Definition
Summary
The
Main Players in 2005
Australian
Free to Air Television
Equal
Employment Opportunity Laws
The
Maths
Distribution
Table and Probability Calculation
Mathematical
Conclusion
Statistical
Arguments
Collusion
The
Disclosure of Collusion in Financial Reporting
Network
Ten 2004 and 2005 Annual Reports
PBL
Annual Report 2003
PBL
Annual Report 2004
PBL
Annual Report 2005
The
Kerry Packer Eulogy
Channel
7 Annual Report for 2003
Seven
Network Annual Report for 2004
Seven
Network Annual Report for 2005
Seven
Network announces "We are above the Law"
Fairfax
News
Corp 2005 Annual Report
Prime
2005 Annual Report
APN
News and Media 2005 Annual Report
Southern
Cross Broadcasting 2004 and 2005 Annual Report
White
Supremacy or Racial Representation
The
Exceptions
The
50 years commemorative programs
Xenophobia
Training
The
Print Media
Radio
Media
Shaping Society
The
Channel 7 Sunrise and Channel 9 Today Programs
White
Territorial Statements
Racism
and White Supremacy - A Very Bad Business
The
ABC Logo - the new symbol of White Supremacy
Reporting
on Racism
White Supremacy: The philosophy that white people are racially superior to others and should therefore dominate society.
Any discussion of ethical investing, or corporate governance, when investing in Australian media stocks has to examine the issue of white supremacy.
This essay uses mathematics to demonstrate that the mainstream media in Australia have an agenda of white supremacy, and that the Federal Government facilitates it.
If you are investing in a bluechip media company you are gambling your integrity on an 82 to 1 shot. If you have a portfolio of these investments your integrity is as worthless as a losing powerball ticket
This essay also provides documentary evidence that this policy exists. The policy of white supremacy is disclosed in the annual reports of the media companies. For starters, the PBL Annual Report 2005, which has NEVER had an Asian presenter in front of the camera at Channel 9, has a picture of an Asian man holding a clothes basket for a white woman.
Network Ten Ltd, which also has NEVER had an Asian presenter, has a picture of Asians with their heads lowered in the presence of The Education Minister. Network Ten also links these political images to corporate governance statements. Network Ten 2004 and 2005 Annual Reports
These are media companies capitalised in the billions of dollars. Their annual reports are their showcase documents. All images are hand picked and 100% deliberate.
Everyday these publicly listed companies subtly tell all Australians that Asians should not be employed, should not speak, nor show their faces.
Asian presenters do appear regularly on television, but only on SBS, which is essentially still perceived by the population as television for foreigners. SBS is racial segregation within the television industry.
Both sides of politics have had a fair share of government over the last 30 years and have said nought about racial representation in the media.
Racism is rigorously policed in the workforce, and the mainstream media regularly report on it. Yet the mainstream media is exempt from regulation.
The following essay links this absence of representation to xenophobia and the emergence of Pauline Hanson in Federal politics.
It also exposes The Kerry Packer Eulogy held at the Opera House on 17th February 2006, and universally applauded by all commentators in the media as a triumph, as an evangelical statement by James Packer, Australia's richest man, as to his commitment to white supremacy.
So as not to be seen as an apologist, or a Muslim sympathiser, the author does not examine the statistics relating to the absence of both Aboriginal or Middle Eastern presenters in the Australian media. The mathematics, however, can be taken as very much the same.
This report recommends that funds managers divest shareholdings in the following media stocks until there is racial representation in line with the general population, as dictated by statistical sampling methods:
Company |
Corporate Website |
Media Website |
Substantial |
|
Publishing and Broadcasting Limited |
http://pbl.republicast.com/ar2005/republicast.asp?controlpanel=yes&page=94&zoom=100&twopagelayout=no | ||
|
Seven Network |
http://sevencorporate.com.au/uploads/files/1128985758969_0.9443600414397504.pdf | ||
|
Network Ten |
http://www.tencorporate.com.au/ | ||
|
Fairfax |
http://www.fxj.com.au/ | ||
|
News Corp |
http://www.newscorp.com/Report2005/AnnualReport/HTML2/128.htm |
For a full rundown on the industry go to:
http://www.ketupa.net/austnetworks.htm#ten
and
http://www.aph.gov.au/library/intguide/sp/media_regulations.htm
These laws were introduced into Australia in 1975. All companies must individually comply with the legislation. http://www.csu.edu.au/division/humres/eo/legisl.htm
I ask the following question:
“Given that we have had Equal Employment Legislation in Australia for the last 30 years, and that all Australians with numerous facial characteristics have had an equal chance of getting a job in front of the camera at any television network, what is the probability of one network NEVER employing an Asian face in front of the camera?”
