Sometimes west is Best, at least better

 

Some lessons from elsewhere: for starters, extend your family values beyond

the boundaries of your home N R Narayana Murthy

 

As is said in the Vedas: Man can live individually, but can survive only

collectively. Hence, our challenge is to form a progressive community by

balancing the interests of the individual and that of the society. To meet

this we need to develop a value system where people accept modest

sacrifices for the common good. A value system is the protocol for behavior

that enhances the trust, confidence and commitment of members of the

community. It goes beyond the domain of legality-it is about decent and

desirable behavior. Further, it includes putting the community interests

ahead of your own.

 

There are two pillars of the cultural value system: loyalty to family and

loyalty to community. One should not be in isolation to the other, because,

successful societies are those which combine both harmoniously.

 

As an Indian, I am proud to be part of a culture which has deep-rooted

family values. This is the essence of Indian values and one of our key

strengths. Our families act as a critical support mechanism for us.

Unfortunately, our attitude towards family life is not reflected in our

attitude towards community behavior. From littering the streets to

corruption to breaking of contractual obligations, we are apathetic towards

the common good. The primary difference between the West and us is that,

there, people have a much better societal orientation. In the West-the US,

Canada, Europe, Australia, New Zealand-individuals understand that they have

to be responsible towards their community. They care more for the society

than we do.

 

Further, they generally sacrifice more for the society than us. Quality of

life is enhanced because of this. Consider some of the lessons that we

Indians can learn from the West:

 

Respect for the public good: In the West, there is respect for the public

good. For instance, parks free of litter, clean streets, public toilets free

of graffiti-all these are instances of care for the public good. On the

contrary, in India, we keep our houses clean and water our gardens everyday

but, when we go to a park, we do not think twice before littering the place.

 

Attitude to corruption: In India, corruption, tax evasion, cheating and

bribery have eaten into our vitals. Corruption, as we see in India, is

another example of putting the interest of oneself, and at best that of

one's family, above that of the society.

 

Public apathy: Apathy in solving community matters has held us back from

making progress, which is otherwise within our reach. We see serious

problems around us but do not try to solve them. We behave as if the

problems do not exist or are somebody else's. On the other hand, in the

West, people solve societal problems proactively.

 

There are several examples of our apathetic attitude. (i) For instance, all

of us are aware of the problem of drought in India. More than 40 years ago,

Dr K L Rao, an irrigation expert, suggested creation of a water grid

connecting all the rivers in North and South India, to solve this problem.

Unfortunately, nothing has been done about this (ii) The story of power

shortage in Bangalore is another instance. In 1983, it was decided to build

a thermal power plant to meet Bangalore's power requirements. Unfortunately,

we have still not started it. (iii) The Milan subway in Bombay is in a

deplorable state for the past 40 years and no action has been taken. To quote

another example, considering the constant travel required in the software

industry; five years ago, I had suggested a 240-page passport. This would

eliminate frequent visits to the passport office. In fact, we are ready to

pay for it. However, I am yet to hear from the ministry of external affairs

on this.

 

We, Indians, would do well to remember Thomas Hunter's words: Idleness

travels very slowly, and poverty soon overtakes it. What could be the reason

for this? We were ruled by foreigners for over a thousand years. Thus, we

have always believed that public issues belonged to some foreign ruler and

that we have no role in solving them. We have lost the will to proactively

solve our own problems and got used to executing someone else's orders. Our

decision-makers look to somebody else to take decisions. Unfortunately,

there is nobody to look up to, and this is the tragedy.

 

Our intellectual arrogance has also not helped our society. I have traveled

extensively, and in my experience, have not come across another society

where people are as contemptuous of better societies as we are, with as

little progress as we have achieved. No other society gloats so much about

the past as we do, with as little current accomplishment. This is not a new

phenomenon, but at least a thousand years old. For instance, Al Barouni, the

famous Arabic logician and traveller of the 10th century, who spent about 30

years in India from 997 AD to around 1027 AD, referred to this trait of

Indians. According to him, during his visit, most Indian pundits considered

it below their dignity even to hold arguments with him. In fact, on a few

occasions when a pundit was willing to listen to him, and found his

arguments to be very sound, he invariably asked Barouni: which Indian pundit

taught these smart things!

 

At the same time, everyday, in the newspapers, you will find numerous claims

from our leaders that ours is the greatest nation. These people would do

well to remember Thomas Carlyle's words: ''The greatest of faults is to be

conscious of none.''

 

If we have to progress, we have to listen to people who have performed

better than us, learn from them and perform better than them. We continue to

rationalize our failures. No other society has mastered this art as well as

we have. Obviously, this is an excuse to justify our incompetence,

corruption, and apathy.

 

Another interesting attribute, which we Indians can learn from the West, is

their accountability. Irrespective of your position, in the West, you are

held accountable for what you do. However, in India, the more 'important'

you are, the less answerable you are. For instance, a senior politician once

declared that he 'forget' to file his tax returns for 10 consecutive years-

and he got away with it. There are over 100 loss-making public sector units

in India. Nevertheless, I have not seen action taken for bad performance

against top managers in these organisations. In the West, each person is

proud about his or her labour that raises honest sweat. On the other hand,

in India, we tend to overlook the significance of those who are not in

professional jobs.

 

We have a mindset that reveres only supposedly intellectual work. For

instance, I have seen many engineers, fresh from college, who only want to

do cutting-edge work and not work that is of relevance to business and the

country. Yet another lesson to be learnt from the West, is their

professionalism in dealings. The common good being more important than

personal equations, people do not let personal relations interfere with

their professional dealings. They don't hesitate to chastise a colleague,

even if he is a personal friend, or family for incompetent work. In India,

we tend to view even work interactions from a personal perspective. We are

the most 'thin-skinned' society in the world-we see insults where none is

meant.

 

In India, we consider our marriage vows as sacred. We are willing to

sacrifice in order to respect our marriage vows. However, we do not extend

this to the public domain. For instance, India had an unfavourable contract

with Enron. Instead of punishing the people responsible for negotiating

this, we reneged on the contract-this was much before we came to know about

the illegal activities at Enron.

 

To quote another instance, I had given recommendations to several students

for the national scholarship for higher studies in US universities. Most of

them did not return to India even though contractually they were obliged to

spend five years after their degree in India. In fact, according to a

professor at a reputed US university, the maximum default rate for student

loans is among Indians-all of these students pass out in flying colours and

land lucrative jobs, yet they refuse to pay back their loans. Thus, their

action has made it difficult for the students after them, from India, to

obtain loans.

 

Further, we Indians do not display intellectual honesty. For example, our

political leaders use mobile phones to tell journalists on the other side

that they do not believe in technology! To borrow Gandhi's words: There is

enough in this world for everyone's need, but not enough for everyone's

greed.

 

Let us work towards a society where we would do unto others what we would

have others do unto us. Let us all be responsible citizens who make our

country a great place to live. We have to extend our family values beyond

the boundaries of our home. Let us work towards maximum welfare of the

maximum people-''Samasta janaanaam sukhino bhavantu''.

 

(Excerpts from a lecture delivered at the Lal Bahadur Shastri Institute of

Management in New Delhi on October 1, 2002)

Narayana Murthy is the Head of Infosys, a top software company based in Bangalore

Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1