Food for Thought

Article I - Food security for People

Article II - Challenge Corporate Control of Our Food Supply

Source:
The People-Centered Development Forum
http://iisd1.iisd.ca/pcdf/              
============================================================================

			                [PCDF Logo]
              PCDForum Column #81 Release Date June 1, 1996
 FOOD SECURITY FOR PEOPLE
 by Tony Quizon
 Asia today has many of the world's fastest growing economies, each
 competing for markets and investments by offering lower wages and working
 standards and providing the most attractive subsidized infrastructure.
 One consequence of the rush to integrate into the global economy is a
 drastic reorientation of agricultural priorities as basic food crops are
 phased out to devote lands to higher-value export products. The
 consequences are ominous: endangered food security, a degraded
 environment, uprooted rural communities, and greater dependence of the
 poor on the market for their survival.
 The predictions are grim. In just a few years, Asia will be dependent on
 rice imports from other regions. Even today, one bad crop in Southern
 China alone could wipe out all surplus stocks on the global rice market.
 Our water resources are so badly mismanaged that some believe future wars
 will be fought, not over land, but over water. It is hard to believe that
 this is Asia, with its long history of food self-sufficiency deeply
 imbedded in a culture of community survival.
 The change in priorities is reflected in international institutions as
 well as in Asia's rural villages. When it was founded 50 years ago, the
 United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) focused on
 farmers. Now its focus is on production. Then it was concerned with
 household food security. Now the focus is on markets and global surplus
 stocks and the lead role in dealing with issues of food and agriculture
 has been passed to financial institutions (such as the World Bank and the
 Asian Development Bank), the system of international agricultural
 research centers, the World Trade Organization, and transnational
 corporations, which view food security solely as matters of money and
 technology.
 When we speak of agriculture, are we thinking of the producers? Or only
 the production? When we speak of food security, are we referring to
 market-led food security? Or to farmer-led food security?
 These were central questions raised at the September 1995 Asian NGO
 Workshop held in Quebec in preparation for the November 1996 World Food
 Summit in Rome. We concluded that if we truly believe the right to food
 is the right to life, then this right should supersede other secondary
 rights, including the right of corporations to profit in the presence of
 hunger or famine. Similarly, the right of landless farmers to cultivate
 idle private land to feed their starving families must supersede the
 property rights of the persons or corporations that may own that land.
 Imagine the agony of a landless worker peering over her neighbor's fence,
 and seeing vast tracts of idle land to which she has no access.
 For small farming households in Asia, food security used to be a
 relatively simple affair: you reaped what you sowed, ate what you
 harvested, and traded your surplus. What the term hand-to-mouth implied
 was not a pitiful existence, but a noble life. Yet, in recent years, the
 market intruded between farmers and their harvests. Farmers were taught
 that to ensure food security for themselves and their families they must
 sell what they plant and buy what they eat.
 Thus today, in fields that used to grow food, we find cut-flowers being
 cultivated for export. Other fields are transformed into food factories,
 and chemicals are dumped into their soils. And as farmers become
 increasingly alienated from their land and produce, they become careless
 about the environment. And why should they care? How can we expect of
 people to take care of the land that is not theirs?
 Given today's harsh realities, the mere survival of small farmers is a
 living testimony to their hard work and ingenuity. Hidden from the
 probing eyes of the market, we find that farmers do know the dangers of
 chemicals. For while they may sell their pesticide-laden vegetables to
 the market, many also maintain a backyard plot of organically grown crops
 for their own family consumption.
 We need an approach to food security that places farmers at the center of
 agricultural research, technology development and extension. There are
 efforts all around Asia to establish community seed banks, carry out
 agrarian reform, restore the ecological vitality of local land and water
 resources, and help communities use alternative indicators of household
 food security as a basis for community planning. These efforts remind us
 that agriculture is a human enterprise to be carried out by and for
 people-not simply one more opportunity to enhance corporate profits. This
 is a message that Asian NGOs will be bringing with them to the
 forthcoming World Food Summit.
 _______________
 Tony Quizon is Executive Director of the Asian NGO Coalition, P.O. Box
 3107, QCCPO 1103, Quezon City 1103, Philippines, Phone (63-2) 993-315 or
 973-019; Fax (63�2) 921�5122; E�Mail [email protected] and a contributing
 editor of the PCDForum. This column was prepared and distributed by the
 PCDForum based on his presentation to the Global Assembly on Food
 Security, October 8th 1995, in Quebec, Canada.
 People-Centered Development Forum columns and articles may be reproduced
 and distributed freely without prior permission. It is requested as a
 courtesy that copies of any publication in which a PCDForum column
 appears be sent to the author and to the PCDForum, 14 E. 17th St., Suite
 5, New York, NY 10003, U.S.A. Fax (1-212) 242-1901.
 --------------------------------------------------------------------------