Assumptions:
Assume that one network has 50 presenters or entertainers at any one time, be they newsreaders, sports presenters, reporters, variety programs hosts, kids entertainers, or regular guests.
Assume an attrition rate of 6%, which translates to 3 employees per annum.
Hence in the 30 years since Equal Employment Opportunity legislation was introduced 90 jobs would have come available.
Next we need an estimate of the Asian faces in the community during the years under review.
Lets start with the latest government records available.
Australia 's population: Projected ethnic composition in 2025
(Source: http://www.aph.gov.au/library/pubs/CIB/1996-97/97cib16.htm)
There is no real statistical measure of the number of Asian faces faces in the community. (There are valid reasons for governments not compiling such data.). Hence I have had to construct an estimate based on the latest data and projections. The report states:
“The Asian component of the population has grown rapidly from a small base: in 1976, the Asia-born comprised 1.1 per cent of the population; in 1985, 2.5 per cent. As at June 1995, 4.8 per cent of the estimated resident population of Australia was born in an Asian country, and with Australia-born children first and second generation 'Asians' comprised about 6 per cent of the population."
By 2025 this is projected to increase by 10% to 16%” (refer diagram).
Assuming linear progressions from 1.1% in 1976, 2.5% in 1985, 6% in 1995,
and 16% by 2025 we come up with the following distribution table.
Note however that the 6% and 16% are based on recent immigration records and projected migrant intakes. It says nothing of the fact that Asians have been around in the Australian population since the gold rush days and in sufficient numbers to cause racial tension within the predominantly white population. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/4311063.stm
Hence the probability distribution, which estimates the number of Asian faces in the general population in 2005 at 9.330%, is considered conservative as it underestimates the number of Asian faces in the population.
As documented in the above table, if you invest in an Australian media stock you are betting your integrity on an 82 to 1 shot.
What are the chances of an 82 to one shot coming up 4 times in a row?
Its one (1) in 45,212,176 . (82*82*82*82)
If you have a portfolio of shares in the Australian Media Industry your integrity is as worthless as a losing Powerball ticket.
There is always room for disagreement in probability.
If statisticians disagree with the calculations I welcome their contributions and would be pleased to link their comments to this website.
But I would like to ask the question:
“When investing in a stock what would you risk your integrity on?”
A 20 to 1 shot?
A 2 to 1 shot?
I would be looking for a probability approaching “one” (1).
The same kind of probability as the sun rising tomorrow.
This only occurs when all races are represented in line with the population distribution.
Mathematics clearly demonstrates that 7, 9, and 10, and the Federal Government through Channel 2, have colluded.
45,212,176 to 1 shots aren’t just coincidence, they are policy.
Mathematics, which is truth, condemns the Media industry in Australia, and it condemns it a thousand times over.
If you have a portfolio of shares in Australian media stocks, you have an investment in the White Australia Policy http://www.immi.gov.au/facts/08abolition.htm
I don’t find it strange that both sides of Government have never spoken out against the networks.
The rule is you don’t criticise your team mates.
Did you know that the bosses of Channels 7, 9 and 10 actually lunch together? Refer The Sydney Morning Herald, 8th August 2005, page 5. “The boss of Channel Nine, Sam Chisholm, went out to lunch last week with his deadly rivals David Leckie, the boss of Channel Seven, and John McAlpine, the recently retired head of Channel Ten. Perhaps he should have spent that time in the office, because it was the week Nine's ratings collapsed.”
http://newsstore.smh.com.au/apps/newsSearch.ac;jsessionid=CC28EE23A6D1D508BDAA252EE538B31F?page=1&sy=smh&sp=nrm&so=relevance&dt=selectRange&kw=The+boss+of+Channel+Nine&dr=6months&pb=smh&rc=10&sfx=text
And
the month of August is just when companies begin preparing their Annual Reports
in Australia.
(The significance of this remark will become clearer in just a moment.)
Do you want hard evidence of Collusion?
No problem!
A commitment to racism is a prerequisite to operating a publicly listed media company in Australia, and it has to be disclosed in the Annual Reports.
Seven Network, Network Ten, and PBL are all publicly listed companies, and have to lodge Annual Reports with The Australian and Securities Investment Commission.
Annual Reports are not just a set of financial statements. Annual Reports are the showpiece document of publicly listed companies. It not only documents financial performance, it is a statement of corporate values. It is often the one document used by investors to decide whether or not to invest. Hence Directors go to great lengths to ensure the message is the correct one.
