Septimus Despencer

 

From Little Missions, Septimus Despencer 1932

Preface
The three years following the armistice of 1918 were spent by the writer in almost continuous travel in what are called the 'Succession States',—that is to say, the new countries which have established themselves, or been established, in the room and on the ruins of the Hapsburg Monarchy. At close quarters I watched the twilight of the gods I had known—and loved—and saw the new heaven and earth emerge from the conflagration in which they were consumed. viewed from a distance, from Paris for example in the year of the Peace Conference, the spectacle wore a very different aspect. Paris was none too well informed, particularly in he early part of 1919, as to what was happening in Central and Eastern Europe ; and all the inter allied organizations, the supreme Council and the supreme Economic Council und was das alles sich' benennen möchte, were greatly hampered by the lack of dispassionate figures and facts. A great deal was happening. Each of the new States was endeavouring to establish faits accomplis, before the Conference came to fix the new frontiers. Almost everyone was in a state of war with someone else : republics rose and fell : waves of occupation advanced and receded : and many believed the Russian Revolution was about to overwhelm Europe as far as the Alps.

Under these circumstances some of the interallied bodies took to sending small commission or individual officers to report on the situation in particular countries or areas. Someone—so far as I know, it was myself—gave to these expeditions the name of 'Little Missions'. Hence the title of this book. Quorum pars magna fui. In the course of 1919 and 1920 I travelled en petite mission nearly 250,000 kilometers, concluded seven international agreements (of the kind known as 'compensation treaties' (see Chapter 8), and was involved in four distinct wars, not one of which was ever reported in the English or American Press !

Chapters 2, 8 and 9 have appeared, substantially in their present form, in the Atlantic Monthly, whose permission to republish is gratefully acknowledged. The rest of the book is new : but occasional phrases, paragraphs, and in a few cases whole pages, are borrowed from articles which have appeared in the (British) Contemporary Review or the alas ! defunct Edinburgh Review, to each of which acknowledgment is also gratefully made.

S. D.      

( pages 5 - 6 )

 

Contents

CHAP. [and, simplified setting] PAGE

1. THE INTERNATIONAL ATMOSPHERE   11

2. FRAU SACHER OF SACHER�S   19

3. THE NEW AUSTRIA   35

4. RUMP-HUNGARY   47

5. THE CZECH REPUBLIC   65

6. JUGOSLAVIA   85

7. ROUMANIA   113

8. THE END OF WEST UKRAINE   123

9. THE POLISH LEGIONS   145

10. POLAND   167

11. THE JEWISH PROBLEM   187

12. HISTORIC PARALLEL 199

      INDEX   205

( page 7 )

 

Historic Parallel
When France at length collapsed in 1815 under the pressure of a world in arms, the statesmen who had carried on the war against her collected to a Peace Congress in Vienna. While the populations of the Continental System were still starving under the English blockade, which the British Government maintained for some months after Waterloo, the Congress danced and sang and flirted and in the intervals made a Peace.

The war had been waged to put an end to French militarism and to make the world safe for autocracy (or, in certain countries, aristocracy), with the maintenance of which the liberties of mankind were inextricably bound up. The most conspicuous offender against these liberties was Napoleon ; and there was a strong public movement in the Allied countries to ' hang l'Empereur '. It was with undisguised relief that the Allied statesmen in Vienna were able to substitute the less dangerous solution of life-long internment in mid-Atlantic in the custody of Sir Hudson Lowe.

But the perils of the future were unfortunately not removed with the elimination of the French Emperor. The war had let loose on the world the bacillus of ' the Revolution ', which comported the negation of God and the Family and the existing social system and yet strangely enough was highly contagious. The deeper purpose of the Vienna Peace Congress was to erect a barrier against the onslaughts of this dangerous pest.

The lead at the Congress was taken, almost from the first, by Austria. Not that Austria had contributed more largely than the other Allies to the ultimate victory. On the contrary, for the last two years of the war she had relied on the others with their relatively unimpaired man-power to bear the brunt of the struggle ; and in the final Hundred Days which ended with the battle of Waterloo no Austrian troops were engaged at all. That the decisive factor in Napoleon's collapse had not been the military genius of the Archduke Charles or the Duke of Wellington (the foremost among the Allied Generals), but the financial strength of Great Britain, was sufficiently obvious. But, when at the close of the conflict the other Allies proceeded to disarm, Austria did not ; and the force which her armaments in being lent to her arguments at the council table was very quickly apparent.

