Subject: FILE: Committee of 300 - Part 3
Date: Sun, 15 Nov 1992 19:45:15 GMT


----- Committee of 300 - Part 3 ----------------------------------------


Copyright (C) 1992 by Dr. John Coleman

"Conspirators' Hierarchy: The Story of the Committee of 300", by
Dr. John Coleman, is reproduced here with the permission of the
publisher: America West Publishers.


               INSTITUTlONS THROUGH WHICH

                  CONTROL IS EXERCISED

   Profiling is a technique developed in 1922 on command of
the Royal Institute for International Affairs (RIIA). Major John
Rawlings Reese, a British Army technician, was instructed to
set up the largest brainwashing facility in the world at the
Tavistock Institute for Human Relations as a part of Sussex
University.  This became  the core of Britain's  Psychological
Warfare Bureau. When I first introduced the names of Reese and
Tavistock into the United States in 1970, very little interest was
shown. But over the years, as I revealed more and more about
Tavistock  and its  vital role  in the conspiracy,  it has become
popular to imitate my earlier research.
   Britain's Psychological Warfare Bureau made extensive use
of the work done by Reese on his 80,000 British Army guinea
pigs, captive soldiers who underwent many forms of testing. It
was Tavistock-designed methods that got the United States into
the Second World War and which, under the guidance of Dr.
Kurt Lewin, established the OSS, the forerunner of the CIA.
Lewin became the director of the Strategic Bombing Survey,

                              48

which was a plan for the Royal Air Force to concentrate on
bombing German worker housing while leaving military tar-
gets,  such as munition plants, alone. The munition plants on
both sides belonged to the international bankers who had no
wish to see their assets destroyed.
   Later, after the war was over, NATO ordered Sussex Univer-
sity to establish a very special brainwashing center which became
part of Britain's Psychological Warfare Bureau, only now, its
research was directed toward civilian rather than military ap-
plications. We shall return to that super secret unit which was
called  Science  Policy  Research  Institute  (SPRI) under our
chapters on drugs.
   The  idea  behind  saturation  bombing  of civilian  worker
housing was to break the morale of the German worker. It was
not designed to affect the war effort against the German military
machine.  Lewin  and his  team of actuaries  reached  a target
figure, that if 65% of German worker housing was destroyed by
nightly RAF bombing, the morale of the civilian population
would collapse. The actual document was prepared by the Pru-
dential Assurance Company.
   The RAF, under the command of "Bomber" Harris, carried
out Lewin's plans, culminating in the terror firestorm bombing
of Dresden, in which over 125,000, mainly old men, women and
children,  were killed. The truth of "Bomber" Harris's horror
raids on German civilians was a well kept secret until long after
the end of WW II.
   Tavistock provided most of the detailed programs that led to
the establishing of the Office of Naval Intelligence, (ONI) the
number one intelligence service in the United States, one which
dwarfs the CIA in size and scope. Contracts worth billions of
dollars were given to Tavistock by the United States Government
and Tavistock's  strategic planners provide most of what the
Pentagon uses for our defense establishment, even today. Here
again is illustrated the grip the Committee of 300 has on the
United States, and the majority of our institutions. Tavistock

                              49

runs over 30 research institutions in the United States, all of
which we will name in our charts at the end of the book.
   These Tavistock-U.S. institutions have in many cases grown
into gargantuan monsters, penetrating every aspect of our gov-
ernment agencies and taking command of all policy making.
One of Tavistock's chief wreckers of our way of life was Dr.
Alexander King, a founder member of NATO and a favorite
with the Committee of 300, as well as an outstanding member of
the Club of Rome. Dr. King was assigned by the Club of Rome
to destroy America's education by taking control of the National
Teachers Association and working in close conjunction with
certain law makers and judges. If it was not generally known
how all-pervading is the influence of the Committee of 300, this
book should dispel every vestige of that doubt.
   The trial run for the Federal Emergency Management Agency
(FEMA)   a Club of Rome creation   came in a test run against
the  nuclear  power  station  at Three Mile Island, Harrisburg,
Pennsylvania. Termed "an accident" by the hysterical media,
this was not an accident but a deliberately designed crisis test
for FEMA. An additional benefit was  the fear and hysteria
created by the news media which had people fleeing the area
when in fact they were never in any danger.
   It was considered a success by FEMA and it scored a lot of
points for the anti-nuclear forces. TMI became the rallying 
point for the so-called "environmentalists," a highly financed and
controlled group run out of Aspen Institute on behalf of the Club
of Rome. Coverage was provided free of charge by William
Paley of CBS television, a former British intelligence agent.
   FEMA is a natural successor to the Strategic Bombing Survey
of WW II. Dr. Kurt Lewin, theoretician for what the Tavistock
conspirators called crisis management, was deeply involved in
the  study.  There  is  an  unbroken  chain between  Lewin  and
Tavistock that stretches back for thirty-seven years. Lewin in-
corporated the Strategic Bombing Survey into FEMA, with only
a few small adjustments proving necessary, one of the changes