The Directors of Seven Network, Network Ten, and PBL have gone to great lengths to disclose their racist policies in their Annual Reports.
But they only do it once in each Annual Report.
And they all have their unique way of racially vilifying Asians.
After 50 years of white supremacy in the media, and with indirect Government backing, the moguls and executives feel invincible.
The following images are ALL the images of Asians in the Annual reports. I have not been selective in my analysis.
The Annual Reports amount to signed admissions of guilt. And when something is documented it stands against you for a thousand years.
http://stocknessmonster.com/news-item?S=TEN&E=ASX&N=163950
There are no Asian faces in Channel 10’s 2004
Annual report except for the Chinese Dragon Boat race on P. 18 and their heads are lowered.
That’s our Prime Minister at the podium. http://www.pm.gov.au/
There are 3 themes here:
Channel 10 sponsors the Young Australian of the Year award, but is proclaiming our Prime Minister as Australian of the Year for his stance on Asian boat people, the policy of not allowing Asians on the Ten Network, and for educating our Kids along this path.
In the 2004 Annual Report these images immediately precede Corporate Governance Reporting. The Directors of Network Ten state that racial vilification of Asians is primary when considering corporate governance. (Remember, this is a media company. These images are not accidental)
These three themes are repeated in the 2005 Annual Reports.
http://stocknessmonster.com/news-item?S=TEN&E=ASX&N=172247
The dragon boat theme is repeated in the 2005 report, only this time Asians are not allowed to even show their faces. Either the photographer went to great lengths to set up a shot where Asian faces would not be shown, or the Directors at Network Ten deliberately picked a photo which excluded Asian faces, just like they have excluded them from television for 30 years. And if you can't see someone's face, then they can't be heard either. This dovetails in perfectly with the extreme racial vilification in the PBL financial statements of 2004 discussed later.
Notice they have their heads bowed down in the presence of Brendon Nelson,
Federal Minister for Education, Science and Training.
http://www.dest.gov.au/ministers/nelson/main.asp
Brendon Nelson is awarding a prize for a school competition on national literacy. The policy of educating our Kids is repeated.
Network Ten sponsors over 50 charitable organisations and community events, as disclosed on the same page as the above photograph appears. What a coincidence that the 3 themes are repeated two years running.
The probability of this occurring by chance is around 125,000 to 1. (50*50*50 )
Again in the 2005 Annual Reports these images immediately precede Corporate Governance Reporting. The Directors of Network Ten restate their view that racial vilification of Asians is part of corporate governance.
Here is the original at http://www.deenmiele.com/Press/Harpers%20Bazaar/HarperBazaar640.jpg
This is very sexually confronting, and a “BAZAAR” is a shop or a part of a store in which miscellaneous articles are bought and sold (easily). There were other issues of Harper's Bazaar in 2003. Why choose one so sexually confronting for inclusion in the Annual Report?
Just as Network TEN has its boat people theme, PBL has its Asian Doubles theme.
And if the sexual aspect is a bit ambiguous, the 2004 Annual Report is as subtle as a sledge hammer.
http://stocknessmonster.com/news-history?S=PBL&E=ASX&Year=2004
P.23 Two Asian ladies together again
The magazine on the left is the Malaysian Women's Weekly.
Malaysia is a predominantly Islamic country, with strict censorship and stong moral codes. . http://www.mapsofworld.com/country-profile/malaysia.html
Now before I enlarge the photo on the left, take a look at a typical example of the Malaysian Women's Weekly.
Now let's have a look at the images in the PBL Annual Report.
PBL puts its images of Asian women side by side. Why put the "Women's Weekly and "Cleo?" tgether?
This is a media company. PBL doesn't just throw images together. There are reasons for it.
The Directors of PBL want to go one better than last year, and have produced a composite photograph of every inappropriate image.
Cleo is known in Australia as a woman’s lifestyle magazine which deals with sexual issues. Cleo magazine is placed next to The Malaysian Women's Weekly to state that we are definitely talking sex.
Note the “ATE YOU” in “CELEBRATE YOU”.
Note the 138 below the ATE. 138 is 69 times 2. (And when this is going on you can't see faces, and no one speaks)
The reader can ponder the meaning of "Horoscope Insight" which sounds very much like "Horror Scope Inside".
Also note “what your man really wants in bed but will never tell you”.
The Women’s Weekly is published MONTHLY. They can't exactly call it "The Women's Monthly", and the publishers are very sensitive to anything that may be taken as a reference to a woman's cycle. But they dress the model in a red dress and ask on the third item "are you overdosing on vitamins?" (First sympton of an overdose? - your urine darkens)
Note the "RED HOT LIPS" and the fact that this model's mouth is open, whereas the other cover girls have their mouths closed.
