| Pridi
Banomyong grew up during this transitional
period. He was born of a commoner's family in
Ayutthaya on 11 May 1900, towards the end of Rama
V's reign. He recalled the peasants' insoluble
problems of the first 16 years of his life in the
following terms: "While
the peasants already face various natural
hardships such as crop diseases, drought and
flooding, as well as illness and cattle theft,
the landowners show no compassion, They insist on
collecting rent on time and in full, which drives
the peasants deeper into poverty. When the
peasants cannot honour their obligation, their
assets, including whatever rice they have, is
confiscated."
Moreover,
"the many other aspects of poverty and
hardship borne by the peasants clearly showed
that they received no assistance from the
government. Yet they had to pay tax. If they
could not, they would be conscripted to hard
labour for 15-30 days annually, and still they
had to pay paddy land tax if thay wished to
cultivate the land."
Pridi's
assessment of the problems facing Siamese society
in his youth was not far from reality. Dr. Carl
C. Zimmerman of Harvard University was
commissioned by the Siamese Government to conduct
its first economic survey in 1930. An excerpt of
Dr. Zimmerman' s report reads:
"The
middleman profits in many ways from the peasants'
indebtedness, which created buying and selling
methods that deviated from economic principles,
With their economic superiority over the
peasants, the rice buyers can grade rice and set
prices to suit themselves. These shortcomings
make it painfully difficult to attain and
progress in the agricultural sector".
when he
subscribed to Law School, Pridi learnt of what is
known as "extraterritoriality" which
the lecturer defined as foreigners having special
rights above Siamese jurisdiction. This made
Pridi realize that Siam had lost her judicial
sovereignty. Later, Pridi spoke in an interview
of the social experiences he encountered in his
youth:
"I
have already spoken about the Thai social
conditions which I saw myself. the people are
economically deprived because they do not have
political freedom of equality, and are under the
influence and domination of several capitalist
countries, I resolved even before I came to stydy
in France that I would do extensive research and
study to find ways to improve the living
conditions of the people."
Like
many other students with exceptional academic
records, Pridi won a Ministry of Justice
scholarship to study law in France between 1920 -
1927. However, he never abandoned his ideals and
awareness of the social and economic problems
which beset his homeland, On the contrary, these
experiences spurred him to stydy law as well as
advanced Western economics with the aim of
applying them one day to improve Siam's
condition. While studying abrosd, Pridi also came
to realize the importance of changing the Siamese
governmental system to democracy. This he
believed would provide a basis for a new life, a
new culture which would turn his country into a
civil society in consonance with others. He was
convinced that democracy was an indispensable
basis for human civilization in the new era.
This
inspiration, in conjunction with the realities of
the world community, propelled him to become a
leading figure in the People's Party, which
introduced and established democratic rule with
the King as the constitutional head of state, in
turn allowing democracy to flourish in Thailand
up to the present day.
Pridi
sought to change the administrative system not
only for the sake of political democracy. It was
also clear that he intended to move the country
towards economic, social, and educational
democracy. Above all else, he wished for
democratic rule to set guidelines for the
development of a small nation such as Siam, so
that it may stand proud and independent among the
civilized nations of the modern world community.
His democratic aspirations were evident in the 6
principles of the Proclamation of the Peole's
Party, which he drafted as a declaration on the
day of the coup on 24 June 1932. The six cardinal
principles were as follow:
- To
maintain and secure all forms of
independence, such as political,
judicial, and economic independence...
- To
maintain domestic safety and drastically
reduce crime...
- To
promote the economic well-being of the
people; the new government shall find
employment for every citizen, plan the
national economy, and keep the people
from poverty and hunger...
- To
provide citizens with equal rights...
- To
provide citizens with liberty and
freedom...
- To
provide citizens with the fullest
education.
Other
than these six aspirations, the most distinctive
and controversial of Pridi's ideas was the
National Economic Plan, which showed that Pridi
attached great importance to the country's
economic system. In his own words, "this
change of administration is not merely a coup
d'etat but an economic revolution," He
incorporated this objective into Section 1 of the
Economic Plan which he drafted: "I remain
resolute on this subject, and am of the view that
if the government devises an appropriate national
economic plan, finding employment for every
citizen will not be beyond us. The improvement of
the people's welfare is one of the primary goals
in the reform of the system. Never was there an
intention to transform the political system from
a monarchy to an oligarchy which would attempt to
be a democracy in name only. I focussed on the
substance, namely, nourishing the welfare of the
people, The constitution became the key to open
the door of opportunity for the ordinary people
to have a voice in the country's administration
according to their needs and aspirations. Once
this door has been opened, it is the duty of the
government to lead the people through this door
into a new land of prosperity.-"
Even
though Pridi's ideas on a state guided economic
ststem had its weak points which were open to
criticism, such a system also had a social
revolution component. As an individual who
received the Diplome d'Etudes Superieurs
d'Economic Politique, Pridi realised that the
ecnomic system is merely a mean to raise the
people's standards of living. This thinking is
reflected in his ramarks on the economic
structure that, "those who read the economic
plan with a negative frame of mind would coclude
that the government's attempt to run the economic
system would dehumanise peoples into animals..I
took great caution to prevent such
dehumanisation; on the contrary, my desire was to
help make people more human by eliminating the
dangers to personal welfare brought about by
economic factors.
Pridi
was the first politician to provide social
assurance to the people by the government, This
ws clearly enunciated in section 3 of the Draft
Economic Plan. It is indeed a pity that such
ideas were perceived as being communist in
nature, It was only 60 yeats later that Thailand
was able to accept such a social assurance
policy.
The
ideas of the Draft National Economic Plan had no
affiliation with communism as was alleged at that
time. Rather, Pridi stated that his policies were
a mixture of socialism and liberalism." The
Draft Plan guarantees private ownership in
Sections 1 and 5 and calls for the establishment
of a Central Bank (Section 7) which are elements
in every liberal economic system.
Even
though the Draft Economic Plan was not accepted
by the various cabinets during that era while
Pridi was subsequently exiled on charges of being
a communist, the Economic Plan became a model for
a systematic planning of economic and social
development. Many of the ideas in the Economic
Plan were eventually implemented with good
results both during the time when Pridi was in
charge of the country's administration and
thereafter. These ideas included the
establishment of the Bank of Thailand, a
progressive taxation system, reform of the civil
service administration to reflect the new
political system and social assurance for all
people. [Next]
|