Course Activities & Reflection

DED240

"Teaching & Learning with the Internet"


      

       


About Course

DED240 will provide a framework for trainee teachers to start integrating the internet in their own teaching and into the learning of their students. For more information about the course module and links to course and lecture notes, click on  http://eduweb.nie.edu.sg/programme/diped/ded240/index.htm


Web Forum

To get into the Web Forum page for this module, click the following website:  http://155.69.76.13/~ded240


Reflection #1

Focus Question:

Designing learning to harness the information resources of the internet. What are the main similarities and differences between such ‘traditional’ approaches and the kind of models of teaching and learning associated with ‘web-based instruction’ in the article provided.

            The Internet has made its way into the classroom in recent years and its integration in education has tremendous impact on the pupils' thinking and learning. As teachers, it is very crucial that we know the correct approach to use so that we can be effective in our teaching.
            The 'traditional' classroom approach to teaching and learning is predominantly characterised by "chalk and talk", the teacher plays a central role in pupils' learning. Here, the teacher focus on dispensing information and often pupils' interactions are usually not encouraged. In the traditional classroom, there is hardly room for creativity and innovation - which are critical in today's knowledge-base driven economy. Pupils are merely passive learners of knowledge and they seldom dwell in higher order thinking.
            With the use of IT and Internet in teaching, it is unfortunate to say that some teachers still use the ineffective 'traditional' approach. The Internet is used as a means to transmit information to pupils. It only takes over the traditional role of a teacher.
            There are some similarities between the 'traditional' approach and the model approach associated with web-based instruction. Both aim to provide and present pupils with information. Teachers use the Internet as an alternative source of instruction to teach pupils. Pupils also have the opportunity to involve and have access to the World Wide Web. In both approaches, the computer takes the role of a tutor to deliver instruction and information.
One main difference between the 'traditional' and the 'model' is their approach to instruction. The former tends to be more teacher-oriented where the teacher presents, delivers instruction and reinforce practice. The latter is more learner-centred where pupils are actively involved in learning. They learn to use the web information to construct knowledge and help them in problem solving. In the traditional approach, the instructional materials tend to be very limited and can sometimes be very monotonous. Instruction is sometimes not well-focus and teachers sometimes tend to supply information that irrelevant to the instructional objectives. Unlike the traditional, the model approach is based on instructional design principles and is more focus. Pupils' activities and web materials are well designed and varied. They are very motivating and able to enhance learning through the appropriate use of graphics, images, animation, sound effects, colours and simulation. In the traditional approach, pupils are presented with massive chucks of information and their learning objectives are seldom tested. The Internet materials presented are not differentiated. Teachers tend to engaged pupils in low order, knowledge type questions. The model approach aims to assess pupils learning through on-line web activities or quiz. It also makes use of the inquiry approach (eg the WebQuest). Pupils are exposed to higher-order thinking which require them to compare, contrast, classify, induce, deduce and analyse. Teachers can also customise and design web sites that provide remediation and enrichment to meet the needs of different abilities.
            Unless we embrace the model approach based on sound instructional principles, it would be difficult to instill creativity and innovation among our young.


Reflection #2

Focus Question:

Developing a search strategy for a chosen topic. How difficult did you find it to translate your topic into search terms which produced quality and manageable information. Describe some of the steps you went through, and any difficulties encountered (and how you overcame these).

            Searching the Internet for the desired information can be quite a tedious process if we do not possess the necessary search strategy. Such knowledge is necessary so that we can be more efficient and productive.

1. Brainstorming for keywords
I wanted to search the internet and some relevant information on a Science topic concerning "Gravity", I started brainstorming, base on my prior knowledge, for keywords associated with gravity, for example, 'gravitational force', 'weight', 'pull', 'Earth', 'pictures', 'experiment' and 'activity'. Using a search engine like "AltaVista", I find it almost impossible to search through all these keywords to obtain the information I needed. In fact, I was loaded with countless pages of information.

2. Basic knowledge of search engine syntax
Fortunately, with the help of some basic knowledge of the syntax involving search engine, such as the use of quotation marks at the beginning and end of the search words, the use of upper and lower case letters, I was able to narrow down my search results. However, my search results is still very wide and contains many irrelevant information. To further narrow my search on the topic, I find it necessary to devise a search strategy instead of doing it in this 'ad hoc' manner.

