Tuesday, July 27, 2004

SKIP DOWN TO THE COMMENTS. THERE ARE SOME REALLY GOOD PERSPECTIVES

SEX, SEX, SEX!

How on earth are we suppose to talk to teenagers about sex?
I am, for the first time in my youth ministry life, totally at a loss.

When I was at Cornerstone (actually in the middle of my conversation with Corrie about the suburbs) I was “interviewed” by this amazingly bizarre performance artist/ moral crusader called the Pink Nun. The Pink Nun’s whole gig is about radical abstinence and she is a button pusher let me tell you. (check out her page at www.pinknun.com).

Anyway, the Nun, tape recorder and microphone in hand, asked me about my own opinions on sex before marriage and then, when she found out I was a youth minister, she asked what I would say to teenagers about staying abstinent before marriage. Upon considering her questions I realized that I was totally at a loss. Every response that came to me seemed so canned, so utterly unconvincing, so completely inauthentic.

Now the Nun was happy to fill in the expected Evangelical Christian take on the issue (it leaves you empty, it’s not safe, sex is best in marriage etc. etc.) and I totally agree with this take but there’s something about it that is troublingly unsatisfying.

So, I need help friends…
What do we say to folks? How do we have the “premarital sex conversation” without sounding patronizing, self-righteous or like we’re reading the classic evangelical script on the topic (this last one is the one that I’m most concerned about).

Here are a few ideas and struggles I’ve got but I desperately need to talk about this…

1.) How do I tell some one that having sex before marriage is damaging for them and expect them to choose abstinence, when I constantly make decisions that are damaging and not life giving to me, even though I know better. It’s like knowledge that it’s “bad” just isn’t enough…at least not for me. I still struggle. But we seem to think that if kids know better then they’ll stop screwing around and I just don’t think it works. But if it does I’m open to hear about it,

2.) My opinions about sex are very theological, so how do I have any conversation with a non-Christian about it and not sound all weird? If you’re not following Jesus why should I think that you’ll give a crap about what God designed sex for? How do we have this conversation with non-Christian folks whom I believe would have more life and joy in a abstinent lifestyle without sounding, well, weird.

3.) It seems to me the way through this morass lies somewhere in addressing the underlying consumerism that drives our cultures sexual ethic. If we are all just sexual commodities to be consumed then there’s no reason to “wait for marriage” but if there’s a way that waiting until marriage actually honors another person and doesn’t treat them as a product…well, that seems to have legs. But is that just a theologized opinion again and there fore unhelpful to some folks?


So….
What are helpful ways to have this conversation with followers of Jesus and those not yet following Him?

How do you “teach this to kids” in a Youth Ministry setting?

A penny for your thoughts my friends.

Dixon


16 Comments:

Anonymous said...

three cheers for rufus wainwright...

-corrie.

12:29 PM

 

Anonymous said...

the "classic evangelical script on the topic" as i've experienced has always been about fear and distance. if i were a kid who's never had sex being told by the pink nun "it will leave you empty" i would ask "how do you know what makes me feel empty?" a performance artist wearing a hot pink habit with a fear-based dogma is just as much of a product to consume as a t-shirt that says "i slept with your boyfriend last night". she's saying, "come here, wear my button, sign my pledge card, consume what i have to say that doesn't involve your feelings, your fears, or your needs."

i don't know the answer, and i find just as much difficulty with your point 2 as you do, but it seems that at the most basic level kids need simply to be known. my 'agenda' then becomes, well, them. if we can agree that christian and non-christian kids alike have this basic desire to be known then talking about anything, drugs, sex, how great their parents are, how shitty their parents are, or the cure concert last night becomes a function of knowing them.

this model is problematic for the classic evangelical script, though, because it's not a script—it can’t be read from, it takes a great deal of time, we're each limited in the amount of kids that we can know well and WORST it requires us to be known in the process. this model begs the question: who is the pink lady behind the habit and underneath the white make-up? it's terribly ironic, but not at all surprising to me that a city like nashville with all of it's christian bookstore resources, churches and cell groups is also where the international central office of sexaholics anonymous happens to reside.

i would suggest, then that the issue is not just (or even) about sex, or teenagers but our own fear of intimacy--with ourselves, our spouses, our friends, and the kid standing in line at rocketown wearing a shirt that says "i'd rather be masturbating".

i wonder what the pink nun would say to him, because at least it doesn’t say, “i’d rather be screwing”.

