept
change, even when it is recognized as unwelcome change by the
large population group in the sights of Stanford Research Insti-
tute,  was  the  "advent" of the BEATLES.  The Beatles  were
brought to the United States as part of a social experiment which
would subject large population groups to brainwashing of which
they were not even aware.
   When Tavistock brought the Beatles to the United States
nobody could have imagined the cultural disaster that was to
follow in their wake. The Beatles were an integral part of "THE
AQUARIAN CONSPIRACY," a living organism which sprang
From "THE CHANGING IMAGES OF MAN," URH (489)-
2150-Policy Research Report No. 4/4/74. Policy Report pre-
pared by SRI Center for the study of Social Policy, Director,
Professor Willis Harmon.
   The  phenomenon of the  Beatles  was  not a  spontaneous
rebellion by youth against the old social system. Instead it was a
carefully  crafted  plot  to  introduce  by a conspiratorial body
which could not be identified, a highly destructive and divisive
element into a large population group targeted for change against
its will. New words and new phrases--prepared by Tavistock--
were introduced to America along with the Beatles. Words such
as "rock" in relation to music sounds, "teenager," "cool," "dis-
covered"  and "pop music" were a lexicon of disguised code
words signifying the acceptance of drugs and arrived with and
accompanied the Beatles wherever they went, to be "discovered"
by  "teenagers."  Incidentally, the word "teenagers"  was  never
used until just before the Beatles arrived on the scene, courtesy
of the Tavistock Institute for Human Relations.
   As in the case of gang wars, nothing could or would have
been accomplished without the cooperation of the media, espe-
cially the electronic media and, in particular, the scurrilous Ed
Sullivan who had been coached by the conspirators as to the role
he was to play. Nobody would have paid much attention to the

                              88

motley crew from Liverpool and the 12-atonal system of "music"
that was to follow had it not been for an overabundance of press
exposure. The  12-atonal system consisted of heavy, repetitive
sounds, taken from the music of the cult of Dionysus and the
Baal priesthood by Adorno and given a "modern" flavor by this
special friend of the Queen of England and hence the Committee
of 300.
   Tavistock and its Stanford Research Center created trigger
words which then came into general usage around "rock music"
and its fans. Trigger words created a distinct new break-away
largely young population group which was persuaded by social
engineering and conditioning to believe that the Beatles really
were  their  favorite  group. All trigger words devised in the
context of "rock music" were designed for mass control of the
new targeted group, the youth of America.
   The Beatles did a perfect job, or perhaps it would be more
correct to say that Tavistock and Stanford did a perfect job, the
Beatles merely reacting like trained robots "with a little help
from their friends"--code words for using drugs and making it
"cool." The Beatles became a highly visible "new type"--more
Tavistock jargon--and as such it was not long before the group
made  new  styles  (fads  in  clothing,  hairstyles  and  language
usage) which upset the older generation, as was intended. This
was part of the "fragmentation-maladaptation" process worked
out by  Willis  Harmon  and his  team  of social  scientists  and
genetic engineering tinkerers and put into action.
   The role of the print and electronic media in our society is
crucial to the success of brainwashing large population groups.
Gang wars ended in Los Angeles in 1966 as the media withdrew
its coverage. The same thing will happen with the current wave
of gang wars in Los Angeles. Street gangs will wither on the
vine once media saturation coverage is toned down and then
completely withdrawn. As in  1966, the issue would become
"burned out." Street gangs will have served their purpose of
creating turbulence and insecurity. Exactly the same pattern will

