|
From Human nature and conduct by John Dewey, 1922 . . . . . . the class struggle grows between those whose productive labor is enforced by necessity and those who are privileged consumers. And the exaggeration due to its isolation from ignored consumption so hypnotizes attention that even would-be reformers, like Marxian socialists, assert that the entire social problem focuses at the point of production. Since this separation of means from ends signifies an erection of means into ends, it is no wonder that a � materialistic conception of history � emerges. It is not an invention of Marx ; it is a record of fact so far as the separation in question obtains. For practicable idealism is found only in a fulfillment, a consumption which is a replenishing, growth, renewal of mind and body. Harmony of social interests is found in the wide-spread sharing of activities significant in themselves, that is to say, at the point of consumption.* But the forcing of production apart from consumption leads to the monstrous belief that class-struggle civil war is a means of social progress, instead of a register of the barriers to its attainment. . . .
Bibliographic notes Title John Dewey and Arthur F. Bentley: a philosophical correspondence,1932-1951 / Selected and edited by Sidney Ratner and Jules Altman, with James E.Wheeler as associate editor.With an introd.by Sidney Ratner. Publisher New Brunswick, N.J. : Rutgers U.P. 1964 |
Page created 27 December 2004
Last updated 27 August 2005
W. Paul Tabaka
Contact [email protected]