Prepared by: Alexander Prokopets
Group A 20001029
Subject: Economics for Managers
Instructor: Philip Leatherwood
Case study
Ust-Kamenogorsk GES is located on the Irtysh River, 12 km upstream from the regional center of East Kazakhstan, Ust-Kamenogorsk. The station is the second hydroelectric facility in the Irtysh cascade, and serves as a counter-regulator for Bukhtarma GES, leveling weekly/daily fluctuations in the water flow from the Bukhtarma reservoir.
Ust-Kamenogorsk GES houses four hydro generating units with a total installed capacity of 331.2MW (82.8MW each) and an operation head of 39.8 meters. UK GES generates 13.8 KV power. The power generated is then increased by the main transformers to 110 KV and through transmission lines is delivered to UK GES customers.
The station has been operating since 1952. As of October 2 1997, AES signed a concession agreement over Ust-Kamenogorsk and Shulbinsk GESes (located further down in the cascade). At that point, AES Ust-Kamenogorsk LLP was formed with a staff of 197 people.
Over a period of October 2, 1997 and February 29, 2000 Ust-Kamengorosk GES produced 3.9B KW/hrs of power, the production cost of which is one of the lowest in Kazakhstan. The station staff are experienced and highly qualified. The number of staff involved in full operational cycle is 105 people. In 1999, UK GES successfully carried out an overhaul of hydro generating unit #1, having fixed the faults of the generator shaft. The repairs were finished before the flood period, having improved the performance of the generator.
UK GES commissioned a state of the art automated system for commercial metering, controlled by ABB electronic meters. The system allows the station personnel to accurately track the power produced and sold, trace down actual technical losses and draw a comprehensive picture of power being distributed through the station’s transmission lines.
UK GES places a great emphasis on the station’s safe and reliable operations. For the first time since the station’s commissioning, UK GES carried out a complete overhaul of the dam water lock. For the first time in Kazakhstan, AES implemented a vibration analysis of the main transformers using a principally new approach that allowed them to assess the actual state of equipment at minimum costs.
AES now carrying out a capital overhaul of hydro generating unit #3. AES lifted the turbine cover, which allowed them to implement a unique operation on turning lower blades of the turbine without having to take them out. For the most part, they have completed the works correcting the shaft line, repairs of the guiding unit, equipment of the turbine well, compressive reinforcement and electrical equipment.
UK GES people are now working on restructuring. UK GES has formed a committee in charge of restructuring. It has already started compiling information from other AES stations and its own staff on this issue.
Among the station’s plans is a reconstruction program envisioning:
- replacement of 110 KV oil switches into SF switches,
- electric machine driving hydraulic system into a thyristor one;
- installation of an automated system of power production and distribution;
- adding systems of diagnostics and technical monitoring to the main equipment;
- large scale repair works on hydro-mechanical equipment and facilities;
- repairs of the dam control board.
Since 1997, people of UK GES have been operating the station reliably and will continue to improve the company so that it complies with the world standards and meets the demand of East Kazakhstan in safe and clean power.
Questions:
True or False Questions:
| 1. If the average total cost curve dips below the demand curve at any point, then monopoly is profitable. |
|
|
2. Can MC intersect MR in the inelastic region of the monopolist’s demand curve ? |
|
|
3. Does the monopolist’s average revenue curve and it’s market demand curve coincide? |
|
|
4. Exercise of monopoly power leads to economic waste when price rises above marginal cost. |
|
|
5. A monopolist’s output decreases if the government forces it to lower its price. |
|
Multiple choice questions:
Figure 1.
Essay questions:
Problems:
1. Using Figure 1. calculate approximate profit the monopoly will produce at it’s profit maximizing point and the most efficient point. Compare those two.
| Price |
Quantity |
|
27 |
0 |
|
24 |
2 |
|
21 |
4 |
|
18 |
6 |
|
15 |
8 |
|
12 |
10 |
|
9 |
12 |
|
6 |
14 |
|
3 |
16 |
|
0 |
18 |
Completion questions
True or false
|
1. A firm almost never is wise to wait more than a few weeks in introducing an innovation. |
|
|
2. Learning takes place among the users of an innovation but not among the producers of an innovation. |
|
|
3. There is no real difference between invention and innovation. |
|
|
4. The learning curve is often represented as log C = log a + b log Q. |
|
|
5. If the firm cuts the total time taken to develop and introduce the innovation, it incurs higher costs. |
|
|
6. The probability that a nonuser will adopt the innovation is lower for more profitable innovations than for less profitable innovations, and for innovations requiring small investments than for those requiring large investments. |
Multiple choice questions:
dC dR
dt dt
Problems:
C = 160 – 300t + 2t2, for 1≤t≤6
Where t is the number of years taken to develop and introduce the new product. The discounted profit (gross of innovation cost) from a new product of this type (in thousands of tenge) is estimated to equal
R = 340 – 280t, for 1≤t≤6
What is the optimal project duration? Why?