THE
POPE SICK? UNBALANCED?
THE POSSIBILITY OBJECTIVELY CONSIDERED
IN THE LIGHT OF EVENTS SINCE 1995
In previous letters from Archidona we have mentioned
the subject of Pope Gregory XVII and what happened to him. We have
suggested the possibility that the Pope’s "doctrinal deviations"
derive from mental aberrations rather than a will to heresy.
The purpose of this letter is to examine his deeds
since 1995 and to try to reach a judgment, fair, objective and correct.
By reason of the Pope's pivotal position in the Church and Office
of Supreme Pastor of Souls. Also given his unique espousal with the Church,
it is of crucial importance and interest to the entire Church to know with
certainty the state of his mental health!
In so doing the Church members will be able to derive a correct
appraisal of his acts since 1995 and so avoid scrupulousness and
bitterness of spirit in the interpretation of " his acts"
emanating from the Holy See.
The Church in its inspired Canon Law 221 already
foresaw the possibility of a Pope becoming mentally handicapped whilst in
office and legislated necessarily over this fact.
We repeat the part of Canon 221 that touches on this subject.
The power of the Roman Pontiff "ceases
involuntarily by death, or by certain and incurable dementia, which is
equivalent to his physical death."
He ceases to function as Pope and his acts are invalid and non-binding
on the Church. But the Church continues Palmarian under the direction of
Pastors.
It should be said that the year 1995 begins properly
the concern about his "actuation" at the time of the Palmarian
Synod that treated of the Palmarian Moral Code!
Not content with the traditional Moral and Pastoral Theology of the
Church, he introduced rigorist, extremist interpretations of the Catholic
Moral Code that gave rise to suspicions amongst the Fathers that his
judgment had become "deviant."
As a consequence of his "Obligatory Moral
Code" with its pastoral implications applied to the faithful, he made
many Missionaries reticent to divulge to the faithful some of the strange
"Prohibitions!"
Many
fathers thought it was "doubtful" as an authentic Catholic Moral
Code but kept silent and reserved, not being certain how to treat its
application, having come from the Supreme Pastor! What is more, too often
reasoned opposition in the Synod was ignored, stifled or shouted down by a
cacophony of "Echo Chamber Bishops" around the Holy Father.
By 1997 his state had deteriorated to the point that it
was possible to detect the certain manifestation of open Heresy in his
rewrite of some events in Sacred Scripture and his revelations in the History of the Popes!
I do not propose to labour the proofs, although I can
say I have them in abundance. The
purpose of these letters is to fortify and confirm the faith of Palmarians
by a reasoned, balanced, true and correct assessment of what has happened
in the Church these past years, both good and bad, and not to provoke a
Crisis of Faith.
The danger consists in the inability to distinguish
between Pope Gregory XVII, the Pope elected directly by Heaven, and what
happened to him in his Pontificate after the year 1995:
his divorce from the Church, the spotless Bride of Christ, One Holy
Catholic and Apostolic, and his actuation since that date as the
"errant star Clemente."
The aberrations which gave rise to doubts manifested
themselves in the heresies in his Palmarian
Bible of the years 1999-2000, the arguments against the Bible are
perhaps too "academic" for those not versed in the
Scriptures.
Clearly his addition to the Bible
of his History of the Popes,
with some of its "extraordinary details" does reveal a state of
mind departed from objectivity and historical reality. Here are just a few
of the details:
(1)
There are nine new Popes included
in the "History of the Popes" that never existed before. He made
up the mottos for each one!
(2)
He has changed the names of six
Popes.
(3)
Pope Virgilius, who was recognised
as a Pope by the Church and by Pope Gregory XVII in his Documents, has now
become an Anti-Pope.
(4)
He declares there have been 150
Popes, Stigmatised and Mystics.
(5)
He declares 115 Popes died
poisoned, two by means of poisoned mushrooms.
(6)
He includes dozens of new
Anti-Popes before totally unknown and non-existent in Ecclesiastical
History.
We believe the above sufficient to prove a "Prima Facie" case for the Pope's diminished mental health, in which case his responsibility is less and he becomes more an object of pity than of censure.
