The ecology of the brown bear (Ursus arctos)





3. Movements

Craighead (1976) provides extensive information on daily movements within Yellowstone. One female habitually made a 5 km trip to a refuse dump, taking 1.5 hours. Brown bears often made trips of 16 km of straight line distance in a 12-hour period and one covered 25.6 km. Movements of 14 km in a single afternoon were also recorded. Other authors have reported regular movements ranging between 14.5 and 80 km in 2-3 days (Berns et al. 1980, Knight 1980).

Several authors (Miller and Ballard 1982, Judd and Knight 1980) report movements of brown bears that have been transplanted up to 258 km away from the site of capture. Extreme movements were recorded such as one male which was transplanted 215 km away from where he returned to his original locality in 13 days. These movements exhibit the potential mobility of brown bears but they were undoubtedly unnatural and took place after the bear's homing instinct was triggered by the relocation.

Weber (1987) reports that Romanian brown bears in Hargita mountains travelled through their home ranges on clearly developed trail systems. Brown bear trails generally were the shortest distance between feeding and resting areas, apparently offering security and ease of travel. Undisturbed bears regularly used these trails for most of their travel. Parts of trails, especially near preferred feeding sites, were frequently used by several bears concurrently. Up to 12 bears were observed on a single trail during one afternoon. Bears used trails with a certain punctuality. The first bears that appeared on a path, beginning in the afternoon, were young animals. They moved cautiously, stopping frequently to examine their surroundings. After a bear travelled the route, others moved more confidently, hesitating less than the first one. Before a bear walked into an exposed area, it often paused for more than 20 minutes to evaluate the situation from cover.

Weber (1987) also found that brown bears defecate throughout their home range, with scats concentrated in areas where they linger, e.g. feeding and resting sites, and along the border of thickets where they hesitate before entering exposed areas. In the later situation, defecation appears to be spontaneous, perhaps a nervous response, and certainly not as a result of examining existing scats. He also noticed that bears defecate while fleeing, particularly at the beginning of flight, with excrement being spread over 1.5 m. Bears often passed the fresh scats of other bears without reaction, indicating that scats are of little if any social importance on these occasions.

BIBLIOGRAPHY
Berns, V.D., Atwell, G.C. & Boone, D.L. (1980) Brown bear movements and habitat use at Karluk Lake, Kodiak Island. Bears-Their biology and management. (Eds. C.J. Martinka & K.L. McArthur). Bear Biology Association Conference Series No 3. Washington D.C., pp. 291-296.
Craighead, F.C.Jr. (1976) Grizzly bear ranges and movement as determined by radiotracking. Bears-Their biology and management. (Eds M. Pelton, J.W. Lentfer & G.E. Folk) IUCN, Morges, Switzerland, New Series Publication 40, pp. 97-109.
Judd S.L. & Knight, R.R. (1980) Movements of a radio instrumented grizzly bear within the Yellowstone area. Bears-Their biology and management. (Eds. C.J. Martinka, K.L., McArthur). Bear Biology Association Conference Series No 3. Washington D.C., pp. 359-367.
Knight, R.R. (1980) Biological considerations in the delineation of critical habitat. Bear Biology Association Conference Series No 3. Washington D.C. (see Ball), pp. 1-3.
Miller, S.D. & Ballard, W.B. (1982) Homing of transplanted Alaskan brown bears. Journal of Wildlife Management 46, 869-876.
Weber, P. (1987) Observations of brown bear movements in the Hargita mountains, Romania. International Conference on Bear Research and Management 7, pp. 19-21.


Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1