|
|
|
COMES NOW THE PLAINTIFFS//APPELLANTS, RABBI K. A. ISRAEL, A PUBLIC MINISTER, AND 'MOUNT. OF OLIVES' PARALEGALS' UNION FOR CIVIL AND HUMAN RIGHTS INTERNATIONALE, TO PRAY FOR LEAVE OF THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT TO FILE, AND TO GRANT, PLAINTIFF'S//APPELLANT'S "MOTION FOR SANCTIONS AGAINST, ANSWER AND RESPONSE TO, AND OBJECTIONS TO,UNDER AND PURSUANT TO F.R.A.P. 30, F.R.C.P. 11, 16(f), 26(g), 37, 41(b), 56(g), AND 28 U.S.C. ss 1927, THE DEFENDANT'S, THE ATTORNEY REGISTRATION AND DISCIPLINARY COMMISSION'S, BY AND THROUGH THEIR ATTORNEY, ROSALYN B. KAPLAN, 'MOTION FOR SUMMARY AFFIRMANCE,' FOR INCREASING THE COST OF LITIGATION, FOR FAILURE TO RESPOND TO A COURT ORDER, INGORING UNFAVORABLE PRECEDENTS, FILING BAD FAITH AFFIDAVITS, ET AL..
REFERENCES;
O'CONNOR'S FEDERAL RULES; CIVIL TRIALS 2004:
1. OBJECTIVE TEST. THE STANDARD FOR DECIDING WHETHER SANCTIONABLE CONDUCT HAS OCCURRED IS OBJECTIVE: DID THE ATTORNEY OR PRO-SE PARTY MAKE A REASONBLE INQUIRY OF THE FACTS AND THE LAW BEFORE SIGNING AND PRESENTING THE OFFENDING DOCUMENT?? FRCP 11(b); (DeBARTOLO GROUP, L.P. VS. RICHARD E. JACOBS GROUP, INC., 186 F.3d 157, 166 (2ND. CIR. 1999); LICHTENSTEIN VS. CONSOLIDATED SERV. GROUP, INC., 173 F.3D. 17, 23 (1ST CIR. 1999).
TO BE CONTINUED;
2. FILING FOR IMPROPER PURPOSE;
3. CLAIMS AND DEFENSES NOT WARRANTED IN LAW;
4. LACKING FAMILIARITY WITH THE LAW;
5. |
|