Article II - Challenge Corporate Control of Our Food Supply

Challenge Corporate Control of Our Food Supply

Originally posted in IGC member conference: peoplestrib
Date: January 5, 1998
Posted by: [email protected]

/* Written 10:55 AM  Jan  5, 1998 by [email protected] in peoplestrib */
/* ---------- "01-98 Challenge corporate control o" ---------- */

******************************************************************
                 People's Tribune (Online Edition)
                   Vol. 25 No. 1/ January, 1998

                 P.O. Box 3524, Chicago, IL  60654
                        Email: [email protected]

******************************************************************

6. SURVIVAL TACTICS: WE MUST CHALLENGE CORPORATE CONTROL OF OUR
FOOD SUPPLY

By Tim Metzger

Increasingly, our world is controlled by transnational
corporations. This means that you and I have less of a choice in
matters which affect our health, careers, and livelihood. The
global market is creating a world in which people are restricted
and trade runs rampant. People can no longer cross borders, while
food that is needed to feed them is exported to rich industrial
countries in the North.

Rural peoples are no longer able to feed themselves with their own
crops, but must cater to a global market place where profit reigns
supreme. This is everyone's problem as we will see when the health
effects become obvious.

In today's world, a handful of corporations threaten to own the
entire seed stock of the world. This means that fewer people will
control the world's food decisions. The fact that most of the
corporations in control of food also are in the business of
chemicals and pesticides should frighten everyone. Our food is
being manipulated to require more pesticides, forcing farmers to
buy these products and ensuring that these companies make an even
larger profit. These same corporations are at the top of the list
in generating pollution in poor communities and communities of
color in the United States. At the same time, they devastate other
countries' economies by forcing people to grow crops which are
technology-intensive and not part of the local diet.

Mexico's ability to produce maize and beans (staples of Mexican
rural society) has been cut by one-third, in order to accommodate
the U.S. market's need for fruits and beef. Mexico must import
much of its food today, thanks to "free trade" under the North
American Free Trade Agreement, while people increasingly cannot
make ends meet.

The cattle industry has destroyed two-thirds of the rain forest in
southern Mexico while taking land that could be used by the rural
poor to feed themselves. Mexico has decentralized its economy in
order to compete in the global market, selling state-owned
property to transnational corporations who have no desire to feed
the Mexican people or be accountable to those it displaces.

At the same time that they destroy communities in other countries,
factories in the United States spill toxins into poor communities
and communities of color. Monsanto and Dow are two of the largest
producers of toxic waste in this country, producing chemicals here
and shipping them to Mexico to be used on the genetically
engineered soy beans that Monsanto creates. It should be noted
that many of the chemicals produced in the United States are
banned for use on farms here, but are still sold to Third World
countries as pesticides.

Monsanto's plant in Louisiana has been fined numerous times for
contributing to the pollution of an area known as "Cancer Alley"
due to the amount of toxic waste produced by large corporations
nearby. The surrounding population is around 90 percent African
American and poor and has no say in what these corporations do to
their community.

In order to stop this, people must organize. From rural towns in
Mexico to cities in the United States, people must demand that
corporations become more accountable to the communities that they
are located in. We must also recognize the global connections that
allow rich people in this county to profit, while poor people
across the globe are the victims of this wealth. The solution to
this is to struggle for real social change that recognizes
people's basic needs and allows people to meet them. Food is the
basis of life and should be equally available to all. It is
unacceptable for private companies to own the means by which
people survive. Unless people recognize and challenge the
corporate status quo, things will only get worse for the majority
of people in the world.

******************************************************************
This article originated in the PEOPLE'S TRIBUNE (Online Edition),
Vol. 25 No. 1/ January, 1998; P.O. Box 3524, Chicago, IL
60654; Email: [email protected]; http://www.mcs.com/~league
Feel free to reproduce and use unless marked as copyrighted. The
PEOPLE'S TRIBUNE depends on donations from its readers.
******************************************************************


Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1