Economics for Managers
Exercise to Accompany News Article,
Corruption Destroys People’s Faith in Democracy.
Respond to the accompanying article. In particular, attempt to use some of the economics vocabulary you have learned, and apply some of the tools and concepts. For example, you might use supply and demand curves to examine the effect on capital markets of "capital flight" and "lending institutions…reluctant to throw good money after bad."
The article makes several arguments that you might respond to--the contrast, for example, of America’s 19th century Robber Barons with Soviet Bloc businessmen. Is that contrast legitimate?
There is also an argument that "corruption distorts the market," but not much detail is given on how. It might be worthwhile to explore the possible connections.
Try to be critical, but generous. Offer your own thoughts, but give good support for your ideas. Stories of your own personal experiences, or those of friends and family, are encouraged; but attempt to be as objective as possible.
400 to 500 words
Due Friday, 29 September
Corruption destroys people's faith in democracy
In the post-communist societies a well-connected few have
created very little
RFE/RL Weekday Magazine, 6 September 2000
By Askold KRUSHELNYCKY
The sixth in our series of reports on pervasive corruption
in the post-communist states focuses on the effects both
petty and high-level fraud have had on the societies where
it has taken hold. RFE/RL correspondent Askold Krushelnycky
examines the problems involved.
Prague, 6 September 2000 (RFE/RL) - Some of those who have
made money corruptly in the former communist countries try
to justify their actions by comparing their practices to
what was called the U.S. "robber-baron" capitalism of the
19th century.
But Stanley Kober, a foreign-policy analyst at the U.S.'s
Cato Institute, says there are strong differences that
undermine any such comparison. Many of those who amassed
great wealth and built powerful business corporations in
19th century America frequently did use unfair, dishonest
and brutal means. But they also built railroads that opened
up the country, founded new communities, created
businesses, built factories, dug valuable mines, and
provided a dynamic environment which encouraged new ideas
and inventions.
"Robber barons were actually creating things. I mean, the
problem there, as people point out, is that they were sort
of like monopolies. But here [in Russia] what do you see is
being created? Also, you don't see a lot of investment
going in. You see a lot of capital flight."
In Russia and other post-communist societies, a
well-connected few have created very little. They use their
privileged positions to take control of former state
property, or to loot their countries of natural resources
or anything else that can be sold abroad.
What's more, the old-style, U.S. cavalier capitalist
reinvested most of his profits in his country.
Post-communist rich businessmen prefer to keep their money
in foreign accounts and do little to stimulate the
development of their countries' economies.
Corruption is a major inhibitor of democratic development
when it is prevalent at the highest levels of government.
Bribery is used to neutralize parliamentarians and other
leading politicians who are elected to represent ordinary
people and to act on their behalf. Intimidation, violence,
and murder suppress many of those who want to act in an
honorable way and raise their voices against corruption.
Such phenomena, common in many post-communist societies,
not only rupture the democratic process. They actually
destroy people's faith in democracy because they equate
democracy and capitalism with the sort of ruthlessness and
massive dishonesty that are the hallmarks of their corrupt
leaders and businessmen.
Don Jensen, a former U.S. diplomat in Moscow who is now
RFE/RL's associate broadcast director, says corruption has
bred cynicism among ordinary people in the former Soviet
bloc.
"There is a growing cynicism by the average person in one
of these countries watching the corruption take place.
There's growing cynicism about so-called democratic change.
Across the board, we've seen in the past 10 years a
universal decline in so-called democratic processes and
institutions."
Jensen says that in many post-communist countries voters
turn away from liberal and democratic politicians because
they associate democracy with the corruption and
impoverishment which has befallen them since the collapse
of communism.
In many of the post-communist states, branches of
government, powerful business interests and organized crime
groups - which often resort to murder - are often tightly
intertwined. Sometimes, they are even indistinguishable
from one another.
"There was always organized crime in these countries but
the problem of course is what's crime and what's the state
- and the distinction is very blurred."
In these societies, criminals can become so strong that it
is difficult to say who is the junior partner in the
relationship between them and those heading a political
power structure riddled by corruption. The forces at the
state's disposal (the courts, police and intelligence
system) work repressively to protect the interests of a
corrupt state and stifle individuals who oppose it. They
themselves become corrupt beneficiaries of the system.
Those who try to be honest are fired from their jobs, or
worse.
Because there is a widespread popular perception that those
with money or in positions of power do not heed the law and
can bribe their way out of trouble, confidence in the rule
of law has eroded and been replaced by contempt for the
justice system.
Viktor Gitin, a former member of the State Duma from the
reformist Yabloko Party, says that an independent, honest
court system is badly needed in Russia.
"It's because our court system doesn't work that many
crimes and legal chaos are possible. In this situation, no
one carries any responsibility [for their acts], and when
people know that they won't have to assume that
responsibility, bureaucrats, deputies, or ordinary citizens
stop thinking that breaking the law can have undesirable
results."
Corruption also hinders political and economic
transparency, necessary in a democracy. Key decisions are
taken secretly by a few people for their own benefit. The
majority is excluded from the political mechanisms that
govern their lives and they are subject to legislation they
play little part in formulating - the opposite of
democracy.
Corruption also holds back economic reforms and the
development of a true market economy from which the
majority can benefit because the status quo is the one
convenient to those reaping the profits of corruption.
Jensen says:
"Corruption distorts the market, it corrodes the rule of
law, it undermines the confidence in normal people in the
ability of their leaders to deliver on promises of social
welfare that leaders always talk about."
Although some Western companies have undoubtedly taken part
in corrupt activities in the post-communist countries, most
have been dismayed by the adverse business environment
fostered by corruption. Many Western firms and investors
have withdrawn or reduced their activities because they are
fed up with becoming the targets of corrupt officials
demanding bribes, of being cheated by corrupt businessmen,
of being at the mercy of a corrupt legal system. They feel
the competition is unfair when they are competing against
rivals who pay bribes and receive favored treatment.
International lending institutions such as the
International Monetary Fund have also become reluctant to
throw good money after bad following revelations of how
Russia and Ukraine deceived or misused funds totaling
billions of dollars.
In sum, corruption corrodes a society. When nepotism
replaces merit, when cunning and cheating replace trust and
honesty, when force and murder triumph over the law and a
sense of decency - then the threads binding together a
civil society are weakened and eventually destroyed.