| Home Domestication
Summarized/Adapted by P. Hein
--
I started to use the term
"domestication" after I read a book called
"The Four Agreements" by Miguel Ruiz. He says
when we are young, we are all socialized or
domesticated by our parents, teachers,
governments, etc. He means we are all taught a set of
beliefs that most of us never question. Instead we just
accept them or agree to them.
He says we aren't aware that these
beliefs are only things which other people started to
believe long before we were born. Most of us simply never
stop to think for ourselves about these beliefs and where
they came from or how long ago.
These old, even ancient, beliefs were developed by many
people, for many various reasons, some which dont
make any sense anymore. When we are young we also accept
these beliefs without considering that they may be false
just as easily as they may be true. Then most of us
continue to accept them as truths throughout the rest of
our lives, again never deeply or even superficially
questioning whether they are in fact true.
I would add that we usually don't think
about how the beliefs we are taught usually serve the
interests and needs of those who control us.
Ruiz also says that before we were born, others -- now
long dead -- created what we now call our society or
culture. This society or culture is made up of all
society's rules, its beliefs, its laws, its religions,
its different cultures, its governments, schools, social
events, traditions, and holidays. Each culture has many,
many rules and beliefs which are taught to every child
born into that culture. The culture uses Mom and Dad, the
schools, the government, the media, and religion to teach
us how to behave and even how to feel if we want to be
accepted as a member of the culture. As children we
actually have no choice but to go along with all of the
existing rules and beliefs because it would be impossible
to live alone. We also can't just pack up and move to
another, more sane and healthy culture when we are young,
both because of practical reasons and also legal
restrictions which prevent our freedom of movement and
freedom of association (This is true even in cultures
such as that in the USA where these things are supposedly
guaranteed to us as human rights. Such human
"rights" as freedom of movement and freedom of
association don't apply to those under 18 years of age in
the USA. Similarly most young people are denied the same
basic human "rights", or perhaps better called
legal permissions, as those given to labeled as
"adults." To understand this discrepancy, it
helps to remember that it is the "adults" who
decide these things, not the children and teens.)
So in any case, the way things
currently work we must be accepted by others who our
lives depend upon. If we are rejected or abandoned by
them, we will simply die. Therefore we have an
instinctive fear of rejection and abandonment.
Ruiz writes that the adults around us, in whatever
culture we were born into, taught us to "focus our
attention" on what they wanted us to believe. They
put information into our minds through repetition. That
is the way we learned most of what we "know".
Ruiz says attention is the ability we have to
discriminate and to focus only on that which we want to
perceive, be aware of or think about. We can perceive
many things simultaneously, but using our attention, we
can hold whatever we want to concentrate on in the
foreground of our mind.
Because the adults directed our attention, often through
fear, we learned a whole set of rules and beliefs. We
learned how to behave in society: what to believe and
what not to believe; what is acceptable and what is not
acceptable; what is good and what is bad, or maybe what
is what is "evil" or "sinful"; what
is beautiful and what is ugly; what is right and what is
wrong; what is moral and what is immoral; what is
"appropriate" and what is
"inappropriate". Notice how many of these words
are subjective. In other words, they depend on one's
point of view, not some objective measure which could be
used across all cultures or even by all individuals
within one culture. What is "good" to highly
religious, conservative, insecure parent might be
"bad" to someone else. What is
"inappropriate" might actually be healthy,
objectively speaking. Yet it was all set up before we
were born and we are usually not encouraged to question
the commonly accepted definitions. (And that is putting
it mildly.)
When you were in school, you sat in a little chair and
were repeatedly told to "pay attention." This
meant to focus your developing brain cells on whatever
the teacher was saying. It did not mean pay attention to
that which interested you naturally. You were disapproved
of or punished if you were not "paying
attention." Perhaps the teacher ridiculed and
embarrassed or shamed you by making the class laugh at
you for "day dreaming,"
Everyone around you constantly gave you and reinforced
the idea that whatever the people called teachers said
must be true, simply because they were the
teachers. Also, if you went to a place where
they filled your mind with spiritual or religious
beliefs, you were also trained to put your attention on
what the religious or spiritual teacher/leader was
telling you. (We might also call teachers and spiritual
leaders etc. "recruiters", "agents"
or "authorized domesticators.")