                              50
                                               
being the target, WHICH WAS NO LONGER GERMANY BUT
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. Forty-five years after
the end of WW II it is still Tavistock that has its hands on the
trigger, and the weapon is pointed at the United States.
   The late Margaret Mead conducted an intensive study of the
German and Japanese population, under the aegis of Tavistock,
on how they reacted to stress caused by aerial bombardment.
Irving Janus was an associate professor on the project which
was  supervised by  Dr.  John  Rawlings  Reese,  promoted  to
Brigadier-General in the British Army. The test results  were
given to FEMA. The Irving Janus report was of great value in
formulating FEMA policies. Janus used it in a book which he
later wrote entitled AIR WAR AND STRESS. The ideas in his book
were followed TO THE LETTER BY FEMA DURING THE
THREE MILE ISLAND "CRISIS." Janus had a really simple
idea: Simulate a succession of crises and manipulate the popu-
lation following the Lewin terror tactics and they will do exactly
as required.
   In carrying out this exercise, Lewin discovered something
new, that social control on a wide scale can be achieved by using
the news media to bring home the horrors of a nuclear war via
the television media. It was discovered that women's magazines
were very effective in dramatizing the terrors of a nuclear war. A
trial run conducted by Janus had Betty Bumpers, wife of Sena-
tor Dale Bumpers of Arkansas, "writing" for McCalls magazine
on that subject.
   The article appeared in McCalls January 1983 issue. Actu-
ally, Mrs. Bumpers did not write the article, it was created for
her by a group of writers at Tavistock whose speciality such
subject matters are. It was a collection of untruths, non-facts,
innuendoes and conjectures based entirely upon false premises.
The Bumpers article was typical of the kind of psychological
manipulation at which Tavistock is so very good. Not one of the
ladies who read McCalls could have failed to be impressed by
the terror-horror story of what a nuclear war looks like.

                              51

   The Committee of 300 has a major bureaucracy at its dis-
posal made up of hundreds of think tanks and front organizations
that run the whole gamut of private business and government
leaders. I will mention as many as I can fit in, starting with the
German Marshall Fund. Its members, and remember they are
also members of NATO and the Club of Rome, consist of David
Rockefeller of Chase Manhattan Bank, Gabriel Hague of the
prestigious Manufactures Hanover Trust and Finance Corpora-
tion, Milton Katz of the Ford Foundation, Willy Brandt, leader
of Socialist International, KGB agent and member of the Com-
mittee of 300, Irving Bluestone, chairman of the United Auto
Workers Executive Board, Russell Train, U.S. president of the
Club of Rome and Prince Philip's World Wildlife Fund, Elizabeth
Midgely, CBS programs producer, B. R. Gifford, director of the
Russell Sage Foundation, Guido Goldman of the Aspen Institute
the  late Averill  Harriman,  Committee  of 300  extraordinary
member, Thomas L. Hughes of the Carnegie Endowment Fund,
Dennis Meadows and Jay Forrestor of MIT "world dynamics."
   The Committee of 300, although in existence for over 150
years, did not take on its present form until around 1897. It was
always given to issuing orders through other fronts, such as the
Royal Institute for International Affairs. When it was decided
that a  super-body  would control European  affairs,  the  RIIA
founded the Tavistock Institute, which in turn created NATO.
For Five years NATO was financed by the German Marshall
Fund. Perhaps the most important member of the Bilderbergers,
a foreign policy body of the Committee, was Joseph Rettinger,
said  to  have  been  its  founder and organizer, whose annual
meetings have delighted conspiracy hunters for several decades.
    Rettinger was a well-trained Jesuit priest and a 33rd Degree
Freemason. Mrs. Katherine Meyer Graham who is suspected of
having murdered her husband in order to get control of the
Washington Post, was another ranking member of the Club of
Rome, as was Paul G. Hoffman of the New York Life Insurance
Company, one of the largest insurance companies in the United

                              52

States and a leading Rank company, with ties directly to Queen
Elizabeth of England's immediate family. John J. McCloy, the
man who attempted to wipe post-World War II Germany off the
map and last but not least, James A. Perkins of the Carnegie
Corporation, were also founding members of the Bilderbergers
and the Club of Rome.
   What a star-studded cast! Yet strangely enough, few if any
outside of genuine intelligence agencies had ever heard of this
organization until recent times. The power exercised by these
important personages and the corporations, television stations
newspapers,  insurance  companies  and  banks  they  represent
matches the power and prestige of at least two European coun-
tries, and still this is only the tip of The Committee of 300's
enormous cross-gridding and interfaced interests.
   Not mentioned in the foregoing line-up is Richard Gardner
who, although an early member of the Committee of 300, was
sent to Rome on a special assignment. Gardner married into one
of the oldest Black Nobility families of Venice, thus providing
the Venetian aristocracy a direct line to the White House. The
late Averill Harriman was another of the committee's direct
links with the Kremlin and the White House, a position which
Kissinger inherited after the death of Harriman.
   The Club of Rome is indeed a formidable agency of the
Committee of 300. Although ostensibly working on American
affairs, the group overlaps other Committee of 300 agencies and
its United States members are often found working with "prob-
lems" in Japan and Germany. Some of the front organizations
operated by the above committee include the following, although
not limited to them:

LEAGUE OF INDUSTRIAL DEMOCRACY
   Officials:  Michael  Novak,  Jeane  Kirkpatrick,  Eugene
Rostow, IRWIN SUALL, Lane Kirkland, Albert Schenker.
   Purpose: To disrupt and disturb normal labor relations be-
tween workers and employees by brain washing labor unions to

                              53

make impossible demands with special attention to steel, auto-
mobile and housing industries.

FREEDOM HOUSE
   Officials: Leo Churn and Carl Gershman.
   Purpose: To spread socialist disinformation among Ameri-
can blue collar workers, spread dissension and dissatisfaction.
Now that these objectives have been largely realized, Gershman
has been drafted by Lawrence Eagleburger to CEDC, a newly
created body to stop a united Germany from expanding its trade
into the Danube Basin.

COMMITTEE FOR A DEMOCRATIC MAJORITY
   Officials: Ben Wattenburg, Jean Kirkpatrick, Elmo Zumwa
and Midge Dector.
   Purpose: To provide a connecting link between the edu-
cated  socialist  class  and  minority  groups  with  the  intent of
setting up a solid block of voters who can be counted on to vote
for leftwing candidates at election time. It was really a Fabianist
operation from start to finish.

FOREIGN POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE
    Officials: Robert Strausz Hupe.
   Purpose: To undermine and eventually end NASA space
program.