3. Use of Boolean Expression
One very important strategy that I learnt from my DED240 module is the use of Boolean expression like "AND", "OR" and "NOT" if my search involves more than one search item.

4. Organise keywords into sub-categories
I also learn to group and organise my keywords into into sub-categories such as main concept, principles, images and activities. This has helped me to be more focus when using the Boolean expression such as "AND" and "OR" in my search. I also have a list of words I do not want but are related to 'gravity'. Here I can use the Boolean expression "NOT". By doing so, I was able to narrow down my search results drastically.

            Searching and managing information from the Internet is after all not a tedious and painful process if we are able to organise our ideas and devise a correct search strategy.


Reflection #3

Focus Question:

If you are able to effectively evaluate what is good and/or effective on the internet, then you should be better prepared to design and develop your own webpages and online educational resources. Choose one of the websites (or URLs) selected on your TOPIC SEARCH last week, and write a short evaluation of this. In terms of its apparent purpose and type, how effective was this URL and what were its main positives and negatives? Which evaluative criteria were most relevant to the website selected? [use either the evaluation sheet provided or any other you come across as a model of this]

Topic: Magnets

Web Page Title : Magnet Man

URL : http://www.execpc.com/~rhoadley/magindex.htm

            While it may be an easy process to bookmark and select websites from the Internet as on-line educational resources. However, the impact and effectiveness of these websites have to be taken into consideration before using them to teach our pupils.

The website chosen for discussion is titled “Magnet Man” at the above URL. The following are my evaluative criteria.

Type & Purpose of Web Page

It is an informational type. The website is very rich in content and everything a pupil may want to know about magnet can be found here. It contains well-defined terms and terminology, drawings, figures as well as real images on the subject. It also provides interesting experiments with procedural guidelines for pupils. It has generously provided a good number of related links to other sites on magnets.

Authority

This website is well maintained by the author. The website shows that it was last updated in 01/01/2001. The author clearly highlights the new information that has been added. The author has clearly identified himself and allowed users to feedback suggestions and ideas. The website is also very well organised and straight to the point. Users can move easily to find the particular resource they need.

Audience

The website intended audience is primary school pupils. The language used is simple and some of the experiments are very basic. The author has also provides pupils with many challenging and unique experiments. I find that it is also a very useful site for teachers and parents to use the materials and ideas to teach their children.

Effectiveness of design

Although the bullet-type format used may make the site look rather monotonous, I felt it make the layout neat and organised. It is easy for user to access any information directly and quickly. The author also uses different colours for different sub-topics. The website is highly informative and creative. Teachers, parents and pupils can use them as supplementary materials. It will be an excellent site for pupils who is interested in creative and challenging ideas about magnets. The experiments are very well illustrated with diagrams and pictures. The procedures provided are clear and easy to understand.

A short annotation for website

This is an excellent informational website for both teachers and pupils. The homepage cover can be improved and made more attractive with graphics and colours.


Reflection #4

Focus Question:

The process of designing a webpage (for whatever purpose) should involve a number of stages of development as well as various ‘elements’ planned as a layout or map.  The resulting ‘interface’ helps to not only organize and publish your website, but to encourage interaction and interest. You have been asked to design a ‘resources’ page , and organize this in terms of a theme related to your chosen topic. Discuss the stages you went through and some of the elements you chose in order to come up with an effective web ‘interface’ plan or layout.

When I am designing and creating a webpage such as a 'resource page', I can categorise my process into 4 main parts:-

1.  Planning Stage
- Consider who my target audience is - ffor this project, my pupils are the people who will visit my website.
- Decide on a suitable webpage design appplication software. When I first started using MS Word to create my webpage (saved as html format), I found it easy to use but there were limitations in creating graphics interface and scroll-down menus. So I decided to use more powerful and dedicated webpage software like "Web Express" and "Frontpage".
- Decide on an appropriate webpage titlee that I want to teach my pupils.
- Specify my webpage learning outcomes.<
- Source for appropriate and relevant leearning resources to be put at this site as hyperlink.

2.   Design Stage
- Decide on the layout of the webpage - whether to use frames or not and also how my portals are to be designed. In my assignment, I have considered the use of tables or even metaphor for my portals.
- Decide on how I would like my visual ddesign to look like such as the background design and colours, type of fonts used for Title, Headings, sub-headings and general text, the colours and size of the fonts, the incorporation of clipart, graphics and animations.
- Decide on how to organise and group myy resources to make it user-friendly.

