By
Kim Andrey
Case study: Confectionery Industry in Kazakhstan
In the 1980th in Kazakhstan there were sweet products available at the local market from 5 recourses. This number consisted of 4 Kazakhstani producers and some part was imported. At that time in the country was central planning economy system and output of those plants was planned and fixed and there was no competition among them.
At beginning of the 1990th the systems was changed and the market one turned on. Nowadays the local sweet market consists of 5 Kazakhstani manufacturers with 37% of the market share, and 10 units of Russian producers with 50% of the market share, and 1.5% under others CIS producers, and rest belongs to producers from others countries.
In 1995 the consumption of sweets was 57.3 thousand tons (t.t.), 29.8 t.t. were produced by the locals and 1.2 t.t. were exported. In the 1997 81.68 t.t. were consumed, 48.7 t.t. came from local manufacturers, 34 t.t. were imported, 1,02 t.t. were exported. In the 1998 70.5 t.t. were consumed, 47.3 t.t. were local products, 26.3 t.t. were imported. The figures for 1999 contain 76.24 t.t. of total consumption, 45.2 t.t. were contributed by locals, 31.8 t.t. were imported.
Tracing the trends among local manufacturers we observed that most of them lost their market share, but an enterprise- JSC Rahat increased its presence at the market from 6.5% in 1995 to 21.5% in 1999. Also we consider increasing in import of Russian sweets from 7% in 1997 to 50% in 1999.
It is known fact that in 1995 advertising policy of the locals and Russians was weaker than now. Western manufacturers dominated with advertising campaigns everywhere in Kazakhstan but now the situation has drastically changed. Locals have experienced more aggressive advertising and expanding policies. The emphasis is placed upon trademarks and brand names as means of convincing consumers that a firm’s product is better than rivals’ products. As an instance we can recall recent big advertising war between JSC Rahat (Almaty) and JSC Sweets of Karaganda (Konfety Karagandy).
QUESTIONS:
True or False
.______1.There is a large enough number of firms at the market of monopolistic competition so that each has little control over price, mutually interdependence is absent, and collusion is virtually impossible.
______2.Product differentiation means only establishment of different prices on the same good.
______3.The demand curve faced by a monopolistically competitive seller is perfectly elastic.
______4.Product is standardized at the market of monopoly competitive.
______5.In monopolistically competitive markets allocate and productive efficiency is realized.
______6.There isn’t advertising promotion in monopolistically competitive market.
______7.Entry to the industry is relatively easy.
______8.Each firm has a comparatively small percentage of the total market, so each has a very limited amount of control over market price.
______9.When demand curve is tangent to the average-cost curve at the profit maximizing output in the long run , a monopolistically competitive seller is maximize its profits or minimize its losses.
_____ 10. It is obvious, that advertising express only advantages for and increases productive efficiency of firm.