SOCIAL DEMOCRATS U.S.A.
   Officials: Bayard Rustin, Lane Kirkland, Jay Lovestone,
Carl Gershman, Howard Samuel, Sidney Hook.
   Purpose:  To  spread radical  socialism,  especially  among
minority groups, and forge links between similar organizations
in socialist countries. Lovestone was for decades the leading
advisor to U.S. presidents on Soviet affairs and a strong direct
link with Moscow.

                              54

INSTITUTE FOR SOCIAL RELATIONS
   Officials: Harland Cleveland, Willis Harmon.
   Purpose: Change the way America thinks.

THE CITIZENS LEAGUE
   Officials: Barry Commoner.
   Purpose: To bring "common cause" legal suits against vari-
ous government agencies, especially in the defense industries.

WAR RESISTERS LEAGUE
   Officials: Noam Chomsky and David McReynolds.
   Purpose: To organize resistance to the Vietnam War among
leftwing groups, students and the Hollywood "in crowd."

THE DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST ORGANIZING
COMMITTEE OF THE INSTITUTE FOR
DEMOCRATIC SOCIALISM
   Officials:  Frank  Zeider, Arthur  Redier  and David
McReynolds.
   Purpose: A clearing house for leftwing socialist ideas and
activities in the U.S and Europe.

ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE  FACT FINDING
DIVISION
   Officials: IRWIN SUALL, also known as John Graham.
   Purpose: A joint FBI-British intelligence operation designed
to single out rightwing groups and their leaders and put them out
of business before they grow too large and too influential.

INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MACHINISTS
   Purpose: A labor oriented front for the Socialist Interna-
tional and a hot-bed of organized labor unrest polarizing work-
ers and management.

                              55

AMALGAMATED CLOTHING WORKERS
   Officials:  Murray Findley,  IRWIN  SUALL and Jacob
Scheinkman.
   Purpose: Much the same as the Machinists Union, to so-
cialize and polarize workers in the garment trade.

A. PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE
   Officials: Bayard Rustin.
   Purpose: To provide a means of coordinating organizations
with a common purpose, an example of which would be the
spread of socialist ideas among college students and workers.

CAMBRIDGE POLICY STUDIES INSTITUTE
    Officials: Gar Apelrovitz.
   Purpose: To expand on the work being done at the Institute
for Policy Studies. Founded in February 1969 by international
socialist, Gar Apelrovitz, former assistant to Senator Gaylord
Nelson. Apelrovitz wrote the controversial book ATOMIC DI-
PLOMACY for the Club of Rome which work was financed by
the German  Marshall Fund.  It concentrates  on research and
action projects, with a stated goal of fundamentally changing
American society, i.e., to create a Fabianist United States in
preparation of the coming One World Government.

ECONOMIC COMMITTEE OF THE NORTH
ATLANTIC INSTITUTE
    Officials: Dr. Aurellio Peccei.
   Purpose: NATO think-tank on global economic issues.

CENTER FOR THE STUDY OF DEMOCRATIC
INSTITUTIONS
   Officials: Founder Robert Hutchins of the Committee of
300, Harry Ashmore, Frank Kelly and a large group of "Fellows."
   Purpose: To spread ideas that will bring on social reforms

                              56

of the liberal kind with democracy as an ideology. One of its
activities is to draft a new constitution for the U.S. which will be
strongly monarchical and socialistic as found in Denmark.
    The Center is an "Olympian" stronghold. Located in Santa
Barbara,  it  is  housed  in  what  is  affectionately  called  "the
Parthenon." Former Representative John Rarick called it "an
outfit loaded with Communists." By 1973 work on a new United
States Constitution was in its thirty-fifth draft which proposes
an amendment guaranteeing "environmental right," the thrust of
which is to reduce the industrial base of the U.S. to a mere
whisper of what it was in 1969. In other words, this institution is
carrying out Club of Rome zero-growth post-industrial policies
laid down by the Committee of 300.
   Some of its  other aims  are control  of economic  cycles,
welfare, regulation of business and national public works, con-
trol of pollution. Speaking on behalf of the Committee of 300,
Ashmore says the function of the CSDI is to find ways and
means of making our political system work more effectively.
"We must change education and we must consider a new U.S
Constitution and a Constitution for the world," Ashmore says.
   Further goals enunciated by Ashmore are as follows:
   (1) Membership of the U.N. must be made universal.
   (2) The U.N. must be strengthened.
   (3) South East Asia must be neutralized. (For neutralized,
       read "Communized.")
   (4) Cold War must be ended.
   (5) Racial discrimination must be abolished.
   (6) Developing nations must be assisted. (Meaning assisted
       to destruct.)
   (7) No military solutions to problems. (Pity they didn't tell
       George Bush that before the Gulf War.)
   (8) National solutions are not adequate.
   (9) Coexistence is necessary.

                              57

HARVARD PSYCHOLOGICAL CLINIC
   Officials:  Dr.  Kurt Lewin  and  staff of 15  new-science
scientists.
   Purpose: To create a climate where the Committee of 300
can take unlimited power over the U.S.

INSTITUTE FOR SOCIAL RESEARCH
   Officials:  Dr.  Kurt  Lewin  and  staff of 20  new-science
scientists.
   Purpose: To devise a whole new set of social programs to
steer America away from industry.

SCIENCE POLICY RESEARCH UNIT
   Officials: Leland Bradford, Kenneth Dam, Ronald Lippert.
   Purpose: A "Future Shocks" research institution at Sussex
University in England and part of the Tavistock network.

SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
   Officials:  Sheldon Arenberg and a staff of hundreds, too
numerous to mention here.
   Purpose:  To  coordinate  all  elements  of the  intelligence
communities of the U.S.A. and Britain. It analyzes what "play-
ers" have to be assigned the role of a national entity; for example,
Spain  would come  under a  supine  watered-down Catholic
Church, the U.N. under the Secretary General and so forth. It
developed the system of "X RAY 2" where think tank personnel,
military installations and law enforcement centers are all linked
to the Pentagon through a nation-wide network of Teletypes and
computers: To apply surveillance techniques on a nation-wide
scale. Arenberg says his ideas are non-military, but his techniques
are mainly those he learned from the military. He was responsible
for the New York State Identification and Intelligence System, a
typical  George  Orwell  "1984"  project,  which  is  completely
illegal  under our Constitution. The NYSIIS  system is in the
process  of being  adopted  nationwide.  It  is  what  Brzezinsk

                              58

referred to as the ability to almost instantaneously retrieve data
about any person.
   NYSIIS shares data with all law enforcement and govern-
ment agencies in the state. It provides storage and rapid retrieval
of individual records,  criminal  and  social.  It  is  a TYPICAL
Committee of 300 project. There is a crying need for a full
investigation to be conducted into just what it is that Systems
Development Corporation is doing, but that is beyond the scope
of this book. One thing is sure, SDC is not there to preserve
freedom and liberty guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution. How
convenient that it should be located in Santa Barbara in easy
reach of Robert Hutchins "Parthenon." Some publications put
out by these Club of Rome institutions are as follows:
       "Center Magazine"
       "Counterspy"
       "Coventry"
       "Covert Action Information Bulletin"
       "Dissent"
       "Human Relations"
       "Industrial Research"
       "Inquiry"
       "Mother Jones"
       "One"
       "Progressive"
       "Raconteur"
       "The New Republic"
       "Working Papers for a New Society"
   These are by no means all of the publications issued under
the auspices of the Club of Rome. There are many hundreds
more, in fact each of the foundations puts out its own publication.
Given the number of foundations run by the Tavistock Institute
and the Club of Rome, a partial listing is all we can include here.
Some of the more important foundations and think tanks are in
the following list, which includes Army think tanks.
   The American public would be astounded if it only knew

                              59

how deeply the Army is involved in "new war tactics" research
with Committee of 300 "think tanks." Americans are not aware
that in 1946 the Club of Rome was ordered by the Committee of
300 to further the progress of think tanks which it said offered a
new means of spreading the Committee's philosophy. The impact
of these think tanks upon our military, just since 1959 when they
suddenly proliferated, is truly astounding. There is no doubt that
they will play an even  greater role in the daily affairs of this
nation as we come to the close of the 20th century.

THE MONT PELERIN SOCIETY
   Mont Pelerin is an economic foundation devoted to issuing
misleading economic theories and influencing economists in the
Western world to follow models it lays out from time to time. Its
leading practitioners are Von Hayek and Milton Friedman.

THE HOOVER INSTITUTION
   Founded originally to fight Communism, the institution has
slowly but surely turned toward Socialism. It has an annual
budget of $2 million, funded by companies under the umbrella
of the Committee  of 300.  It  now concentrates  on  "peaceful
changes"  with emphasis on arms control and domestic U.S.
problems. It is Frequently used by the news media as a "conser-
vative" organization whose views they seek when a conservative
viewpoint is needed. The Hoover Institution is far from that, and
following the 1953 take-over of the Institution by a group allied
to the Club of Rome, it has become a One World-New World
Order outlet for "desirable" policies.

HERITAGE FOUNDATION
   Founded by  brewery  magnate Joseph  Coors  to  act as a
conservative  think  tank,  Heritage  was  soon  taken  over  by
Fabianists Sir Peter Vickers Hall, Stuart Butler, Steven Ayzlei,
Robert Moss and Frederich Von Hayek under the direction of
the Club of Rome. This institute played a major role in carrying

                              60

out British Labour leader Anthony Wedgewood Benn's order to
"Thatcherize Reagan." Heritage is certainly not a conservative
operation although at times it may look and sound like one.

HUMAN RESOURCES RESEARCH OFFICE.
   This  is  an Army  research  establishment  dealing  in
"psychotechnology." Most of its personnel are Tavistock-trained.
"Psychotechnology" covers GI motivation, morale and music
used by the enemy. In fact a lot of what George Orwell wrote
about in his book "1984" appears to be remarkably similar to
what is taught at HUMRRO. In 1969, the Committee of 300
took over this important institution and turned it into a private
non-profit organization run under the auspices of the Club of
Rome. It is the largest behavioral research group in the U.S.
   One of its specialities is the study of small groups under
stress and HUMRRO teaches the Army that a soldier is merely
an extension of his equipment and has brought great influence
to bear on the "man/weapon" system and its "human quality
control,"  so  widely  accepted by  the  United  States Army.
HUMRRO has had a very pronounced effect on how the Army
conducts itself. Its mind-bending techniques are straight out of
Tavistock.  HUMRRO'S applied psychology courses are sup-
posed to teach Army brass how to make the human weapon
work. A good example of this is the manner in which soldiers in
the war against Iraq were willing to disobey their field manual
standing orders and bury 12,000 Iraqi soldiers alive.
   This type of brainwashing is terribly dangerous because
today, it is applied to the Army, the Army applies it to brutally
destroy thousands of "enemy" soldiers, and tomorrow the Army
could be told that civilian population groups opposed to gov-
ernment policies are "the enemy." We are already a mindless
brainwashed flock of sheep, yet it seems that HUMRRO can
take mind bending and mind control a step further. HUMRRO is
a valuable adjunct to Tavistock and many of the lessons taught
at HUMRRO were applied in the Gulf War, which makes it a

                              61

little  easier to  understand how  it came to be  that American
soldiers behaved as ruthless and heartless killers, a far cry from
the concept of the traditional American fighting man.