                              89

be followed in the case of "rock" music. Deprived of media
attention, it will eventually take its place in history.
   Following the Beatles, who incidentally were put together
by the Tavistock Institute, came other "Made in England" rock
groups, who, like the Beatles, had Theo Adorno write their cult
lyrics and compose all the "music." I hate to use these beautiful
words in the context of "Beatlemania"; it reminds me of how
wrongly the word "lover" is used when referring to the filthy
interaction between two homosexuals writhing in pigswill. To
call "rock" music, is an insult, likewise the language used in
"rock lyrics."
   Tavistock  and  Stanford Research  then  embarked on  the
second phase of the work commissioned by the Committee of
300. This new phase turned up the heat for social change in
America. As quickly as the Beatles had appeared on the American
scene, so too did the "beat generation," trigger words designed
to separate and fragment society. The media now focused its
attention on the "beat generation." Other Tavistock-coined words
came seemingly out of nowhere: "beatniks," "hippies," "flower
children" became part of the vocabulary of America. It became
popular to "drop out" and wear dirty jeans, go about with long
unwashed hair. The "beat generation" cut itself off from main-
stream America. They became just as infamous as the cleaner
Beatles before them.
    The newly-created group and its "lifestyle" swept millions
of young Americans into the cult. American youth underwent a
radical revolution without ever being aware of it, while the older
generation stood by helplessly, unable to identify the source of
the crisis, and thus reacting in a maladaptive manner against its
manifestation, which were drugs of all types, marijuana, and
later Lysergic acid, "LSD," so conveniently provided for them
by the Swiss pharmaceutical company, SANDOZ, following the
discovery by one of its chemists, Albert Hoffman, how to make
synthetic  ergotamine,  a  powerful  mind-altering  drug. The
Committee of 300 financed the project through one of their

                              90

banks, S. C. Warburg, and the drug was carried to America by
the philosopher, Aldous Huxley.
   The new "wonder drug" was promptly distributed in "sample"
size packages, handed out free of charge on college campuses
across the United States and at "rock" concerts, which became the
leading vehicle for proliferating the use of drugs. The question
that cries out for an answer is, what was the Drug Enforcement
Agency (DEA) doing at the time? There is compelling circum-
stantial evidence that would appear to indicate that the DEA knew
what was going on but was ordered not to take any action.
    With very substantial numbers of new British "rock" bands
arriving in the U.S., rock concerts began to become a fixture on
the social calender of American youth. In tandem with these
"concerts," the use of drugs among the youth rose in proportion.
The devilish bedlam of discordant heavy beat sounds numbed
the minds of listeners so that they were easily persuaded to try
the new drug on the basis that "everybody is doing it." Peer
pressure is a very strong weapon. The "new culture" received
maximum coverage from the jackal media, which cost the con-
spirators not one single thin dime.
   Great  anger  was  felt by  a  number of civic  leaders  and
churchmen over the new cult but their energies were misdirected
against the RESULT of what was going on and not against the
CAUSE. Critics of the rock cult made the same mistakes that had
been made in the prohibition era, they criticized law enforce-
ment agencies, teachers, parents   anybody but the conspirators.
   Because of the anger and resentment I feel toward the great
drug plague, I make no apology for using language which is not
customary for me to use. One of the worst drug slobs ever to
walk the streets of America was Alan Ginsberg. This Ginsberg
pushed the use of LSD through advertising which cost him
nothing, although under normal circumstances it would have
cost millions of dollars in TV advertising revenues. This free
advertising for drugs, and LSD in particular, reached a new high
in the late 1960's, thanks to the ever-willing cooperation of the

                              91

media. The effect of Ginsberg's mass advertising campaign was
devastating; the American public was subjected to one cultural
future shock after another in rapid succession.
   We became over-exposed and over stimulated and, again,
may I remind you that this is Tavistock jargon, lifted from the
Tavistock training manual, overwhelmed by its new develop-
ment and, when we reached that point, our minds began to lapse
into apathy; it was just too much to cope with, that is to say,
"long range penetration had taken hold of us." Ginsberg claimed
to be a poet but no greater rubbish was ever written by anyone
who ever aspired to becoming a poet. Ginsberg's designated
task had little to do with poetry; his main function was to push
the new subculture and force acceptance of it upon the large
targeted population group.
    To assist him in his task, Ginsberg coopted the services of
Norman Mailer, a writer of sorts who had spent some time in a
mental institution. Mailer was a favorite of the leftwing Holly-
wood crowd and so had no problem with getting maximum
television time for Ginsberg. Naturally Mailer had to have a
pretext--not even he could blatantly come out with the true
nature of Ginsberg's television appearances. So a charade was
adopted: Mailer would talk "seriously" on camera with Ginsberg
about poetry and literature.
   This method of getting wide television coverage at no cost
to themselves was followed by every rock group and concert
promoter who followed the example set by Ginsberg. The elec-
tronic media moguls had big hearts when it came to giving free
time to these dirty verminous creatures and their even dirtier
products and filthy ideas. Their promotion of horrible garbage
spoke volumes and, without abundant help from the print and
electronic media, the drug trade could not have spread as rapidly
as it did in the late 1960's-early 197O's, and probably would
have been confined to a few small local areas.
    Ginsberg was able to give several nationally televised per-
formances extolling the virtues of LSD and marijuana, under