3.   Evaluation Stage
- Always preview the webpage with a browwser first before publishing it.
- Obtain feedback from friends and try tto make improvement to the webpage.
- Check that all the resources provided are continually updated.
- Check that all resources are properly linked.

4.  Publishing Stage

- When all is checked and properly evaluuated, the webpage is ready for publication.
- Decide on where to publish the webpagee. For ISP account holders, they can publish it free with the Service providers. As a non-ISP holder, I have to use internet free websites like geocities.com to publish my webpage.
- Upload the necessary html and image fiiles into the web folders.


Reflection #5

Focus Question:

The Development of Web-Based Learning Resources

There are two parts to this reflection:

Part A: Web Quest

 Webquests represent a more learner-centred, inquiry-based approach to learning focused on ‘an activity’ rather than mere information or skill alone as the  unit of learning. In light of your own experience in developing a webquest, what do you think are the main advantages (and any significant disadvantages) of the Webquest model in comparison to traditional transmission and teacher-centred approaches to learning?

Part A

As I work on the WebQuest for this module, I do find it very different from the traditional transmission approach to teaching and learning. The advantages of the WebQuest model overweighs that of the traditional  'chalk-and-talk' model and some of the advantages are:-

- The WebQuest model comprises of tasks and activities that adopts a more student-centred approach to teaching and learning.

- the pupils are actively involved in constructing their own learning through inquiry learning of on-line web resources and instruction. Pupils also learn to be more independent in their learning and become less dependent on their teachers.

- the activities are designed to allow pupils to work in pairs or groups and hence encourages cooperative learning and group interaction.

- it presents pupils with tasks that requires problem solving skills. Many of its activities encourages pupils to think critically and creatively.

- the mode of assessment may be formative, pupils are assessed in a more relax and anxiety-free environment as compared to the traditional pen-and-paper mode of assessment.

- teachers play the role as a facilitator and motivator. Their presence is to encourage pupils learning, provide scaffolding and stimulate discussion.

- WebQuest incorporates the use of interesting graphics, images and animation, games and quizzes that motivate the pupils to learn.

 

Part B. Seminar Presentation Focus

Briefly recount the ‘story’ of how you developed your Web Resource in terms of addressing the following prompts (no. 2 and 3 where appropriate) :

  1. How did you go about coming up with a specific theme (in relation to a  chosen subject) that was suitable for organizing a web search and resource development?

  1. In the developing of your resource and the website, were there any design or other problems you had to overcome (e.g. getting certain effects like WordArt on your web page, or to convert a Front Page webpage into a form recognized by the Geocities format)?

  1. Any bits of advice or particular design/technical tricks you would recommend or pass on to other people?

Part B

1) As a primary science teacher, I have chosen "learning about water" as theme for the web learning resource. As I am teaching this in the Science lesson, I have decided to focus and organise the web learning resources into the 3 main aspects  - "Water as a matter", "the states of water" and "the water cycle". This can be used as resources for P4 and P5.

There are science concepts that my pupils need to know can be rather difficult to explain and understand. The materials provided in the primary science textbooks are very limited and these concepts are not explained in greater depth. To broaden the scope and perspective on these topics, I want my pupils to go beyond the textbooks and immerse into the rich resources available in the Internet.

---------------

2) As this is the first time that I'm creating a web site, there are several problems that I face.

- I first created my images with MS Word but they did not appear when I publish in geocities. I soon found that I had to edit the directory path in the html codes. Creating and saving it in Frontpage is much easier and does not have such problems.

- However Frontpage has its drawbacks when come to alignment of text and graphics. In this aspect, It is difficult to achieve the "what you see is what you get" effect.

- Another setback is that  there are no drawing tools available in Frontpage. As I needed them for my portals, I had to create them in Word or powerpoint and use them in frontpage. When I create shapes and fill them with text and colours and export it over to frontpage, the text and colours are embeded in frontpage and no changes can be made. The process can be quite tedious if there are many of such shapes with text to be created for the porters.

------------

3) I may not be very acquainted with other web page design software, my advice is find out what other software is available in the market and what kind of software web designers use and what are the strong features of the each software. Decide on what is best for you.

-------------


 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1