RESEARCH ANALYSlS CORPORATION.
   This is HUMRRO'S sister "1984" organization situated in
McLean, Virginia. Established in 1948, it was taken over by the
Committee of 3OO in 1961 when it became part of the Johns
Hopkins bloc. It has worked on over 600 projects, including
integrating Negroes into the Army, the tactical use of nuclear
weapons, psychological warfare programs and mass population
control.
   Obviously there are many more major think tanks, and we
shall come to most of them in this book.  One of the most
important areas of cooperation between what think tanks turn
out and what becomes government and public policy are the
"pollsters." It is the job of the polling companies to mold and
shape public opinion in the way that suits the conspirators. Polls
are constantly being taken by CBS-NBC-ABC, the New York
Times, the Washington Post. Most of these efforts are coordi-
nated at the National Opinion Research Center where, as much
as it will amaze most of us, a psychological profile was developed
for the entire nation.
   Findings  are fed into the  computers  of Gallup Poll  and
Yankelovich, Skelley and White for comparative evaluation.
Much of what we read in our newspapers or see on television
has first been cleared by the polling companies. WHAT WE
SEE IS WHAT THE POLLSTERS THINK WE SHOULD SEE.
This is called "public opinion making." The whole idea behind
this bit of social conditioning is to find out how responsive the
public is to POLICY DIRECTIVES handed down by the Com-
mittee of 300. We are called "targeted population groups" and
what is measured by the pollsters is how much resistance is
generated to  what appears  in the "Nightly  News."  Later,  we
shall learn exactly how this deceptive practice got started and

                              62

who is responsible for it.
   It is all part of the elaborate opinion-making process created
at, Tavistock. Today our people believe they are well-informed
but what they do not realize is that the opinions they believe are
their own were in fact created in the research institutions and
think tanks of America and that none of us are free to form our
own opinions because of the information we are provided with
by the media and the pollsters.
   Polling  was  brought to a fine art just before the United
States entered the Second World War. Americans, unbeknown to
themselves, were conditioned to look upon Germany and Japan
as dangerous enemies who had to be stopped. In a sense, this
was  true,  and  that makes  conditioned thinking all the more
dangerous, because based on the INFORMATlON fed to them,
the enemy did indeed appear to be Germany and Japan. Just
recently  we  saw how  well Tavistock's conditioning process
works when Americans were conditioned to perceive Iraq as a
threat and Saddam Hussein as a personal enemy of the United
States.
   Such a conditioning process is technically described as "the
message reaching the sense organs of persons to be influenced."
One of the most respected of all pollsters is Committee of 300
member Daniel Yankelovich,  of the company, Yankelovich,
Skelley and White. Yankelovich is proud to tell his students that
polling is a tool to change public opinion, although this is not
original, Yankelovich having drawn his inspiration from David
Naisbett's book "TREND REPORT" which was commissioned
by the Club of Rome.
   In his book Naisbett describes all of the techniques used by
public opinion makers to bring about the public opinion desired
by the Committee of 300. Public opinion making is the jewel in
the crown of the OLYMPIANS, for with their thousands of new-
science social scientists at their beck and call, and with the news
media firmly in their hands, NEW public opinions on almost
any subject can be created and disseminated around the world in

                              63

a matter of two weeks.
   This is precisely what happened when their servant George
Bush was ordered to make war on Iraq. Within two weeks, not
only the U.S. but almost the entire world public opinion was
turned against Iraq and its President Saddam Hussein. These
media change artists and news manipulators report directly to
the Club of Rome which in turn reports to the Committee of 300
at whose head sits the Queen of England ruling over a vast
network of closely-linked corporations who never pay taxes and
are answerable to no one, who fund their research institutions
through foundations  whose joint activities  have  almost total
control over our daily lives.
   Together with their interlocking companies, insurance busi-
ness, banks, finance corporations, oil companies, newspapers,
magazines, radio and television, this vast apparatus sits astride
the United  States  and the  world.  There is not a politician in
Washington D.C. who is not, somehow, beholden to it. The Left
rails against it, calling it "imperialism" which indeed it is, but
the left is run by the same people, the very  same ones who
control the right, so that the left is no more free than we are!
   Scientists engaged in the process of conditioning are called
"social engineers" or "new-science social scientists" and they
play an integral part in what we see, hear and read. The "old
school" social engineers were Kurt K. Lewin, Professor Hadley
Cantril, Margaret Meade,  Professor Derwin Cartwright  and
Professor Lipssitt who, together with John Rawlings Reese,
made up the backbone of new-science scientists at Tavistock
Institute.
   During the Second World War, there were over  100 re-
searchers at work under the direction of Kurt Lewin, copying
slavishly the methods adopted by Reinhard Heydrich of the S.S.
The OSS was based on Heydrich's methodology and, as we
know, the OSS was the forerunner of the Central Intelligence
Agency. The point of all this is that the governments of Britain
and the United States already have the machinery in place to

                              64

bring us into line in a New World Order with only a slight
modicum of resistance materializing, and this machinery has
been in place since 1946. Each passing year has added new
refinements.
    It is this Committee of 300 which has established control
networks and mechanisms far more binding than anything ever
seen in this world. Chains and ropes are not needed to restrain
us. Our fear of what is to come does that job far more efficiently
than any physical means of restraint. We have been brainwashed
to give up our Constitutional right to bear arms; to give up our
Constitution  itself;  to  allow  the United Nations to exercise
control over our foreign policies and the IMF to take control of
our fiscal  and monetary policies; to permit the President to
break United States law with impunity and to invade a foreign
country  and kidnap its head-of-state.  In short we have been
brainwashed to the extent where we, as a nation, will accept
each  and  every  lawless  act carried out by  our  government
almost without question.
   I for one know that we will soon have to fight to reclaim
our country from the Committee, or lose it forever. BUT when
it comes right down to it, how many will actually take up arms?
In 1776 only 3% of the populace took up arms against King
George III. This time around, 3% will be woefully inadequate.
We should not allow ourselves to be led down dead-end roads,
for that is what our mind controllers have planned for us by
confronting us with such a complexity of issues that we simply
succumb to long range penetration and make no decisions at all
on many vital issues.
   We shall be looking at the names of those who make up the
Committee of 300 but, before we do that, we should examine
the massive interfacing of all important institutions, companies
and banks under the Committee's control. We must mark them
well because these are the people who are deciding who shall
live and who shall be eliminated as "useless eaters"; where we
will worship God, what we must wear and even what we shall