Note the DIY - "Do It Yourself" - on the Cleo magazine, and the reference to "kick starting" on bottom right of the Women's Weekly, both slang references to masturbation.
"I don't want to go to school. How to calm your child's first day jitters". In the context of these images it is a reference to educating our kids in racism. PBL perfectly aligns its stated policy with that of Network Ten discussed previously.
Journalists often refer to "the culture at Channel Nine" . The culture is one of vulgarity.
I will spare the reader any further analysis, but understand the policies at Channel 9 are based on hatred of Asians and Muslims, not on some 30 year oversight.
.
To those who think this magazine cover is harmless and that I am doing the debasing, there is an easy way to test it.
See if you can get a marketing executive, or even an undergraduate, to sign off on these publications as being "appropriate for publication"> Alternatively you can go to the local library and review The Australian Womens Weekly for any of the abovelisted offending items. You won't find any.
I ponder what the well respected Ita Buttrose, who was once editor for Women's Weekly and Cleo, would make of these two images being placed together in an Annual Report.
If you showed these two covers to a female employee in a workplace environment you could well end up on the receiving end of a sexual harassment suit.
James Packer personally signed off on the 2003, 2004, and 2005 Annual Reports.
http://pbl.republicast.com/ar2005/republicast.asp?controlpanel=yes&page=51&zoom=100&twopagelayout=no
No more Asian women together. Seems there was no more that could be said, so the Directors of PBL take a shot at Asian men.
And the image is not buried in the Annual Report. The Directors feel invincible. It is clearly visible for all to see.
Apparently the Directors of PBL think that Asian men are only good for the most menial of tasks. And of course, Asian men are subordinate to Caucasian women.
Note that the Asian gentleman is from the Salvation Army. The Salvation Army is involved with many community activities, one new initiative being as an employment agency. The joke is, if you can’t get a job in the Media you can always go to the Salvos as a last resort.
Also if Asians lose their money at the gambling table they have a friend at the Salvation Army.
This is PBL’s showpiece document for 2005. It would have been reviewed by all Directors prior to publication.
If I was a Director of PBL and it was proposed to put this picture in the Annual Report I would have resigned prior to publication.
http://pbl.republicast.com/ar2005/republicast.asp?controlpanel=yes&page=18&zoom=100&twopagelayout=no
My perception is that the couple in the foreground are Asian.
http://pbl.republicast.com/ar2005/republicast.asp?controlpanel=yes&page=17&zoom=100&twopagelayout=no
http://pbl.republicast.com/ar2005/republicast.asp?controlpanel=yes&page=25&zoom=100&twopagelayout=no
Comment:
Good photo. All races represented.
I was hoping that with the passing of Kerry Packer, there may have been a change in policy from his son and heir James Packer.
After all, it was an Asian face that saved Kerry's life back in 1990. That distinguished Australian was a heart surgeon by the name of Victor Chang. Kerry held strong against Asian representation at Channel 9 for the next 15 years, and I was hoping for a quick righting of the wrongs by James Packer
There was to be no change in policy.
James Packer organised every detail of the ceremony to mark his father’s passing on 26th December 2005 at the age of 68. (Remember this number).
James installed Alan Jones as master of ceremonies. Alan Jones organised the Cronulla riots http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2005/12/12/1134236003153.html
The selection of 17th February, 2006 as the date of the ceremony was unusually late, but very significant.The 17th February was exactly 68 days after the Cronulla riots of 11th December 2005. (31-11)+31+17 = 68
James linked his father's death to the day when white supremacy reclaimed the southern beaches of Sydney.The ceremony could have been held in a church (the Anglican Archbishop of Sydney, Dr. Peter Jenkins conducted a private funeral for Kerry Packer on 30th December 2005 ) but James Packer deliberatley chose The Sydney Opera House.
The Sydney Opera House is white.
The guest list was white.
And the selection of Russell Crowe to deliver a poem by Rudyard Kipling reeked of white supremacy.
When I heard that Russell Crowe was going to deliver the eulogy my first thought was “Why Russell?”. And I think Russell Crowe was equally surprised to be asked to participate. After all, Russell was never a close family friend. He chooses to spend his spare time at the impoverished South Sydney football matches and when in Sydney lives near the wharves at Wooloomooloo. He is also known for dropping in for a drink in Sydney pubs. Russell has never sought out high society.
Why didn't James Packer call upon one of his competent and long serving stable of television presenters at the Nine Network, many of whom had known Kerry Packer for over 30 years?