Like with the teachers/domesticators at
school, you were told by many others around you that
these "spiritual" teachers/domesticators also
spoke the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the
truth. In fact, you may have been taught that this kind
of truth was somehow even more "true" than the
mathematical or scientific truths you were taught at
school. These truths may have been called
divine or sacred truths, and you
learned that this meant you should never question or
doubt them. (Of course, it was never explained to you why
you shouldnt.) In any case, chances are good that
you accepted all these truths and they became
part of your agreement with the things you
were being taught.
Your parents and probably your brothers and sisters, as
well as other relatives - aunts, uncles, grandparents
etc. - were probably all trying to direct your attention.
From their modeling, each of us also learns how to direct
or as Ruiz calls it, hook the attention of
other humans, and we develop a need for attention which
Ruiz says can become very competitive.
During our childhood, when our brains were forming, we
never had the opportunity to choose what to believe or
what not to believe, just like a baby isnt asked
what language it would like to learn to speak. It isn't
given a choice. It must speak the language used by the
parents. Most children who are subjected to a religion
are also never given a choice about what religion they
would like to follow, if any. Or they may be convinced
they had a choice in which religion they would
"agree" to, when in fact, they were not really
free to choose. They were subtly or not so subtly
pressured into "choosing" what was expected of
them to "choose." The pressure might have been
so subtle, in fact, that it never even felt like pressure
at all.
Nor are children given a choice which
country they would like to live in and which rules they
would like to follow. All of this was set up for all of
us long, long before we were ever born. And of course you
didn't even have the chance to choose your own name. You
can "legally" change it of course, with someone
else's permission, but how many people ever go to the
trouble or make the effort, or even think about it? It is
probably fair to say that about the same percentage of
people change their name as who seriously question and
eventually disagree with the vast majority of the
commonly held beliefs of any culture, or "cult"
for that matter. We might ask ourselves, what is a
culture really, if not a very large scale cult?
As children, we didn't have the opportunity to choose our
beliefs, but one way or another we let the information
into our minds anyhow, and then we stored it there. Ruiz
says that the only way to store information is by
accepting it or agreeing to it. He says
others may try to hook or capture our attention, but if
we don't agree, we don't store that information. That is
why it is so important to question everything.
As soon as we agree, we believe it, and this is similar
to what is called faith. To have faith is to believe
unconditionally and, usually, without question.
That's basically how we learn as children. Children
believe nearly everything adults say. Children agree with
the adults of their culture most of the time when it
comes to some of the most important things. If they
happened to be born into another culture they would agree
with those beliefs - not because they are true, but
because they are repeated and "agreed to" by so
many people, so often. We then develop a belief system
which controls our whole concept of life. Ruiz says even
if we rebelled against the adult beliefs, we probably
were not strong enough to win against the rebellion.
The result is surrender to the beliefs with our
agreement. This process, according to Ruiz, can be called
the domestication of humans. And through this
domestication we learn how to live and relate to each
other.
Day by day, at home, at school, at churches, temples,
mosques, synagogues, and from television, music and
movies, we are told how to live, what kind of behavior is
acceptable and what it means to be
successful. The adults teach us through
repetition and modeling how to be a human and how to
survive in their culture. We are also taught to judge: We
judge ourselves, judge other people, judge the neighbors.
Children are domesticated the same way that we
domesticate a dog, a cat, or any other animal. In order
to teach a dog we punish the dog and we give it rewards.
We train our children, whom we say we love so much, the
same way that we train any domesticated animal: with a
system of punishment and reward.
We are told, "You're a good boy," or
"You're a good girl," when we do what Mom and
Dad or the authorized domesticator wants us to do. When
we don't, we are "a bad girl" or "a bad
boy."
When we went against the rules we were punished; when we
went along with the rules we got a reward or at least we
got acceptance. We were punished or threatened with
punishment many times a day, and we were also rewarded
many times a day. Soon we became afraid of being punished
and also afraid of not receiving the reward.
The reward feels good, and we keep doing what others want
us to do in order to get the reward. With that fear of
being punished and that fear of not getting the reward,
we start pretending to be what we are not, just to please
others, just to be "good enough" for someone
else.