                              65

eat. According to Brzezinski, we shall be under endless surveil-
lance around the clock for 365 days a year ad infinitum.
   That we have been betrayed from within is being accepted
by more and more people each year, and that is good, because it
is through knowledge, a word translated from the word BE-
LIEF, that we shall be able to defeat the enemies of all mankind.
While we were being distracted by the bogeymen in the Krem-
lin, the Trojan Horse was moved into position in Washington
D.C. The greatest danger free people face today is not from
Moscow but from Washington D.C. We need first to conquer the
DOMESTIC ENEMY, and after that we will be strong enough
to mount an offensive to remove Communism from the earth
together with all of its attendant "isms."
   The Carter Administration accelerated the collapse of our
economy and our military strength, the latter begun by Club of
Rome and Lucis Trust member Robert Strange McNamara. In
spite of his promises, Reagan continued to undermine our in-
dustrial base, starting where Carter left off. While we need to
keep our defenses strong, we cannot do that from a weak in-
dustrial base for, without a well-run military-industrial complex,
we cannot have a viable defense system. The Committee of 300
recognizes this and planned from 1953 its zero-growth post-
industrial policies now in full flower.
   Thanks to the Club of Rome our technology potential has
dropped below that of Japan  and Germany,  nations  we  are
supposed to have defeated in the Second World War. How has
this come about? Because of men like Dr. Alexander King and
our blindfolded state of mind, we have failed to recognize the
destruction  of our  educational  institutions  and  systems  of
teaching. As a result of our blindness, we are no longer training
engineers and scientist in sufficient numbers to keep us among
the industrialized nations of the world. Thanks to Dr. King, a
man very few people in America know about, education in the
U.S. is at its lowest level since 1786. Statistics produced by the
Institute for Higher Learning show that the reading and writing

                              66

capabilities of high school children the  United States are
LOWER than they were among high school children in 1786.
   What we face today is not only the loss of our freedom and
the very fabric of our nation, but far worse, the possibility of the
loss of our souls. The steady chipping away at the foundation
upon which this republic rests has left an empty void,  which
satanists and cultists are rushing to fill with their synthetic soul
material. This truth is difficult to accept and appreciate because
there was nothing SUDDEN about these events. If a sudden
shock were to hit us, a cultural and religious shock, we would be
shaken out of our apathy.
   But gradualism--which is what Fabianism is, does nothing
to raise the alarm. Because the vast majority of Americans can
see no MOTIVATION for the things I have described, they
cannot accept it, and so the conspiracy is scorned and often
mocked.  By  creating  chaos  through presenting hundreds  of
daily choices our people have to make, we have come down to a
position where,  unless motivation can be clearly  shown,  all
information is rejected.
   This is both the weak and the strong link in the conspirato-
rial chain. Most thrust aside anything that has no motive, so the
conspirators feel safe behind the ridicule poured upon those
who point to the coming crisis in our nation and our individual
lives. However, if we can get enough people to see the truth, the
motivation block gets weaker until it will eventually be forced
aside as more and more people become enlightened and the
notion that "this cannot happen in America" is dispensed with.
   The Committee of 300 is counting on our maladaptive re-
sponses to govern our reaction to created events, and it will not
be disappointed as long as we as a nation continue in the present
way we respond. We must turn responses to created crises into
ADAPTIVE responses by identifying the conspirators and ex-
posing their plans for us, so that these things become public
knowledge. The Club of Rome has already made THE TRAN-
SITION TO BARBARISM. Instead of waiting to be "raptured,"

                              67

we must stop the Committee of 300 before it can accomplish its
goal of making us prisoners of the" New Dark Age" planned for
us. It is not up to God, IT IS UP TO US. We have to take the
necessary action.
   All information that I provide in this book comes from years
of research  backed  up  by  impeccable  intelligence  sources.
Nothing is exaggerated. It is factual and precise so do not fall
into the trap set by the enemy that this material is "disinforma-
tion." For the past two decades I have provided information
which has proved to be highly accurate and which has explained
a lot of puzzling events. My hope is that through this book, a
better,  clearer and wider understanding  of the  conspiratorial
forces ranged against this nation will come about. That hope is
being realized as more and more young people are beginning to
ask questions and seek information about what is REALLY
going on.
   It is difficult for people to comprehend that these conspira-
tors are real and that they have the power I and many others
have attributed to them. Many have written to ask how it is that
our government does nothing about the terrible threat to civili-
zation? The problem is that our government is PART of the
problem, part of the conspiracy, and nowhere and at no time has
this become more clearly evident than during the Bush Presi-
dency.  Of course President Bush knows precisely  what the
Committee of 300 is doing to us. HE WORKS FOR THEM.
Others have written to say, "We thought we were fighting the
government." Of course we are, but behind government stands a
force so powerful and all-encompassing that intelligence agen-
cies are even afraid to mention the name "Olympians."
   Proof of the Committee of 300 is found in the vast number of
powerful institutions owned and controlled by it. Listed here are
some of the more important ones, all of which come under the
MOTHER OF ALL THINK TANKS AND RESEARCH INSTI-
TUTIONS, THE TAVISTOCK INSTITUTE OF HUMAN RE-
LATIONS with its far-flung network of hundreds of "branches."

