SUBTLE DANGERS
– WITH THE PROBLEM OF TRIDENTINISM
In previous Letters from Archidona Numbers 4 and 26 I touched upon the subject of the Mass and the Priesthood, and alluded to the problems that can derive from nostalgia for the Church of the past.
We refer precisely to the Church, as it was recognised by its Liturgical Cult after the Council of Trent 1545-1563, and the traditional Catholic mind that was enshrined in the liturgy since that Ecumenical Council .This mind endured until the death of Pope St. Pius XII in 1958 and the start of Vatican II.
The Church, today Palmarian, no longer looks back to the Council of Trent as in past years but instead looks FORWARD to the happy consummation of all things in Christ. The point of departure for this change in direction in outlook was the Palmarian Council 1980-1992. This council is the authentic and logical successor to the two previous Ecumenical Councils in the Church, Trent and Vatican I (1869-1870).
Salvation History is an ongoing process, and what remains to be fulfilled is THE RESTORATION OF ALL THINGS IN CHRIST, HIS SECOND COMING AS JUDGE and the FINAL CONSUMATION IN HEAVEN OR HELL.
The Tridentine Liturgy reflected in its time the vision BACKWARDS commemorating and re-enacting every year in the Liturgical Cycle the Mysteries of Christ in his FIRST COMING as Victim, Redeemer and Founder of the Church. The Tridentine Mass and Liturgy encapsulated this expression.
Some Palmarian Catholics, unable to understand the grace of El Palmar are disturbed and confounded by the Palmarian confusion of recent times whose origin lies in the Papacy. They have sought refuge in a return to Tridentinism, where they hope to encounter the longed for desired peaceful days of the Church associated with the Tridentine era.
There are also regrettable, a few Palmarian Bishops that were expelled that have fallen in the trap and feel free to ignore and set aside all of Pope Gregory XVII legitimate Papal acts; whilst maintaining the posture of being Catholics neither Palmarian or Roman. Their departure from all Ecclesiology is most convenient in that it enables them to SAY the Tridentine Mass. I deliberately do not say CELEBRATE the Tridentine Mass for the doctrinal reasons explained in Letters 4 and 26, which you should read again as also the Infallible Doctrine in the Treatise of the Mass Chapter 33 of November 1989.
It is as though for them identification with the traditional refrain, Where Peter is there is the Church is non-existent, and they deny submission and obedience to the Doctrine of the Church because we have now an Apostate Pope. They confuse obedience to the Church and its Magisterium with obedience to the Papacy.
This Letter should be studied in conjunction with Letters 4 and 26, as it seeks to present to Palmarians the very real dangers associated with the total rejection of the Pontificate of Pope Gregory XVII 1978-1995/7; and his legitimate binding acts on the Church, whilst still the officeholder and acting as Vicar of Christ.
A careful reading of the document of the promulgation of the Palmarian Mass in 1983 will clearly show the nature of its BINDING OBLIGATION ON THE BISHOPS by reason of its EXTRAORDINARY MAGISTERIUM PROMULGATION OR EX CATHEDRA STATEMENT. Since 1983 the Palmarian Mass has became obligatory on the Church as the logical continuation in its time to The Mass of Trent. The Palmarian Mass expresses IN LITURGICAL FORM the old maxim The law of belief, is the law of Prayer. Lex Credendi, Lex Orandi. The sublime new doctrinal exposition divulged by the Holy Spirit during the Palmarian Council 1980-1992, is written down in detail for all to read in Treatise Chapter 33.
Moreover the promulgation of the Palmarian Mass by way of the Extraordinary Magisterium clearly shows Pope Gregory XVII intention to proclaim dogmatically about the Mass, and to bind the Church until a future time when a successor might theoretically amend it.
The Promulgation appears at the beginning of The Palmarian Altar Missal but was not considered appropriate to be divulged to the faithful in 1983.
Those few Bishops that are in error, some through ignorance, are misleading the few faithful that follow them to believe it is perfectly valid and correct to return to the Tridentine Mass. In some cases feelings of animosity and repulsion towards the Pope personally have clouded their judgment in what reminds strictly, a Church Teaching matter. It should be logical and comprehensible that obedience is due to Pope Gregory prior to his heresies and his apostasy formalized in 1997.
In the climate of the unique happening to the Pope Priests and faithful can be forgiven for making such errors, which derive from a previous lack of knowledge of the defined material. Those that persist in the position of a return to the Tridentine Mass at all costs, are seriously deceived, or wish to deceive themselves and might not realize this position betrays Christ and his Church. The Bishop is normally subject to the Pope, when the Pope dies, the Pope is spiritually dead, he still remains subject to the Church, which I remind all is still Palmarian and will never again be Roman.
As I have previously demonstrated from the defined material, the Priest will lack the essential Priestly Mystical state necessary to confect the Mass should he transgress the norms established by Pope Gregory’s Apostolic Constitution on the Palmarian Mass of October 1983. He will fall in the anathemas written down in that Promulgation, and lastly he will also have had retired his powers to confect, by reason of the power of the Keys as described in The Apostolic Constitution of July 1983.
This second evil is worst than the supposed first of being unjustly expelled from the Order. The devil does indeed walk as a raging Lion and is devouring many today. The words of Jesus could never be more appropriately applied in our present situation. Watch and pray least you fall in temptation.