We try to please Mom, Dad and the other domesticators, so
we start acting. We pretend to be what we are not because
we are afraid of disappointing them, or being punished or
rejected by them, all because we are not good
enough according to them. Eventually we become
someone that we are not. We become a copy of Mamma's
beliefs, Daddy's beliefs, society's beliefs, and
religion's beliefs.
It has been said, by the way, that the
purpose of education is to reproduce society, and this is
a thought worth really spending some time on.
Ruiz says that our natural tendencies are lost in the
process of domestication. And when we are old enough for
our mind to understand, we learn the word no. The adults
say, "Don't do this and don't do that." We
rebel and say, "No!" We rebel because we are
defending our freedom. We want to be ourselves, but we
are very little, and the adults are big and strong. After
a certain time we are afraid because we know that every
time we do something wrong we are going to be punished or
disapproved of.
The domestication is so strong that at a certain point in
our life we no longer need anyone to domesticate us. We
don't need Mom or Dad, the school, the government or the
spiritual leaders to domesticate us. We are so well
trained that we are our own domesticator. And this is
what the leaders at the very top of the power pyramid
want. They want us to be self-controlled, self-regulated,
self-domesticated. When we are it saves them a lot of
time, energy and resources. We serve their needs, their
system - all with very little control since we are on
auto-pilot now. But what is auto-pilot except the process
of following someone else's programmed instructions?
So this is basically the system of
domestication according to Ruiz, with a bit of my own
touches here and there. :)
Maybe I will continue with my
adaptation/summary later but for me this is one of Ruiz's
main contributions - his well thought-out explanation of
domestication.
|
|
| Criticism of the book While I liked the section on
domestication there was one thing in particular that I
really disagreed with in Ruiz's book. I explain it
here...
In the
popular book called The Four Agreements, by Miguel Ruiz,
there is a story of a mother who hurts her daughter
deeply by the words she shouts at her. The mother says:
"Shut up! You have an ugly voice. Can you just shut
up!"
The author
tell us, though, that the mother is not to blame because
the mother "didn't know the power" of her
words. In fact, when the story is read closely, the
author even seems to suggest that the girl is more
responsible than the mother.
The author
says, "the daughter believed what her mother said,
and in that moment she made an agreement with
herself."
By this it
seems to shift the responsibility for what happened to
the girl from the mother to the girl since the girl is
the one who "made an agreement with herself."
The author
continues, "After that she no longer sang, because
she believed her voice was ugly and would bother anyone
who heard it. She became shy at school, and if she was
asked to sing, she refused. Even speaking to others
became difficult for her."
The author
then says, "Everything changed in the little girl
because of this new agreement She believed she must
repress her emotions in order to be accepted and
loved." I want to emphasize these words
"because of this new agreement." The words
"because of" imply a cause and effect
relationship. So by my reading of this story, it appears
the author is saying that the cause of the girl becoming
shy and having difficulty speaking to others was the
"agreement" she made with herself, not because
of what the mother had said.
The author
also does not tell us that the mother ever apologized for
what she said. Nor does it seem that the mother noticed
that her daughter had stopped singing and had become
afraid to express her emotions. If we consider the word
"responsible" means "the ability to
respond," then it seems fair to say that the mother
had the greatest ability to respond to what she had done
and what changes she, as the mother and the one who was
probably closest to her daughter, might have noticed in
the girl. Besides apologizing, she could have reassured
her daughter that she had a beautiful voice and she could
have encouraged her to keep singing.
Another
important point is that as a society we place a huge
amount of trust in parents. We literally trust them with
the responsibility for the lives of their children, not
to mention their emotional health. To say this another
way, as a society we depend on the parents to fill the
needs, including the emotional and self-esteem needs, of
children and teenagers. If the parents do not do this job
satisfactorily, all of society later pays the price in
one way or another.
Something
else bothers me about turning a blind eye to cause and
effect. When a child or teenager is being abused or
neglected, it is important that they are helped to find a
supportive, nurturing place to live. If society believes
that parents are not the cause of their offspring's
psychological problems, society will not be likely to
take the necessary action to separate the cause from the
effect, in other words, to remove the child or teen from
the abusive or neglectful home.
|
|