                              68

STANFORD RESEARCH CENTER
   Stanford Research Center (SRC) was founded in 1946 by
the Tavistock Institute For Human Relations. Stanford was cre-
ated to help Robert 0. Anderson and his ARCO oil company,
who had secured for the Committee of 300 the oil rights on the
North  Slope of Alaska. Basically, the job was too large for
Anderson's Aspen Institute to handle, so a new center had to be
founded and funded. That new center was Stanford Research
Center. Alaska sold its rights on a downpayment of $900 million,
a relatively small amount for the Committee of 300. The governor
of Alaska was steered to SRI for help and advice. This was no
accident but the result of judicious planning and a process of
long-range conditioning.
    Following the governor's call for help, three SRI scientists
set up shop in Alaska where they met with the Alaskan Secretary
of State and the State Planning Office. Francis Greehan, who
headed the SRI team, assured the Governor that his problem of
how to handle the rich oil find would be safe in the hands of
SRI. Naturally Greehan did not mention the Committee of 300
or the Club of Rome. In less than a month Greehan assembled a
team of economists, petroleum scientists and new-science sci-
entists numbering in the hundreds. The report SRI gave to the
Governor ran to eighty-eight pages.
   The proposal was adopted virtually without change by the
Alaska legislature in 1970. Greehan had indeed done a remark-
able job for the Committee of 300. From this beginning SRI
developed into an institution employing 4000 people with an
annual budget of $160 million plus. Its President, Charles A.
Anderson, has seen much of this growth during his tenure, as
has Professor Willis Harmon, director of the SRI Center for the
Study of Social Policies, employing hundreds of new-science
scientists, many of the top staffers having been transferred from
Tavistock's London base. One of those was RCA board chair-
man and former British intelligence agent, David Sarnoff, who
was closely involved with Harmon and his team for twenty-five

                              69

years. Sarnoff was something of a "watchdog" for the mother
institute in Sussex.
   Stanford claims to make no moral judgments on projects it
accepts, working for Israel and the Arabs, South Africa and
Libya but, as one would imagine, by adopting this attitude it
ensures an "inside edge" with foreign governments that the CIA
has found most useful. In Jim Ridgeway's book, "THE CLOSED
CORPORATION," SRI spokesman Gibson brags about SRI's
non-discriminatory stance. Although not on the Federal Contract
Research Center lists, SRI is today the largest military think tank,
dwarfing Hudson and Rand. Among SRl's speciality depart-
ments are chemical and biological warfare experimental centers.
   One of Stanford's  more dangerous  activities  is  counter-
insurgency operations aimed at civilian populations--just the
sort of "1984" things government is already using against its
own people. The U.S. government pays SRI millions of dollars
each year for this kind of highly controversial "research." Fol-
lowing student protests against chemical warfare experiments
conducted at Stanford, SRI "sold" itself to a private group for
just $25 million. Of course nothing really changed, SRI was still
a Tavistock project and the Committee of 300 still owned it, but
the gullible appeared to be satisfied by this meaningless cosmetic
change.
   In 1958 a startling new development arose. Advanced Re-
search Products Agency (ARPA), a contracting agency for the
Defense Department, approached SRI with a top secret pro-
posal.  John  Foster  at the Pentagon told  SRI that what was
needed  was  a  program  to  insure  the United States against
"technological surprise." Foster wanted to perfect a condition
where the environment became a weapon; special bombs to
trigger volcanos and/or earthquakes, behavioral research on
potential enemies and minerals and metals with potential for
new  weapons.  The project was  accepted by SRI and code-
named "SHAKY."
   The massive electronic brain in SHAKY was capable of

                              70

carrying out many commands, its computers having been con-
structed by IBM for SRI. Twenty-eight scientists worked on
what is  called "Human Augmentation." The  IBM computer
even has the capability to solve problems by analogy and rec-
ognizes and identifies scientists who work with it. The "special
applications" of this tool can be better imagined than described.
Brzezinski knew what he was talking about when he wrote
"THE TECHNOTRONIC ERA."
   Stanford Research Institute works closely with scores of
civilian consulting firms, trying to apply military technology to
domestic situations. This has not always been a success, but as
techniques  improve,  the prospects for massive  all-pervading
surveillance, as described by Brzezinski, daily becomes more
real. IT ALREADY EXISTS AND IS IN USE, EVEN THOUGH
SLIGHT MALFUNCTIONS FROM TIME TO TIME HAVE
TO BE IRONED OUT. One such civilian consulting firm was
Schriever McKee Associates of McLean, Virginia, run by retired
General Bernard A. Schriever, a former chief of the Air Force
Systems Command, who developed the Titan, Thor, Atlas and
Minuteman rockets.
   Schriever put together a consortium of Lockheed, Emmerson
Electric, Northrop, Control Data, Raytheon and TRW under the
name of URBAN SYSTEMS ASSOCIATES, INC. The purpose
of the consortium? To solve social and psychological "urban
problems"  by  means  of military  techniques  using  advanced
electronic systems. It is interesting to note that TRW became the
largest credit information collecting company  in the  credit-
reporting business as a result and an outcome of its work with
Urban Systems Associates, Inc.
   This should tell us a great deal about just how far this nation
is already under TOTAL SURVEILLANCE, which is the first
requirement of the Committee of 300. No dictatorship, espe-
cially  not one on a  global  scale, can function without total
control over each and every individual. SRI was well on its way
to becoming a key Committee of 300 research organization.