                              92

the guise of "new ideas" and "new cultures" developing in the
art and music world. Not to be outdone by the electronic media,
Ginsberg's admirers wrote glowing articles about "this colorful
man" in the art and social columns of all of America,s largest
newspapers and magazines. There had never been such an across-
the-media-board free  advertising  campaign  in  the  history of
newspaper, radio and television and it cost the promoters of the
Aquarian conspiracy, NATO and the Club of Rome not one red
cent. It was all absolutely free advertising for LSD, only thinly
disguised as "art" and "culture."
   One of Ginsberg's closest friends, Kenny Love, published a
Five-page report in the New York Times. This is in accordance
with  the  methodology  used by  Tavistock and  Stanford Re-
search: If something is to be promoted which the public has not
yet been fully brainwashed to accept, then have someone write
an article, covering all sides of the subject matter. The other
method is to have live television talk shows in which a panel of
experts promotes the product and or idea under the pretext of
"discussing", it. There are point and counter-point, both pro and
con participants airing their support or opposition. When it is all
over, the subject to be promoted has been dinned into the public
mind.  While  this  was  new in  the  early 1970's, today it is
standard practice on which talk shows thrive.
   Love's Five-page pro LSD pro Ginsberg article was duly
printed by the New York Times. Had Ginsberg tried to buy the
same amount of space in an advertisement, it would have cost
him at least $50,000. But Ginsberg didn't have to worry; thanks
to his Friend Kenny Love, Ginsberg got the massive advertising
all for free. With newspapers like the New York Times and the
Washington Post under the control of the Committee of 300, this
kind of free advertising is given to any subject matter, and more
especially to those promoting decadent life styles--drugs-hedo-
nism--anything that will confuse the American people. After
the trial run with Ginsberg and LSD, it became standard Club of
Rome practice to call upon major newspapers in America to

                              93

give free advertising on demand to people and ideas they were
promoting.
   Worse yet--or better yet, depending upon the viewpoint--
United Press (UP) picked up Kenny Love's free advertising for
Ginsberg and LSD and telexed it to HUNDREDS of newspa-
pers and magazines around the country under the guise of a
"news"  story.  Even  such  highly  respectable  establishment
magazines as "Harpers Bazaar" and "TIME" made Mr. Ginsberg
respectable. If a nation-wide campaign of this magnitude were
presented to Ginsberg and the promoters of LSD by an advertising
agency, the price tag would have run into at least $1 million in
terms of 1970 dollars. Today the price tag would be nothing less
than $15-$16 million dollars. It is no wonder that I refer to the
news media as "jackals."
   I suggest that we try to find any media outlet to do an expose
on the Federal Reserve Board, which is what I did. I took my
article,  which was  a good expose of the greatest swindle on
earth, to every major newspaper, radio and television station,
magazine  house  and  several talk-show  hosts. A few  made
promises  that  sounded  good--they  would  definitely  air  the
article and have me discuss it--give them about a week and they
would get back to me. Not one of them ever did, nor did my
article ever appear in the pages of their newspapers and journals.
It was as if a blanket of silence had been thrown over me and the
subject  I  was  endeavoring to promote,  and indeed that was
precisely what had happened.
   Without massive media hype, and without almost around
the clock coverage, the hippy-beatnik rock, drug cult would
never have gotten off the ground; it would have remained a
localized oddity. The Beatles, with their twanging guitars, silly
expressions, drug language and weird clothes, would not have
amounted to a hill of beans. Instead, because the Beatles were
given saturation coverage by the media, the United States has
suffered one cultural shock after another.
   The men buried in the think tanks and research institutions,