James Packer was not interested in the real life Russell Crowe. He wanted the unreal Russell. The credentials of the unreal Russell were impeccable. James Packer wanted Hando, the white supremacist thug from Romper Stomper http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Romper_Stomper who had grown up to become Maximus Decimus Meridius – General in the Roman Empire (White Supremacy - the Romans kept slaves). And if James was commanding Maximus during the ceremony, he was proclaiming himself Emperor.
The real clincher was not so much James Packer’s choice of poem (IF) to be read out by Russell , but his choice of poet. – Rudyard Kipling.
Why not Banjo Paterson, or Les Murray, or any other Australian poet? http://www.answers.com/topic/list-of-australian-poets
After all, Kerry loved his bush property at Ellerston http://www.smh.com.au/news/business/laid-to-rest-in-his-beloved-country/2005/12/30/1135915693201.html:
So why Rudyard Kipling?
It takes about 45 seconds on Google to work out the answer.
Kipling is famous for many poems and infamous for the “The White Man’s Burden” which was pro white imperialism http://www.online-literature.com/kipling/
Remember that in the media , image is everything. Crafted and one hundred percent deliberate.
This ceremony was breathtakingly embarassing.
James Packer desecrated the Sydney Opera House on 17th February 2006. He proclaimed it a monument to White Supremacy. He duped Russell Crowe, and publicly humiliated every international celebrity who attended the event, along with every Australian watching the ceremony live on television, and on relay around the world.
James wasn’t just burying his father. James was proclaiming himself to the world as the new Evangelist of White Supremacy. This happened in front of our Prime Minister, John Howard, whose policies on immigration and detention centres are well documented. Mr. Howard arranged for the ceremony to be taxpayer funded.
Alan Jones is a Rhodes Scholar who majored in English and French Literature. His studies would have covered the Roman Empire and Rudyard Kipling, and his hand can be seen running through the whole ceremony.
James Packer was so pleased with the performance that Alan Jones was masters of ceremonies at James Packer's wedding 18 months later.
Both State and Federal Parliament has its sprinkling of Rhodes scholars who must have known what was being said.
Kym Beasley , the then Leader of the Federal Opposition, is a Rhodes Scholar and said nothing.
I leave the reader to consider whether silence is complicity.
On his 68th birthday (26/7/2007), John Howard PM was to make his own white territorial statement, choosing to spend the day with the Australian troops in East Timor, which gained its independence from Indonesia in 1999. http://abc.net.au/news/stories/2007/07/26/1989169.htm
On the same day, Fairfax chooses to expose Kerry Packer as a brothel owner, having run such an enterprise at Palm Beach in the 1980's.(search archives at http://www.smh.com.au Happy birthday Prime Minister! Fairfax knows the significance of 68 in the Kerry Packer Eulogy, but cannot speak even though it prides itself on independence. Three months into Kevin Rudd's prime ministership the Opera House gets a $700 million "renovation". Basically the Opera House is going to be degutted. http://www.smh.com.au /news/opinion/lets-rethink-this-renovation-and-build-a-new-opera-house/2008/02/06/1202233942886.htmlhttp://stocknessmonster.com/news-item?S=SEV&E=ASX&N=310820
Lots of faces. No Asians.
http://stocknessmonster.com/news-item?S=SEV&E=ASX&N=344393
No faces which even remotely resemble Asian features except for one on the cover of That’s Life P. 17
And as regards the absence of Asian representation at Channel 7, “That’s Life” kind of sums it all up.
http://sevencorporate.com.au/uploads/files/1128985758969_0.9443600414397504.pdf
p.5 Two Asian faces in a group of fourteen from the hit Series “Lost”.
“Lost” is a very good way to describe Asian representation on the Seven Network. Anna Choi is there, but you will have real trouble finding her.
No other Asian faces appear in the report
http://www.sevencorporate.com.au/uploads/files/1128985758969_0.9443600414397504.pdf
p.20 shows a shot of the Channel 7 offices at Martin Place in Sydney. The 7
logo is above the New South Wales coat of arms on the flag below. Note
that racial vilification laws are primarily a State matter (as opposed to
Federal) , and that these companies are State registered.
The statement could not be clearer to the other networks. “We are above the
law.”
http://stocknessmonster.com/news-item?S=FXJ&E=ASX&N=384615
There are around 180 faces in the report. Many photos are news items. Many other photos are just “Australian lifestyle” photos.
The only Asian face is a police officer alongside Michelle Corby, a convicted
drug trafficker, whom many Australians believe was innocent.
Refer Page 10.
This page is a historical tribute to many things Australian.
Resentment of Asians is apparently the Australian way of life according to Fairfax.
http://www.newscorp.com/operations/newspapers.html
News Corp has a very different view of Asians.
