Faith and Knowledge
Alfred Tang
February 20, 2001 ©
Presented at the Christian Faculty-Staff Network at
UWM
This paper is intended for Christian faculty to think
about the issues of integration of faith and normal academic disciplines on a secular
campus. The separation of the church
and state keeps us accountable for not mixing religion and academic
politics. It is a blessing in disguise
because it forces us to critically think about the real intellectual issues per
se and to hold us to a higher standard of professional competency. In this paper, I wish to suggest some
attitudes and actions that fit the unusual challenge of integrating faith and
knowledge on a secular campus.
Despite the caliber of their intelligence, most serious
thinkers will sooner later experience despair or the end of reason. This sentiment is expressed formally in
Gödel Incompleteness Theorem.[1] Michael Dummett summarizes its basic thesis,
By
Gödel’s Theorem there exists, for any intuitively correct formal system for
elementary arithmetic, a statement U expressible in the system but not
provable in it, which not only is true but can be recognised by us to be true.[2]
Gödel Theorem can be
extended to argue for the non-existence of rigid designator and is a formal
expression of a source of intellectual crisis.[3] Søren Kierkegaard proposed a leap of
faith as a cure for despair.
Physicist Niels Bohrs succinctly expressed the essence of the
existentialist attitude,
L [There are] two sorts of truth: trivialities, where
opposites are obviously absurd, and profound truths, recognized by the fact
that the opposite is also a profound truth.[4]
These statements suggest
that analytic logic and formal system alone are inadequate to penetrate the
deepest mysteries of reality. Faith,
taken as that dimension which transcends reason, is the foundation of
knowledge. As Solomon wrote, “The fear
of the Lord is the beginning of knowledge” (Pr 1:7a).
John Oliver, professor of music at MIT and Yale, once
said that a genius learns from himself. Many thinking people are intuitively
aware of the reality and complexity of self-relationality. According to the doctrine of Perichoresis,
the Persons of the Trinity mutual penetrate each other. Michael Polanyi used the Möbius strip to
model the integrality of tacit (informal) knowledge and explicit (formal)
knowledge in the mind. Douglas
Hofstadter refers to this kind of Möbius-strip-type self relationality as the strange
loop. James E. Loder and W. Jim Neidhardt
formalize knowledge and relationality in the strange loop model.[5]
There are many processes in the economy of research
universities that compete for our attention.
For one, faculty members are often required to align their researches
with funding policies. (As an example,
one is never funded for research on the integration of faith and science.) For two, the demand of time makes spiritual
reflection on our work nearly impossible.
The former presidential science advisor George A. Keyworth, II comments
on the time pressure in modern research,
In
this new digital age we live in, it is no longer the ability to work that
matters but, rather, how fast you do it.[6]
There is little time to
reflect on the meaning and value of our work nowadays in research universities
when the push is toward R&D. The
pressure of time is sometimes counter-productive. Howard Gardner’s psychometric approach to analyze creative
geniuses suggests that time is an essence to prospect periods of flow.[7] In other words, we must react to the
pressure of time by a disciplined effort to protect a reflexive prayer life.
Faith and knowledge are complimentary parts of a holistic understanding of God and His creation.
[1] Jean van Heijenoort, Frege and Gödel: Two
Fundamental Texts in Mathematical Logic (Cambridge: Harvard, 1970), 83-108.
[2] Michael Dummett, Truth and Other Enigmas
(Cambridge: Harvard, 1978), 186.
[3] ibid., 188.
[4] James E. Loder and W. Jim Neidhardt,
The Knight's Move (Colorado
Springs: Helmers and Howard, 1992), 35.
[5] ibid., 54-59.
[6] George A. Keyworth, II “Physics, Power and Defense
in the 21st Century”, APS News, vol. 10, No. 2 (February
2001).
[7] Howard Gardner, Creative Mind (New York: Harper
Collins, 1993), 32.
[8] Ronald H. Nash, Faith & Reason: Search for a
Rational Faith (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1988), 24.