                              94

whose names and faces are still not known to but a few people,
made sure that the press played its part. Conversely, the media's
important role  in  not exposing  the  power behind  the  future
cultural shocks made certain that the source of the crisis was
never identified.  Thus  was  our society  driven  mad  through
psychological shocks and stress. "Driven mad" is taken from
Tavistock's  training manual. From its modest beginnings  in
1921, Tavistock was ready in 1966 to launch a major irrevers-
ible cultural revolution in America, which has not yet ended.
The Aquarian Conspiracy is part of it.
   Thus softened up, our nation was now deemed ripe for the
introduction of drugs which was to rival the prohibition era in
scope and the huge amounts of money to be made. This too was
an integral part of the Aquarian Conspiracy. The proliferation of
drug usage was one of the subjects under study at the Science
Policy Research Unit (SPRU) at Tavistock's Sussex University
facility. It was known as the "future shocks" center, a title given
to so-called future oriented psychology designed to manipulate
whole population groups to induce "future shocks." It was the
first of several such institutions set up by Tavistock.
    "Future  shocks"  is  described  as  a series  of events  which
come so fast that the human brain cannot absorb the information.
As I said earlier, science has shown that there are clearly marked
limits to the amount of changes and the nature of them that the
mind can deal with. After continuous shocks, the large targeted
population group discovers that it does not want to make choices
any more. Apathy takes over, often preceded by mindless violence
such as is characteristic of the Los Angeles street gangs, serial
killers, rapists and child kidnapers.
   Such a group becomes easy to control and will docilely
follow  orders  without rebelling,  which is the object of the
exercise. "Future shocks," says SPRU, "is defined as physical
and psychological distress arising from the excess load on the
decision-making mechanism of the  human mind."  That  is
Tavistock jargon lifted straight from Tavistock manuals--which

                              95

they don't know I have.
   Just as an overloaded electrical circuit will activate a trip
switch, so do humans "trip  out," which is a syndrome that
medical science is only now beginning to understand, although
John Rawlings Reese conducted experiments in this field as far
back as the 1920's. As can be appreciated, such a targeted group
is ready to "trip out" and take to drugs as a means of escape from
the pressures of so many choices having to be made. This is how
Drug  usage  was  spread  so  rapidly  through America's "beat
generation." What started with the Beatles and sample packages
of LSD has grown into a flood-tide of drug usage which is
swamping America.
   The drug trade is controlled by the Committee of 300 from
the Top down. The drug trade started with the British East India
Company and was closely followed by the Dutch East India
Company. Both were controlled by a "Council of 300." The list
of names of members and stockholders of the BEIC read like
something out of Debretts Peerage. BEIC established the "China
Inland Mission," whose job it was to get The Chinese peasants,
or coolies, as they were called, addicted to opium. This created
the market for opium which the BEIC then filled.
   In much the same way the Committee of 300 used "The
"Beatles" to popularize "social drugs" with the youth of America
and The Hollywood "in-crowd." Ed Sullivan was sent to England
To become acquainted with The first Tavistock Institute "rock
group"  to  hit the  shores  of the United States. Sullivan then
returned to the United States to draft the strategy for the electronic
media on how to package and sell the group. Without the full
cooperation of the electronic media and Ed Sullivan, in particular,
"The Beatles" and their "music" would have died on the vine.
Instead, our national life and the character of the United States
was forever changed.
   Now that we know, it is all too clear how successful the
"Beatles" campaign to proliferate the use of drugs became. The
fact that "The Beatles" had their music and lyrics written for