--Matt Grace

12:46 PM

 

Carrie Graham said...

Can I take a stab at this one for homework in addition to the other issue we discussed Thursday? Not because I'll have magical answers (like I usually do, right?)...just for kicks... ;)

8:48 AM

 

chuck roan said...

OK.. so this is my first time, so go easy. Interesting start off for this topic. To add to the "empty" feeling. The analogy I would use to the 30 somethings is.. its like when you buy your first car. You fork over your life savings, you wash it, you research it, you put your heart into it.. but over time something changes. The paint isn't as shiny, there is a stain on the seat, and then your neighbor just bought a new car and suddenly thats what you want. My point is.. sex can be like this. You think you want it so bad.. then suddenly once you have it, you aren't satisfied.. so either a) you want more and more hoping it will get better. b) you spin into a guilt spiral that makes you want to give in.
Sex is marketed to us every day as the best thing that could ever happen... it represents "true love", etc. Heck porn is easier to get than beer or cigarettes.. you don't have to leave the house for that. Gone are the days of watching movies through scrambled signals.
I can't imagine what a kid must think to see how easy and accessible sex is.. The only hope to some how comunicate how amazing they would be to their future spouse to say you are the first. To not have to worry about comparing their spouse to previous conquests. And finally to not wake up the next morning with the thoghts of either "thats it?" or "what the heck did i just do!?!!?"

1:25 PM

 

Anonymous said...

in defense of lisa [the lady behind the pink habit and the make-up],
the whole pink nun thing isn't supposed to be a "ministry." she's just an artist who loves Jesus and purity and wants to use the amazingly bizarre artistic gifts God has given her. i was thrilled that dixon was open to being interviewed [like he had much choice] because he gave her a fresher, deeper perspective than she is used to receiving.

i've been thinking about this question since that night at cornerstone too. i agree with y'all that the script is obsolete, and i totally agree with mr. grace that our biggest hurdle is our own fear of intimacy/transperancy. "who is the pink lady behind the habit?" who is the youth leader with the cool black glasses? it sucks to let people into our darkness, but the leaders/friends whose stories made an impact on my life are the ones who chose to be vulnerable with me, share their mistakes and lessons learned.

and i think non-christians WILL give a crap about how God designed sex. it's a theologized opinion, but that doesn't mean we have to explain it using seminary flashcards. i remember one conversation with my [non-christian] best friend in high school, she talked about deciding whether she was going to have sex with her boyfriend. she said two things that surprised me. she said something like, "it seems like sex requires such a high level of trust with another person, i don't think i would be able to trust someone enough to sleep with them, unless they made some sort of lifelong commitment to me." and she said, "i think once i have sex for the first time, i'm probably going to have sex with every boyfriend after the first one. i'm not sure if i really want to start my 'list' yet." i was surprised because there was Truth in her words- i pretty much agreed with her. i don't remember how i responded, but i could have used her comments to bridge the "weirdness" gap between her worldview and mine by showing her what we have in common.

one last note: i think "waiting until you're married honors your future spouse" definitely has legs and isn't totally a theologized opinion. but here's a question- what do you say to someone who never wants to get married, or a homosexual person who can't get married? how is an abstinant lifestyle better for them? hmm...

-corrie.

11:58 PM

 

chuck roan said...

perhaps the question back to the last question.. if you don't plan to get married, then why enter into a physical relationship? Granted this may be a little ivory tower type comment, but as Christians do we promote relationships with no goal and only meet a "physical" need.. It was in college that I heard the comment that I wouldn't date someone I wouldn't marry. While that doesn't mean we have to "know" on the first date, but you do have a feeling if this is someone you could spend a lot of time with. This is oppposed to just finding someone one to "hook up with"

8:08 PM

 

ali said...

charles ryan... you are my hero. say hello to your lovely wife for me. if i ever make a pilgrimage back to carolina, we should go and eat barbecue and theologize about the world and tell old ddk stories. i had more fun at your house than i could ever believe.