                              71

   By the  1980's, 60% of SRl's contracts were devoted to
"Futurism" with both military and civilian applications. Its ma-
jor clients were the U.S. Department of Defense-Directorate of
Defense Research and Engineering, Office of Aerospace Re-
search which dealt with "Applications of the Behavioral Sciences
to Research Management," Executive Office of the President,
Office of Science and Technology, U.S. Department of Health.
On behalf of the Department of Health, SRI ran a program
called "'Patterns in ESDEA Title I Reading Achievement Tests."
Other clients were the U.S. Department of Energy, the U.S.
Department of Labor, U.S. Department of Transportation and
the National Science Foundation (NSF). Of significance was the
paper developed for NSF, entitled "Assessment of Future and
International Problems."
   Stanford Research, under the tutelage of Tavistock Institute
in London, put together a far reaching and chilling system it
called "Business Intelligence Program." In excess of 600 com-
panies in the U.S. and abroad became subscribers. The program
covered research in Japanese Foreign Business Relations, Con-
sumer Marketing in a Period of Change, The Mounting Challenge
of International Terrorism,  Sensory Evaluation in  Consumer
Products,  Electronic  Funds  Transfer  System,  Opto-Electric
Sensing, Exploratory Planning Methods, the U.S. Defense In-
dustry and Capital Availability. Among the TOP Committee of
300 companies who became clients of this program were Bechtel
Corporation (George Schultz was on its board), Hewlett Packard,
TRW, Bank of America, Shell Company, RCA, Blyth, Eastman
Dillon, Saga Foods Corporation, McDonnell Douglas, Crown
Zellerbach, Wells Fargo Bank and Kaiser Industries.
   But one of the most sinister of all SRI programs with the
possibilities of doing tremendous damage in altering the direc-
tion in which the United States will go, socially, morally and
religiously, was Stanford's Charles F. Kettering Foundation's
"CHANGING IMAGES  OF MAN" under Stanford official
reference "Contract Number URH (489)-2150 Policy Research

                              72

Report Number 4/4/74, Prepared by the SRI Center for the Study of
Social Policy, Director Willis Harmon." This is probably one of
the most far-reaching investigations into how man might be
changed that has ever been conducted.
    The report, covering 319 pages, was written by  14 new
science scientists under the supervision of Tavistock and 23 top
controllers  including B. F. Skinner, Margaret Meade,  Ervin
Lazlo and Sir Geoffrey Vickers, a high-level British intelligence
officer in M16. It will be recalled that his son-in-law, Sir Peter
Vickers Hall, was a founding member of the so-called conser-
vative "Heritage Foundation." Much of the 3000 pages of "rec-
ommendations" given to the Reagan administration in January
1981 were based upon material taken from Willis Harmon's
"CHANGING IMAGES OF MAN."
   I was privileged to receive a copy of "THE CHANGING
IMAGES OF MAN" from my intelligence colleagues five days
after it was accepted by the United States government. What I
read shocked me, as I realized I was looking at a blueprint for a
future America,  unlike anything I had ever seen before. The
nation was to be programmed to change and become so accus-
tomed to such planned changes that it would hardly be noticeable
when profound changes did occur. We have gone downhill so
fast since "THE AQUARIAN CONSPIRACY" (the book title
of Willis  Harmon's technical paper)  was  written,  that today,
divorce draws no stigma, suicide is at an all time high and raises
few  eyebrows,  social  deviations  from  the  norm  and  sexual
aberrations,  once  unmentionable  in  decent  circles,  are  now
commonplace and excite no special protest.
   As a nation we have not noticed how "CHANGING IMAGES
OF MANKIND" has radically altered our American way of life
forever. Somehow we were overcome by the "Watergate Syn-
drome." For a while we were shocked and dismayed to learn
that Nixon was nothing but a cheap crook who hobnobbed with
Earl Warren's Mafia friends at the beautiful home they built for
him adjoining the Nixon estate. When too many "future shocks"

                              73

and news headlines demanded our attention, we lost our way, or
rather, the huge number of choices with which we were and still
are daily confronted, confused us to such a degree that we were
no longer able to make the necessary choices.
   Worse yet, having been subjected to a barrage of crimes in
high places, plus the trauma of the Vietnam War, our nation
seemed  no  longer to  want truths.  Such reaction  is  carefully
explained  in  Willis  Harmon's  technical  paper, in short, the
American nation was reacting exactly as profiled. Worse yet, in
not wishing to accept truth, we took matters a step further: We
looked to government to shield us from the truth.
   The corrupt stench of the Reagan-Bush Administrations we
wanted covered with six feet of earth. The crimes committed
under the title of Iran/Contra affair (or scandals), we didn't want
uncovered. We let our President lie to us regarding his where
abouts in the period October 20-23rd, 1980. Yet these crimes far
exceed in quantity and scope anything Nixon did while he was
in office. Do we as a nation recognize it as going downhill with
our brakes off?
   No, we do not. When those whose business it is to bring the
truth to the American people that a private, well-organized little
government inside the White House was busy committing one
crime after another, crimes which attacked the very soul of this
nation and the republican institutions upon which it rested, we
were told not to bother the public with such things. "We really
don't want to know about all this speculation," became a stan-
dard response.
   When the highest elected official of the land blatantly put
U.N. law above the Constitution of the United States--an im-
peachible offense, the majority accepted it as "normal." When
the highest elected official of the land went to war without a
Congressional declaration of war, the fact was censored out by the
news media and, again, we accepted it rather than face the truth.
   When the Gulf War, which our President plotted and planned,
began, not only were we happy with censorship of the most

                              74

blatant kind, we even took it to our hearts, believing that it was
"good tor the war effort." Our President lied, April Glaspie lied,
the  State Department lied.  They  said the  war  was justified
because President Hussein had been warned to leave Kuwait
alone. When Glaspie's cables to the State Department were
finally made public,  one United States  Senator after another
went charging to defend Glaspie, the harlot. It mattered not that
they came from both the Democrats and the Republicans. We,
the people, let them get away with their vile lies.


<<<<< cont in Committee of 300 - part 4 >>>>>