                              96

them by Theo Adorno was concealed from public view. The
prime function to "The Beatles" was to be discovered by teen-
agers,  who  where  then  subjected  to  a non-stop  barrage of
"Beatle music," until they became convinced that they liked the
sound and adopted it, along with all that accompanied it. The
Liverpool group performed up to expectations, and with "a little
help from their friends," i.e., illegal substances we call drugs
created a whole new class to young Americans in the precise
mold ordained by the Tavistock Institute.
    Tavistock had created a highly visible "new type" to act as
their drug-runners. The China Inland Mission "Christian mis-
sionaries" would not have fitted in with the 1960's. "New type"
is  social-science scientist jargon;  what it meant was that the
Beatles created new social patterns, first and foremost being to
normalize and popularize the use of drugs, new tastes in clothes
and hair styles which really distinguished them from the older
generation as was intended by Tavistock.
   It is important to note the deliberate fragmentation-inducing
language used by Tavistock. The "teenagers" never once dreamed
that all the "different" things they aspired to were the product
of older scientists working in think tanks in England and Stanford
Research. How mortified they would have been if they had
discovered that most of their "cool" habits and expressions were
deliberately created for their use by a group of older social
science scientists!
   The role of the media was, and remains, very important in
promoting the use of drugs on a nation-wide scale. When cov-
erage of the street warfare gangs was abruptly terminated by the
media, they became "burned out" as a social phenomena; the
"new age" of drugs followed. The media has always served as a
catalyst and has always pushed "new causes" and now media
attention  was focused on drug usage and its  supporters, the
"beat generation," yet another phrase fashioned at Tavistock, in
its  determined efforts  to bring  about social  changes  in The
United States.

                              97

   Drug usage now became an accepted part of everyday life in
America. This Tavistock-designed program took in millions of
American youth, and the older generation began to believe that
America was undergoing a natural social revolution, failing all
the while to realize that what was happening to their children
was not a spontaneous movement, but a highly artificial creation
designed to force changes in America's social and political life.
   The descendants of the British East India Company were
delighted with the success of their drug pushing program. Their
disciples became adept in the use of lysergic acid (LSD)  so
conveniently made available by patrons of the drug trade like
Aldous Huxley, courtesy of the highly respected Sandoz company
of Switzerland  and financed by the great Warburg banking
dynasty. The new "wonder drug" was promptly distributed at all
rock concerts and on college campuses in free sample packages.
The question that begs to be asked is, "What was the FBI doing
while all this was going on?"
   The purpose of the Beatles had become abundantly clear.
The British East India Company's descendants in the upper-
class  society in London must have felt very good about the
billions of dollars that began rolling in. With the coming of
"rock" which shall henceforth be used as shorthand to describe
Adorno's fiendish satanic music, a tremendous increase in the
use of social drugs, especially marijuana, was observed. The
entire dope business was expanded under the control and direction
of the Science Policy Research Unit (SPRU).
   SPRU was run by Leland Bradford, Kenneth Damm and
Ronald Lippert, under whose expert guidance a large number of
new-science scientists were trained to promote "future shocks,"
one of the chief being the dramatic increase in the use of drugs
by America's teenagers. SPRU's policy papers, planted in vari-
ous  government  agencies,  including  the  Drug  Enforcement
Agency (DEA), dictated the course of the disastrous "drug war"
allegedly waged by the Reagan and Bush Administrations.
   This was the forerunner of how the United States is run

                              98
                 
today,  by one committee and/or council after another, by an
inner-government fed on Tavistock papers which they firmly
believe  are their own opinions. These virtual unknowns  are
making decisions that will forever change our form of govern-
ment and the quality of life here in the United States. Through
"crisis adaptation" we have already been changed so much as to
barely compare with what we were in the  1950's. Also, our
environment has been changed.
   There is much talk about environment these days and, while
it mostly refers to green surroundings, pure rivers and fresh air,
there is another, equally important environment,  namely, the
drug environment. The environment of our life style has become
polluted; our thinking has become polluted. Our ability to con-
trol our destiny has become polluted. We are confronted by
changes that pollute our thinking to the extent that we do not
know what to make of it all. The "Environment of Change" is
crippling the nation; we appear to have so little control that it
has produced anxiety and confusion.
   We now look to group solutions instead of individual solu-
tions to our problems. We do not make use of our own resources
to solve problems. In this the prolific rise in drug usage is playing
a leading role. The strategy is a deliberate one, devised by the
new-science scientists, the social engineers and tinkerers, aimed
at the most vulnerable of all areas, our self-image, or how we
perceive ourselves, which leads us eventually to become like
sheep being led to the slaughter. We have become confused by the
many choices we have to make, and we have become apathetic.
  We  are  manipulated by  unscrupulous  men  without  ever
being aware of it. This is particularly true of the drug trade and
we are now in the transition stage where we can be set up for a
change  from the present constitutional  form of government,
which has taken a giant step forward under the Bush administra-
tion. While there are those who still persist, in the face of all of
the  evidence  to  the  contrary  in  saying,  "It can't happen in
America," the fact is: IT HAS ALREADY HAPPENED. Our