Showing Asian women in a beauty contest is demeaning.
But isn't this the perfect reply to the vulgarity of PBL's 2004 images?
News Corpoartion says that Asian women are pure, lovely, and should be put on a pedestal and admired.
Rupert Murdoch takes a special interest in Australia and his competitors here. He would have had the PBL Annual Report "forensically examined".
I leave the reader to consider whether Rupert, who has an Asian wife, would have missed what was being said in the PBL Annual Report for 2003 and 2004.
http://stocknessmonster.com/news-item?S=PRT&E=ASX&N=387943
No Asians
http://stocknessmonster.com/news-item?S=APN&E=ASX&N=167061
No Asians
http://stocknessmonster.com/news-item?S=SBC&E=ASX&N=243168
No Asian faces
http://stocknessmonster.com/news-item?S=VRL&E=ASX&N=171931
No Asian faces
Note that it is not a question of racial representation, it is a question of white supremacy. Questions of racial representation are valid when all groups are represented, and you argue about the mix.
Here there is only one group represented – whites, with of course a few exceptions which are statistically insignificant.
Listed here is what counts as racial representation at the major television networks:
Asian Representation :
Anna Choy - Caucasian with some Asian features on the Channel 7 Beyond Tomorrow program. Anna is in front of the camera for about one hour every year in total.http://www.beyondtomorrow.com.au/presenters.html
Caroline Tran - Asian Presenters on JTV, a music show airing on Channel 2 late on Friday nights.http://www.jtv.com.au
Anh Do - Commencing in October 2006, comedian Anh Do hosts a Friday late night program on Channel 2 for emerging Australian filmmakers.
That’s it folks! Anna, Caroline, and Anh are the summation of Asian presenters on 2, 7, 9 and 10 since transmissions began in the 1950’s. If I missed anyone I must have blinked!
Al Paradihy - daily traffic reporter on the Channel 7 Sunrise Program. Sorry if I spelt his name incorrectly, but there are no further details of him on the Sunrise website at http://seven.com.au/sunrise/regulars
even though he is a regular.Comment: Note that Mr. Paridy reports from a helicopter hovering over Sydney. This is a white supremacist territorial statement (discussed later). Whites have the ground.
Nuala Haffner - weather reporter on the Channel 7 nightly
news, British with African features. Nuala is not a meteorologist.
http://seven.com.au/news/profile_040131_nualahafner
Comment: Channel 7 is very street smart when it comes to racism. They know that Aboriginals do not identify with Africans. Note that black aboriginal representation is not an option at the 7 network. It would be telling Aboriginals that they are wanted in the cities.
Ray Martin – high profile white aboriginal reporter on the Channel 9 Current Affairs Program. http://aca.ninemsn.com.au/reporter/reportbio16.asp
Comment: White aboriginal representation is the only kind of aboriginal representation that the Nine Network can tolerate.
Stan Grant : Aboriginal presenter sacked in 2000 by Channel
7.
http://www.abc.net.au/mediawatch/transcripts/s166318.htm
http://www.abc.net.au/message/tv/ms/s548522.htm
Normally the press will go to great lengths to protect the personal lives of their presenters, but Stan committed the cardinal sin against white supremacy. He had a relationship with a white woman.
Ernie Dingo: Aboriginal presenter liked by all Australians. Mr. Dingo is a presenter on a Channel 7 travel program. This is consistent with white supremacist racial stereotyping of aborigines. It tells them to go walkabout. Mr. Dingo also has appeared on "Dancing with the Stars". Black people have rhythm also.
http://thegreatoutdoors.com.au/
http://www.museum.tv/archives/etv/D/htmlD/dingoernie/dingoernie.htm
If Mr. Dingo was given a newsreaders job it would tell Aborigines that they are wanted in the cities. Hence it cannot happen.
Comment: the failure of the Australian Broadcasting Corporation in never having a full blooded aboriginal news reader , and never developing a role model in this regard, is a major contributing factor to the woeful literacy rates amongst aboriginals.
Indira Naidoo:
http://www.hottestontv.com.au/index.php?section=celebs&profile=150&letter=i&sort=firstname&sort_gender=b&anch=6
In 1996, Indira moved to the ABC's Sydney newsroom where she presented the National Late Edition News and was a stand-in presenter for the 7pm weekday, weekend and World at Noon news bulletins.
Indira joined SBS Television in December 1997.
Message Stick http://abc.net.au/message/ is a half hourly program which reports on indigenous culture. It is produced by the ABC and shown on Friday evenings and repeated on Sunday afternoons.
