|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Figures accompanying Part
II [261] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part 2 - Values, Motives,
and Systems of Action |
|
|
Fig. 10 MAJOR TYPES OF SOCIAL VALUE-ORIENTATION |
|
|
Fig. l0c THE TRANSCENDENT
QUALITY-PERFECTION IDEAL |
|
|
|
UNIVERSALISM |
|
|
|
Affectivity |
|
|
|
Neutrality |
|
|
|
|
|
SPECIFIC |
|
Self |
|
Valuatlon of specific
emotional gra- |
|
|
|
Valuation of specific
style patterns |
|
|
|
|
tifications in specific
types of situ- |
|
|
|
appropriate to specific
situations or |
|
|
|
|
ations or with specific
types of as- |
|
|
|
with specific types of
ascriptively |
|
|
|
|
criptively designated
persons (e.g., |
|
|
|
selected persons (e.g., modes ol |
|
|
|
|
affective expression
permitted un- |
|
|
|
dress appropriate to
weddings). |
|
|
|
|
|
der certain convivial
condItions). |
|
|
|
|
|
Collectivity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation of certain
kinds of affective |
|
|
|
Valuation of certain
kinds of disci- |
|
|
|
|
action in specific types
of Situations |
|
|
|
plined action in specific
types of |
|
|
|
|
or with specific types of
persons; |
|
|
|
situations or with
specific types of |
|
|
|
|
the action is an
obligatory one to- |
|
|
|
persons ascriptively
designated |
|
|
|
|
ward ascriptively
selected persons |
|
|
|
(e.g., bureaucratic
etiquette in of- |
|
|
|
|
(e.g., condolence,
congratulations on |
|
|
|
ficial capacity;
organized deference |
|
|
|
|
birthday, etc.) organized
deference |
|
|
|
behavior in hierarchies). |
|
|
|
|
behavior. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASCRIPTION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DIFFUSE |
|
Self |
|
Valuation of general
affective ex- |
|
|
|
Valuation of a general
discipline or |
|
|
|
|
pression (or receptiveness) with |
|
|
|
style of life, either
individually of |
|
|
|
|
classes of persons
ascriptively se- |
|
|
|
within a group, with
action toward |
|
|
|
|
lected (e.g., expectations regarding |
|
|
|
classes of persons and
objects In ac- |
|
|
|
|
appropriate ~ypes of
affectivity in |
|
|
|
cordance with their
ascribed quali- |
|
|
|
|
male and female
relationships). |
|
|
|
ties (e.g.,
expectation of behavior in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
accordance ~ it h a
differentiated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
style of life which
stressesap~ro- |
|
|
|
Collectivity |
|
|
|
priateness of various
types of action |
|
|
|
|
Valuation of a general
affective obli- |
|
|
|
for various situations). |
|
|
|
|
gation toward
ascriptively selected |
|
|
|
|
|
|
classes of persons (e.g., expectation |
|
|
|
Valuation of a general
discipline |
|
|
|
|
of completely selfless
absorption in- |
|
|
|
which imposes obligations
toward |
|
|
|
|
los community insofar as
the proc- |
|
|
|
classes of persons and
according to |
|
|
|
|
ess represents some high
ethical |
|
|
|
classes of situations (e.g., aristo- |
|
|
|
|
ideal). |
|
|
|
cratic code of honor;
Kantian ethics). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
see 3.3 Systems of Value-Orientation > The Problem of Classification of
Value Systems [184+] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|