CHARISMS IN THE CHURCH AS THE COMPLEMENT TO THE HIERARCHICAL LIFE-Part 111

The assistance Jesus promised to his Church comes by means of the Charismatic Way. We confess so when we recite the Palmarian Creed of 1980 Page. XXXII .We quote;

 I recognise and confess that Christ, assists His Church, through the centuries,

 by means of apparitions, miracles, and distinct Charismatic and Prophetic gifts.

 A multitude of Sanctuaries, of Devotions, and of Religious Orders owe to these

 there existence.

Many Palmarians continue privately to pray, recite and meditate the Creed.

The exit of the Church from the Roman Structure in 1978 discovered Catholics,

whose sense of the Church was deeply routed in Roman Institutionalism. They were unwilling to accept the possibility of divine intervention in the form of the Charismatic way as the solution to the New World Order takeover of the Church of Rome. This reluctance found it roots in their human concept of the Church to the detriment of the supernatural factor, and their unwillingness to abandon institutionalised thinking to walk by pure faith.

The Charismatic life is the perfect complement of the hierarchical. Both charisma do not contradict each other, but mutually assist each other.

Individuals who receive charisms gratuitously given by God for the good of the Church, and to fulfil a Mission in the Church, should never be considered or honoured as Saints as such for merely being in receipt of Charismas.

Pope Gregory XVII in Papal Document No 14 of 17th September 1978 Feast of the Stigmatisation of St Francis of Assisi reiterated this truth when he spoke the following on the subject.

We, as Universal Doctor of the Church, desire to make clear that we canonise only the holiness and heroic virtue of the members of the Mystical Body of the Church, independently of their visions, and ecstasies and prophecies, or other spiritual gifts.

It is common teaching of the Church that visions on the part of the recipient, indicate neither merit or demerit, since they are graces given gratuitously by God. God in His infinite mercy, concedes these celestial and extraordinary Charisms as help and complement for the Church. We teach also the truth, defended in the Church, that it would be rash to reject, hold in contempt, or ridicule these extraordinary charisms produced by God in holy and trustworthy persons.

We confirm that these gratuitous charisms, if indeed they are not a principal end, they are certainly efficacious means to attain sanctity by co-operation with grace.

We desire to make clear this indisputable truth. Not all the saints receive these extraordinary charisms and also not all Charismatics are saints.

There is a good number of Mystics who have never been raised to the Altars, nor could they, since they have not completely co-operated with grace. It is also certain that a good number of Mystics have been condemned by God, and are in Hell for all eternity.

They received more Celestial graces, and in spite of them were not converted. They rejected grace, and precipitated themselves into the Abyss. For greater grace received, greater responsibility before the judgement, without appeal of God.

 

The Pope is constituted the Supreme Judge in the Church. An office which of course to function presupposes and assumes his continued fidelity as the Vicar of Christ.

The presumed identification of the Pope with the Church and the incredulity before the possibility that a true Pope could ever break his espousal and be divorced is erroneous; and derives from ignorance and lack of knowledge of how Our Lord constituted the Church as the Divine Society.

Although there have been unworthy Popes none of them ever promulgation Doctrines that denied the teachings of the Age-Old Infallible Magisterium. Pope Gregory XVII did just this and contradicted Papal Dogmatic Teachings of the past including his own infallible teachings; for which reason he has become a hopeless and contumacious heretic deprived of light for having sinned against the light.

Ironically Pope Gregory XVII himself said the following on this very subject of the Teaching Office of the Magisterium in October 1978 in Document No 22.We read the following from his Document;.

No man on earth has the power to change the Word of God which is contained in the Holy Bible, in the traditional Doctrine of the Church in the Pontifical Magisterium, in all the teaching of Holy Mother Church, all of which is guided by the Holy Ghost.

I might add more here, the recently discovered modern day proofs that come to us from Theomatics--the Original Bible Code –and also ELS.-Equidistant Letter Sequences.

When correctly and properly understood provide absolutely irrefutable proof to any reasoning informed mind of the total and incredible veracity of every word written in the original canonical Bible texts in Hebrew and Biblical Greek. This makes demonstrable lunatic the assertions of the Pope and clearly show the abject error of his way.

It is to be noted as providential that Pope Gregory XVII in the previously quoted extract above condemns with his own words the Bible of Clement 20 years before He fabricated it.

The Blessed Virgin Mary whilst forming this man for the Papacy on September 18th 1972 warned Him about doctrinal deviation in the words she said to him which we now quote below when he was the then Visionary Clemente;

Turn to the Magisterium of the Church through all Her history. Down through the centuries the Holy Spirit, whose truths are changeless and eternal, has spoken.

You may not listen to teachings opposed to the truth, no matter how important the dignitary preaching, for the truth is but one. All that deviates from the truth is anathema.

As it was in Christ’s time, so it has continued to be for his Disciples and Prophets down the ages. Today is no exception.

An unprecedented number of -prophetic voices- have been raised throughout the World, warning of the dire consequences that will come from Man’s unbridled unbelief, materialism and hedonism,(pleasure loving) which has reached in the year 2002 proportions that can bear comparison with some of the worst Pagan Societies of the past.

 

But just as the Israel of old disparaged, ridiculed and assassinated the prophets of doom and gloom sent to warn them, so it has been that -modern day prophetic voices- raised within the Church,- The New Israel, or the Israel of God- have meet with the same response.

No less, as the Divine Master before them, today’s prophets are assassinated not as crudely perhaps by a physical death. But more subtly, cunningly, yet effectively by character assassination, calumny, ridicule and imposed exile.

It is repeated again and again the pattern played out in Ancient Jerusalem such character assassinations were typically carried out by - Pontiffs, Priests, and Scribes,- today also of the Church, once Roman and now Palmarian!

Christ’s fatalistic prophesy is re-lived--

It cannot be that a prophet should perish outside of Jerusalem (Luke 13.v 33,34).

I refer to the Jerusalem of the present moment, The Palm Grove of Troy, the Grove of Mary’s Palms, The Palmed City, Palmar de Troya, - The horse of Troy in the City of God.

From where came the spiritual warriors that replaced the soldiers of the infidel City of Apostate Rome. So it has happened to so many chosen to warn the Church, they have suffered a Martyrdom.

The social Palm of Martyrdom is the lot of Palmarians today many have been calumniated and branded unjustly before the face of the Church, rebels, heretics, and apostates accusations that are impossible to reconcile with right reason and the correct appraisal of facts..

Social Martyrdom is a foretaste of the exile and persecution that -the Palms of Mary- can expect in the future when comes the time of the great persecutions predicted and talked about in these Letters. A small price to pay you might think for loyalty to Jesus and Mary and the sound Doctrinal Teachings of the Church!

The errant Pope and his followers prefer to ignore the truth and their mute silence is an eloquent testimony and reluctant admission that there is no opposing argument. What is their left to be said, perhaps, -None more blind, than he or they who will not see-or The blind leading the blind? Was not this the accusation made against Rome in the sixties and seventies?

[email protected]

   principal page

Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1