The Austrian Chancellor, Prince Metternich, proceeded to build up a system of vassal States, all vowed to the principles of ' legitimism ' (as the maintenance of the Peace Settlement was then described) and all looking to Vienna for political counsel, military instructors and armament loans.

There was one part of the Peace Settlement to which those of the Allies who, like the Emperor Alexander, considered themselves idealists—' ideologues ' was the contemporary term—attached the utmost importance ; and that was the establishment, for which the Peace Treaties provided, of a league of (' legistically ' minded) nations with a council of the chief Powers as its executive organ. It was hoped in this way to provide the machinery for focusing international public opinion (assumed to be pacific and conservative) against disturbers of the existing settlement, and bringing recalcitrant German or Italian Princes with ' Liberal ' tendencies to heel. A quasi-religious significance was attached to this combination of the chief powers, which was known as the Holy Alliance, and was the nucleus of a whole philosophy of political mysticism.

The guiding spirit and the driving force of the Holy Alliance came from Vienna. If anywhere in Europe there was a State which had earned a reputation for arbitrary or brutal administration (like Naples), or which denied rights and liberties to its subjects (like the States of the Church), or maintained the ascendancy of a governing race or class by keeping the leaders of the minorities in exile or gaol (like Modena and Parma), such States were invariably vassals of Vienna. If anywhere there was a State with Liberal or constitutional tendencies, it was sure to be outside the Austrian orbit, and to be regarded with profound distrust by the Holy Alliance.

The policy of Austria was based on genuine, and (as the event proved) well-founded apprehension as to the effect on herself of any changes in the position of the vassal States as fixed by the Peace Treaties : and the arrogance with which she was apt to treat other countries, and on occasion even her own vassals, was essentially an expression of weakness—in contradistinction to the arrogance of Napoleonic France which was the expression of Napoleon's strength. Those statesmen who appreciated this distinction and stood up to Austria commonly gained their point : but they were few and far between, and not always the Ministers primarily responsible for the foreign affairs of their respective countries. In general the Foreign Offices throughout Continental Europe were at pains, willingly or unwillingly, to bring their policy into conformity with the Austrian system.

The policy of the rest of Europe throughout the half-century which followed the Peace Settlement was conditioned by the struggle to remove or palliate the servitudes which in the interest of Austria the Treaties had imposed.

The first outbreak came in 1830, when some half-dozen props of the system collapsed, not all of which could afterwards be replaced. The United Netherlands disappeared incontinently from the map, and the legitimist Bourbons in France and a certain number of German Princes lost their thrones. The Austrian hegemony lasted till the next upheaval in 1848. In that year of casting off of yokes, when to be alive was good but to be young was very heaven, Metternich had to escape from Vienna in disguise and the Holy Alliance ceased to be regarded by anyone any longer as holy. The wreckage of the 1815 framework still remained : and it took one war in Germany in 1866 and a whole series of wars in Italy between 1848 and 1870 to clear it finally away.

Rich England stood by meanwhile giving no effective support to either side, but growing richer and richer while the Europeans struggled in the meshes of their toils. When the struggle was over, the English Liberal Gladstone pronounced its epitaph with the characteristic exclamation : ' When and where has any good ever come out of Austria ? '

 

Such is the story of the Peace Settlement of 1815.

 

' Of what use then ', said Asmodeus, ' is the faculty of memory, if mankind does not profit by the experience of the past ? '

' We are here ', replied the Demon, ' without doubt in presence of a disposition of the Supreme Will. The scope of my own activities, for example, would be diminished by at least one-half, if mankind were to begin to learn the lessons of History. but, the Devil be praised,' he added, leering piously, ' they never do.'

(pages 199 -204 )

London : Edward Arnold 1932.

 

 

Butler, Ralph. Title(s) Little missions, by Septimus Despencer [pseud.] Publisher Lond., Arnold, c1932. Paging 215 p. 19 cm. Subject Headings Reconstruction (1914-1939) Europe.
[ Los Angeles Public Library ]

 

Page created 6 April 2005
Last updated 9 May 2005

W. Paul Tabaka
Contact [email protected]

Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1