as for sex, dix... yes. i am too theological about everything too, but i don't think it's all as crazy at it sounds. the best way you talk to people about sex and marriage is the way you and kristin are and living your life together within the community. seeing what committed and in love relationship looks like is the best thing, i think.

and remember, these kids aren't dumb. i think most people involved sexually before marriage - at least most of them who hang around us - know that it hurts them. they know it is a bad choice... they just know they also want it, and don't know how to make that choice. so i think it is about offering a real and radical alternative where they can go, yeah, i want that...

and (to get theological) i get into the whole bridal theology relationship thing, you know? which i think is redemptive in response to consumer culture. i am on a thing right now about how if we can change our image of god it changes our image of ourselves and others. so i get back into we are the bride waiting for the beloved. and when my god-thinking is really affected by that, well, everything is.

about how you teach kids about this... right now (bc of people i know who are getting into trouble) i am of the opinion that the key is about being in each other's lives... asking kids (or friends) what are you doing? why? when? and being interested. i guess it's not the content that i think the kids are in need of... it's the love and the investment.

unhelpful, i know. i miss you guys...

8:13 AM

 

chuck roan said...

Ali.. WHATS UP>> I have moved, gotten married.. you guys totally need to visit. I even have beds and bedrooms for all now.. I am TRUELY suburbia.. it would drive DDK crazy!
Kinser.. I saw the Nature Boy at the Wal Mart.. I need to post the pic. (thats Rick Flair for everyone else) but I digress...
I confess that I live in the world of home schooled Christians and the hardest part for me is failing to bring up sex b/c we just assume its not a struggle. Although in the subarbs, in a city FULL of evangelical churches.. pornography is a HUGE problem.. this a digression, but even for kids from good schools and parents. Thats one of the hardest things is how do you stop kids from saying no when its so easy to find.

5:29 PM

 

Anonymous said...

This is Thomas McKenzie
aka Darth Heretic

It interests me that the one thing Dixon says that gets the most comments is about sex.

Beside that, and in response to Dixon's 3 Questions:

1) Are you asking how you can teach on Christian morality without being a hypocrite? You can't. You just have to do it anyway, just like the rest of us. And the reason that kids shouldn't have sex before marriage is not because it will hurt them, or because it will give them a bad feeling, etc. The reason not to do it is the same reason we shouldn't steal or kill or lie. Because its against God's will for us. Its sin. That's it. Why is it sin? Well, we could come up with some good reasons, but the non-emotionally-satisfying fact of the matter is that our obediance comes first, then our understanding. No one every thought their way into health. We just have to do it.

2) There is not a darn thing you can say to the non-Christian. There is no reason to try to convince a non-Christian not to have crazy sex. Why? See number one. They don't have a good reason not to do it, and if you are trying to reason someone into morality you are a) a modernist and b) ignoring the Holy Spirit. You can I can barely keep our pants on with the power of God, what about the poor guy who's mind and heart are captive to evil? The thing to tell the non Christian is that there is a God who loves them and who can redeem them from their bondage. Anything more is nothing but speculative philosophy that any one from any tradition can do.

3) If you are wed to speculative philosophy and trying to convince someone to live a moral life, you could always try the whole "you're just being used by the corporations, so keep your pants on to fight the Man" line. I don't think it will work, but it was a bit of similar speculative philosophy that kept the pre-Christian me off of drugs. (A guy told me that buying drugs contributed to the economic bondage and gang violence I saw among the poor in the city, so if I was going to boycott Exxon for the Valdez spill, I'd better boycott drugs for all those drive-by shootings. It worked on me).

Thomas McKenzie

9:32 PM

 

Anonymous said...

How do you define "sex"? Does "sex" include:

A) oral, vaginal, anal penetration?
B) solitary/mutual masturbation?
C) hugging/kissing/holding hands?
D) etc.

I think one of the problems regarding this issue is a definition of "sex" and "sexual behaviors".

9:32 AM

 

Dixon said...

Right...perhaps by only defining sex as intercourse we perpetuate a "where's the line and when have I crossed it" approach to sex as opposed to "how do I love God and love my neighbor".

Or maybe trying to break it down into what acts "officially" constitute sex isn't a helpful approach either. I'm not sure...I need to chew on it some more.

Thanks for the post.
DDK

10:22 PM

 

To add a comment CLICK HERE

Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1