                              99

will to resist events not to our liking has been steadily eroded
and undermined. We will resist, some of us say, but not so many
of us will do that, and we will be in the minority.
   The drug trade has insidiously changed our environment.
The  alleged  "war on  drugs"  is  a farce; it does not exist in
qualitative measure to make the slightest difference to the de-
scendants of the British East India Company. Combined with
computerization, we are almost fully brainwashed, robbed of
our ability to resist forced changes. Which brings us to another
environment, PEOPLE CONTROL, also known as personal
information control, without which governments cannot play
their numbers game.
   As matters stand, we the people have absolutely no way of
knowing just what government does or does not know about us.
Government computer files are not subject to scrutiny by the public
at  large.  Do  we  foolishly  believe  that personal  information
sacrosanct? Remember, in every society there are rich and power-
ful families who control law enforcement agencies. I have proved
the existence of such families. Do not think that if these families
wanted to find out about us, they could not do so. These are the
families who often have a member in the Committee of 300.
   Take Kissinger, for instance, who has his own private dos-
siers on hundreds of thousands of people, not only in the U.S.
but all over the world. Are we on Kissinger's enemy list? Is this
far fetched? Not at all. Take P2 Masonic and Committee Monte
Carlo who have such lists which run into tens of thousands of
names. Incidentally, Kissinger is one of them. There are other
"private" intelligence agencies, such as INTEL, whom we shall
meet later.
   One of the ways heroin is moved into Europe is through the
Principality of Monaco. The heroin comes from Corsica carried
in ferries that ply a busy trade between Corsica and Monte Carlo
during the summer. There is no check of what goes on or comes
off these ferries. As  there  is  no border between France  and
Monaco, drugs, and more especially heroin (partly processed

                              100

opium), flows through the open border of Monaco into laborato-
ries  in  France, or else if it has already been processed into
heroin, it goes directly to the distributors.
   The Grimaldi family has been in the drug smuggling busi-
ness for centuries. Because Prince Ranier got greedy and began
skimming heavily and would not desist after three warnings, his
wife, Princess Grace, was murdered in a car "accident." Ranier
underestimated the power of the Committee of which he is a
member. The Rover car in which she was traveling had the
brake fluid chambers tampered with in such a way that each
time the brakes were depressed, fluid was released in measured
amount, until by the time the car reached the most dangerous of
several hairpin bends, there was no stopping power, and it sailed
over  a  stone  wall, hitting the ground fifty feet below in a
sickening smash.
   Everything possible was  done by the Committee of 300
operatives to conceal the truth about the murder of Princess
Grace.  To this day the Rover car remains in the custody of
French police, shrouded under a cover on a trailer which no one
is allowed to approach, let alone examine. The signal for the
execution of Princess Grace was picked up by the British Army
listening post in Cyprus and it is believed by well placed source
that the Committee Monte Carlo and P2 gave the order.
   The drug trade, controlled by the Committee of 300, is a
crime against humanity, but having been conditioned and softened
up by years of incessant bombardment by Tavistock Institute,
we have more or less accepted our changed environment, re-
garding the drug trade as a problem that is "too big" to handle.
This is not the case. If we could marshal an entire nation, equip
and  send millions of American soldiers to fight in a war in
Europe in which he had no business intervening, if we could
defeat a major power, then we can smash the drug trade, using
the same WW II tactics.
   The  logistical problems that had to be  solved when we
entered the Second World War are even today still mind-boggling.

                              101


<<<<< cont in Committee of 300 - Part 5 >>>>>