Note that this racial representation does not exempt the ABC from the accusation of white supremacist. It is whites who have always dominated the best paid positions at the ABC. It is whites who dominate prime time. It is whites who have positions of influence such as political reporters. It is whites who interview celebrities.
The term “of middle eastern appearance” is a commonly used expression.. There absence of presenters “of middle eastern appearance” on 2,7 9, or 10 is another consideration.
Comment: If we had developed our own team of reporters of middle eastern appearance, we could have sent them overseas to report on, and denounce, the London bombings. The message would have been clear. The London bombings had nothing to do with Australia. It could have been "quarintined" in London.
By sending Caucasian reporters the message of denunciation turns into racial vilification. There are national security issues here for consideration
If you think the earlier assumption of 50 presenters is a little too high, I would suggest you watch the 50 year commemorative shows which the commercial networks have produced which clearly document their commitment to racism. You will see many white faces, and no Asians, or Blacks.
The networks are so impervious to criticism that they happily document their racist policies over the years. Both Channels 7 and 9 are celebrating 50 years of transmission. Channel 9 (PBL) produces the series "20 to 1" and willingly supplies archival footage documenting white supremacy.
Channel 7 airs its "50 Years of Television" special on 17/9/06 but chooses not to look at Australian television and instead concentrates on world television events. Seven Nework does not wish to document 50 years of white supremacy.
And the next time "The Logies" comes around, observe that it is "whites only".
Ever wondered why Australians are so xenophobic?
It comes from the networks like 2, 7, 9 and 10 which have been telling us very subtly, each evening for many years, that Asians and Blacks are not wanted in this country.
For those who feel that television has little or no effect on how viewers think, the billion dollar advertising industry begs to differ. And just because these “advertisements” for white supremacy are not paid for, don’t think it has not had an effect.
After a 50 year TV diet of “whites over here at 2,7,9, and 10” and “Asians and Blacks over there at SBS” I’m not surprised that Australians took so easily to locking up non whites in detention centres in the middle of the Australian desert.
The media had a good time demolishing Pauline Hanson. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/2010782.stm
Its about time they acknowledged their role in creating her.
If you still don't understand the Cronulla riots, take a read of "White Territorial Statements" discussed later. This is how the networks have induced xenophobia into the population over successive generations.
If the Media moguls counter that there were only Caucasian presenters around over the last 30 years I ask why did you not train any Asians or Blacks? I especially ask why they did not train any full blooded Aboriginal presenters – really black ones.
How much did our media moguls spend on horse trainers last year?
How much did they spend on training Asian presenters?
The argument that there are no Asian faces who speak with Australian accents is quite false. There are many. So many that they have their own slang terms. They are called ABC’s (Australian Born Chinese). It denotes an Australian who has Asian features but who speaks with an Australian accent. Also sometimes referred to as a “Banana”. Slang terms are only invented for commonly known phenomena.
Where are the Asians, Arabs and Black journalists in the mainstream print media?
Look in the mainstream newspapers. Why do you have to be Caucasian to get a gig as a journalist?
After 50 years of newsreaders subtly telling us that only Caucasians can read, I’m not surprised that we think that non whites can’t write.
Even prime time radio, where facial characteristic are meaningless, is an exclusive Caucasian club!
But then again, according to television, its only white guys who should speak.
Not only do I believe that the face of the media should reflect society, I believe the media creates society. After 50 years of television telling us that Caucasians are what is wanted in Australia it is interesting to note the absence of Asian faces in the corporate boardrooms, and at senior management level.
Many organisations may counter that they don’t get Asians, Arabs or Blacks applying for these positions.
I say they know they need not apply.
I cringe a little when our international sporting teams exclude certain racial characteristics. After 30 years of EEO there should be all kinds of faces in all teams. The selection process is not racist, nor are our athletes. But it does confirm that Asians, and to some extent Blacks, know that they are not wanted.
We need Asian and Black sports commentators on all the major networks.
These are the morning programs of Channels 7 http://seven.com.au/sunrise and Channel 9
http://today.ninemsn.com.au/
Their presenters and regular guests appear on the following websites.
http://seven.com.au/sunrise/regularshttp://today.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=6492
All the presenters and regulars on the shows are, of course, white.
Both the Channel 7 Sunrise program, and the Channel 9 Today program, have taken on a “homely feel”, where presenters sit around discussing topical questions.
What these shows are subtly telling us, and especially our children, is that Asians, Blacks and Arabs are not wanted in our homes.
And that they are not wanted “inside”. As in “on the inside” of any organisation.
This is the very worst of it!
If I gatecrashed one of the Sunrise outside interviews yelling “ASIANS OUT!” I could be jailed for 7 years for racial vilification.
Channel 7 and Channel 9 say it every day and win awards.
Federal Politicians and both sides of politics appear on the Today program:
Joe Hockey (Liberal) Channel 7 http://www.joehockey.com/
Kevin Rudd (Labor) Channel 7 http://www.kevinrudd.com/
The Sunrise and Today Programs make a territorial statement by telling Asians and Blacks that they are not wanted in white’s houses.
Neighbours http://seven.com.au/homeandasay/meetthecast/ is a long running show situated in the suburbs. There are no Asians in Ramsay Street. The message is clear. The suburbs are for whites.
Network Ten has the long running "Home and Away". http://www.neighbours.com/characterss/ which is located at a beachside suburb. No Asians or Blacks in the cast. And this has been the policy ever since the shows inception some 20 years ago. The message is that the beaches belong to White Australians. If you need an explantion as to what caused the Cronulla riots, look no further.
Channel 9’s has McLeod’s Daughters http://mcleodsdaughters.ninemsn.com.au/ , centred around life on a farm. All its characters are White. This is a territorial statement saying that Australia is owned by whites and that there should not be any Asians or Blacks in country areas.
Channel 9 then produces “The Alice” http://thealice.ninemsn.com.au/ with a theme of life in Alice Springs, a popular tourist destination in the middle of Australia. Whites have the lead roles and storylines focus on whites. Its always the white guys who travel in their cars. “The Alice” showcases stunning scenery, stating that this all belongs to whites.
Note that this is the only program on the Channel 9 network with black aboriginal content, in minor roles. It tells aboriginals that this is where they should be - as far away from the coastal capital cities as possible..
Channel 2 produces “Squatter” centring around colonial life in early Australia. http://www.abc.net.au/tv/outbackhouse/history/SQUATTERLIFE.htm
Another white territorial statement, confirming the statements made by the commercial networks. No aboriginals appear in the series. The ABC does not want aboriginals connected to the land in any way.
Channel 7 agrees with the Squatter statement and has a black traffic reporter, in a helicopter, on the Sunrise program. Note the consistencies of themes with blacks.
They have no connection to the land.
Channel 10 regularly makes the Aryan nation statement with its nightly news readers, all of which are white, and 5 out of the 8 are blond. http://www.ten.com.au/main_idx.aspx?section=newsWeather
The number of blonde (Aryan) presenters on the networks is another disturbing feature of Australian television.
On 21/9/2006 Channel 9 begins airing the series "ROME", a dramatisation of the Roman Empire. The program is inconsistent with Channel 9's programming, and would normally would have been shown by Channel 2 or SBS. The series was a "must have" at Channel 9 as it was a necessary continuation of the Kerry Packer eulogy, discussed earlier.
It is interesting to look at programs like “The Price is Right” http://tvshows.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=51682 and ‘Who wants to be a Millionaire” http://millionaire.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=21871%20 where the networks give money away. When the camera scans the audience there is an absence of Asian faces.
This is not because Asians have been culled out.
It is because Asians have boycotted the shows.
If Asians are boycotting the shows it is reasonable to assume a “flow on” effect to products advertised by the networks.
If Asian faces account for 10.% of the market, then advertisers would do well to push for the expulsion of all executives at Channels 7, 9, and 10.
http://www.abc.net.au/perth/about.htm
The origins of the logo were in combining the letters ABC.
Its much easier to make it out of a “W” and a sideways “S”.
The recent race riots in Cronulla were deplored by the Australian media.
How ironic.
White supremacy condemning racism. White supremacy taking the high moral ground.
Detention centres are supported by both sides of Parliament, so allow me an "apolitcal" comment.
Having written this article over the last year I now see detention centres for what they are - the ultimate threat by white supremacy. The threat to exterminate illegal immigrants by natural methods. Exterminate them by the heat of the Australian desert, or by tropical disease, some of which have no cure or prevention. The threat was a hollow one, but it parallels the holocaust.
On the subject of detention, we have forgotten Aboriginal communities. If you are borne into them, this is where you stay.
Consider:
Recent technological developments can help us fight racism. There was a
computer generated photograph produced about a year ago showing the one face
of Australia. It had been melded together from a
small, but statistically representative, sample based on the Australian Census.
I was surprised to see that the characteristics were not Caucasian but slightly Asian.
Every television network should have their composite photographs compiled by a government agency and be required to present their photograph, compared to the face of Australia, to their shareholders at the Annual General Meeting. Photographs should be produced for all tiers of management, with special attention to those faces appearing in front of the camera.
Every publicly listed Australian company should also have to comply as part
of their “Balanced Scorecard”.
